Bangladesh v England, 2nd Test, Dhaka, 4th day March 23, 2010

Predictable Bangladesh lose their focus

The fourth day in Dhaka was a sadly predictable affair as the home side stewed of believed injustices and England tried not to think of home
32

The penultimate day of England's tour of Bangladesh was a destitute day of cricket. It began with one team looking back in anger, still frothing with indignation after Monday's umpiring controversies, while the other looked forward with eagerness to their flight home and a break from the touring grind. The net result was that the present passed by in a fog of indifference, dropped like a Jonathan Trott sitter - embarrassingly but, for the visitors at least, not half as costly as it ought to have been.

It was all so hopelessly predictable. Bangladesh awoke to a screed of inflammatory headlines - "Umpires for the Empire?" being the best of them - and duly performed as if their excuse for failure had been pre-packaged. England, meanwhile, happily accepted the six-wicket gifts that came their way, but even if you accept Trott's calamity as an aberration, they still allowed three further opportunities to go begging, and required a deflection off Alastair Cook's toe to extract the Chittagong roadblock, Junaid Siddique, for 34.

Before the start of the match, Kevin Pietersen had admitted how important it was for England to maintain their concentration right up to the last delivery of the series. "We often don't finish tours the way that we would like," he said. "We sort of veer off at the end of a series because we want to get home, because we travel so much. The key to the team this week is to really make sure we grind it out here and get a good victory."

Will this count as a "good victory" if England manage to wrap the contest up on the final day? Not especially. It will be a face-saver at best, and who knows what would have happened had Tamim Iqbal made the most of the three opportunities that he, of all batsmen, was afforded before he had reached his second fifty of the match. That he could not capitalise on his let-offs spoke volumes for the mood in the Bangladesh dressing-room. Emotion got the better of the squad - and most culpable of all was the coach, Jamie Siddons, who was fined for his outburst on the third afternoon. With their equilibrium tilted, a familiar meltdown ensued.

When asked if Bangladesh were still feeling aggrieved at the umpiring, their top-scoring debutant, Jahurul Islam, could barely hold himself back. "It's right," he said. "We were working hard yesterday and if you don't give out one specialist batsman, then you may not get the second chance. They didn't give out Matt Prior, he scored 62, then same mistake for [Tim] Bresnan, and he scored 91. If we had got those two wickets, they might have been bowled out for 275 to 300 runs. Then we would have been in a strong position."

But all of that was yesterday's news, and Bangladesh's failure to refocus was dispiriting. For all the progress that they have made in recent times, they still cannot do anything about arguably the most damning statistic in world cricket, their draw count. In 66 completed Tests since November 2000, they have secured a stalemate in just six matches - and four of those owed everything to the weather.

Only twice - once at Gros Islet against West Indies in 2004, and then seven months later at home to Zimbabwe - have Bangladesh played out the full distance in a five-day Test match, which is an awful record, even allowing for the greater speed at which contests are played these days. New Zealand, the side that is always cited when excusing their shortcomings, may have taken 45 Tests and 26 years to record their first victory, but they still managed to draw exactly half of their matches leading up to that breakthrough performance at Auckland in 1956.

Before you can learn how to win, you have to know how not to lose - and that, incidentally, was the lesson that Nasser Hussain was forcing upon England in the winter of 2000-01, at exactly the time that Bangladesh were playing their inaugural Test. After bossing the opening exchanges, Bangladesh had a real opportunity to claim a moral victory, by gritting it out in this match, much as Junaid and Mushfiqur Rahim had done for four-and-a-half hours in Chittagong last week. It can still be done with a bit of tail-end resistance and a few hours of tidy bowling, but unless they can instigate an overnight mood transplant, another contest is sure to bite the dust tomorrow.

"It was looking very easy at the end. I could have played a big innings easily if I had been more careful and stopped playing shots," said Jahurul, who epitomised the loss of focus when he was drawn into a loose drive on 43, to be bowled through the gate by Graeme Swann. "You can always hope in cricket, and you never know, it's still possible, but if we could have ended the day with four wickets down, that would have been good. Those last two wickets were too much for us."

