Bangladesh cricket January 31, 2014

Bangladesh cricket needs practical approach

Affected by the crushing loss to Sri Lanka and speculation over the proposed two-tier Test system, the BCB needs to appease the confusion of its players and adopt a pragmatic outlook
19

Every year since 2006, Bangladesh have had one very bad game. The one for 2014 has now come in their first international match of the year after Sri Lanka crushed them by an innings and 248 runs in the first Test in Dhaka.

The margin of loss, and non-stop speculation on the proposed two-tier Test system, has further made it an inconvenient defeat, particularly when all the talk is about the country's future in Test cricket. Bangladesh are No. 10 in the ICC rankings, making them one of two teams in danger of being relegated to the Intercontinental Cup from 2015 if the two-tier system is adopted.

For now, the threat is still only on paper. The ICC press release summarising the guiding principles of the Big Three's proposals on the January 28 did not contain the words 'demotion', 'relegation' or 'I-Cup'. But the effect of discussions, speculation, statements and board meetings had been seen in the lead-up to the Dhaka Test.

Two days before the game, Mushfiqur Rahim rightfully gave his views on the two-tier system and how it would affect the team. A few players, like Shakib Al Hasan, spoke briefly about their concern, while others, like Tamim Iqbal, joked about what their future would look like. Mushfiqur's statement was definitive.

The Bangladesh captain was worried, about the future of the team and about too much talk of other issues before a Test series. A similar thing had happened in March 2013 on Bangladesh's tour to Sri Lanka when the visiting side lost players to injuries and the hosts were uncertain of fielding a proper line-up due to a tiff over contracts with SLC. Bangladesh shut off the distraction and drew their first game against Sri Lanka in Galle. They even won their first ODI against Sri Lanka in Sri Lanka later on the tour. In Zimbabwe, however, Bangladesh faced poor training facilities, complained about it and lost the first Test by 335 runs.

After his statement against the proposed system, Mushfiqur was mocked in some circles. But the ICC's decision to grant Bangladesh Test status in 2000 or the BCB's continued apathy towards Test cricket is not his burden to carry. He is a salt-of-the-earth cricketer whose life has been devoted to the game.

There was half a chance that Bangladesh would be at their best against Sri Lanka because, in the past, they have reacted well when faced with difficult situations. However, one could not fault them if they were thinking of their future on the eve of a Test match. One would also have understood if the situation had worried them to the extent that the next morning, they picked three seamers, were put in to bat and lost four wickets before lunch.

From this point onwards, whether Bangladesh play more, or less, Test cricket will depend completely on the BCB's strengths in building relations with other boards. The team's performance would definitely be counted but given the climate in world cricket, diplomacy and finance are going to override how well the game is played.

Shamsur Rahman was making his Test debut, but it seemed the entire playing XI were just as nervous. They bowled poorly for the rest of the game and the captain led the way in dropping sitters. While this was happening, news from Dubai on the second day of the Test match suggested Bangladesh had been given the stay of execution and there was no direct threat to their status and international schedule. By then, however, Sri Lanka had run away with the game. In the second innings, all the batsmen looked like they wanted to be left alone but not out in the middle.

The day after the game, coach Shane Jurgensen called the ongoing draft proposal controversy during the Test match a case of "bad timing".

"There were a few distractions before the game which probably didn't help either, with the ICC thing," Jurgensen said. "More than just discussions, there was disappointment. It was bad timing for the whole thing to happen ahead of a Test match. At the same time, we are representing Bangladesh in international cricket, and we didn't play well."

There was a peculiar glare on the Bangladesh team throughout this game. While the seniors like Tamim, Shakib and Mushfiqur would know what it is like to play Test cricket when the rest of the cricketing world is questioning their status as a team, guys like Mominul Haque, Sohag Gazi and Al-Amin Hossain would have been oblivious of such a scenario.

Now the newcomers, too, would be feeling the burden of this pressure until Bangladesh rise in the Test rankings. For that Test matches have to be won, not something done by bowling dot balls or throwing wickets away.

