Australia news June 4, 2013

CA offers marketing contracts to Ahmed, Sandhu

Cricket Australia is expected to pour more money into growing the game at grassroots level and appealing to a more diverse fan-base after receiving a massive financial boost thanks to the new A$590 million broadcasting rights deal. The organisation has been pushing for some time to increase its appeal to a wider multicultural demographic, which has continued with the offering of special marketing contracts to Fawad Ahmed and Gurinder Sandhu.

Ahmed, a refugee from Pakistan, could yet play in the Ashes if legislation before federal parliament is passed in time to allow his Australian passport to be fast-tracked, while Sandhu, whose parents are from India, was New South Wales' Player of the Year last summer.

CA hopes both men will take up the marketing contracts, a concept which was introduced as a result of the reduction in the number of central playing contracts recommended by the Argus report. Under an agreement with the Australian Cricketers' Association, players from outside the central contract list could be offered deals based on marketing appearances, and CA's chief executive James Sutherland said Ahmed was a good fit for such a contract.

"In terms of someone like Fawad, he's done very well in domestic cricket at the end of last season and he's got a different sort of background," Sutherland told ESPNcricinfo. "Part of our real focus at the moment is to grow and diversify our participation base. There are a number of players from different cultural backgrounds who are playing in domestic cricket and I guess there are opportunities to really highlight that and for them to be some sort of inspiration to others in our community to be part of the Australian cricket scene."

That broader aim of appealing across cultures will continue to be a major focus of CA over the next few years and it will have significantly increased funds with which to tackle the issue as a result of the broadcasting deal. The new five-year arrangement with Channel Nine and Channel Ten is worth 118% more than the previous deal and while some of that increase will be directed to the elite teams and players, grassroots cricket will also be a winner.

"How you spend your increases in revenue is just as important as the revenue itself," Sutherland said. "We have a very clear strategy and approach that says that at least 75% of our revenue will be spent of fans, Australian teams and participants, and that will be a very sharp focus for us over the next five years.

"Clubs are a really important part of the fabric of Australian cricket and whilst it's difficult to be absolutely specific, what we are very focused on is ensuring that cricket is a sport of choice for fans and participants. Growing our participation base, diversifying our participation base is really important.

"A fundamental within all of that for clubs is having good facilities and having the resources around them to attract people. It's competitive out there. There are lots of sports options. Kids today play four or five sports at the same time. We're really intent on making sure cricket is at the top of the list in summer time and part of that in our view will be looking for opportunities to improve facilities around clubs and communities to make sure that cricket is even more likely to be that sport of choice."

Brydon Coverdale is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo. He tweets here

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • HatsforBats on June 6, 2013, 8:43 GMT

    @Meety, I think we all know why Sok isn't getting picked ;) Maybe if we team up and raise some money for CA we'll get contracts and an Ashes berth, I can roll out some dodgy leggies. Sandhu is promising, but so is McDermott and many others: contracts should be merit-based, and thats it.

  • Meety on June 6, 2013, 0:35 GMT

    @HatsforBats on (June 5, 2013, 8:59 GMT) - agreed. Wonder why O'Keefe can't get a contract? I mean - he was born in Malaysia! I get why Fawad gets a conttract as he actually works for cricket & is doing a great job OFF the cricket pitch, Sandhu is a great talent - but I just think this type of contract is sailing some tricky waters even if it is for the best intents!

  • HatsforBats on June 5, 2013, 8:59 GMT

    @ Mitty2, completely agree the BBL needs to be outside the shield season, there is not a single positive reason for it to stay and several negatives if it does. Regarding Ahmed & Sandhu, IMO both need at least a couple more seasons under their belts before being awarded any sort of contract.

  • nthuq on June 5, 2013, 5:03 GMT

    @D H Ravish Gowda - Sheffield Shield teams are allowed one overseas player each and would gladly accept a good Indian batsman, but I've never seen any Indian batsmen interested in developing themselves in different conditions.

  • on June 4, 2013, 13:16 GMT

    Dear Editor Sir, why not allowed the Indian players to represent the Australia's Domestic Sheffield sealed trophy tournament and teams like NSW, SA, WA,Victoria , Queensland

  • Mitty2 on June 4, 2013, 11:16 GMT

    I like the idea of expanding the demographics in order not just for the cricket benefits... But in terms of Australian cricket this is a good scheme in terms of finding more talent at grassroots in order to improve the shield. However, as many will agree, the fundamental problem is purely the scheduling. If the BBL wasn't right in the middle it would undoubtedly improve the outputs of the batsmen. As seen with the difference of the runs scored in the first half and the second half of the shield, particularly with doolan, the BBL has a huge affect on the players. As seen with Silk, there definitely is talent... But the scheduling regardless will be of detriment to the up and coming new batsman... But at least the length of it has been minimized.

    Regarding ahmed and sandhu, on a purely contract basis, they both IMO, could have significant futures for Australia.

