South Africa in Australia 2012-13 November 19, 2012

South Africa hope bouncers can curb Clarke

Don't be surprised if South Africa rethink their tactics to Michael Clarke after his Gabba double-century and send down more bouncers in Adelaide
29

Bodyline first flared in Douglas Jardine's mind at the Oval Test match in 1930, when he saw Don Bradman flinch at several short balls on a wet wicket. Bradman always retorted quite reasonably that the innings in question only ended when he was wrongly given out caught behind having made 232. But Jardine trusted the evidence of his eyes, and his memory of Bradman's momentary discomfort bloomed into calculated and effective action, however unpopular.

Michael Clarke is no Bradman, and the Gabba pitch was far from damp. Yet Clarke can expect a more sustained barrage of short-pitched bowling from South Africa in Adelaide after long swathes of his unbeaten 259 in Brisbane were curiously allowed to pass without resort to a tactic that caused Australia's captain considerable discomfort early in his innings.

Churlish as it may be to criticise a batsman who peeled off his third score of more than 200 for 2012, the fact remains that Clarke struggled in his play against bouncers at the Gabba. Two attempts at half-hearted pull shots from the bowling of Rory Kleinveldt landed tantalisingly out of the reach of fielders, while Clarke's difficulty in trying to duck underneath short balls caused him to throw his gloves at several of them in self-preservation, one delivered by Dale Steyn looping fortunately between the batsman and the slips cordon.

Why South Africa more or less abandoned the tactic as Clarke's innings bloomed in the company of Ed Cowan then Michael Hussey is one of the first Test's major mysteries, and can perhaps be put down to the bowling's collective lack of thought after the early gains of the new ball were turned back by Australia's counter-attack. Only once all innings did Clarke reach the boundary with anything resembling a pull shot, swinging Steyn over wide mid-on when given room outside off stump.

But most other times Clarke's usually organised footwork and crisp ball-striking were absent when the bowlers fired the ball at his body or helmet, and his somewhat ungainly attempts to get under bouncers illustrated the kind of inflexibility created by a back condition Australia's leader has had to manage since his teenage years.

Clarke was helped by the fact that both Cowan and Hussey are exemplary players of the pull shot, as befits a pair who have spent significant stretches of their respective careers batting at the top of the order. Cowan's willingness to play the stroke early on against Steyn was an important moment in the match, and it is possible that the comfort he and Hussey showed in their cross-bat shots left South Africa reticent to pitch short in any case, even after Clarke had shown markedly less enthusiasm for it.

Morne Morkel is perhaps the best equipped of South Africa's pacemen to challenge Clarke with short-pitched offerings, though Steyn's skidding bumpers are also of sufficient velocity and direction. On an Adelaide surface that may offer some early life before flattening out and then deteriorating to offer variable bounce late in the match, the short ball appears a more likely path to defeating Clarke than pushing the ball up to the bat in the hope of an edge.

"Any batsman at first struggles with the short ball," Morkel said when quizzed about Clarke's handful of awkward moments in Brisbane. "We'll probably sit and come up with game plans today, start working on those sort of things. Definitely, that is a plan to use the short ball. Because you've got two per over, you might as well use that, but you have to do it in a clever way and we will go from there."

Clever is one way of describing Jardine's tactics 80 years ago, and a key to their success was the sustained nature of the assault. If South Africa truly wish to curb Clarke's strokeplay at Adelaide Oval they will need to attack him with greater clarity of purpose, and force him into playing shots that he did not seem terribly keen to employ in Brisbane.

Daniel Brettig is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo. He tweets here

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • eegs18 on November 21, 2012, 17:35 GMT

    This is a ridiculous statement that Clarke is vulnerable to short pitched bowling. Typical always having a go at a bloke when he is on top. This guy scored a fantastic double hundred and yes he did get lucky a couple of times but every batsman needs a bit. Some people just can't accept the fact that Michael Clarke has risen with the captaincy and could really become a huge force in world cricket over the next few years.