The last week would have been hard for Mushfiqur, who takes some time letting go of things. The reaction to the statement on the two-tier system must have rankled him and he may even have regretted it. When he spoke after the game, Mushfiqur sounded stricken, but he was brave enough to take the blame, when the prevailing culture in Bangladesh cricket is to do the opposite.

From this point onwards, whether Bangladesh play more, or less, Test cricket will depend completely on the BCB's strengths in building relations with other boards. The team's performance would definitely be counted but given the climate in world cricket, diplomacy and finance are going to override how well the game is played.

Mushfiqur's team cannot stop being positive or stop trying to win Test matches. If they are disheartened by all the talk, they should imagine how the likes of Habibul Bashar, Mohammad Rafique and Mashrafe Mortaza played between 2001 and 2005. It was horrible, at times, but they held firm.

Since 2006, Bangladesh have started to win matches, first against lower-ranked or equal-strength sides, and gradually against higher-ranked teams. In each of those years, they have had one disaster, either in Tests or limited-overs matches. In 2006, it was the Brendan Taylor's last-ball six, followed by a New Zealand victory achieved in six overs in Queenstown.

The ICL player defection in 2008, defeat to Ireland in the 2009 World Twenty20s, the losses to Netherlands in 2010 and 2012 and scores of 58 and 78 in the 2011 World Cup were subsequent low points. Last year, Bangladesh suffered a 335-run loss to Zimbabwe, Mushfiqur resigned on the tour and the BPL corruption controversy erupted.

There could be more defeats for Bangladesh this year, as they have started off on the wrong foot. The optimists inside the dressing room, however, would see it as a customary blip that is now out of the way.

The BCB also needs to be proactive and appease its players rather than shooting them down for being vocal on issues. The board needs to talk to the players and explain what is happening and how it could affect them. A general sense of practicality is necessary and expected over the next couple of weeks in Bangladesh cricket.

Mohammad Isam is ESPNcricinfo's Bangladesh correspondent. He tweets here

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • on February 3, 2014, 6:39 GMT

    Bangladesh sud play for them self.I thought they just try to play for the spectators and gallery rather than get them self in and playing long innings..their fans simply dont understand what is test cricket is all about..

  • i_golam on February 2, 2014, 11:28 GMT

    One bad result / one bad loose / ... & ofcourse ... we saw some bad cricket from BD !! ... So what ? you may have all your condemnation for Bangladesh but one thing you should know that BD will snatch up real terms and will be among the best !!!

  • on February 2, 2014, 10:56 GMT

    coach should work with sort balls for batsman. BD player are suffering a lots with short ball.

  • on February 2, 2014, 5:55 GMT

    I dont understand where bangladesh cricket is actually going, why cant they ve constant with their performance,is it like luck works and they win.hopefully Icc doesnt stop them from playing anyways because hopefully someday bangladsh would play on their capabilities than luck!

  • on February 1, 2014, 23:38 GMT

    Here is a question for everyone: Nazmul Hussain's bowling average in test is 38 whereas Rubel Hussain's bowling average in test is 81! Why isn't Nazmul in the team? We all know he is not "injured" since he is playing in the NCL. Even Melinga doesn't pay test cricket. If Rubel Hussain was trying to be like Melinga, why is he playing test and making a horrific record for himself? And why is my account hasib9 not working? Is it because I said things against the so called big three? Do they run cricinfo as well?

  • tigerletsgo on February 1, 2014, 21:42 GMT

    I think the most practical approach would be is to drop out Tamim immediately; I think he is too much of a natural cricketer and should not be in a test selection. A test player must be circumspect and have the ability to be versatile as the situation demands. Tamim is a senior player only by the virtue of time and he does have some good shots which is only useful in ODI, but definitely he is not a test player. Rest of the team is cream of the crop for BD. Tamim seems to be one bad apple still remain in a barrel. Management must act soon before the second test in Chittagong. Otherwise he is the one will starts the slide.

