Australia v Sri Lanka, 1st Test, Hobart, 4th day December 17, 2012

Fighting draw could set-up improving Sri Lanka

If Sri Lanka can fashion a draw in Hobart, they will head into the rest of the Test series in high spirits and with most parts of their machine humming nicely

When a back-of-a-length delivery from Mitchell Starc hit a crack in the Bellerive pitch and scooted through to the wicketkeeper at ankle height in the final hour on day four, Sri Lanka's hopes of a maiden Australian victory in Hobart had all but sunk.

It had always seemed the least likely of the tour's three venues to deliver a triumph, but there had been a sniff of victory at tea. Sri Lanka's last fourth-innings total in Hobart had been 410, and they needed 17 fewer to take a series lead here, against an Australian attack depleted by injury. But as the shadows grew longer, the surface began to turn on the visitors. Survival will be preferred to offense on day five.

It is fitting that Sri Lanka's fate now largely rests with Nos. 3, 4 and 5. Tillakaratne Dilshan had showcased his enduring worth in the first innings, while the remainder of the vastly experienced top order had faltered. On day four, even Sri Lanka's bowlers proved more capable than many had suspected, knocking nine Australian wickets over in two sessions. Had a plumb lbw off Ed Cowan been awarded on day three, Australia would not have had as fine a platform upon which to aggress as their 132-run opening stand.

Still, Rangana Herath collected his seventh five-wicket haul in nine Tests this year, and Chanaka Welegedara collected three wickets. If Sri Lanka's batsmen can achieve a defiant draw tomorrow, the visitors will move to Melbourne not only in high spirits, but with most parts of their machine humming nicely.

The consistency that features in Herath's 2012 harvest may not suggest he is a bowler who relies on confidence, but his first spell in a Test is almost uniformly reserved. Low trajectory and a rapid swish of the arm characterised his bowling in the first innings, and accordingly, he was economical but wicketless. At home, even the quicker ones can bite to win him a scalp, but Hobart's surface was not given to the same largesse, and Herath was made to wait for an errant cut from David Warner to add to his year's tally.

When the breakthrough came though, Herath unpacked his bag of tricks in earnest. The variations in pace became more acute, the ball hung in suspense a moment longer, and even the carrom ball appeared on occasion. Herath only has two right-hand batsmen in the Australian top six to take the ball away from, and Shane Watson, one of them, did poorly in his tussle with the spinner.

In the first four balls he faced from Herath, Watson survived two lbw shouts, and was stumped overbalancing on the fifth. Like Muttiah Muralitharan, Herath prefers to have men on the fence - even when he is bowling well - and today that hankering earned him a wicket, when Matthew Wade's belligerence came to rest in the hands of the long-on fielder.

"Five wickets is a good achievement because this is my first Test in Australia," Herath said. "Melbourne and Sydney, from what I've heard, will be more helpful to spinners. This is a good start for me in the series."

Many of the negative appraisals of Sri Lanka's attack before the tour had been founded on a cursory perusal of bowling averages, but Chanaka Welegedara's stats do not do justice to his improvement in recent years. He was the worst of Sri Lanka's bowlers in the first innings, despite having the healthiest wicket tally, but his three wickets in the second dig were much better deserved.

Welegedara is working his way back from injury and hitting 130 kph regularly, allowing his movement to pose a significant threat. Twice he found the leading edge of an aggressive Michael Clarke, only to see the ball sail over the infield and to the boundary in a resounding endorsement of Clarke's batmaker. He had already removed Ed Cowan, however, with one that came in off the seam, and Peter Siddle and Mitchell Starc were ill-equipped to counter Welegedara's reverse-swing with the old ball. Sri Lanka have regarded Welegedara as the leader of the pace attack, and he now seems to have found some of the rhythm that he lacked when he was left out during the recent series against New Zealand.

It is also encouraging for Sri Lanka that Mahela Jayawardene remains at the crease. In recent years he has been peerless on disintegrating pitches, and a dour but chanceless 37-ball stay on the fourth evening will steel him for the epic test to come on the fifth day. Australia are well aware of his mastery on such surfaces, having been Sri Lanka's opponents on a staggeringly dry Galle surface where Jayawardene was the only centurion.