  • SnowSnake on November 21, 2012, 2:40 GMT

    SA can try but SA's pace is not that of Brett Lee. Steyn averages around 135 kmph and Philander 130 kmph. At that pace, bouncers are not going to do much. Only Morkel may be effective and that too for first 10 overs. If SA is only relying on bouncers then they are not that well prepared.

  • MattyP1979 on November 20, 2012, 22:58 GMT

    I for one hope these tactics don't work. If Clarke goes early it will be left up to the other 10 emense batting talents of Aus to try and claw a draw. Looking forward to the next match and too see if Aus can play as well and SA as poorly to get 5 days out of it.

  • Hammond on November 20, 2012, 10:58 GMT

    Good luck with that. The poms have been trying to bounce out Australian top order batsmen since the 1930's. This being the main reason why they've only won six test series out of 22 played here since Bodyline. They should look at how full England bowled in 2010, and how successful it was.

  • Clyde on November 20, 2012, 10:36 GMT

    As my coach used to say, don't lift the bat. Then move the head and neck if necessary. Being hit on the body mostly stings and only sometimes hurts, but often this does not even happen. Two short balls an over just means, in effect, four-ball overs. It is a game-slowing tactic as much as anything.

  • WonkyFNQ on November 20, 2012, 9:55 GMT

    Scott Jones is right. Adelaide has true bounce and very short square boundaries. Bowling short there usually ends up with the crowd throwing a lot of balls back from row 10. I dare them to try it to Warner, Quiney, Ponting, Hussey or Wade, all excellent players of the cross bat shots. Even Cowan showed he was adept at them at the Gabba. Clarke may not pull of the back foot, but I doubt it will get him out.

  • PrasPunter on November 20, 2012, 8:50 GMT

    @Marcio, for sure, people wouldnt let go of their prejudices against us. Oh ya, we have been dominating for quite some time , which couldn't be digested at all by one and sundry. Hence their outrage against us is quite natural . But on any day, I would love to make people grudging against us by another round of dominance, rather than being liked for not doing so.

  • S.Jagernath on November 20, 2012, 7:08 GMT

    The surface will be too flat & slow for this sort of plan.Australia need to use the short ball more as well,Jacques Kallis is the main suspect.But the surface will still not allow for that either.

  • skkh on November 20, 2012, 6:13 GMT

    Marcio ..mate I second all that you have said and incidentally I too am "a friend from up north". Aussie bashing seems to be our favorite national pastime. Sad but true.

  • on November 20, 2012, 4:18 GMT

    Anyone bowling short stuff at the Adelaide Oval is asking for trouble due to the short boundaries square of the wicket. Bowlers from both teams would be better off focussing their energies on aiming to hit the top of off stump than banging it in half way down the pitch.

  • eegs18 on November 21, 2012, 17:35 GMT

    This is a ridiculous statement that Clarke is vulnerable to short pitched bowling. Typical always having a go at a bloke when he is on top. This guy scored a fantastic double hundred and yes he did get lucky a couple of times but every batsman needs a bit. Some people just can't accept the fact that Michael Clarke has risen with the captaincy and could really become a huge force in world cricket over the next few years.

  • SnowSnake on November 21, 2012, 2:40 GMT

    SA can try but SA's pace is not that of Brett Lee. Steyn averages around 135 kmph and Philander 130 kmph. At that pace, bouncers are not going to do much. Only Morkel may be effective and that too for first 10 overs. If SA is only relying on bouncers then they are not that well prepared.

  • MattyP1979 on November 20, 2012, 22:58 GMT

    I for one hope these tactics don't work. If Clarke goes early it will be left up to the other 10 emense batting talents of Aus to try and claw a draw. Looking forward to the next match and too see if Aus can play as well and SA as poorly to get 5 days out of it.

  • Hammond on November 20, 2012, 10:58 GMT

    Good luck with that. The poms have been trying to bounce out Australian top order batsmen since the 1930's. This being the main reason why they've only won six test series out of 22 played here since Bodyline. They should look at how full England bowled in 2010, and how successful it was.