  • Ontique on February 1, 2014, 9:04 GMT

    To JPNana: Get your facts right before commenting!! Didi you even watch Bangladesh play in last 2 years!!!? After winning 2 games in Asia cup, Bangladesh won series against West Indies (who came visiting Bangladesh Just after winning T20 World Cup), Defeated SriLanka in Srilanka (to draw the ODI series), Registered the highest test innings of last year (638 runs), whitewashed New Zealand in ODI series, Drew the test series.....Call all these flukes now! The fact is the opposite. Bangladesh is playing consistently now and the last game was just a bad game which can happen to any team. One bad game doesn't take away the achievements of last 2 years.Haters stay away please.....

  • King_Ravanaa on February 1, 2014, 7:45 GMT

    let me tell you clearly what's the problem Bangladesh really having. after two flukes in the last Asia Cup series not only the Bangladesh fans, but also their players aalso have become over confident. they thought they can beat anyone at anytime. you can clearly see it from their players certain statements and the comments of some bangali fans. but in reality they are still a lesser team, who showed few signs of improvement but yet in the same leaugue with teams like zimbabwe, ireland.. overconfidence is their biggest weak point. their worst perfomance in ODI's and Tests came against SL. but after they drew one game and, two recent flukes in ODI's they thought now they are in the leaugue of teams like SL, Pak, Ind etc. but i am sure now they fall in to their real status...

  • on February 1, 2014, 7:23 GMT

    BCB officials are after money, not cricket. they could have arranged one or two 4 day match against IRE to prepare for the series against SL. they need to change the captaincy to Shakib. Rahim is a good guy but not a good skipper. Bring mashrafee, forhad reza and mahmudullah to strength the batting as well as bowling area. play more 4 day matches. BCB could bring AFG to play in the BCL afte rthe t20 world cup. common BCB wake up and do something. Finally, play with this best 11: Tamim, Shamsur, Shakib, Mominul, Rahim, Nasir, Mahmudullah, Forhad reza, Gazi, Mashrafee, Robiul. 3 medium pacers and 3 spinners with 8 solid batsman. Gazi, mashrafee, and Robiul can stay at the crease too.

  • on February 1, 2014, 6:17 GMT

    Some off field issues may have hampered the player's concentration in that match but still they should have displayed better cricket in the 2nd innings. Nevertheless, let's move on to the 2nd test to see if the issues are that much serious.

  • on February 3, 2014, 6:39 GMT

    Bangladesh sud play for them self.I thought they just try to play for the spectators and gallery rather than get them self in and playing long innings..their fans simply dont understand what is test cricket is all about..

  • i_golam on February 2, 2014, 11:28 GMT

    One bad result / one bad loose / ... & ofcourse ... we saw some bad cricket from BD !! ... So what ? you may have all your condemnation for Bangladesh but one thing you should know that BD will snatch up real terms and will be among the best !!!

  • on February 2, 2014, 10:56 GMT

    coach should work with sort balls for batsman. BD player are suffering a lots with short ball.

  • on February 2, 2014, 5:55 GMT

    I dont understand where bangladesh cricket is actually going, why cant they ve constant with their performance,is it like luck works and they win.hopefully Icc doesnt stop them from playing anyways because hopefully someday bangladsh would play on their capabilities than luck!

  • on February 1, 2014, 23:38 GMT

    Here is a question for everyone: Nazmul Hussain's bowling average in test is 38 whereas Rubel Hussain's bowling average in test is 81! Why isn't Nazmul in the team? We all know he is not "injured" since he is playing in the NCL. Even Melinga doesn't pay test cricket. If Rubel Hussain was trying to be like Melinga, why is he playing test and making a horrific record for himself? And why is my account hasib9 not working? Is it because I said things against the so called big three? Do they run cricinfo as well?