"I think four quick wickets tomorrow and we chase 150 and win, that's how I see it," said Tim Bresnan, who had a right to be upbeat after a career-best 91 and a diligent spell of 1 for 21 in nine overs. "We'll see how it goes but that's how we've set it up. We will be chasing a total, I have a feeling about that, especially after getting the key wicket of Mushfiqur. We've got a nightwatchman in tomorrow and then Naeem [Islam], who'll hang in a bit, but if we can get them out, we are sniffing a win."

Andrew Miller is UK editor of Cricinfo. Go to http://twitter.com/miller_cricket to follow him on Twitter through the England tour of Bangladesh.

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • aasife_gong on March 24, 2010, 6:02 GMT

    Mr. Miller, lets see how England will cope with the heat of Ashes in Australia. In Australia they will become just like Bangladesh. Did you forget the 5-0 humiliation in 2006-07? That team had Flintoff and Straus and other key players. If a different tier test system is introduced, no doubt England will be with Bangladesh.

  • gungchiil on March 24, 2010, 3:21 GMT

    I know people do a lot of home work, paper work, net work - from all their activities. I believe somebody has a gr8 insight of cricket. But when human being are biased they do the mistakes by knowing them not only in cricket but also in lives. But Mr. Miller is nothing but an Englishman!!

  • imissnapser on March 24, 2010, 1:57 GMT

    sl always, good article andrew miller. our problem is, we're as predictable as our team. same people were granting you knightship for your articles about tamim, and junaid, and shakib. nobody is denying the fact that there were some umpiring mistakes on day three. that doesnt make up an excuse why a team scoring 400+ in the first innings, slumps to 176-6. argue the three unlucky outs, but forget the three lucky breaks aswell, why dont we. bangladesh is making progress, no doubt. slowly, but surely for sure. you have to give the team the due respect, but at the same time digest the criticism that we deserve of our own doing.

  • tpjpower on March 24, 2010, 0:53 GMT

    What doesn't kill you makes you stronger. If Bangladesh can come through this with their dignity intact they'll be significantly better equipped as a team to deal with hardship and frustration. These boys play exciting cricket and the world wants to see them succeed. Make no mistake, England are a good side; for Bangladesh to match them and even put them under plenty of pressure in this series shows how much the Tigers have improved. Good luck to the Bangla boys!

  • MirajAhmmod on March 24, 2010, 0:48 GMT

    Mr. Tombaan, according to your theory, only top ranked one test playing nation should play test, not the followers. BD is ranked 10, but 10 out of 250 countries. If you fail to distinguish BD from Ireland, Canada, Zimbabwe, you should go back to cricket to learn more, sorry to say in that way. Why don't you ban WI when they are defeated by BD and Zimbabwe? BD was continuously defeated by innings and in 3/4 days, now they can fight up to 5 days, can threat professional teams with a draw chance - this is because they are playing test cricket. I don't know, how far it's a good decision to restrict test cricket among the top nine nations (why not 10, 12, 15?). In that sense, football (soccer) is less discriminatory than CRICKET. No worries, BD will overcome, just wait, shortly.

  • on March 24, 2010, 0:46 GMT

    @tombaan

    naa mate. Bangladesh has one of the current top allrounders in the team, top bowlers too!! they are way ahead of Ireland (is that a team? they dont have top players), canada and zimbawe are still not upto the level!!!

  • Bengali-Tiger007 on March 24, 2010, 0:45 GMT

    Its not BD at fault here that they are losing, any team can be dishearted and perform even worse then them. But I give full credit to my BD team for their courage and fight back. Eng should have been all out for less than 300, but its not our fault at all because the two umpires were wearing the England shirt underneath their white coat!!!! By the way, to all the Eng fans who are talking nonsense in this forum, please go else where. We are not push overs and we do not tolerate racism either. Even if you guys win, you'l all know that it wasn't a fair win and for that reason you all should be ashamed. BD won this match and we all know that. Another thing, we don't need to be told how to improve, The best teams in the world like India don't have express pace bowlers, infact they have world class medium pace bowlers like Zaheer & co. Rubel and Shaf are still very young, they will be top bowlers one day providing that the BCB don't mess them about. BD is better, hahahahahah!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • on March 23, 2010, 23:57 GMT

