Bangladesh v New Zealand, 1st Test, Chittagong, 1st day October 9, 2013

Five-bowler strategy a positive sign for Bangladesh

Playing five bowlers paid off for Bangladesh late on the first day in Chittagong, and it's a combination is likely to work better for them in Test cricket
  shares 15

Bangladesh's decision to field five bowlers is one that the team management should be encouraged to take more often. This Test was the second occasion when they tried out such a combination in the past four years, and they were rewarded instantly.

Shakib Al Hasan and Abdur Razzak got the late wickets of centurion Kane Williamson and Brendon McCullum to leave New Zealand on 280 for 5. The day mostly belonged to the visitors but, with the extra bowler, Mushfiqur dared to take the second new ball as soon as it was available. He wasn't intending to use both pacers at the time, but the harder, newer ball was always going to give the two left-arm spinners more bounce and a little more bite off the pitch.

The addition of Razzak was necessary. Effectively, he replaced Ziaur Rahman in the line-up, but the inclusion of Razzak actually kept Mahmudullah - who has been played as a specialist batsman in Tests recently - out. Mahmudullah's sudden lull in form - 34 runs in his last six Test innings - played against him. He insists that form isn't an issue as he has scored some runs in the Dhaka Premier League, but it is time for Mahmudullah to look for a different role.

As a specialist batsman, he has been employed at No. 8 for ten Tests out of the 17 he has played so far, between 2009 and the first Test against Zimbabwe last May. He has scored 591 runs at this position, including a century and four fifties, averaging 42.21 with a strike-rate of 60.80. The numbers seem fine but it is extremely rare for a team to play a specialist batsman that low down the order. In fact, none of the 29 players who have scored more runs than Mahmudullah there are specialist batsmen. Their stronger suit is bowling or wicketkeeping.

It was always a defensive move, but previous selectors have described it as a necessary move to insulate against top-order collapses. But what it has done in the past is offer too much comfort to the batsmen above Mahmudullah, resulting in him having to clean up the mess with the tail.

Instead, Razzak's presence in the attack means that Shakib can bowl freely and be used sparingly by Mushfiqur. This was probably the first time in the last five years that Shakib wasn't bowling when Bangladesh had spinners attacking from both ends. Sohag Gazi too could be used properly, despite bowling a long first spell.

Bangladesh played four and a half bowlers in their last Test also, which resulted in a 143-run win over Zimbabwe. Ziaur Rahman, who made his debut in that game batting at No. 8 and was asked to bowl his medium-pace, took four wickets in the second innings. Some called it a lucky move because Ziaur's bowling had lost its bite several years ago after a knee injury, but one extra bowler capable of even holding up an end matters for Bangladesh.

With only the four bowlers at his disposal, Mushfiqur often delays making attacking moves. The spinners are usually tired, trying to do both, maintain the run-rate and pick up wickets. The seamers are not fresh, as they have to toil with the old ball from one end. Shakib has had to plug away for 35-40 overs a day, often the only attacking and defensive option.

Moreover, Mushfiqur has to consider the fickle nature of his batting line-up when handling his bowlers. There have been times when the bowlers didn't have the time to have a considerable amount of rest before they had to bowl a second time in the game.

The result of this Test match or the ones that follow should not push the management into thinking that a batsman at No. 8 is necessary. It doesn't add strength to the line-up, it offers unwanted comfort. The Bangladesh top order is aggressive, so those batsmen being made to take on a bit of extra responsibility wouldn't hurt. A second innings chase or a final-day save could be one of those days when the No. 8 would be missed but the onus would fully be on the top seven, enough batsmen for any side.

Most importantly, it is not just runs that would win them a Test match. Five bowlers would give them more opportunities to take the 20 wickets that would actually get them closest to a Test win.

Mohammad Isam is ESPNcricinfo's Bangladesh correspondent. He tweets here

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • POSTED BY sirnayem on | October 10, 2013, 4:54 GMT

    Good to see that our team is now thinking out of the box! Best of luck boys.. lets do it!

  • POSTED BY jimbond on | October 10, 2013, 4:14 GMT

    In this test, they could have dropped one of the pace bowlers to make place for Mahmudullah. As to whether or not they need his batting at No. 8 or not, we will see in a day or so.

  • POSTED BY on | October 9, 2013, 21:59 GMT

    If you can't make runs by 7 batsman then you can't make runs by 8 batsman either. Anyways i elected tigers first eleven before the test match i knew that its gonna be spinning track and main point was Shakib came back after injury and he don't had practice match so if we depends on shakib a lot then its gonna be stupidity so give chance to Shohag and Razzak they are in good form and beside that Shakib will help them as a part time bowler and that's all they did our captain and coaching stuff and i am sure Tigers will get instant result in this test match.Good luck !