  • tigerletsgo on February 1, 2014, 21:42 GMT

    I think the most practical approach would be is to drop out Tamim immediately; I think he is too much of a natural cricketer and should not be in a test selection. A test player must be circumspect and have the ability to be versatile as the situation demands. Tamim is a senior player only by the virtue of time and he does have some good shots which is only useful in ODI, but definitely he is not a test player. Rest of the team is cream of the crop for BD. Tamim seems to be one bad apple still remain in a barrel. Management must act soon before the second test in Chittagong. Otherwise he is the one will starts the slide.

  • Ontique on February 1, 2014, 9:04 GMT

    To JPNana: Get your facts right before commenting!! Didi you even watch Bangladesh play in last 2 years!!!? After winning 2 games in Asia cup, Bangladesh won series against West Indies (who came visiting Bangladesh Just after winning T20 World Cup), Defeated SriLanka in Srilanka (to draw the ODI series), Registered the highest test innings of last year (638 runs), whitewashed New Zealand in ODI series, Drew the test series.....Call all these flukes now! The fact is the opposite. Bangladesh is playing consistently now and the last game was just a bad game which can happen to any team. One bad game doesn't take away the achievements of last 2 years.Haters stay away please.....

  • King_Ravanaa on February 1, 2014, 7:45 GMT

    let me tell you clearly what's the problem Bangladesh really having. after two flukes in the last Asia Cup series not only the Bangladesh fans, but also their players aalso have become over confident. they thought they can beat anyone at anytime. you can clearly see it from their players certain statements and the comments of some bangali fans. but in reality they are still a lesser team, who showed few signs of improvement but yet in the same leaugue with teams like zimbabwe, ireland.. overconfidence is their biggest weak point. their worst perfomance in ODI's and Tests came against SL. but after they drew one game and, two recent flukes in ODI's they thought now they are in the leaugue of teams like SL, Pak, Ind etc. but i am sure now they fall in to their real status...

  • on February 1, 2014, 7:23 GMT

    BCB officials are after money, not cricket. they could have arranged one or two 4 day match against IRE to prepare for the series against SL. they need to change the captaincy to Shakib. Rahim is a good guy but not a good skipper. Bring mashrafee, forhad reza and mahmudullah to strength the batting as well as bowling area. play more 4 day matches. BCB could bring AFG to play in the BCL afte rthe t20 world cup. common BCB wake up and do something. Finally, play with this best 11: Tamim, Shamsur, Shakib, Mominul, Rahim, Nasir, Mahmudullah, Forhad reza, Gazi, Mashrafee, Robiul. 3 medium pacers and 3 spinners with 8 solid batsman. Gazi, mashrafee, and Robiul can stay at the crease too.

  • on February 1, 2014, 6:17 GMT

    Some off field issues may have hampered the player's concentration in that match but still they should have displayed better cricket in the 2nd innings. Nevertheless, let's move on to the 2nd test to see if the issues are that much serious.

  • on February 1, 2014, 3:32 GMT

    Guess we have to go play Pakistan in Pakistan. No one else seems interested in playing tests against the Tigers. Isam is on the money when he says that building bilateral ties is the best way to get test match experience. However the players have a critical role to play as well. If they keep playing their 'macho brand" of cricket, throwing wickets at will, then no number of test matches will help. One has to play more responsibly. aggression not backed by true ability, makes the aggressor look like a fool. Play responsibly; don't keep throwing away your wickets - that should be the advice to the team. Shane Watson is aggressive at the crease; but he can afford to be as he backs that up with solid numbers; solid technique; the same can be said of India's Kohli. Dhoni is always aggressive nad he backs that up with solid numbers, most of the time. Minus the runs, aggression is meaningless.

  • Ozcricketwriter on February 1, 2014, 2:10 GMT

    Bangladesh needs less test matches. They need to be cut out of the test arena until they are ready. Let other teams play against them only if they want to, not because they have to. This is what happened to Sri Lanka in the mid to late 1980s and it was incredibly good for them. Too many bad losses hurts Bangladesh's confidence and is bad for cricket overall as well. We need to get rid of the Future Tours Programme and replace it with bilateral agreements.

