Afridi's mysterious freakery

In Georgetown he employed indescribable bowling to achieve a feat of statistical ridiculousness
Osman Samiuddin March 14, 2014

Shahid Afridi
7 for 12 v West Indies, first ODI, Georgetown

Drift, I'm beginning to think, is not quite the right word for it. It's not the right tone. Shane Warne used to get drift - that I can make sense of; Abdul Qadir used to as well, but the stock delivery for both used to float far more, like a lightly weighted balloon. What Shahid Afridi gets on those occasions when he is bowling well is called drift - I've called it that plenty of times - but I'm not sure I can any longer square that with either his style of bowling or his character.

Life drifts. Paper planes drift. Music drifts. Writing drifts. Afridi does not drift. Afridi does whatever is the opposite of drift. He is defined by that opposition. It is impossible to imagine him drifting in any sphere, shape or form. Granted bowling is not always an extension of personality but to reconcile his legspin getting drift with how he is is especially tricky.

So what is it? The central wrinkle in any appreciation of Afridi's bowling is that calling him a legspinner is to both be overambitious and inadequate. A sub-complication is that there is no such thing as orthodox legspin. You can use one fast bowler as a reference point in comparison to another and create a broadly homogenised genre. You can do the same with offspinners. But try doing that with a legspinner. Warne, Qadir, Anil Kumble, Stuart MacGill, Danish Kaneria (to use just five recent examples); as a category, legspin is only really as wide as each individual practitioner. That is partly why we love it. Afridi has never been a great turner of the ball. Sometimes he goes a whole spell without a single delivery turning away from bat. He has a wrong 'un, a conventionally gripped offbreak, a faster ball, and then a bunch of other stuff that might be deliberate and might not, but importantly might be harmless dot balls if delivered by any other man.

Lately I've started making sense of his bowling by imagining him to be a bit like Fazal Mahmood. Fazal's pace has always been a point of curiosity, but it is safe to assume, from various first-hand accounts, that he wasn't fast-bowler quick. That Richie Benaud once used his own legspin as a measure (Fazal, Benaud wrote figuratively, was twice as quick) I've always found telling. In particular, the legcutter Fazal made his name with. I can see how it might be a not-too distant relative of the vintage Afridi legbreak, except a few clicks quicker.

Fazal's best deliveries also used to get what we call drift, as well as some dip, before cutting away. But that word just isn't right; there is too much intent and purpose, too much ambition in those deliveries that behave that way, too much career-driven focus (the career, in this case, being a wicket at the end) for them to just drift. Let's maybe diagnose it exactly as we see it: deliveries with a mild affliction of swing?

The point to this pedantry being that when Afridi starts getting it is when the complex universe in his bowling is right. It was the absence of this in the months and matches leading up to this first ODI against West Indies that was beginning to make him look every one of his years - the real Pathan years. Between taking Mathew Wade's wicket off the last ball of his first over in Sharjah in August 2012 and having Lendl Simmons stumped off the first ball of his second over in Guyana in July 2013, Afridi had gone wicketless in six ODIs and 57 overs. For a guy who tries as hard to convince the world - and himself - that he really is a bowler and an incidental batsman (and to be fair has done a pretty good job with the convincing over the last decade), imagine the torture of being in such a rut.

That Simmons wicket was tell-tale of what was to come. It swung in - mildly, of course - cut away, and boom! Stumped, gone (with generous pause for endless third-umpire TV replays in between the boom, stumped and gone). Possibly it was the first one that had behaved like that for months.

And next ball he did it again, that mild inswing, except this one didn't break away. This one went on with the angle the ball's swing had created and thudded into Dwayne Bravo's front pad. Smart, dead, gone, so dead and gone, there was no use for technology this time. "It's an Afridi special as well," Ian Bishop reminded us on air, "it's quicker, and just slides straight on to Dwayne Bravo." Slide - I'm more comfortable with that than drift. Maybe it should be a genre of one: Afridi, right-arm slider.

After that there could only be one outcome. Afridi's keenness to impress and please, and to be validated, has always been of a hyperactive bent. So here, where behind him stretched a long, long drought, which had led to him being dropped from the side, he had much to make up for. He had already made crucial runs when Pakistan batted. Now he also had two early wickets, and ahead of him a batting line-up that was swiftly receding in capability; it was like adding an espresso, some speed and then a shot of pure adrenaline to the hyperactivity.