  • Clyde on November 20, 2012, 10:36 GMT

    As my coach used to say, don't lift the bat. Then move the head and neck if necessary. Being hit on the body mostly stings and only sometimes hurts, but often this does not even happen. Two short balls an over just means, in effect, four-ball overs. It is a game-slowing tactic as much as anything.

  • WonkyFNQ on November 20, 2012, 9:55 GMT

    Scott Jones is right. Adelaide has true bounce and very short square boundaries. Bowling short there usually ends up with the crowd throwing a lot of balls back from row 10. I dare them to try it to Warner, Quiney, Ponting, Hussey or Wade, all excellent players of the cross bat shots. Even Cowan showed he was adept at them at the Gabba. Clarke may not pull of the back foot, but I doubt it will get him out.

  • PrasPunter on November 20, 2012, 8:50 GMT

    @Marcio, for sure, people wouldnt let go of their prejudices against us. Oh ya, we have been dominating for quite some time , which couldn't be digested at all by one and sundry. Hence their outrage against us is quite natural . But on any day, I would love to make people grudging against us by another round of dominance, rather than being liked for not doing so.

  • S.Jagernath on November 20, 2012, 7:08 GMT

    The surface will be too flat & slow for this sort of plan.Australia need to use the short ball more as well,Jacques Kallis is the main suspect.But the surface will still not allow for that either.

  • skkh on November 20, 2012, 6:13 GMT

    Marcio ..mate I second all that you have said and incidentally I too am "a friend from up north". Aussie bashing seems to be our favorite national pastime. Sad but true.

  • on November 20, 2012, 4:18 GMT

    Anyone bowling short stuff at the Adelaide Oval is asking for trouble due to the short boundaries square of the wicket. Bowlers from both teams would be better off focussing their energies on aiming to hit the top of off stump than banging it in half way down the pitch.

  • MattyP1979 on November 20, 2012, 2:51 GMT

    Even as a pom Clarke is a breath of fresh air at the moment. His captaincy is second to none and is riding on a huge crest of form with the bat. Agree with some that luck has gone his way but that happens when your in nick. Was pleasantly suprised Aus got a draw out of the first test, much will depend on Clarke and the pensioners in the next.

  • Buggsy on November 20, 2012, 2:49 GMT

    Wow big news, there are probably less than a handful of batsman in the world that are consistently comfortable with sustained, accurate short pitched bowling. And Marcio is right, if this was Australia talking it would be 'dirty tactics'.

  • zenboomerang on November 20, 2012, 0:54 GMT

    Well bowling a few short ones are always good variations for the quickest bowlers against new batters, but Adelaide has the best & fairest wicket in Oz with very good regular bounce which soon becomes predictable for the batters, so the Saffa's should have used that at the Gabba or try it at the WACA... The seamers that will do the best at AO will be those that go in with a strong plan & back that up by bowling good tight spells from both ends - too many bouncers & wide balls will just let the batsmen get their eye in & waste the bowlers energy - could say that for all pitches, but AO will make you pay if you aren't on your game...

  • crow_eater on November 19, 2012, 23:38 GMT

    Hit the nail on the head there Marcio. Is strangly quiet on this post, perhaps they are actually worried about their teams dismal showing against India than what a well balanced & resurgent team Australia are.

  • Meety on November 19, 2012, 23:16 GMT

    @HatsforBats on (November 19 2012, 09:55 AM GMT) - I am not sure it is a great idea. Yes Pup does look awkward facing bouncers, but so did Steve Waugh. Tugger very rarely got out during the 1990s to short stuff, - Pup nicks a lot of pitched up deliveries, that's what I'd be doing early (but don't tell the Saffas that!). I'd also consider spin early against Pup as he is sometimes too confident against them!