  • Cannuck on January 31, 2014, 22:16 GMT

    I think BD problem is they get carried away very easily. They want success right away, while other teams in similar stages of their cricket had to go through similar defeats & wait of their first wins. BD was lucky to win some matches in recent years, mostly because of the formats. ODI, T20 can be won by any side, given some luck on their side, & catching the opponents on a bad day. That ONE win does not equal to be in the same standards as others. Recently they beat NZ. Good for BD, but NZ is also not the mightiest team in the rankings. They won because there were NO expectations for them to win against NZ, unlike against SL who I believe every BD thought were closer to them in the standards and therefore an easy win. SL may be going through transitions, a corrupt board etc., but in reality their talent pool is much better. Also please do NOT give the excuse of NO TEST exp., cause SL knows about that better than BD, & yet their approach is better! So better luck BD, keep at it!

  • enayet on January 31, 2014, 21:05 GMT

    It's a very good piece of write-up. Mohammad Isam analyzed Bangladesh's recent defeat to Sri Lanka very well. These issues need to be addressed by the Bangladesh Cricket Board (BCB) immediately if they are to be a competitive test team in the cricketing world. They have to increase their negotiation skills that will help them to play test matches against the bigger oppositions. BCB needs right people to this end. I have no idea how competent the present set-up is.

  • Shajadul on January 31, 2014, 20:45 GMT

    Only 4/5 test match per year is not enough....it is already taking very long time for BD to improve. ICC and others needs to look at this matter seriously and provide more opportunity.

  • on January 31, 2014, 20:33 GMT

    aside the results Bangladeshi batsmen should try to bat in the test mode, hitting sixes and fours often and making the crowd happy don't do any good for them, Captain is the only batsmen who is willing to occupy the greese but the rest just fish outside off stump or play recklessly and get out, as a Sri Lankan this is sad to see, we love to see BD performing well like Pakistan did in the last game, not like India in the Nz though lol

  • on January 31, 2014, 20:08 GMT

    I have watched the whole match and it was painful. I think the team selection has been very poor, Farooque Ahmed (selector) kept on mentioning that the Mirpur pitch would offer more bounce and pace that's why the "three pacers", when was the last time any BD pacers contribute to anything in Mirpur. On the otherhand. under the same conditions, the SL bowlers got more bounce thus more wickets. We need a bowling coach, and talentless player like Rubel shouldn't be in the team. Selectors keep on saying, you can't judge a player based on short format, then how come Rubel and Shamsur are included in the team. It's unlikely Shamsur and Monimul will become quality test batsmen, they are technically flawed and don't have the mental toughness. What happened to unity of the team, it seems like everyone is running after personal glory???

  • S.R.Khan on January 31, 2014, 19:27 GMT

    The BCB needs to sit do with the team management, as well as development coaches, and figure out what to do about BD players' lack of test match temperament. One would have thought that regular NCL and BCL games over the past two years or so would have been adequate preparation to deal with longer-version cricket. Clearly, however, these two competitions have not yielded the right results. The powers that be need to go back to the drawing board and figure out who to put things right again.

  • on January 31, 2014, 18:07 GMT

    first of all we need more test match....... without playing enough how can we be a good side of test !!

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • on January 31, 2014, 18:07 GMT

    first of all we need more test match....... without playing enough how can we be a good side of test !!

  • S.R.Khan on January 31, 2014, 19:27 GMT

    The BCB needs to sit do with the team management, as well as development coaches, and figure out what to do about BD players' lack of test match temperament. One would have thought that regular NCL and BCL games over the past two years or so would have been adequate preparation to deal with longer-version cricket. Clearly, however, these two competitions have not yielded the right results. The powers that be need to go back to the drawing board and figure out who to put things right again.

