Australia v Sri Lanka, 3rd Test, Sydney, 2nd day January 4, 2013

Sri Lanka fight but Australia build lead


Australia 6 for 342 (Hughes 87, Warner 85) lead Sri Lanka 294 by 48 runs
Scorecard and ball-by-ball details

Ostensibly, Australia finished the second day at the SCG in front. In reality, this was a much more even day's play than most throughout the series, and one that will give Sri Lanka some hope of upsetting Michael Clarke's men - a slim hope, perhaps, but a hope nevertheless. It was a day on which David Warner, Phillip Hughes and Clarke all scored half-centuries yet failed to bury Sri Lanka. It was a day on which run-outs cost two of Australia's top five their wickets, one a result of laziness and the other due to a poor call.

By stumps, Australia's lead had reached 48 runs thanks largely to the acting No.6 Matthew Wade, who was unbeaten on 47. Peter Siddle was with him, on 16, and Sri Lanka's challenge was to ensure Australia's lower order and tail-enders didn't drag the game out of their reach. Much will depend on how quickly the Sri Lankans can finish things off on the third morning and how well they then bat themselves, but on a pitch that was quickly drying out they knew that even a seemingly small target could be tricky for Australia in the fourth innings.

First, they need to get through Wade, who appeared to take his increased responsibility seriously. He was not always comfortable against spin but fought through, surviving a prod to short leg on 22 that was put down by Lahiru Thirimanne and being reprieved by a review on the same score when he was given out caught at short leg, only for replays to show the ball lobbed off his pad and did not touch bat or glove. Rangana Herath was denied on both occasions, but his spin will only become harder to handle as the match wears on and the pitch wears down.

Soon afterwards, the second new ball accounted for Mitchell Johnson, who edged behind off Nuwan Pradeep for 13, and that ended a 36-run partnership between Johnson and Wade, who had come together after a moment of rashness from Clarke. Australia's captain appeared to have started 2013 in much the same way as he cruised through 2012, finding gaps, using his feet to spin and generally making life difficult for his opponents. But on 50, he went for a slog sweep of Herath and his top edge was taken at midwicket. It was far from Australia's only lapse in judgment.

Michael Hussey was the victim of another such brain fade, when Clarke called him through for a single that wasn't there. At 37, Hussey remains one of the quickest runners in world cricket and even a full-stretch dive could not save him from Dimuth Karunaratne's direct hit. Hussey's innings, which had started with a guard of honour from the Sri Lankans, ended on 25, and while there is a strong chance he will bat again in the second innings, it was far from what Hussey wanted from his final Test.

Karunaratne's throw was sharp and accurate, and the Sri Lankans were to be commended for their fielding on several occasions. The day began with another run-out and while Pradeep's work in the deep was responsible for it, so too was an awful piece of running from Ed Cowan. On 4, Cowan ambled through for the first run when Warner pushed a ball into the leg side. There should have been a comfortable two, but Cowan's slow movement, sluggish turn and a slight hesitation combined to cost him his wicket.

That brought Warner and Hughes together and they put on 130 for the second wicket as runs flowed through the off side when Sri Lanka's seamers gave them width - which was often. Hughes picked up nine boundaries in his innings, cutting and cover-driving well and he also pulled a boundary forward of square leg off Pradeep. Warner's ten boundaries all came through the off side, including one to backward point off Pradeep to bring up his half-century from his 37th delivery.

However, on 85 Warner threw away the chance for a hundred, skying a catch to long-off when he tried to clear the boundary off Tillakaratne Dilshan. Hughes also missed out on his century when on 87 he went for a cut to a Herath ball that stayed low and was a touch quicker than the batsman anticipated, and his toe-edge was very well collected by the wicketkeeper Dinesh Chandimal.

The day could have been even better for Sri Lanka had Herath been able to convince Mahela Jayawardene to ask for a review from the first ball Clarke faced. Aleem Dar turned down Herath's appeal and replays showed the decision would have been overturned has the Sri Lankans reviewed. Had they done so, they might even have ended the day with a first-innings lead. As it was, they ended up behind but with the knowledge that if they start day three well, anything can happen.