  • POSTED BY on | October 9, 2013, 21:55 GMT

    Too much experiment in selecting first eleven sometimes brings disappointment in the team members. Some talented players failed to continue consistency, but should not be excluded frequently.

  • POSTED BY AusieBangaleeShameem on | October 9, 2013, 20:16 GMT

    Good points are mentioned here. Thanks Isam.

  • POSTED BY ILoveMyBangladesh on | October 9, 2013, 20:04 GMT

    I totally agree that Bangladesh should play 5 bowlers....However, Mahmudullah should fit in those seven batsmen.

  • POSTED BY on | October 9, 2013, 19:41 GMT

    no anamul could have been easily removed by nayeem as he is far far beter than anamul.i think there is hardly a difference between batting no 2 and 3.even nayeem batted aS OPENER IN THE domestic cricket.............

  • POSTED BY on | October 9, 2013, 19:10 GMT

    well said by isam . its a good move for bd.

  • POSTED BY TwohedulAzam on | October 9, 2013, 18:12 GMT

    Excellent analysis by Isam, totally agree. Thats how test matches are won usually, it also shows Bangladesh is now matching the big boys in strategy and technique as they now have the batters who can be relied up on and bowlers who can match the strategy. I want to see Bangladesh in this line up from now on.

  • POSTED BY siponus2007 on | October 9, 2013, 18:03 GMT

    none of the 29 bangladeshi batsman didnt score more runs than mahmudullah , and he also a all rounder , and musfiq opted him out ?

  • POSTED BY sirnayem on | October 10, 2013, 4:54 GMT

    Good to see that our team is now thinking out of the box! Best of luck boys.. lets do it!

  • POSTED BY jimbond on | October 10, 2013, 4:14 GMT

    In this test, they could have dropped one of the pace bowlers to make place for Mahmudullah. As to whether or not they need his batting at No. 8 or not, we will see in a day or so.

  • POSTED BY on | October 9, 2013, 21:59 GMT

    If you can't make runs by 7 batsman then you can't make runs by 8 batsman either. Anyways i elected tigers first eleven before the test match i knew that its gonna be spinning track and main point was Shakib came back after injury and he don't had practice match so if we depends on shakib a lot then its gonna be stupidity so give chance to Shohag and Razzak they are in good form and beside that Shakib will help them as a part time bowler and that's all they did our captain and coaching stuff and i am sure Tigers will get instant result in this test match.Good luck !

  • POSTED BY on | October 9, 2013, 21:55 GMT

    Too much experiment in selecting first eleven sometimes brings disappointment in the team members. Some talented players failed to continue consistency, but should not be excluded frequently.

  • POSTED BY AusieBangaleeShameem on | October 9, 2013, 20:16 GMT

    Good points are mentioned here. Thanks Isam.

  • POSTED BY ILoveMyBangladesh on | October 9, 2013, 20:04 GMT

    I totally agree that Bangladesh should play 5 bowlers....However, Mahmudullah should fit in those seven batsmen.

  • POSTED BY on | October 9, 2013, 19:41 GMT

    no anamul could have been easily removed by nayeem as he is far far beter than anamul.i think there is hardly a difference between batting no 2 and 3.even nayeem batted aS OPENER IN THE domestic cricket.............

  • POSTED BY on | October 9, 2013, 19:10 GMT

    well said by isam . its a good move for bd.

  • POSTED BY TwohedulAzam on | October 9, 2013, 18:12 GMT

    Excellent analysis by Isam, totally agree. Thats how test matches are won usually, it also shows Bangladesh is now matching the big boys in strategy and technique as they now have the batters who can be relied up on and bowlers who can match the strategy. I want to see Bangladesh in this line up from now on.

  • POSTED BY siponus2007 on | October 9, 2013, 18:03 GMT

    none of the 29 bangladeshi batsman didnt score more runs than mahmudullah , and he also a all rounder , and musfiq opted him out ?

  • POSTED BY asiacricket1234 on | October 9, 2013, 17:23 GMT

    It'd be a plus for Bangladesh if all of them performs. I cant figure out why they keep picking Rubel is test? Hes useless. Al Amin or Nazmul could've been a better option. Shakib seemed out of form. Although he got a wicket he was leaking runs. So even though we had 4 bowlers out there only 3 of them put NZ under pressure.

  • POSTED BY on | October 9, 2013, 16:21 GMT

    Excellent point. Strategically it is a smart move considering the wickets that we use to have in BD as most of them are used to be flat for the first 2/3 days then start to slow down and start spinning. For the flat behavior, bowler like Razzak could be really handy who generally bowl a bit quicker in the air and firing the stumps which he showed today. And when the turf will start turning Shakib could be the key who can purchase turn and bounce by using his natural loop of bowling. In another context, it shows the thirst for win which is really pleasing to see. Thanks to the team management and the captain. Hope they will be paid off.

