South Africa in Australia 2012-13 November 5, 2012

Duminy's difficult path to familiar ground


When JP Duminy had his first chance to play for South Africa it was through injury. Ashwell Prince's fracture on the eve of the Perth Test in 2008 gave Duminy his chance. To say he took it with both hands would explain both what kept Prince out of the side and how Duminy stayed in it.

Four years later, Duminy was picked again because of an injury - twice. Jacques Kallis' stiff neck in Wellington gave Duminy an opportunity in the batting order. He responded with a century. He would have probably lost his place despite that hundred immediately afterwards but when Mark Boucher's career ended with a freak eye injury, Duminy earned a more permanent spot in the Test XI and is a certain starter in Australia.

To the folk down under, it will be as though nothing has changed. Duminy is now, as he was then, in sublime touch. They may not know that for a while he was a batsman interrupted by poor form, clear weaknesses and a closing out of his spot in the team.

In 14 innings after the 2008-09 series in Australia, Duminy managed just 272 runs at an average of 19.43. The statistics were damning enough to result in him being dropped. What they don't tell is that Duminy had consistent problems against the short ball and off spin and was regularly dismissed by either.

His limited-overs game did not suffer similar setbacks and he continued to feature in that format, but in the longer version he was sent back to the first-class game to develop. A double hundred against Dolphins in December 2010 was a signal that Duminy had come full circle and he became a fringe player in the Test squad again. He had to join a queue, behind Prince and Jacques Rudolph and has only now become a regular again.

"It was tough at times. I was coming off such a high [in Australia] and it's difficult to maintain those sorts of performances," Duminy said, reflecting on his match-turning century at the MCG. "You will go through ups and down and I was fortunate enough to have good people around me to work through those problems. The circumstances of being brought back into the team were also tough with Boucher getting injured but it was about taking the opportunity as well."

His chances have come in an unusual fashion as the composition of South Africa's Test line-up has changed. Since Boucher retired, team management have opted to go with seven front-line batsmen to allow AB de Villiers to keep, although that does not seem to be a long-term option. Duminy slots in at No.7, behind Rudolph.

It lengthens South Africa's batting to the envy of other countries. Duminy has to play a bridging role between the batsmen and the tail, different to his usual middle-order batsmen. "One thing I have learned batting at No.7 and with the tail is that bowlers tend to forget about you," he said. "With bowlers not worrying about you, you tend to get more lose deliveries. They are happy to get you off strike."

That much was evident at Lord's in August when Duminy and Vernon Philander combined to take South Africa out of trouble. The England attack seemed to think they had got through the big guns but there was more to come. Duminy scored a half-century and Philander helped him ensure the bowlers had something to defend.

It is that sort of strength that South Africa are trying to develop and Duminy said he understands that he will be required to operate as both mender and match at No.7. "You get let off by some bowlers but you can find yourself in difficult situations with the team 100 for 5, so there are two ways to look at it. I think I have grown in that role in the last three Tests and I want to start cementing a long career in Test cricket."

There would be few places as illustrious to do that as Australia, especially since it was the scene of Duminy's breakthrough. He knows the hype will be around that but does not want it to dominate his mindset. "This is a starting point for me again. What's happened in the past is in the past."

Already it has been a successful second coming, he has had four innings, scored 271 runs at 45.17. It must be remembered that includes one not out, something that may become a more prominent feature in Duminy's statistics given his position in the batting order. Whether he will stay there or get bumped up a place when South Africa either decide to play a specialist gloveman or are forced to because of de Villiers' recurring injury, is a question for later on.

Duminy likes to talk about the future because he sees his as bright, starting with the current tour of Australia. He is looking forward to the new challenge, especially since the complexion of the hosts' bowling attack has changed since the first time he faced them. With young seamers stealing the spotlight and no Mitchell Johnson, South Africa may fancy their chances even more.

"This time, there is a little less experience," Duminy said. "With saying that, they have a quality attack. We're going to have to play well against them. If we can get through the initial parts of the Test match and be positive in the first innings we can do well."

Firdose Moonda is ESPNcricinfo's South Africa correspondent

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • Geeva on November 7, 2012, 4:56 GMT

    @Smahuta:Rudolph averages 37 since coming back....stats dont lie :),

  • Gavin on November 6, 2012, 20:15 GMT

    @Geeva Actually stats can lie a little bit. What you need to do is look at what Rudolph averages since his return to the team. You will find it is around 40.

  • greig on November 6, 2012, 19:32 GMT

    @stormer. Very good point. Many people don't know that he useful to be a specialist keeper.

  • greig on November 6, 2012, 19:30 GMT

    @bucker410. Im not sure how much S.A. test cricket you watch but AB certainly doesn't bat at 7...!!!

  • Jack on November 6, 2012, 6:49 GMT

    Good player. That he worked hard to overcome his loss of form shows a certain mental toughness. Btw, I think the selectors are doing Thami a huge disservice. He should be playing, or they should drop him from the squad. Better that than keep him in no-man's-land.

  • Julian on November 6, 2012, 6:33 GMT

    De Villiers is a specialist wicket keeper , he came onto the scene as a wicket keeper with the Titans ... How can people not know this ... He just developed his batting so well and Boucher was fiirst choice wicket keeper .. He is a natural athlete , which is why is looks like he belongs at point or cover ... but he has always been a wicket keeper

  • Geeva on November 6, 2012, 5:20 GMT

    @TommytuckerSaffa yes i am serious have you seen their averages??Both are overated for SA to be great those two positions needed avg 45plus.I saw Rudoph in Eng Steve Finn roughed him up.AB de villiers shudnt keep he avg close to 50 and can take games away form opposition.Lol both strugglle with spin too.Averages dont lie my friend!

  • Peter on November 5, 2012, 22:34 GMT

    I am still unsure on the workings of the quota or even if it exists, but AB is such a talent, I can't help but feel the extra burden of keeping will affect his batting. No matter who you support, you always appreciate classy cricketers & this guy is one. Good luck to him (although not too much).

  • Mashuq on November 5, 2012, 19:52 GMT

    Starc should be used to target Duminy but JP has grown and may live up to the ealier hype if he batted higher. As it is Rudolph is a waste at 6. Duminy at 5, AB at 6 and Faf at 7 would make better use of the resources.

  • greig on November 5, 2012, 19:44 GMT

    Posted by Geeva on (November 05 2012, 11:02 AM GMT)...SA should be playing as speacilist wicketkeeper.The Aus quicks will def expose Dumminy and Rudolphs weaknesses against pace

    Are you serious?? What you think Duminy and Rudolph dont play pace well, what you think they are specialist spin batsmen...rofl.

    Duminy is far more in form that Rudolf, he should start. AB will keep, because he is adement about it.

  • No featured comments at the moment.