  • on January 31, 2014, 20:08 GMT

    I have watched the whole match and it was painful. I think the team selection has been very poor, Farooque Ahmed (selector) kept on mentioning that the Mirpur pitch would offer more bounce and pace that's why the "three pacers", when was the last time any BD pacers contribute to anything in Mirpur. On the otherhand. under the same conditions, the SL bowlers got more bounce thus more wickets. We need a bowling coach, and talentless player like Rubel shouldn't be in the team. Selectors keep on saying, you can't judge a player based on short format, then how come Rubel and Shamsur are included in the team. It's unlikely Shamsur and Monimul will become quality test batsmen, they are technically flawed and don't have the mental toughness. What happened to unity of the team, it seems like everyone is running after personal glory???

  • on January 31, 2014, 20:33 GMT

    aside the results Bangladeshi batsmen should try to bat in the test mode, hitting sixes and fours often and making the crowd happy don't do any good for them, Captain is the only batsmen who is willing to occupy the greese but the rest just fish outside off stump or play recklessly and get out, as a Sri Lankan this is sad to see, we love to see BD performing well like Pakistan did in the last game, not like India in the Nz though lol

  • Shajadul on January 31, 2014, 20:45 GMT

    Only 4/5 test match per year is not enough....it is already taking very long time for BD to improve. ICC and others needs to look at this matter seriously and provide more opportunity.

  • enayet on January 31, 2014, 21:05 GMT

    It's a very good piece of write-up. Mohammad Isam analyzed Bangladesh's recent defeat to Sri Lanka very well. These issues need to be addressed by the Bangladesh Cricket Board (BCB) immediately if they are to be a competitive test team in the cricketing world. They have to increase their negotiation skills that will help them to play test matches against the bigger oppositions. BCB needs right people to this end. I have no idea how competent the present set-up is.

  • Cannuck on January 31, 2014, 22:16 GMT

    I think BD problem is they get carried away very easily. They want success right away, while other teams in similar stages of their cricket had to go through similar defeats & wait of their first wins. BD was lucky to win some matches in recent years, mostly because of the formats. ODI, T20 can be won by any side, given some luck on their side, & catching the opponents on a bad day. That ONE win does not equal to be in the same standards as others. Recently they beat NZ. Good for BD, but NZ is also not the mightiest team in the rankings. They won because there were NO expectations for them to win against NZ, unlike against SL who I believe every BD thought were closer to them in the standards and therefore an easy win. SL may be going through transitions, a corrupt board etc., but in reality their talent pool is much better. Also please do NOT give the excuse of NO TEST exp., cause SL knows about that better than BD, & yet their approach is better! So better luck BD, keep at it!

  • Ozcricketwriter on February 1, 2014, 2:10 GMT

    Bangladesh needs less test matches. They need to be cut out of the test arena until they are ready. Let other teams play against them only if they want to, not because they have to. This is what happened to Sri Lanka in the mid to late 1980s and it was incredibly good for them. Too many bad losses hurts Bangladesh's confidence and is bad for cricket overall as well. We need to get rid of the Future Tours Programme and replace it with bilateral agreements.

  • on February 1, 2014, 3:32 GMT

    Guess we have to go play Pakistan in Pakistan. No one else seems interested in playing tests against the Tigers. Isam is on the money when he says that building bilateral ties is the best way to get test match experience. However the players have a critical role to play as well. If they keep playing their 'macho brand" of cricket, throwing wickets at will, then no number of test matches will help. One has to play more responsibly. aggression not backed by true ability, makes the aggressor look like a fool. Play responsibly; don't keep throwing away your wickets - that should be the advice to the team. Shane Watson is aggressive at the crease; but he can afford to be as he backs that up with solid numbers; solid technique; the same can be said of India's Kohli. Dhoni is always aggressive nad he backs that up with solid numbers, most of the time. Minus the runs, aggression is meaningless.

  • on February 1, 2014, 6:17 GMT

    Some off field issues may have hampered the player's concentration in that match but still they should have displayed better cricket in the 2nd innings. Nevertheless, let's move on to the 2nd test to see if the issues are that much serious.