Bangladesh v England, 1st Test, Chittagong, 2nd day

Swann and Broad cement England's control

The Report by Andrew McGlashan

March 13, 2010

Comments: 16 | Text size: A | A

Bangladesh 154 for 5 (Tamim 81*, Shahadat 0*, Swann 3-40) trail England 599 for 6 (Cook 173, Collingwood 145, Pietersen 99, Bell 84) by 445 runs
Scorecard and ball-by-ball details


Paul Collingwood cut loose after reaching his hundred, Bangladesh v England, 1st Test, Chittagong, March 13, 2010
Paul Collingwood helped himself to 145 as England piled up a huge total © Getty Images
Enlarge

Graeme Swann and Stuart Broad shared five wickets as England built on a commanding batting display by reducing Bangladesh to 154 for 5 at Chittagong, but Tamim Iqbal at least provided some resistance with a combative, unbeaten 81. Paul Collingwood's 10th Test hundred, and a stand of 184 in 35 overs with Ian Bell, propelled the visitors' total to 599 for 6 and despite a counterattack by Tamim and Mahmudullah Bangladesh have a huge task to even take the game five days.

The match was crying out for an element of competitiveness from Bangladesh after an insipid performance in the field and Tamim's performance at least ensured the England attack weren't given as easy a ride as the batsmen. However, Swann's removal of Mahmudallah and Shakib Al Hasan before the close were huge blows for the home side who still need 246 to save the follow on

Tamim's 125 in the one-day series displayed the talent he holds, but if Bangladesh are to develop as a Test nation those innings have to be played over the longer format and Tamim's contest with the England attack became the most compelling part of the match. He impressively restrained his attacking instincts as the close approached and also had the technique to withstand the quicks.

That couldn't be said of his first two partners as Broad exploited a glaring weakness against the short ball to remove Imrul Kayes and Junaid Siddique in the 30-minute passage before tea following Alastair Cook's positive declaration. Both batsmen had no idea how to handle the short deliveries as Broad proved comfortably the quickest bowler of the match and extracted disconcerting lift.

When Swann continued his extraordinary knack of striking in his first over, removing Aftab Ahmed courtesy of alert anticipation at short leg by Bell and a dubious decision, Bangladesh were tottering on 51 for 3 and it was threatening to become a walkover. But Tamim was joined by Mahmudullah, who scored a maiden Test century on the recent tour of New Zealand to follow impressive contributions against India, and together the pair revived the innings with a stand of 94. The stand served as a reminder that once the Kookaburra ball loses its hardness wicket-taking proves hard work.

Tamim became the quickest Bangladesh player to pass 1000 Test runs - in 29 innings - as he reached a half century from 53 balls. The knock included a hooked six off Broad and he latched onto Steven Finn's first spell in Tests as a three-over burst cost 25.

Mahmudullah offered stylish support and justified his elevation up the order following the hasty reshuffle of the line-up after Raqibul Hasan's 'retirement'. He drove confidently through the off side, but the pick of his shots was a six straight against Swann. However, shortly after reaching fifty Swann had revenge when Mahmudullah gloved a sweep and a skilled set-up by the bowler did for Shakib who tried to drive inside-out.

Graeme Swann's first over magic

England paced their innings perfectly with Collingwood and Bell stepping on the gas to plunder the bowling in the afternoon. Collingwood struck a single boundary between his fifty and his hundred - and that appeared to deflect of pad rather than bat - but after reaching three figures off 157 balls he began to pepper the boundary in one-day style. Midwicket, both along the ground and in the air, is Collingwood's area and he toyed with the Bangladesh spinners.

So, too, did Bell although he has not made such easy runs since the 162 he plundered off Bangladesh during his third Test in 2005. The bowling was barely first-class standard, let alone Test quality. In contrast to Collingwood's rustic thumping, Bell was elegance personified as he regularly skipped down the pitch to counter the leg-stump line of the spinners and fed the ball through the off side with inside-out drives. He was given the chance to become the third century-maker of the innings but fell to a well-judged boundary catch which signalled the declaration.

That smart piece of work from Rubel Hossain at long off was the exception rather than the rule as the fielding disintegrated, while Mushfiqur Rahim continued to be a liability behind the stumps. Bangladesh had long-since given up the pretence of trying to bowl England out and it was clear from the start of play, when Shakib removed all the slips, that they were just waiting for the visitors to score as many as they wanted.

Cook ticked past his previous career-best of 160 against West Indies, at Chester-le-Street, last year but continued England's lack of double hundreds when he pulled a long hop back to the bowler. England's last was by Kevin Pietersen in 2007 and there have only been seven since Graham Gooch, Cook's mentor, hit 333 against India in 1990. But while the double eluded the new captain, a Test victory is well within his grasp.

