| Series | Countries | Live Scores | Fixtures | Results | News |
Features
|
Photos | Blogs | Statistics | Archive | Video & Audio | Games | Mobile | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Pakistan must overcome the fear of playing in Australia by displaying more aggression if they wish to meet with any success in the series
December 27, 2009
![]()
|
|||
|
Related Links
News : After fun runs, Hauritz hopes for wickets
News : Intikhab rues wasted opportunity on good batting pitch Report : On song Australia back up their leader Matches:
Australia v Pakistan at Melbourne
Series/Tournaments:
Pakistan tour of Australia
|
|||
Timidity will kill you on the cricket fields of Australia. Pakistan teams in recent years have not taken heed of this basic tenet when coming out to play against Australia, and the hammerings they've experienced have generally been preceded by submission to fear. If this side is going to learn the lesson, it has started off slowly.
It is easy to be meek tourists here. Stadiums, like the MCG, are not playing fields as much as they are vast, lonely chambers of interrogation. The sheer size can eat you up. The crowds are huge and loud and the more you let them get to you, the more they bring it to you.
There used to be days, of course, when the Australian side really brought it all to bear upon tourists like some brutal theatre; the noise, the crowd, the glares and chatter from players, forever pecking away at you like some wild-eyed malevolent woodpecker. Those days are gone but Pakistan have still been playing their ghosts in this Test; ghosts of men such as Matthew Hayden, Justin Langer, Shane Warne, Glenn McGrath and their intimidating ways. There are no demons in the pitch or in the bowling. Australia's batting is solid, but not murderous anymore. And yet Pakistan has played them like it was 1999, not 2009.
The initial selection told it. Abdur Rauf is a sum of many commendable things but he is not, as is Umar Gul, an attacking fast bowler. Gul may be in an uncertain patch in his career right now, but can anyone deny that he is, in essence, a wicket-taking bowler? They would've played with two spinners had Danish Kaneria not been injured, but a case could even be built for going in with five bowlers. It further weakens an already dodgy batting order but then Pakistan are not, and have never been, India. They win Tests with their bowling not their batting. Pakistan's was an honest effort with the ball, but when did honesty ever win anything?
They then began their innings in the afternoon so meekly it was difficult to know they were there. Solidity is often the order of the day as far as Pakistan's opening is concerned, but not sluggishness; surviving 13 overs of the new ball as an opening pair is an achievement for Pakistan, but going at two-an-over negates that, especially if wickets are never stable. So unwilling were Pakistan's top three to dictate terms that it took them 32 overs to find the first boundary, a passage of extraordinary conservatism in this day and age. Their coach Intikhab Alam didn't think it was, arguing that stability was needed, this being Test cricket. It is, but not from 1969.
It is precisely why Umar Akmal is so refreshing; he is not timid, in fact, he may be even a little too cocky, though time will better judge that. But he has intent and clarity and in these days when the meek no longer inherit the earth, that can take you places.
Australia have made a national habit out of it. India have been successful this decade because of it; they've had men like Virender Sehwag, Sourav Ganguly, Yuvraj Singh and Harbhajan Singh, men who do not take backward steps and who make themselves known by coming at you. The Pakistan sides that have been successful in Australia have had such men - Javed Miandad, Imran Khan, Sarfraz Nawaz, Mushtaq Mohammad and Wasim Akram.
There is natural aggression in this Pakistan side, but it stands strangely doused and latent. Young men like Mohammad Aamer and Akmal junior have it; even in Mohammad Asif's wily ways there is a streak. But there are too many who look restrained and submissive and that cannot be the successful way. Perhaps it is the natural calm of the leader and though that is sometimes necessary with Pakistan, it can also be lethargic and reactive. The aggression somehow needs to be harnessed and a snarl needs to come out soon, for otherwise the Test and series will be gone before they know it.
Already, the maximum they can hope for here is a draw. And that will be a kind of victory in itself, given they have lost nine on the trot against Australia. But that cannot be the extent of their ambition, not in this land. Somehow they have to open up, they have to chance it and really let themselves go.
| Comments have now been closed for this article |
||||||
Pakistan editor Osman spent the first half of his life pretending he discovered reverse swing with a tennis ball half-covered with electrical tape. The second half of his life was spent trying, and failing, to find spiritual fulfillment in the world of Pakistani advertising and marketing. The third half of his life will be devoted to convincing people that he did discover reverse swing. And occasionally writing about cricket. And learning mathematics.
Access your Indian Rupee earnings from anywhere in the world.
ICICI Bank Money2India brings " locked exchange rate" and a free gift
on registering and transfer of USD 250 and above.
FREE copy of Playfair with Wisden pre-order
At Cricshop.com
The issues with this team are too many and too varied. I must say that this timidity is borne out of lack of confidence and planning. On the battle field armies always look at their leaders. If the leader is in the mood to tear the enemy from limb to limb that will be the general attitude of the men fighting under him. Yousuf is not the kind. I am not challenging his cricketing brains rather his attitude. It usually reflects in his strategies on and off the field. The Pakistani men you mentioned in your article were all full of sauce. I was on the ground the day when Miandad went after Lille with his bat. He was left alone by Aussies after that incident. I was on the ground in Karachi when Miandad went out to bat on a bouncy track facing Marshal, Garner, Holding and can't recall the name of that crazy bowler with a roundhouse action and ripping speed without a helmet. Mushtaq made sure that he put it on when he sent it out!That's called balls and I see the same streak in Umar.