    Whether sandhu shades the likes of Sayers, cutting, coulter-Nile and McDermott is undetermined, but he is still a huge talent

  • HatsforBats on June 6, 2013, 8:43 GMT

    @Meety, I think we all know why Sok isn't getting picked ;) Maybe if we team up and raise some money for CA we'll get contracts and an Ashes berth, I can roll out some dodgy leggies. Sandhu is promising, but so is McDermott and many others: contracts should be merit-based, and thats it.

  • Meety on June 6, 2013, 0:35 GMT

    @HatsforBats on (June 5, 2013, 8:59 GMT) - agreed. Wonder why O'Keefe can't get a contract? I mean - he was born in Malaysia! I get why Fawad gets a conttract as he actually works for cricket & is doing a great job OFF the cricket pitch, Sandhu is a great talent - but I just think this type of contract is sailing some tricky waters even if it is for the best intents!

  • HatsforBats on June 5, 2013, 8:59 GMT

    @ Mitty2, completely agree the BBL needs to be outside the shield season, there is not a single positive reason for it to stay and several negatives if it does. Regarding Ahmed & Sandhu, IMO both need at least a couple more seasons under their belts before being awarded any sort of contract.

  • nthuq on June 5, 2013, 5:03 GMT

    @D H Ravish Gowda - Sheffield Shield teams are allowed one overseas player each and would gladly accept a good Indian batsman, but I've never seen any Indian batsmen interested in developing themselves in different conditions.

  • on June 4, 2013, 13:16 GMT

    Dear Editor Sir, why not allowed the Indian players to represent the Australia's Domestic Sheffield sealed trophy tournament and teams like NSW, SA, WA,Victoria , Queensland

  • Mitty2 on June 4, 2013, 11:16 GMT

    I like the idea of expanding the demographics in order not just for the cricket benefits... But in terms of Australian cricket this is a good scheme in terms of finding more talent at grassroots in order to improve the shield. However, as many will agree, the fundamental problem is purely the scheduling. If the BBL wasn't right in the middle it would undoubtedly improve the outputs of the batsmen. As seen with the difference of the runs scored in the first half and the second half of the shield, particularly with doolan, the BBL has a huge affect on the players. As seen with Silk, there definitely is talent... But the scheduling regardless will be of detriment to the up and coming new batsman... But at least the length of it has been minimized.

    Regarding ahmed and sandhu, on a purely contract basis, they both IMO, could have significant futures for Australia.

    Whether sandhu shades the likes of Sayers, cutting, coulter-Nile and McDermott is undetermined, but he is still a huge talent

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • Mitty2 on June 4, 2013, 11:16 GMT

    I like the idea of expanding the demographics in order not just for the cricket benefits... But in terms of Australian cricket this is a good scheme in terms of finding more talent at grassroots in order to improve the shield. However, as many will agree, the fundamental problem is purely the scheduling. If the BBL wasn't right in the middle it would undoubtedly improve the outputs of the batsmen. As seen with the difference of the runs scored in the first half and the second half of the shield, particularly with doolan, the BBL has a huge affect on the players. As seen with Silk, there definitely is talent... But the scheduling regardless will be of detriment to the up and coming new batsman... But at least the length of it has been minimized.

    Regarding ahmed and sandhu, on a purely contract basis, they both IMO, could have significant futures for Australia.

    Whether sandhu shades the likes of Sayers, cutting, coulter-Nile and McDermott is undetermined, but he is still a huge talent

  • on June 4, 2013, 13:16 GMT

    Dear Editor Sir, why not allowed the Indian players to represent the Australia's Domestic Sheffield sealed trophy tournament and teams like NSW, SA, WA,Victoria , Queensland

  • nthuq on June 5, 2013, 5:03 GMT

    @D H Ravish Gowda - Sheffield Shield teams are allowed one overseas player each and would gladly accept a good Indian batsman, but I've never seen any Indian batsmen interested in developing themselves in different conditions.

  • HatsforBats on June 5, 2013, 8:59 GMT

    @ Mitty2, completely agree the BBL needs to be outside the shield season, there is not a single positive reason for it to stay and several negatives if it does. Regarding Ahmed & Sandhu, IMO both need at least a couple more seasons under their belts before being awarded any sort of contract.

  • Meety on June 6, 2013, 0:35 GMT

    @HatsforBats on (June 5, 2013, 8:59 GMT) - agreed. Wonder why O'Keefe can't get a contract? I mean - he was born in Malaysia! I get why Fawad gets a conttract as he actually works for cricket & is doing a great job OFF the cricket pitch, Sandhu is a great talent - but I just think this type of contract is sailing some tricky waters even if it is for the best intents!

  • HatsforBats on June 6, 2013, 8:43 GMT

    @Meety, I think we all know why Sok isn't getting picked ;) Maybe if we team up and raise some money for CA we'll get contracts and an Ashes berth, I can roll out some dodgy leggies. Sandhu is promising, but so is McDermott and many others: contracts should be merit-based, and thats it.