    I don't think he's being biased or cruel, I think Mr Miller feels let down, as do I. Having lauded, and clearly loved Bangladesh, he's clearly disappointed that they've let their heads drop and to lose their profesionalism. I think profesionalism is the key word, because that's what this young side lacked today. Cleary distraught over the yesterday they gave up, and it's something no team should do. I hoped, and I think Mr Miller thought, that Bangladesh were better than that. After all a draw would be a huge thing, it would show real fight and grit and resolve, something the critics all say they lack. Come on Shakib and Bangladesh, bat the day, show the critics their wrong and show some true grit and profesionalism, you're country needs you. P.S please stop accusing the English of being rascist, I know you're angry but the days of Empire and imperial thought are dead, it's time we all moved on. We're all better than that. Thank you :).

  • _NEUTRAL_Fan_ on March 23, 2010, 23:40 GMT

    Tamim needs to lead Bangladesh in mental strength. Test cricket at times is very very unforgiving. They cannot afford to wilt when they get sledged or they get a bigger slice of the bad decisions. When you look at Tim Bresnan and Vettori and even Dhoni, they are not the most talented bats around, especially Bresnan but I guarantee you, if you give them a reprieve...they WILL most times cash in. Tamim was dropped 5 times in the match and didn't cash in, Rahim got a 50/50 chance going his way (as usual since his height gives the impression of balls going clean over) BUT GOT OUT SOON AFTER. You've got to be stronger mentally to survive. Mayb decisions cost them a win BUT they shouldn't cost them a draw. Again they are at the mercy of Eng playing poorly/poorer to have any chance in the game BUT there is hope for the team to learn from experiences 1nce they r persisted with. @supersaiyan Eng were rightly murdered game 4 vs SA because they were totally outplayed not cause of 1 decision.

  • KnightBD on March 23, 2010, 23:27 GMT

    Very surprised to see you show your true color before you even leave Bangladesh Mr. Andrew Miller. I can give you at least 4 umpiring decision against us in this test mach, how can you give? any??? Still you call it a fair game? twisted.

  • aasife_gong on March 24, 2010, 6:02 GMT

    Mr. Miller, lets see how England will cope with the heat of Ashes in Australia. In Australia they will become just like Bangladesh. Did you forget the 5-0 humiliation in 2006-07? That team had Flintoff and Straus and other key players. If a different tier test system is introduced, no doubt England will be with Bangladesh.

  • gungchiil on March 24, 2010, 3:21 GMT

    I know people do a lot of home work, paper work, net work - from all their activities. I believe somebody has a gr8 insight of cricket. But when human being are biased they do the mistakes by knowing them not only in cricket but also in lives. But Mr. Miller is nothing but an Englishman!!

  • imissnapser on March 24, 2010, 1:57 GMT

    sl always, good article andrew miller. our problem is, we're as predictable as our team. same people were granting you knightship for your articles about tamim, and junaid, and shakib. nobody is denying the fact that there were some umpiring mistakes on day three. that doesnt make up an excuse why a team scoring 400+ in the first innings, slumps to 176-6. argue the three unlucky outs, but forget the three lucky breaks aswell, why dont we. bangladesh is making progress, no doubt. slowly, but surely for sure. you have to give the team the due respect, but at the same time digest the criticism that we deserve of our own doing.

  • tpjpower on March 24, 2010, 0:53 GMT

    What doesn't kill you makes you stronger. If Bangladesh can come through this with their dignity intact they'll be significantly better equipped as a team to deal with hardship and frustration. These boys play exciting cricket and the world wants to see them succeed. Make no mistake, England are a good side; for Bangladesh to match them and even put them under plenty of pressure in this series shows how much the Tigers have improved. Good luck to the Bangla boys!

  • MirajAhmmod on March 24, 2010, 0:48 GMT

    Mr. Tombaan, according to your theory, only top ranked one test playing nation should play test, not the followers. BD is ranked 10, but 10 out of 250 countries. If you fail to distinguish BD from Ireland, Canada, Zimbabwe, you should go back to cricket to learn more, sorry to say in that way. Why don't you ban WI when they are defeated by BD and Zimbabwe? BD was continuously defeated by innings and in 3/4 days, now they can fight up to 5 days, can threat professional teams with a draw chance - this is because they are playing test cricket. I don't know, how far it's a good decision to restrict test cricket among the top nine nations (why not 10, 12, 15?). In that sense, football (soccer) is less discriminatory than CRICKET. No worries, BD will overcome, just wait, shortly.