Andrew McGlashan is assistant editor of Cricinfo

RSS Feeds: Andrew McGlashan

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by demon_bowler on (March 14, 2010, 4:04 GMT)

To Shonkhochil: Kevin Pietersen's mother is English. Jonathan Trott's family is of English descent and he holds a British passport. Craig Kieswetter's mother is Scottish and he holds dual British-South African nationality. Eoin Morgan comes from a country with close ties with the United Kingdom that does not itself play test cricket, which is why he chose to qualify for England. All four have served a period of qualification to play for England. How dare you claim that they have no right to represent their mother's country/ancestral country/adopted country? Try concentrating on the repeated failures of your own team rather than casting these unsporting insinuations. Bangladesh has a worse test team than when England toured there six years ago -- what's your answer to that?

Posted by   on (March 14, 2010, 2:10 GMT)

Oh dear , Sam_K14 , you are SO right , or should that be righteous . You state that B'desh have "never had world class anything" . Yeah , well that includes opponents , especially England . And there are no second prizes in a response.

Posted by PottedLambShanks on (March 13, 2010, 19:55 GMT)

I enjoy the fact that Andy Miller has, instead of trying to find some way of making us think England were lucky and Bangladesh were by far the better team, he has simply handed the report-writing duties to someone else.

Posted by benjer on (March 13, 2010, 19:52 GMT)

@Sam_K14,Sorry dear Do't start in this way Bangladesh just started to play good cricket & definetly they will improve a lot in future & have enough world class alrounder,Sppiner & Batsman as well & it would be take little time to perform regularly.Just you think abt India they have enough world class player in the team though they were a rubbish team for the away match even now also they are not be the world class team where they don't have the capability to perform regularly outside of the Asia specially in test cricket.just go back three years before & think abt their performence in Autralia,westindies,England,S.Africa,Newzeland!!Anyway if u r born in any country then you should be respect to that.Don;t tell anything Blindly pls ckeck properly to say something.Also pls compare last two years performence with the India.

Posted by shonkhochil on (March 13, 2010, 19:33 GMT)

@Sam_k14- this comment might seem a bit harsh to you but here are some facts.How many players of England came from a different country?! player that scored a century in second ODI where is he from? KP--where is he from? England were so desperate that they called an opener to play for the national team at the day he qualified for citizenship!! How many bad decision has umpire made in this series? In second ODI Rod Tucker saved England's batsman who scored a century at least twice.Third ODI Enamul Hoque gave Shakib out LBW where the ball was at least one foot oustide the off stump... ICC is using BD as the training ground for new umpires.. After playing so many years with a strong county cricket structure why England need to borrow player from other country? BD is a poor country & we don't have money to buy players!! If you don't like BD's game don't watch it.

Posted by shonkhochil on (March 13, 2010, 19:11 GMT)

@sam_k14-- I choose my team based on the player we have in our national league.It was just a point I wanted to make for the selectors of the Bangladesh team. about the world class comment I would request you to take a look at the ICC ranking of ODI bowler,ODI all rounder&test All rounder.hope you will find some good answer there.From the day Bangladesh got test status for some reason some guys started to 'bark' & still they are... Let me give you an example. how many test match have Sachin played? now add all the number of test match played by 11 players of bangladesh team.. total number of test played by 11 players of bangladesh is less than played by Sachin alone!! If you don't realize my point yet then answer one ques? when India knocked out from first round of last world cup what Indian people did? when SA lost to BD what did the people of SA did? they were angry but did they stop supporting or watching game? I am angry with BD performance but I will support BD with all my heart..

Posted by benjer on (March 13, 2010, 18:52 GMT)

I would like to draw the kind attention of our selector & boards pls do something better for Bangladeshi Supporter.Don't fight each other.We are well known about the capability of Shaharier Nafees in the opening slot & Alok kapali in the middle order position both are can play long Innings & their tecnic also very good better than the many other player of our current player of the team.So pls bring both of them for the second test match.Now our talented young captain feels lots preasure as he kepts lot of things in his mind now.He need to release from the captaicy as soon as possible for better concentrate in his natural performence.He looks very gllomy. We can select our team like in this way 01.Tamim 02.S.Nafees 03.Faisal Hossain 04.Kapali 05.Mahmudullah 06.Shakib 07.Musfique 08.Diman (Keepre)09.Enamul Jnr. 10.Shafiul 11.Shahadat.Musfique is totally unfit behind the wicket.Aftab,Naeem &Imrul totally unfare in in test cricket & Junaed have to take rest for few days.

Posted by   on (March 13, 2010, 18:44 GMT)

Why Enamul Haq jnr is neglected repeatedly. He is a genuine spinner with lot of variations in stock. At least he should have chance to prove whether he is capable of serving his class in Test matches.

Posted by Rezrocks on (March 13, 2010, 18:43 GMT)

nonsense, i have no words to express my feelings.

Posted by Sam_k14 on (March 13, 2010, 17:53 GMT)

@Shonkhochil, And you think the team you recommended will win a cricket match! No matter what you guys say, B'Desh is just an ordinary team and is not capable of playing test cricket. So dont bother making team recommendations and subsequent explanations. Find some other form of amusement than watching B'desh cricket. B'Desh should stick to playing county or club teams in other countries. They are not test cricket material. You had mentioned "world class all rounders" and "genuine batsmen" "pace bowlers" and "best wicket keepers" in your subsequent exoplanation. B'desh never had world class anything. You are making the team look more stupid than they already are!