Posted by gitapat on (December 28 2009, 04:13 AM GMT)Timidity goes with lack of confidence and performance on the field. Bad management on the part of the Pakistan Cricket Board has in the last 2/3 years undermined the constitution of the Pakistan Cricket team. They lost their best player Mohammed Yousuf to ICL which weakened the team considerably until recently. By reacting to frivolous match-fixing allegations they have now lost Younis Khan,their second-best player. If these 2 players play together the Pakistan team is formidable with other batsmen like Misbah-ul-haq and their talented bowling combination The Pakistani players are under constant pressure from the Pakistani cricket fans who expect them to win every match. Not only should the players become more professional and tough,it is time the Pakistan Cricket Board and the Pakistani fans grew up.
Posted by rvgandhi on (December 28 2009, 04:01 AM GMT)Why is the author making unnecessary comparisons with the Indian team...
Posted by zkaleem on (December 27 2009, 23:30 PM GMT)Excellent article with substantive comments and wrtiiten in eloquent style. A rarity nowadays in Pakistani journalism!
Posted by Classy.Nerd on (December 27 2009, 22:40 PM GMT)truely agreed with u osman.. the team certainly lacks the aggression of professionals. watching them play, it seems they really got on to the field wearing the 'underdogs' ribbon! besides, Yousifs leadership seriously needs to be questioned. I would rather spell lethargic on the field. perhaps, leadership certainly is inherited ! one question: how can a side touring Australia get on the field with only four bowlers to choose from, despite when your batsmen are already vulnerable to shaky starts. here comes another injury prone pakistani bowler
Posted by Alexk400 on (December 27 2009, 21:55 PM GMT)Pakistanis playing like zombies. You can't win against aussies like that. You have to fight fire with fire. Aussies bowling is not even good. Only doug bollinger is impressive even him also give some 4 balls. Aussie bowling is not disciplined. WHy rauf and faisal is in the team is beyond me. They are not world class. faisal in the team because favour to javaed mianded?. He gets too many chances for delivering nothing. I always see pakistan produce extremely talented cricketers. Even afridi is better option as second spinner. His bowling alone deserve the spot. My only problem with afridi is he never listens to authority. So why not make him captain?. They need Younis khan to bring some common sense. yufu is great batsman he is also dravid mould as captain. TIMID. Based on what i see if Umar akmal do not go berserk , Pak may lose this matches easily. Pak needs to counter attack. Go all out if you are going to lose.
Posted by Bilal_S on (December 27 2009, 21:33 PM GMT)Perhaps it is time for Shahid Afridi to start playing test cricket again. His batting has improved dramatically in the past two years. His successes in T20 carried themselves forward to the one day arena (with both bat and ball). A regular no. 6 bat, he still may not be, but it seems insanity to refuse to try it considering the kind of form he is in. There may be worries that his bowling may not be up to test-level. This would be another mistaken reduction as his bowling too has been improving consistently since Woolmer took over. He will also provide the necessary aggression you are talking about, as his T20 captaincy shows. I am not advocating giving him the captaincy immediately, but Mohammad Yousuf is certainly not looking like a leader in Australia - tactically or in terms of his body language and man management. However, despite this, I think it is wise to encourage the openers to play more sedately as these two especially, have had a tendency to get out driving expansively.
Posted by K-ABBAS on (December 27 2009, 20:18 PM GMT)This article is true that Pakistan has to overcome the name of Australia. This is not that team which Pakistan played against in 1999 or in 2005. They need to attack like South Africa and India as they did in past few years. But attack can be possible if they have a brave leader and Pakistan is missing a brave leader since Wasim Akram. Every body remeber the stare of Pakistan capt M. Yousaf towards Umar Akmal when he tried to attack New Zealand on the last day of 3rd test in Napier.
Posted by Cereal_Killer on (December 27 2009, 17:15 PM GMT)My feelings exactly!! Australians thrive on intimidation factor and the best way to tackle them is by returning the favor. Umar Akmal can do it and the 1st hour of play on day 3 will probably reflect on how this series would end.
Posted by Mudassir11Hussain on (December 27 2009, 17:06 PM GMT)The things which always betray Pakistan team's ability to perform well are their batting capacity and fielding. Now these disabilities are further strengthen by Yousuf's captaincy which definitely lacks the required flare and aggression. No doubt he has been a great contributor with the bat (in total contrast with his fielding capacity), but he does not seem fit in his new role as a Captain. Furthermore, inclusion of Faisal Iqbal and Misbah-ul-Haq is also a big question mark. It seems we have a total dearth of new talented batsmen? With total agreement to Mr. Samiuddin, our team needs conviction, resolve and a bigger heart to tackle Aussies in all aspects of the game.