  • on March 24, 2010, 0:46 GMT

    @tombaan

    naa mate. Bangladesh has one of the current top allrounders in the team, top bowlers too!! they are way ahead of Ireland (is that a team? they dont have top players), canada and zimbawe are still not upto the level!!!

  • Bengali-Tiger007 on March 24, 2010, 0:45 GMT

    Its not BD at fault here that they are losing, any team can be dishearted and perform even worse then them. But I give full credit to my BD team for their courage and fight back. Eng should have been all out for less than 300, but its not our fault at all because the two umpires were wearing the England shirt underneath their white coat!!!! By the way, to all the Eng fans who are talking nonsense in this forum, please go else where. We are not push overs and we do not tolerate racism either. Even if you guys win, you'l all know that it wasn't a fair win and for that reason you all should be ashamed. BD won this match and we all know that. Another thing, we don't need to be told how to improve, The best teams in the world like India don't have express pace bowlers, infact they have world class medium pace bowlers like Zaheer & co. Rubel and Shaf are still very young, they will be top bowlers one day providing that the BCB don't mess them about. BD is better, hahahahahah!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • on March 23, 2010, 23:57 GMT

    I don't think he's being biased or cruel, I think Mr Miller feels let down, as do I. Having lauded, and clearly loved Bangladesh, he's clearly disappointed that they've let their heads drop and to lose their profesionalism. I think profesionalism is the key word, because that's what this young side lacked today. Cleary distraught over the yesterday they gave up, and it's something no team should do. I hoped, and I think Mr Miller thought, that Bangladesh were better than that. After all a draw would be a huge thing, it would show real fight and grit and resolve, something the critics all say they lack. Come on Shakib and Bangladesh, bat the day, show the critics their wrong and show some true grit and profesionalism, you're country needs you. P.S please stop accusing the English of being rascist, I know you're angry but the days of Empire and imperial thought are dead, it's time we all moved on. We're all better than that. Thank you :).

  • _NEUTRAL_Fan_ on March 23, 2010, 23:40 GMT

    Tamim needs to lead Bangladesh in mental strength. Test cricket at times is very very unforgiving. They cannot afford to wilt when they get sledged or they get a bigger slice of the bad decisions. When you look at Tim Bresnan and Vettori and even Dhoni, they are not the most talented bats around, especially Bresnan but I guarantee you, if you give them a reprieve...they WILL most times cash in. Tamim was dropped 5 times in the match and didn't cash in, Rahim got a 50/50 chance going his way (as usual since his height gives the impression of balls going clean over) BUT GOT OUT SOON AFTER. You've got to be stronger mentally to survive. Mayb decisions cost them a win BUT they shouldn't cost them a draw. Again they are at the mercy of Eng playing poorly/poorer to have any chance in the game BUT there is hope for the team to learn from experiences 1nce they r persisted with. @supersaiyan Eng were rightly murdered game 4 vs SA because they were totally outplayed not cause of 1 decision.

  • KnightBD on March 23, 2010, 23:27 GMT

    Very surprised to see you show your true color before you even leave Bangladesh Mr. Andrew Miller. I can give you at least 4 umpiring decision against us in this test mach, how can you give? any??? Still you call it a fair game? twisted.

  • KnightBD on March 23, 2010, 23:23 GMT

    @ tombaan ... this once again shows the arrogance of vanity from a team who are sinking in cricket ranking with time. Bangladesh will beat England blindfolded in next World Cup.

  • dulabari on March 23, 2010, 22:27 GMT

    Few comments on ststistics on draws: -Initially new Zeeland used to play 3 day and 4 day Tests. There was no requirements of 90 overs/day bowling. Also other teams used to send weak teams there. Once England sent two teams to Australia and New Zeeland at the same time. Besides there were no pressure of expection, media, and other commercial stuff. In other words it was much easier to draw then. But I agree with you that Bangladesh must learn how to draw a test match first.