  • POSTED BY TheRisingTeam on | October 9, 2013, 16:14 GMT

    Interesting analyses. Totally agree that's how Bangladesh should go by their test line-up from now on. On pitches where its slow and low, Bangladesh should use 5 bowlers with 3 of them specialist spinners. Wickets with grass, 5 bowlers with 3 seamers this time and then you have the additional part-timers like Nasir, Naeem etc and this gives the captain lots of options and a realistic chance of taking 20 wickets. But pitches have to sporting rather than flat otherwise its pretty much pointless. But bowling in tests still needs to be consistently tight and accurate by the boys and that didn't happen as fluently today. It will also mean the specialist batsman in the side will value their wickets more rather like the article mentions leave it to the bottom order.

  • POSTED BY SyedAreYouDumb on | October 9, 2013, 16:14 GMT

    Very true! Bangladesh should get used to not playing an 8th batsman because thats very peculiar for any cricket team: amateur or professional. Now they can try and get those 20 wickets however it's only because Shakib is a quality bowler.

  • POSTED BY Samin on | October 9, 2013, 16:05 GMT

    Very well written. According to me, Bangladesh did above their average. Mushfiqur did a great job. Nice move by taking 5 bowlers which I thought before the match.

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • POSTED BY Samin on | October 9, 2013, 16:05 GMT

    Very well written. According to me, Bangladesh did above their average. Mushfiqur did a great job. Nice move by taking 5 bowlers which I thought before the match.

  • POSTED BY SyedAreYouDumb on | October 9, 2013, 16:14 GMT

    Very true! Bangladesh should get used to not playing an 8th batsman because thats very peculiar for any cricket team: amateur or professional. Now they can try and get those 20 wickets however it's only because Shakib is a quality bowler.

  • POSTED BY TheRisingTeam on | October 9, 2013, 16:14 GMT

    Interesting analyses. Totally agree that's how Bangladesh should go by their test line-up from now on. On pitches where its slow and low, Bangladesh should use 5 bowlers with 3 of them specialist spinners. Wickets with grass, 5 bowlers with 3 seamers this time and then you have the additional part-timers like Nasir, Naeem etc and this gives the captain lots of options and a realistic chance of taking 20 wickets. But pitches have to sporting rather than flat otherwise its pretty much pointless. But bowling in tests still needs to be consistently tight and accurate by the boys and that didn't happen as fluently today. It will also mean the specialist batsman in the side will value their wickets more rather like the article mentions leave it to the bottom order.

  • POSTED BY on | October 9, 2013, 16:21 GMT

    Excellent point. Strategically it is a smart move considering the wickets that we use to have in BD as most of them are used to be flat for the first 2/3 days then start to slow down and start spinning. For the flat behavior, bowler like Razzak could be really handy who generally bowl a bit quicker in the air and firing the stumps which he showed today. And when the turf will start turning Shakib could be the key who can purchase turn and bounce by using his natural loop of bowling. In another context, it shows the thirst for win which is really pleasing to see. Thanks to the team management and the captain. Hope they will be paid off.

  • POSTED BY asiacricket1234 on | October 9, 2013, 17:23 GMT

    It'd be a plus for Bangladesh if all of them performs. I cant figure out why they keep picking Rubel is test? Hes useless. Al Amin or Nazmul could've been a better option. Shakib seemed out of form. Although he got a wicket he was leaking runs. So even though we had 4 bowlers out there only 3 of them put NZ under pressure.

  • POSTED BY siponus2007 on | October 9, 2013, 18:03 GMT

    none of the 29 bangladeshi batsman didnt score more runs than mahmudullah , and he also a all rounder , and musfiq opted him out ?

  • POSTED BY TwohedulAzam on | October 9, 2013, 18:12 GMT

    Excellent analysis by Isam, totally agree. Thats how test matches are won usually, it also shows Bangladesh is now matching the big boys in strategy and technique as they now have the batters who can be relied up on and bowlers who can match the strategy. I want to see Bangladesh in this line up from now on.

  • POSTED BY on | October 9, 2013, 19:10 GMT

    well said by isam . its a good move for bd.

  • POSTED BY on | October 9, 2013, 19:41 GMT

    no anamul could have been easily removed by nayeem as he is far far beter than anamul.i think there is hardly a difference between batting no 2 and 3.even nayeem batted aS OPENER IN THE domestic cricket.............

  • POSTED BY ILoveMyBangladesh on | October 9, 2013, 20:04 GMT

    I totally agree that Bangladesh should play 5 bowlers....However, Mahmudullah should fit in those seven batsmen.