| Series | Countries | Live Scores | Fixtures | Results | News |
Features
|
Photos | Video & Audio | Blogs | Statistics | Archive | Games | Mobile | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Alex Brown
June 9, 2009
![]()
|
|||
|
Related Links
News : CA eyes foreign players for 'bigger bash' Twenty20
News : Symonds eyes role as global Twenty20 freelancer News : Australia players earn new marketing deal Players/Officials:
Paul Marsh
| James Sutherland
Teams:
Australia
|
|||
Cricket Australia (CA) and the Australian Cricketers' Association (ACA) have moved to stave off defections to lucrative Twenty20 leagues by committing to a new Memorandum of Understanding that delivers higher wages and places greater emphasis on the off-field welfare of the nation's cricketers.
The player payment pool is projected to rise to A$96.2 million (US$76.9m) - an increase of 13.1% - over the next two years, representing a significant increase in the value of state and national contracts. Players will also be remunerated for CA-related sponsorship work and, for the first time, the top-six ranked players will receive "fixed contracts", in which match payments for the next 12 months are paid out in full at the beginning of CA's pay cycle.
The latter move was made following complaints that players were being penalised financially for adhering to Australia's policy of rest and rotation during hectic one-day tournaments. It is intended to serve as an incentive for centrally contracted cricketers to strive to be considered among the best six players in the land.
CA has also acquiesced to ACA calls for players' partners and loved ones to be welcomed on tours, and for welfare programmes to be set in place to prepare cricketers' for life after the game. The moves, according to ACA chief executive Paul Marsh, represent an acknowledgement of the unique social challenges encountered by national and state cricketers, and will go far towards limiting the impact of overseas Twenty20 leagues on Australian competitions.
CA is aware it cannot match the contracts offered by Twenty20 leagues in terms of pro-rata payments - Andrew Symonds, for example, stands to earn US$1.35 million for each six-week stint he completes for Deccan Chargers - but has acknowledged it can outflank tournaments such as the IPL by bolstering its commitment to player welfare.
"Players can be away from home for up to 10 months a year and that, by anyone's standards, is an unnatural life," Marsh told Cricinfo. "What we have here is a greater understanding that cricket, unlike any other sport, can place special demands on players and their families. And with opportunities opening up in the IPL, the EPL and the Southern Premier League - where players can earn more money for less cricket - I think we have now an understanding that if we want to keep players in Australia, we have to give players as normal a life as possible.
"CA is very aware what is now in front of elite players in terms of IPL-style opportunities. Unlike some other countries, they have not yet lost players other than those who are already at the back end of their careers, and I think this MoU reflects the commitment to retaining players for the long term."
Players' overall share of Cricket Australia's revenue - projected at A$370 million (US$296m) over the next two years - has increased from 25 to 26% from previous MoUs. But in an acknowledgment of the precarious global economic climate, CA and ACA have agreed that up to A$3 million (US$2.4m) could be taken from the player pool in each of the next two years if CA's revenue projections fall short of current estimates.
| CA is aware it cannot match the contracts offered by Twenty20 leagues in terms of pro-rata payments to players but has acknowledged it can outflank tournaments such as the IPL by bolstering its commitment to player welfare | |||
"We have always acknowledged that the players are stakeholders in the game, and we're not about to send it broke," Marsh said. "The players' share of revenue will remain at 26%, regardless."
James Sutherland, CA's chief executive, stressed the need for financial prudence during this period of economic uncertainty. "It is critically important to us that we pay what the game can afford - and, in so doing, that Australian cricket maintains an appropriate balance between its investment in elite cricket and its investment in grassroots cricket," Sutherland said. "The new MoU does this. Once again, the agreement is in many ways like a partnership and delivers CA and the ACA an outcome which offers the players more while also increasing Australian cricket's investment in game development."
CA will maintain the current number of national and state contracts, but will substantially increase their value. A base national contract will increase from a minimum A$180,000 (US$144,000) to A$210,000 (US$168,000) over the next two years, with minimum state deals to rise from A$44,000 (US$35,000) to A$52,000 (US$41,500) over the corresponding period. Match payments are set to rise, and prize money for state competitions will almost double from A$550,000 (US$439,000) to A$1 million (US$800,000).
Restrictions have also been removed for international cricketers seeking to ply their trade temporarily overseas. Previously, players surrendered between 2.5 to 12.5% of their contracts depending on the length of their stints in competitions such as the IPL or county cricket, however state players will now be granted a six-week penalty free window.
"At a macro level, this is a deal that is significantly better at attracting and retaining players," Marsh said. "[Australian] football codes can offer money, but they can't offer the unique experience of playing all over the world, which cricket obviously can. That should appeal to younger athletes. And with measures in place to ease the touring burden on families, hopefully strains on players will be reduced."
| ||||||
| Comments have now been closed for this article |
||||||
ICICI Bank M2I. Register Now and Get A Gift Offer.