  • Md_Alimoor_Reza on March 23, 2010, 21:38 GMT

    Mr. Miller, When there are injustice in umpiring, in addition to poor performance of English batting, you report articles in a nonchalant manner. Surprisingly, I noticed the 3rd day bulletin of the BD vs ENG test match was the 3rd headline of the cricinfo front page, whereas usually they cover the story as headline. This is so disheartening. But now when Bangladesh falls short of the average performance of a 4th innings batting you are so vociferous. This is ridiculous. You should be impartial as a journalist at least unlike your fellow countrymen commentators. Even if Bangladesh does not win this match I should give them 100% credit for playing and coming back over an over again in a match so shockingly biased[in terms of umpiring].

    Finally, when you guys leave Bangladesh if you are not going to say anything nice, don't say anything at all about Bangladesh's improvement. By the way, I have to admit I was a follower of you [in twitter, flickr, last but not the least cricinfo].

  • ZsZs on March 23, 2010, 21:07 GMT

    One more thought - The 4 draws that were curtailed by weather: Umpiring Decisions are acts of God as well. Out of the players hands. Bangladesh should have played around such acts, but a sense of grievance is hard to overcome. Especially when it is a series of acts, and not one. A good match got spoiled by acts of God or gods in this case, or demi-gods. The books may call it whatever they please, but we shall remember what happened.

  • on March 23, 2010, 21:06 GMT

    andrew miller shouldn't be writing anymore articles. he needs to get back to his mind and not think anything one-sided. time has changed.english team never been to a bright side. eventhough they invented so many game. its quiet obvious to everyone they don't know how to win. if they dont learn how to judge people with evenly attitude and fairness. they will remain a loser side forever.take care miller

  • albion1 on March 23, 2010, 20:37 GMT

    Bangladesh is and young side and have been impressive at times. There is some real talent there. Lack of concentration is inevitable and following such a series of poor decisions I think any team would have suffered. It's depressing that umpires do seem to favour the 'big' teams sometimes. One thing is for sure, if the selectors show patience Bangaldesh can be genuinely competitive in time - more fast medium bowlers are needed, and experience abroad is imperative. I would like to see the domestic competitions in England, Australia and South Africa invite Bangladeshis to take part.

    I write as an Englishman but good luck Bangladesh.

  • on March 23, 2010, 20:36 GMT

    change tone with changed situation!! Quality.

  • baula on March 23, 2010, 20:15 GMT

    First break 'em with bunch of wrong decisions then tag 'em as predictable. How convinient. I still believe they won the game irrelevant of the outcome of the match.

  • islam_saif on March 23, 2010, 19:39 GMT

    But Mr Muller, If we show you the past and as if past is more glorious then you may say "please give the example of recent time and forget about past". This is how some people react when the opposition sides are doing well. We know very well Bangladeshis past is not glorious and we believe one day you say "Please give the recent example". In that day may be Umpires for the Empire victims may not exactly Bangladesh may be for Canada/Zimbabwe or may surprisingly England who knows??? Coz Cricket Ranking always goes on Recent time not searching the history. So it is very much predictable may in future England will placed in 9th rank position and Crying for Umpires good! Judgments.

  • Bang_La on March 23, 2010, 19:03 GMT

    To Michael Bigg: No, Tamim thrashed English bowlers, who we call street-bowlers. The legendary Swann had an economy rate of 9 at that point. You, and no son of any Englishman would admit on face now but ask the burnt marks during the embarassment he caused. Tamim exposed the lower-than ordinary English cricket side who can not take control of a game without umpires' aid. And they claim they play cricket for 100 years! What a joke :) RIP.

  • supersaiyaan on March 23, 2010, 19:02 GMT

    England lost to south africa by innings in d last match of dat series jst bcoz of one bad decision.d cot behind appeal against graeme smith which was referred but only to be turned down by daryl harper.england were furious after dat incident n as a result of dis daryl harper has been omitted by d icc frm umpiring in t20 world cup.we can all guess wats his fate goin to be. if only 1 bad decision can turmoil englands focus frm d game n been defeated by an innings;dn wat else to be expected frm d young blood of bdesh?dey hv suffered for more dan one(or 5) occassions.its hard 2 imagine wat dey r goin thru. But gud 2 see d tigers r still on d field n fighting hrd n avoided innings defeat(unlike englnd did against SA). bdesh are lot tougher dan englnd.