  • Kolpak1989 on November 19, 2012, 23:05 GMT

    Marcio makes a very good point. Where are the English and Indian commentariat who would be jumping up and down about deplorable tactics and gamesmanship if this were the Australian bowling strategy? That said, probably a good plan for the South African bowlers. It will be very interesting to see how Clarke responds. Might be worth keeping in mind though that even if you get Clarke you still have to get Cowan, Ponting and Hussey as well. And they all play the pull shot extremely well so SA is going to have to adapt.

  • Biggus on November 19, 2012, 22:51 GMT

    @Marcio-You've hit the nail on the head mate, and no, I'm not outraged at the Saffers at all. Morkel make Clarke look a little uncomfortable a couple of times with short stuff so it's an obvious approach. Fast bowlers and intimidatory tactics are always 'outrageous' if you don't have them it would seem, especially if those bowlers are Australian.

  • RoJayao on November 19, 2012, 22:50 GMT

    A curious connection to Bodyline, given the disgrace that tactic was. But this is why test cricket rules. Strategy. Counter attacking. Courage. Brains not just brawn. I say bring it on and lets see if Clarke can adjust, adapt and dominate again. How good is test cricket?!!

  • pat_one_back on November 19, 2012, 22:27 GMT

    @Marcio, agreed, in part, testing someone who offered chances off a few shorties isn't quite 'if you can't bowl 'em out knock 'em out' but I think you make a valid point around how emotive some posters here get.

  • pat_one_back on November 19, 2012, 21:21 GMT

    Recall Pat Cummins working over the legendary Kallis on the teenagers debut, EVERY batsmen is susceptible to fast well directed short stuff, it's a case of can you execute it because if your slightly off your simply bowling short rubbish.

  • RandyOZ on November 19, 2012, 17:17 GMT

    Will not stop him. Best batsman going around at the moment.

  • JohnnyHopkins on November 19, 2012, 16:16 GMT

    @SurlyCynic There wasn't anything wrong with the Gabba pitch. People seem to have already forgotten that a whole days play was lost to rain. Add that extra day in and it would've been the perfect test match wicket.

  • electric_loco_WAP4 on November 19, 2012, 14:22 GMT

    @SurlyCynic- Clarke did have some luck...... The SA batsmen if anything had even more luck ...and I'm saying about only 2 batsmen who clicked AQmla and Kallis. The rest of SA didn't have a lot of luck...Hope the Aus bowlers improve a bit more and to their potential .... don't think the SA batsmen will be that lucky in that case.

  • on November 19, 2012, 13:54 GMT

    The irony is it will probably be a juicy away swinging ball just outside off from Steyn or a probing seaming delivery from Philander that gets him the next time out.

  • ScottStevo on November 19, 2012, 13:22 GMT

    @Marcio, I see your point, however, Clarke was rattled a few times by short pitched stuff. One spooned between himself and the slips, one spooned in front of himself and the bowler and another that pounded into his body...on other days, he's out three times over. The leading edges he got had nothing to do with short pitch bowling and were poorly timed, judged and played attempts at working balls from off (or just outside) into the leg side. I was very surprised to see it happen a second time - even after he practiced the correct stroke afterwards, although, if it's a shot he's playing in the nets, it will most likely continue and it WILL get him out.

  • Marcio on November 19, 2012, 10:40 GMT

    If this was a story about Australia targetting a SA batsman - who had scored 200 runs and smashed Austyrlia everywhere - by bowling bouncers, the page would be full of outraged posts, mostly from our friends up north, angrily shouting down the evil Australians. "They can't bowl, so they have to try to bash him out!" I'm betting there's not a single outraged post here. Myabe it's time some people let go of their prejudices.

  • SurlyCynic on November 19, 2012, 10:37 GMT

    It's unlikely that Clarke will have that amount of luck every innings. Still, I hope the pitches improve a bit as 'Chief Executive' pitches like Brisbane are damaging to test cricket. Before that test SA and Aus hadn't had a draw in years.

  • Alexk400 on November 19, 2012, 10:01 GMT

    Just chest height offstump will do it. FAST and FURIOUS ..he will be jumping up and down. he is a grinder. You have to make him worry...

