Australia news

Player suspicions allayed by Howard

Daniel Brettig

January 23, 2012

Comments: 3 | Text size: A | A

Australia get together after winning the Border-Gavaskar Trophy, Australia v India, 3rd Test, Perth, 3rd day, January 15, 2012
Paul Marsh: "Players are starting to feel that the performance of the Australian cricket team is the high priority it should be for CA, whereas for the past few years this has rightly been questioned" © Getty Images
Enlarge
Related Links

Suspicions and doubts about the priorities of Cricket Australia's management have filtered steadily out of the Australian dressing room in the months since the appointment of Pat Howard as the team performance manager.

A year ago the players readily questioned the priorities of CA and its desire to equip the team in the best possible way to win matches, to the point that management and selectors were banned from the dressing room during the ODI series against England. Now there is confidence that Howard and the coaches and selectors underneath him are committed to creating the best environment for success, and will not allow compromising decisions to be made.

Causes for most anger in the ranks last summer included the 17-man squad named in advance of the first Ashes Test in Brisbane, and the refusal to release Michael Hussey and Doug Bollinger from the Twenty20 Champions League to prepare for a Test series in India.

Such decisions fell within the remit of Michael Brown, the former general manager of cricket operations. Brown has left CA to oversee preparations for football's 2015 Asian Cup, having been shifted to one side by Howard's appointment. Paul Marsh, the chief executive of the Australian Cricketers Association, said the new structure had bred trust.

"Under the new structure I'm reasonably confident that we won't see another 17-man home Ashes squad announced just to keep the marketing people happy," Marsh told ESPNcricinfo. "What the players want more than anything is a support structure that gives them the best possible chance to be successful. I don't think the previous structure always allowed this but the new structure has an individual in Pat Howard who is accountable solely for team performance.

"This has quickly created an environment where the players now feel that they have someone within CA senior management who is completely aligned to the goals of the team. The immediate impact of this is that players are starting to feel that the performance of the Australian cricket team is the high priority it should be for CA, whereas for the past few years this has rightly been questioned by the playing group."

Brown's former role was unwieldy, covering an enormous amount of ground. It included the team, playing conditions, disciplinary measures, television rights and pay negotiations. He was seldom heard from by the players unless it was a call to inform them of their selection in the national team, or to notify them of a disciplinary breach.

By contrast, Howard is a consistent presence around the team in his oversight role, sitting in on selection meetings and working closely with the head coach Mickey Arthur. His background as a former rugby international and coach has also given him a closer appreciation of high performance sport and its demands than Brown was able to call upon.

Ultimately accountable for the performance of the team, Howard has said he is less an auditor than an agent of collaboration, between players, coaches, the national team and the states.

"I don't see myself as looking over their shoulder, I see myself as enabling that performance - we've all seen there's a lot of talent there - and making sure that talent gets an opportunity is really important," Howard said. "And I think most of the Australian public have seen, given a chance there are some guys who are really well and truly up to it or can grow into it.

 
 
I think for a while there everyone did get a bit insular, and it was a bit quieter, we were a bit more intense. But I think now the new coach has set in, the new selectors have stepped in, the communication's been really good, everyone knows where they stand." Michael Hussey on the new structure
 

"That's one of the great stories of the summer. Everyone, be they players or management, want the same thing, they want Australia to win, to perform, and they bring to the table lots of ideas about how we can improve. If we can bring that collaboration to the table then as a consequence we can only improve over the next couple of years."

The strong results seen so far against India have suggested that the team is benefiting from the change, and Hussey said there was an air of refreshment that had come from the knowledge that everyone was working towards the same goal.

"Certainly winning breeds fun, but also there's been so much change around the team, and I think for a while there everyone did get a bit insular, and it was a bit quieter, we were a bit more intense," Hussey said. "But I think now the new coach has set in, the new selectors have stepped in, the communication's been really good, everyone knows where they stand, they know what their roles are, and they know where they want to take the team in the future.

"I think that gives everyone a lot of heart and a lot of confidence. And then you can really be yourself and really see the characters come through in the team."

Daniel Brettig is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo. He tweets here

RSS Feeds: Daniel Brettig

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by   on (January 24, 2012, 23:53 GMT)

Seriously Farkin.... I breeds instability as the selectors dont have the faith in the players named. 13 players for a home series. 12 and 13th to be released for state duties if confliciting after the 11 is named. State players in the area can be the effective 12th. We need to breed hunger, look at what it did for Hilfa and Sids. Get that same hunger in the batting line up and awesome!!

Posted by Smithie on (January 23, 2012, 9:50 GMT)

Encouraging start by the new management group. Given the recent statements of Srinivasan and Gambhir about presenting rank turners to visiting teams planning needs to start now. We should import a few Sub Continental spin coaches, prepare sub continental rank turners and allocate significant resources to developing skills that allow Australia to win in these conditions. We need bowlers who can deliver doosras. No need to be snotty about actions - the ICC rule is 15 degree flex - use it !

Posted by farkin on (January 23, 2012, 5:25 GMT)

there is nothing wrong with a 17-man squad it gets people to do there best to be selected for the home test series and the only ones who don't like it are the ones who may get dropped from the test team

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Daniel BrettigClose
Daniel Brettig Assistant editor Daniel Brettig had been a journalist for eight years when he joined ESPNcricinfo, but his fascination with cricket dates back to the early 1990s, when his dad helped him sneak into the family lounge room to watch the end of day-night World Series matches well past bedtime. Unapologetically passionate about indie music and the South Australian Redbacks, Daniel's chief cricketing achievement was to dismiss Wisden Almanack editor Lawrence Booth in the 2010 Ashes press match in Perth - a rare Australian victory that summer.
Tour Results
India v Sri Lanka at Hobart - Feb 28, 2012
India won by 7 wickets (with 80 balls remaining)
Australia v India at Sydney - Feb 26, 2012
Australia won by 87 runs
India v Sri Lanka at Brisbane - Feb 21, 2012
Sri Lanka won by 51 runs
Australia v India at Brisbane - Feb 19, 2012
Australia won by 110 runs
India v Sri Lanka at Adelaide - Feb 14, 2012
Match tied
More results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days