Bangladesh v New Zealand, 1st Test, Chittagong, 1st day

Five-bowler strategy a positive sign for Bangladesh

Playing five bowlers paid off for Bangladesh late on the first day in Chittagong, and it's a combination is likely to work better for them in Test cricket

Mohammad Isam in Chittagong

October 9, 2013

Comments: 15 | Text size: A | A

Abdur Razzak celebrates the wicket of Ross Taylor, Bangladesh v New Zealand, 1st Test, Chittagong, day 1, October 9, 2013
Five bowlers: the way to go for Bangladesh © AFP
Enlarge

Bangladesh's decision to field five bowlers is one that the team management should be encouraged to take more often. This Test was the second occasion when they tried out such a combination in the past four years, and they were rewarded instantly.

Shakib Al Hasan and Abdur Razzak got the late wickets of centurion Kane Williamson and Brendon McCullum to leave New Zealand on 280 for 5. The day mostly belonged to the visitors but, with the extra bowler, Mushfiqur dared to take the second new ball as soon as it was available. He wasn't intending to use both pacers at the time, but the harder, newer ball was always going to give the two left-arm spinners more bounce and a little more bite off the pitch.

The addition of Razzak was necessary. Effectively, he replaced Ziaur Rahman in the line-up, but the inclusion of Razzak actually kept Mahmudullah - who has been played as a specialist batsman in Tests recently - out. Mahmudullah's sudden lull in form - 34 runs in his last six Test innings - played against him. He insists that form isn't an issue as he has scored some runs in the Dhaka Premier League, but it is time for Mahmudullah to look for a different role.

As a specialist batsman, he has been employed at No. 8 for ten Tests out of the 17 he has played so far, between 2009 and the first Test against Zimbabwe last May. He has scored 591 runs at this position, including a century and four fifties, averaging 42.21 with a strike-rate of 60.80. The numbers seem fine but it is extremely rare for a team to play a specialist batsman that low down the order. In fact, none of the 29 players who have scored more runs than Mahmudullah there are specialist batsmen. Their stronger suit is bowling or wicketkeeping.

It was always a defensive move, but previous selectors have described it as a necessary move to insulate against top-order collapses. But what it has done in the past is offer too much comfort to the batsmen above Mahmudullah, resulting in him having to clean up the mess with the tail.

Instead, Razzak's presence in the attack means that Shakib can bowl freely and be used sparingly by Mushfiqur. This was probably the first time in the last five years that Shakib wasn't bowling when Bangladesh had spinners attacking from both ends. Sohag Gazi too could be used properly, despite bowling a long first spell.

Bangladesh played four and a half bowlers in their last Test also, which resulted in a 143-run win over Zimbabwe. Ziaur Rahman, who made his debut in that game batting at No. 8 and was asked to bowl his medium-pace, took four wickets in the second innings. Some called it a lucky move because Ziaur's bowling had lost its bite several years ago after a knee injury, but one extra bowler capable of even holding up an end matters for Bangladesh.

With only the four bowlers at his disposal, Mushfiqur often delays making attacking moves. The spinners are usually tired, trying to do both, maintain the run-rate and pick up wickets. The seamers are not fresh, as they have to toil with the old ball from one end. Shakib has had to plug away for 35-40 overs a day, often the only attacking and defensive option.

Moreover, Mushfiqur has to consider the fickle nature of his batting line-up when handling his bowlers. There have been times when the bowlers didn't have the time to have a considerable amount of rest before they had to bowl a second time in the game.

The result of this Test match or the ones that follow should not push the management into thinking that a batsman at No. 8 is necessary. It doesn't add strength to the line-up, it offers unwanted comfort. The Bangladesh top order is aggressive, so those batsmen being made to take on a bit of extra responsibility wouldn't hurt. A second innings chase or a final-day save could be one of those days when the No. 8 would be missed but the onus would fully be on the top seven, enough batsmen for any side.

Most importantly, it is not just runs that would win them a Test match. Five bowlers would give them more opportunities to take the 20 wickets that would actually get them closest to a Test win.

Mohammad Isam is ESPNcricinfo's Bangladesh correspondent. He tweets here

RSS Feeds: Mohammad Isam

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by sirnayem on (October 10, 2013, 4:54 GMT)

Good to see that our team is now thinking out of the box! Best of luck boys.. lets do it!

Posted by jimbond on (October 10, 2013, 4:14 GMT)

In this test, they could have dropped one of the pace bowlers to make place for Mahmudullah. As to whether or not they need his batting at No. 8 or not, we will see in a day or so.

Posted by   on (October 9, 2013, 21:59 GMT)

If you can't make runs by 7 batsman then you can't make runs by 8 batsman either. Anyways i elected tigers first eleven before the test match i knew that its gonna be spinning track and main point was Shakib came back after injury and he don't had practice match so if we depends on shakib a lot then its gonna be stupidity so give chance to Shohag and Razzak they are in good form and beside that Shakib will help them as a part time bowler and that's all they did our captain and coaching stuff and i am sure Tigers will get instant result in this test match.Good luck !

Posted by   on (October 9, 2013, 21:55 GMT)

Too much experiment in selecting first eleven sometimes brings disappointment in the team members. Some talented players failed to continue consistency, but should not be excluded frequently.

Posted by AusieBangaleeShameem on (October 9, 2013, 20:16 GMT)

Good points are mentioned here. Thanks Isam.

Posted by ILoveMyBangladesh on (October 9, 2013, 20:04 GMT)

I totally agree that Bangladesh should play 5 bowlers....However, Mahmudullah should fit in those seven batsmen.

Posted by   on (October 9, 2013, 19:41 GMT)

no anamul could have been easily removed by nayeem as he is far far beter than anamul.i think there is hardly a difference between batting no 2 and 3.even nayeem batted aS OPENER IN THE domestic cricket.............

Posted by   on (October 9, 2013, 19:10 GMT)

well said by isam . its a good move for bd.

Posted by TwohedulAzam on (October 9, 2013, 18:12 GMT)

Excellent analysis by Isam, totally agree. Thats how test matches are won usually, it also shows Bangladesh is now matching the big boys in strategy and technique as they now have the batters who can be relied up on and bowlers who can match the strategy. I want to see Bangladesh in this line up from now on.

Posted by siponus2007 on (October 9, 2013, 18:03 GMT)

none of the 29 bangladeshi batsman didnt score more runs than mahmudullah , and he also a all rounder , and musfiq opted him out ?

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Mohammad IsamClose
Tour Results
Bangladesh v New Zealand at Dhaka - Nov 6, 2013
New Zealand won by 15 runs
Bangladesh v New Zealand at Fatullah - Nov 3, 2013
Bangladesh won by 4 wickets (with 4 balls remaining)
Bangladesh v New Zealand at Dhaka - Oct 31, 2013
Bangladesh won by 40 runs
Bangladesh v New Zealand at Dhaka - Oct 29, 2013
Bangladesh won by 43 runs (D/L method)
Bangladesh v New Zealand at Dhaka - Oct 21-25, 2013
Match drawn
More results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days
Sponsored Links

Why not you? Read and learn how!