  • tombaan on March 23, 2010, 18:56 GMT

    This again proves why Bangladesh should not be playing test matches. They are in the same slot like Ireland, canada, Zimbabwe etc....

  • ZsZs on March 23, 2010, 18:30 GMT

    Mr Miller, why such volte-face regarding a side that you were extolling for the last 3 days? The umpires made consistent biased decisions, and you have just made it clear that you belong to the elitists who would see that the status quo of test cricket is not tainted, even at the expense of a tainted process. I was proud of your writing with the descriptive way you write, even told my 8th grade son that Miller knows the art of writing. Ahh, now I see that it was for your own benefit, your ego is alive and well, and your writing was not for the benefit of journalism. I hope that you can return to your unbiased writing again.

  • on March 23, 2010, 18:23 GMT

    I'm a big fan of Bangladesh cricket team, I only watch the match of Bangladesh team. I don't see IPL at all. But I still believe Bangladeshi players lose their pationate so easily, test cricket is totally a psychological game like chess, and our players need to be pationate. They have to work hard to make things happen in their favor.

  • Iftekharul_Hasan_Siam on March 23, 2010, 18:10 GMT

    it is very unfortunate to see a team loosing opportunities due to very poor umpiring.teams like bangladesh do not score even above 300 regularly.so,when once a year they do this it really bring good opportunities for them but every times it is the umpires who are killing the chance of winning the match.yes england is winning this test but i will not give them even half-credit.

  • Nipun on March 23, 2010, 17:22 GMT

    Excuse me Miller,the umpiring howlers in this match have been of considerably more effect than that much hyped Sydney 2008.Nobody at that time focussed on INDIA LOSING THEIR FOCUS !!! Come on,open your eyes,broaden your mind-if you still think that it is possible to focus after what happened in the 1st 3 days of this tests-rather,throughout the whole s Bangladesh have been murdered,remember Eoin Morgan & Prior saved in the 2nd ODI & Sakib's promise murdered in the 3rd ODI-then you must be kidding !!!

  • mujahidul on March 23, 2010, 16:56 GMT

    Jamie siddons' fine only reminds me that "Boss is always right, no one is allowed to question." Since ICC failed to ensure a fair game they have lost a big cricket fan like me. Who knows? maybe they didn't loose only me they might have lost thousands of cricket fans. I don't think I'll watch this boring game in near future. I wasted my sleepless nights watching cricket, but the umpires broke my heart. Good bye cricket!!

  • on March 23, 2010, 16:43 GMT

    not so easy Mr. Bresnan, England could be the stepping stone for Bangladesh to begin their rise in the test cricket world. lets wait the 26 years before we can judge Bangladesh.

  • Bang_La on March 23, 2010, 15:56 GMT

    Dear Andrew, I reckon this is your last piece on Bangladesh soil and you will be hurrying to catch Albion-bound plane in the afternoon. Hope your stay was comfortable and wish you a safe trip. Thanks for visiting us.

    Cricket is a mind game and Bangladesh have been convincingly defeated in that game. They may have now been smacking lips for those 150 odd runs contributed by Hill and Tucker to English scorecard, but its useless. There is no place having IFs in sport. Now, as I see the change of tune in your own writing, the whole British media will be all over Bangladesh cricket-playing abilities like Dalmatians to rip into pieces thus giving wind to Morgan's two-tier test league. There is no one I see who could go to archive and cite the frustrations and nervousness resonated in English minds and how they blamed Cook's inept captaincy! This was all England's faltering, nothing from dogged Bangladesh. Such is English success-story.

    Adios bang_la@excite.com

  • on March 23, 2010, 14:33 GMT

    "Top-scoring debutant"... Oops, does Tamim's innings not count?

  • mendicant on March 23, 2010, 14:08 GMT

    Couldn't agree with you more about needing to learn how to draw first. It's a stepping stone seemingly forgotten by the team and fans alike. Although the umpiring in this match has been cruel, and the ICC and their protection of poor umpiring is a sham, Bangladesh needs to act like a professional team and man up in these situations.