Brydon Coverdale is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo. He tweets here

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • Roo on January 5, 2013, 10:57 GMT

    Only one person misread this pitch & that was Clarke... The curator said the day before the match that it would be a dry pitch - bat 1st with a backup spinner... Mahela agreed... So far this summer Clarke has made fundamental mistakes - poor bowler selection or use at AO, WACA, SCG - running out Hussey & poor shot selection when a more mature approach would have led to a much bigger 1st innings lead in this match... Expect a few blunders by new captains, so hope he is learning from his mistakes...

  • Andrew on January 5, 2013, 2:54 GMT

    LOL! Any doubts that TommySaffa was a dope can be expelled right here & now. "..australia stuggling with this Sri Lankan ..." -he forgets that Sri Lanka just recently won aTest in Sth Africa AND the less said about Sth Africa in Sri Lanka the better. I seem to remember MJ & Sanga putting on about 800 runs in partnership against them. Oh dear!

  • Janaka on January 5, 2013, 1:40 GMT

    If Sri Lankans play sensible cricket, Sri Lankans have a good chance of winning the game. I believe that Aussies expected a higher score than this. But, they have another innings plus 138. So, it's time for Sri Lankan batsmen to keep the game alive by not throwing wickets away. Karunaratne played well (now it's lunch), but he was chasing the out swinging balls wide of offstump. That's going to be creating chances. I wish all the best for Sri Lankans. No big hopes, but keep fighting and fighting. Don't give up.

  • disco on January 5, 2013, 1:01 GMT

    A thoroughly deserved, well crafted, superbly timed ton from Matthew Wade vindicates his escalation to no.6 Especially as we had a tail order mini collapse.

  • j on January 5, 2013, 0:38 GMT

    This pitch is turning dry and dusty. If Lyon cant take wickets on this gift of a surface he should he dropped. Time after time he's been given a 3rd/4th innings surface and he's failed to turn it at all. The cricket world awaits with baited breath - Will Lyon turn just a single ball?

  • Dummy4 on January 4, 2013, 23:56 GMT

    Quite like the look of Wade, in fact, quite like the look of Aus in general. Shaping up to be an interesting summer. Not sure he's the best wk/bat in the world though, Electric loco etc, though I commend your enthusiasm I detect a faint touch of anti english bias,and , by extension, anti every other test playing team on the planet. I hear that De Villiers chap is quite decent, and some bloke called Prior's a bit useful, too.

  • Guy on January 4, 2013, 22:54 GMT

    @BigBoodha, I felt you wouldn't want to chase on it, but I was surprised by how fast it has dried out. I think Clarke's theory was that they would only need to bat once, but if the tail folds today, that strategy could really backfire. My prediction is for Australia to limp home chasing 180 odd - hopefully Huss to hit the winning runs! @electric_loco_WAP, Wade is a very very poor man's Gilchrist!

  • rob on January 4, 2013, 22:27 GMT

    What is wrong with cricinfo. .. no comments posted. .. come on dudes, get your stuff together. .. why have a website if you don't run it properly.

  • John on January 4, 2013, 21:39 GMT

    SL might have a chance here. This is the first test where they have shown some fight. Still, it would require a solid effort from the SL bats in their second innings (it could happen) and a collapse by Australia at the end.

    On another note, I'm really touched by the amount of time TommytuckerSaffa devotes to Australian Cricket. He never misses a post. I can only assume that, deep down, he really, really likes us.

  • Dale on January 4, 2013, 21:18 GMT

    @electric_loco_WAP4 I'm a fan of Matthew Wade but i think you're getting ahead of yourself here. Wade shows some promise but to say he might possibly be the best wk/batsman in the world ahead of deVilliers and Prior is a very strong suggestion. And one without footing i'd say given Wade's lack of runs and missed stumpings of late.

    Give him more time, he's not a superstar but he can certainly become very handy and one of the top keepers in the world