  • HatsforBats on November 19, 2012, 9:55 GMT

    Honestly, I think it's a good plan. Clarke only 'pulls' off the front foot and then only when very well set. I don't recall having ever seen him hook. Like all batsman he has his weaknesses so maybe SA can exploit this. But, to be fair, those pulls that lobbed to midwicket barely got above waist height and were from balls delivered on an unexpectedly slow surface. Not exactly fast short stuff. The Steyn delivery was a good one from the best quick in the world. If the SA quicks can bowl better than they did at the gabba on a pitch that won't be any quicker and will have less carry good luck to them, but it might be better suited to Perth.

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • HatsforBats on November 19, 2012, 9:55 GMT

    Honestly, I think it's a good plan. Clarke only 'pulls' off the front foot and then only when very well set. I don't recall having ever seen him hook. Like all batsman he has his weaknesses so maybe SA can exploit this. But, to be fair, those pulls that lobbed to midwicket barely got above waist height and were from balls delivered on an unexpectedly slow surface. Not exactly fast short stuff. The Steyn delivery was a good one from the best quick in the world. If the SA quicks can bowl better than they did at the gabba on a pitch that won't be any quicker and will have less carry good luck to them, but it might be better suited to Perth.

  • Alexk400 on November 19, 2012, 10:01 GMT

    Just chest height offstump will do it. FAST and FURIOUS ..he will be jumping up and down. he is a grinder. You have to make him worry...

  • SurlyCynic on November 19, 2012, 10:37 GMT

    It's unlikely that Clarke will have that amount of luck every innings. Still, I hope the pitches improve a bit as 'Chief Executive' pitches like Brisbane are damaging to test cricket. Before that test SA and Aus hadn't had a draw in years.

  • Marcio on November 19, 2012, 10:40 GMT

    If this was a story about Australia targetting a SA batsman - who had scored 200 runs and smashed Austyrlia everywhere - by bowling bouncers, the page would be full of outraged posts, mostly from our friends up north, angrily shouting down the evil Australians. "They can't bowl, so they have to try to bash him out!" I'm betting there's not a single outraged post here. Myabe it's time some people let go of their prejudices.

  • ScottStevo on November 19, 2012, 13:22 GMT

    @Marcio, I see your point, however, Clarke was rattled a few times by short pitched stuff. One spooned between himself and the slips, one spooned in front of himself and the bowler and another that pounded into his body...on other days, he's out three times over. The leading edges he got had nothing to do with short pitch bowling and were poorly timed, judged and played attempts at working balls from off (or just outside) into the leg side. I was very surprised to see it happen a second time - even after he practiced the correct stroke afterwards, although, if it's a shot he's playing in the nets, it will most likely continue and it WILL get him out.

  • on November 19, 2012, 13:54 GMT

    The irony is it will probably be a juicy away swinging ball just outside off from Steyn or a probing seaming delivery from Philander that gets him the next time out.

  • electric_loco_WAP4 on November 19, 2012, 14:22 GMT

    @SurlyCynic- Clarke did have some luck...... The SA batsmen if anything had even more luck ...and I'm saying about only 2 batsmen who clicked AQmla and Kallis. The rest of SA didn't have a lot of luck...Hope the Aus bowlers improve a bit more and to their potential .... don't think the SA batsmen will be that lucky in that case.

  • JohnnyHopkins on November 19, 2012, 16:16 GMT

    @SurlyCynic There wasn't anything wrong with the Gabba pitch. People seem to have already forgotten that a whole days play was lost to rain. Add that extra day in and it would've been the perfect test match wicket.

  • RandyOZ on November 19, 2012, 17:17 GMT

    Will not stop him. Best batsman going around at the moment.

  • pat_one_back on November 19, 2012, 21:21 GMT

    Recall Pat Cummins working over the legendary Kallis on the teenagers debut, EVERY batsmen is susceptible to fast well directed short stuff, it's a case of can you execute it because if your slightly off your simply bowling short rubbish.