  • on March 23, 2010, 13:56 GMT

    Sad, but 100% agree. For the want of win, we forgot the bottom line: defend, and stay at the crease.

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • on March 23, 2010, 13:56 GMT

    Sad, but 100% agree. For the want of win, we forgot the bottom line: defend, and stay at the crease.

  • mendicant on March 23, 2010, 14:08 GMT

    Couldn't agree with you more about needing to learn how to draw first. It's a stepping stone seemingly forgotten by the team and fans alike. Although the umpiring in this match has been cruel, and the ICC and their protection of poor umpiring is a sham, Bangladesh needs to act like a professional team and man up in these situations.

  • on March 23, 2010, 14:33 GMT

    "Top-scoring debutant"... Oops, does Tamim's innings not count?

  • Bang_La on March 23, 2010, 15:56 GMT

    Dear Andrew, I reckon this is your last piece on Bangladesh soil and you will be hurrying to catch Albion-bound plane in the afternoon. Hope your stay was comfortable and wish you a safe trip. Thanks for visiting us.

    Cricket is a mind game and Bangladesh have been convincingly defeated in that game. They may have now been smacking lips for those 150 odd runs contributed by Hill and Tucker to English scorecard, but its useless. There is no place having IFs in sport. Now, as I see the change of tune in your own writing, the whole British media will be all over Bangladesh cricket-playing abilities like Dalmatians to rip into pieces thus giving wind to Morgan's two-tier test league. There is no one I see who could go to archive and cite the frustrations and nervousness resonated in English minds and how they blamed Cook's inept captaincy! This was all England's faltering, nothing from dogged Bangladesh. Such is English success-story.

    Adios bang_la@excite.com

  • on March 23, 2010, 16:43 GMT

    not so easy Mr. Bresnan, England could be the stepping stone for Bangladesh to begin their rise in the test cricket world. lets wait the 26 years before we can judge Bangladesh.

  • mujahidul on March 23, 2010, 16:56 GMT

    Jamie siddons' fine only reminds me that "Boss is always right, no one is allowed to question." Since ICC failed to ensure a fair game they have lost a big cricket fan like me. Who knows? maybe they didn't loose only me they might have lost thousands of cricket fans. I don't think I'll watch this boring game in near future. I wasted my sleepless nights watching cricket, but the umpires broke my heart. Good bye cricket!!

  • Nipun on March 23, 2010, 17:22 GMT

    Excuse me Miller,the umpiring howlers in this match have been of considerably more effect than that much hyped Sydney 2008.Nobody at that time focussed on INDIA LOSING THEIR FOCUS !!! Come on,open your eyes,broaden your mind-if you still think that it is possible to focus after what happened in the 1st 3 days of this tests-rather,throughout the whole s Bangladesh have been murdered,remember Eoin Morgan & Prior saved in the 2nd ODI & Sakib's promise murdered in the 3rd ODI-then you must be kidding !!!

  • Iftekharul_Hasan_Siam on March 23, 2010, 18:10 GMT

    it is very unfortunate to see a team loosing opportunities due to very poor umpiring.teams like bangladesh do not score even above 300 regularly.so,when once a year they do this it really bring good opportunities for them but every times it is the umpires who are killing the chance of winning the match.yes england is winning this test but i will not give them even half-credit.

  • on March 23, 2010, 18:23 GMT

    I'm a big fan of Bangladesh cricket team, I only watch the match of Bangladesh team. I don't see IPL at all. But I still believe Bangladeshi players lose their pationate so easily, test cricket is totally a psychological game like chess, and our players need to be pationate. They have to work hard to make things happen in their favor.

  • ZsZs on March 23, 2010, 18:30 GMT

    Mr Miller, why such volte-face regarding a side that you were extolling for the last 3 days? The umpires made consistent biased decisions, and you have just made it clear that you belong to the elitists who would see that the status quo of test cricket is not tainted, even at the expense of a tainted process. I was proud of your writing with the descriptive way you write, even told my 8th grade son that Miller knows the art of writing. Ahh, now I see that it was for your own benefit, your ego is alive and well, and your writing was not for the benefit of journalism. I hope that you can return to your unbiased writing again.