Hobart's hazard stems from the cracks that have expanded with every ray of sunshine and every gust of wind on day four, while Galle's threat was more a result of a loose top layer of soil, but if Jayawardene succeeds in frustrating Australia on Tuesday, he will be largely following a blueprint he has already marked out. Kumar Sangakkara will be desperate to bust out of a poor run of form as well, and he need only look at his own fourth innings knock in Hobart five years ago for inspiration.

Only a near-miracle will see Sri Lanka score the 328 they need to win on a misbehaving pitch, but if at stumps on day five, they are not sitting on a series deficit, they will have learnt plenty and earned much for the matches that are ahead.

Andrew Fernando is ESPNcricinfo's Sri Lanka correspondent

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • Sandeep on December 18, 2012, 16:25 GMT

    Many Sri lankan comparing their team with India. I don't know why they feel jealous with their neighbour. Some are satisfied because their team playing little good than India played. they don't want to see their team as champion. I can understand why they don't like Indian team because they cannot win easily from India and we have seen same thing many time. But it is not solution just think your team should not good than India Even your team should good than any team in the world. ALL THE BEST for SL

  • Sandeep on December 18, 2012, 16:16 GMT

    @Charudaththa Ekanayake so it is draw. You people comparing to You with India. First match is over let's wait for 2nd. How much u strong who just lost world cup final in your home.

  • Viraj on December 18, 2012, 4:50 GMT

    Andrew Fernando's articles are most enjoyable. Keep up the good work. I am happy with the way Sri Lankas competed thus far (185/4 , 37 overs to go at this stage) , the end result is inconsequntial.

  • Ricky on December 18, 2012, 3:10 GMT

    It is shame that AUSTRALIAN has prepared Low and Uneven bounce wicket ,very dificult to survive in this type of a wicket - IT IS SHAME FOR AUSTRALIAN CRICKET

  • Andrew on December 18, 2012, 2:50 GMT

    I don't mind a bit of patriotic good natured bias (bias in the nicest sense), in an article by a SL journalist. Sri Lanka have their worst head to head Test record against Oz, & they will be looking for anything promising. Whilst it has to be remembered that Oz did declare arguably TWICE, Sri Lanka have played well & Fernando's belief that this could set SL up for a series win is plausible. Oz are going to have some problems win/lose or draw out of this game. The main batsmen has a question mark over his fitness, the obvious replacement for captaincy has a /-mark over his place in the side, two strike bowlers may end up being overworked & so we may have 3 or 4 changes to the side moving forward. I think the SCG pitch has changed in nature in recent years, a bit more pace friendly, & the MCG depends on a good 1st innings, so there are some variables there. A draw will be LIKE a win for SL & give them a lot of confidence.

  • Simon on December 18, 2012, 1:49 GMT

    Wow, some of us are touchy, eh? @endianwagona, did I say Australia dominated, in this game or at any other stage of the summer? No, I did not. Kindly refrain from putting words in my mouth. @Nmiduna, I have no idea what you think "snobbery" is, but I don't see any respondents here that are "offended" by the article. All anyone has said is that use of the word "dominance" is strange for a side that was so far behind in the game, and it would seem that either the author or the Cricinfo subeditor agreed, because the title of the article has been changed for the better. Nobody said that Herath and Welegedera didn't bowl well, but really, did the wickets they took place any pressure on Aus, given the state of the match? All cricket followers know the answer is "no", and that should be acknowledged. But Mr Fernando is correct to say that both bowlers will go confidently to Melbourne, and if they can take early first-innings wickets there and pressure Aus, then it is a whole different story.

  • Dummy4 on December 18, 2012, 1:47 GMT

    a draw means Sri Lanka has done much better than India. that'd be a moral boost to the lankan players

  • Dummy4 on December 17, 2012, 23:49 GMT

    It's time to briing Ajantha Mendis in, given the impotence of the current Sri Lankan attack, the poor recent record of Suraj Randiv and that his bunny Brad Haddin is tipped to be Clarke's replacement. Who, apart from Malinga do the Aussie batsmen fear most?

  • Dummy4 on December 17, 2012, 23:40 GMT

    Andrew Fernando is from NZ, so good calls there boys.

  • Sandeep on December 17, 2012, 23:18 GMT

    @Mayan so just satisfy only you doing well than India. improve your thought and think you should play well than any team in the world.

    You don't want world champion or just want good only than your neighbour country. Let us see how much Sri Lanka will Play well in Australia. Wait and watch

  • No featured comments at the moment.