Posted by Trigger_Tiger on (March 13, 2010, 17:22 GMT)

@ Barteey: In that case India in the 70s, New Zealand around the same time and then Sri Lanka in the 80s should have been turned out for the sake of sanity to prevail?

In a more serious note which pertains to the improvement of cricket and NOT making the game a monopoly where obviously teams like India will do good, but never be good enough to hold the top spot (I hope Dhoni can prove me wrong, I like the current Ind. Team) since the Aussies will always dominate followed by the ever-rising Saffies. Bangladesh has a good opener, and need to find another who can partner him well. They need a good number 3 and 4. And the pacers (who are decent but can get much better with a better bowling coach) need to improve their game a notch. The tailenders wag, so I have no complains with them and the spinenrs are quality. There is no doubt that we have good and potent batsmen who can deliver. But as we saw in the 3rd ODI against England, everyone needs to fire! If that happens, good for cricket!

Posted by shonkhochil on (March 13, 2010, 16:03 GMT)

This comment is only for my friend "Bharteey".. I believe 'Bharteey' rarely watches cricket match.. wants to turn out Bangladesh from ODI & test match ?? some people were talking about keeping Bangladesh away from test match which makes a bit sense but from ODI too?! great decision!! I guess you are scared that top money making team in the world will be kicked out from the first round of the world cup again because of a team like Bangladesh!! Why don't you check the score of last India Vs Srilanka test series? you will see now a days any test team can make 500 in first innings.. check out the last Bangladesh Vs India test series.. you will see a team like india can be bowled out by Bangladeshi bowling for 243!! this is test cricket.. it happens.. don't just make a comment because it's Bangladesh.. If you wanna criticize do it in a way that makes sense.. ICC is trying to globalize the game & you are trying to centralized.. good plan..best wishes...

Posted by   on (March 13, 2010, 15:40 GMT)

Still can't find any reason y Shahriar Nafees is not considered for test cricket..................where kayes,junaid,ashraful,aftab all lacks form and nafees goven chance only once where he scored 20+ in one of the innings and he is a good player

Posted by shonkhochil on (March 13, 2010, 14:05 GMT)

A bit explanation of my team. I guess no one will question the selection of Tamim,Kayes,Shakib,Mahmudullah & two pace bowler in absence of Mortaza.Let's talk about the rest. I haven't seen Junaid scoring runs for long time.He is a good player but a terrible fielder & I really think he needs a break. Why picking Faisal hossain or Jahurul Islam? Jahurul is already in the team.He is the highest scorer in recently finished league & Faisal is one of the top three scorer in two consecutive season in Bangladesh first class league.Alok kapali is a class batsman, he can bowl too.He is experienced & will fit great in the team. Enamul Haque jr is very good spinner for the test match.He has a lot more variation than Razzak.I will keep Musfiq as a batsman. Dhiman is the best wicket keeper I have ever seen in Bangladesh.Great reflex. So I have 4 genuine batsman(tamim,Imrul,jahurul,Musfiq) 3 class allrounder( Shakib,Mahmud,Alok) 1 genuine spinner(Enamul) a great wicket keeper & two pace bowlers..

Posted by Bharteey on (March 13, 2010, 14:04 GMT)

Bangladesh should be turned out from one day and test matches along with Zimbabwe for some sane cricket to prevail.

Posted by shonkhochil on (March 13, 2010, 13:43 GMT)

I would like to do a difficult job today. I will select the Bangladesh team for the second test match for free!! 1- Tamim Iqbal 2- Imrul Kayes 3- Jahurul Islam/ Faisal Hossain 4- Alok Kapali 5- Mahmudullah 6- Shakib-Al-Hasan 7- Musfiqur rahim 8- Dhiman Ghosh (wkt keeper) 9- Enamul Haque jnr 10- Shahadat Hossain 11- Rubel Hossain. A free advise for our young skipper..please conc on your game & performance other than criticizing boards & players. I have a batting line up long enough upto number 8. one specialist wicket keeper who will do far better than Mushfiq. two world class all rounder. one genuine longer version spinner and two fast bowlers.

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Andrew McGlashanClose
Andrew McGlashan Assistant Editor Andrew arrived at ESPNcricinfo via Manchester and Cape Town, after finding the assistant editor at a weak moment as he watched England's batting collapse in the Newlands Test. Andrew began his cricket writing as a freelance covering Lancashire during 2004 when they were relegated in the County Championship. In fact, they were top of the table when he began reporting on them but things went dramatically downhill. He likes to let people know that he is a supporter of county cricket, a fact his colleagues will testify to and bemoan in equal quantities.
Tour Results
Bangladesh v England at Dhaka - Mar 20-24, 2010
England won by 9 wickets
Bangladesh v England at Chittagong - Mar 12-16, 2010
England won by 181 runs
Bangladesh A v England XI at Chittagong - Mar 7-9, 2010
Match drawn
Bangladesh v England at Chittagong - Mar 5, 2010
England won by 45 runs
Bangladesh v England at Dhaka - Mar 2, 2010
England won by 2 wickets (with 7 balls remaining)
More results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days