Ultimately, and sadly, there remains something underwhelming about the performance, misplaced in a nothing series between two middling sides (the hosts more so than the tourists) in cricket's nothingest format. For a while afterwards it felt like a late-period outlier in Afridi's career: in seven ODIs immediately after this, he took only four wickets. Only late last year did he return to consistently better form and output. But such is its sheer statistical freakery that it is impossible to forget and ignore. Seven for 12? Those are figures from a terrible, uncovered, unprepared and rain-drenched pitch early in the 1900s, with stiff-legged batsmen unable to cope with, I don't know, a Sydney Barnes or even the Demon, Frederick Spofforth himself.

Posted by immi2711 on (March 14, 2014, 17:04 GMT)

HuH!!!!!! I am scratching my head, And Ajmal is a run of the mill bowler....something is so wrong here....It is just foul...shame on everyone

Posted by CHAMPIONKHAN on (March 14, 2014, 20:18 GMT)

I have been reading cricket articles for almost half a century now . This can be ranked as one of the best. It was a delight to read. Please pass on my kudos to Mr. Osman. I really enjoyed the article. The intricate web of word took me to a ride of Afridi bowling l. The writer managed to create the imagery with his play of word. Excellent. Well done

Posted by johnathonjosephs on (March 14, 2014, 20:23 GMT)

One of the few awards here that you can not argue with (the other being Johnson's performance).

Posted by   on (March 14, 2014, 21:46 GMT)

@immi... To make facts correct, this spell of Shahid was all time second best performance in ODIs.... Obviously there is no comparison between two but its all about which spell was great to be awarded

Posted by   on (March 15, 2014, 2:21 GMT)

I understand the frustration and aggravation of the people for the awards declaration. I think they are under the impression that the players were judged for their life achievements. They should know that the awards were announced for this categories for the recent performance. The people who judged them, in my opinion are among the best of their fields. Therefore the chance of error or any type of ism is not involved at all. The decision and the declaration was made purely on merit. I would not be wrong in recognizing Mr. Tendulkar (the best batsman of the recent history). Since he is retired, he deserved to be honored and decorated with the award, I completely agree with the decision. There is Seagakara, Kohli, Styn and other Bt & Bw of SA, Aus, Brit, SL, WI, NZ, IND and PAK whose performance was very good and is recorded in the pages of the history as well but failed to win the award. If I'm not wrong, the ODI batting award was won by an unknown and unpopular player of this game.

Posted by sergio11 on (March 15, 2014, 4:56 GMT)

@immi2711 ..this award is for the ODI performance of the year!! not for the best ODI bowler....!! 7/12 is the 2nd best odi best balling figure....so it has to be Afridi

Posted by casimpk on (March 15, 2014, 5:28 GMT)

Fair award! This category was for the best ODI performance of the year in bowling, NOT for best ODI player! He bowled exceptionally & then scored a 50 too!

Posted by   on (March 15, 2014, 5:50 GMT)

No other performance whether in batting or bowling can be compared to this innings of Afridi one of most fair award !!!

Posted by   on (March 15, 2014, 8:03 GMT)

wow..Great man with a glorious victory ...he is always exceptional on the ground in all aspects..U deserve this award :)

Posted by   on (March 15, 2014, 8:07 GMT)

Fair Award !! Afridi highly deserved it

Comments have now been closed for this article

About The Awards

The ESPNcricinfo Awards recognise the best individual batting and bowling performances in cricket over the calendar year. They are voted on by an independent jury of former cricketers, commentators, and ESPNcricinfo's senior writers. Previous winners have included Dale Steyn, Virender Sehwag, Shahid Afridi and Kumar Sangakkara.

ESPNcricinfo@20 Cricketer of the Generation

A high-powered jury of cricketers, current and past, cricket writers and commentators picks the player of the last 20 years to cap ESPNcricinfo's 20th anniversary celebrations.

Contribution to Cricket award

This award, the winner of which is nominated by Rahul Dravid, recognises significant contributions to cricket in a non-playing role.

Statsguru Awards

Which batsman was the most consistent over the year? Who was the best bowler in the third and fourth innings? The Statsguru Awards go beyond runs scored, wickets taken, or averages, and are the result of detailed data analyses of performances. ESPNcricinfo's ball-by-ball data analysis of every international game has answers to these queries and more.