Safe & simple online money transfer. Apply Now!
Buy Wisden 2013 & get a FREE Playfair
Available now at Cricshop
Also for all the various patriotic Australians commenting, When 50 overs cricket was introduced...it was called Pajama cricket...Now Australia is good at it so it suddently gets clubbed with Test Cricket?...You are not bad at T20...Both IPL winning teams had an Australian captain and an Australian all rounder (not to mention Australian Bad Boys)...I dont see how any World cup can be less important than a Test Series with whom....the World No 6 team?
Stop Whingeing...Act like men that you claim to be...and say we will come stronger for the next world Cup
Hope to see you in the next World Cup final (Both 50 and T20) From, An Indian who is currently liking the way we are playing and is honest enough to be happy that we dont meet Australia in the Super 8.
Posted by DAN22 on (June 12, 2009, 5:57 GMT)Ha Ha Ha...This is similar to American Financial Giants paying taxpayers money as bonuses with the justification that they want to retain their best guys...the same guys who got them in the hole in the first position.
Posted by MasterClass on (June 10, 2009, 18:19 GMT)tegigis, cmac - your comments on 20/20 are in complete contradiction to the words of your own greats: Gilchrist & Hayden...who were honest enough to admit their mistake and changed their own similar opinion after playing in the IPL. It may come as a surprise to you but we chose to place a little bit more respect on their opinions than yours. But don't feel too bad, you still have the Ashes to cling to...or maybe not!
Posted by tegigis on (June 10, 2009, 10:44 GMT)I don't see the problem of losing T20 cricket. As far as cricketing purists go, it's merely more than a little hit and giggle, T20 should be kept as a curtain raiser for one dayers and for spectacle fiasco's like the IPL and the ICL and to keep the crowds rolling in for domestic teams.
I think T20 cricket is a fad, ala flare jeans, one day we'll look back at photo's and videos and think what the hell were we doing. I know, so of you will think me crazy, at the time flares seemed like the coolest thing, and the way of the future too...
Posted by cmac on (June 10, 2009, 7:45 GMT)The new pay structure is important because Australia needs to retain our best players to play primarily TEST cricket and secondarily one day cricket. I, and many other cricket fans i know, think that 20/20 is a slap-and-tickle waste of energy for our cricketers. i don't give a stuff about us getting eliminated from the 20/20 world cup - the sooner the better in order to prepare for the Ashes, which really counts for something.
Posted by colinkynoch on (June 10, 2009, 6:36 GMT)Well Zordrac, Australia are still well clear on top of the current ICC Test Rankings with 128 points to South Africa on 119 and India on 117.
Posted by bicyclelegs on (June 10, 2009, 5:51 GMT)Actually, Zordrac, Australia are still no. 1 ranked Test team. And I don't see how a pay rise can end in disaster. It is aimed at retaining exactly the players they need to dig themselves out of the holes you mention.
Posted by dwblurb on (June 10, 2009, 5:51 GMT)Zordrac, Australia may have lost their position as no. 1 test team, but have since got it back by berating South Africa away from home. They are no. 2 in one day cricket. Supporters can't really ask much more than their team being the best team in the world in the most important form of cricket.
Posted by Saibaskar on (June 10, 2009, 4:46 GMT)Australia paid the price for keeping away from IPL. They were handed out a first round exit by IPL hardened Gayle, Dilshan, Malinga and Mendis. Australian cricket board is bothered about its players making it big without its hold over them or they are bothered about not getting enough cut in IPL to let their players feature in it. Whatever be the reason australia can ill afford to ignore 20/20 cricket. They would precisely be doing the same mistake Indian Hockey did during 70s. When the world moved towards turf hockey India struck with grass and today India's status in hockey tells the story of what happens to top teams who do not keep up with the changes that happen in a sport. In future olympics and Commonwealth Games will feature cricket in this format and the emphasis will be in this format for the sake of a medal. So, it is in Australia's interest to get its players play in 20/20 leagues rather than getting thrown out of a world event in round 1.
Posted by Rooboy on (June 10, 2009, 4:23 GMT)No need to be so bitter, MasterClass and Zordrac. Your petty jealousy is understandable but unbecoming. You see MasterClass, cricket is not the only sport played in Australia. Unlike teams from the subcontinent, Australia is well represented internationally in many different sports and so there are many good athletes who are lured away from cricket. If CA has the cash to try to entice young Australians to play cricket, and to continue to play, then let them pay what they want, and we'll sit back and laugh at the childish whining of some fans of other countries. And Zodrac ... no, Australia didn't just lose their number one test ranking. They actually just defeated the second ranked test team away from home to retain the number one position. Not bad to be on a 'major downward spiral' but still be ranked above india, sri lanka, in fact everyone except SA in the ODI arena. And who cares about 20/20?!? Sorry for bringing facts and reality into the discussion!