August 17, 2007

West Indies cricket

Lessons from a salvo

ESPNcricinfo staff

Vaneisa Baksh

'Let me check that out' - Bennet King talks to Ramnaresh Sarwan during training, St Kitts, June 21, 2006
 © AFP
Enlarge

RELATED LINKS

Recent comments by West Indies captain Ramnaresh Sarwan while he was in Toronto for therapy for his shoulder injury have raised eyebrows and set tongues wagging. Sarwan was reported to have called former coach Bennett King the "worst coach" he had ever had, and to have said King's manner was aggressive and intimidated younger players.

Much speculation has been raised over the timing of Sarwan's remarks, especially as King had returned to Australia a couple of months ago. Had Sarwan been waiting for the new administration to be assembled before airing his gripe? It seems more likely that Sarwan was simply responding to a pointed question and his remarks were neither premeditated nor part of some unfolding strategy.

His history alone reveals the likeliness of this: Sarwan is a chatterbox and will talk freely once he gets going. Perhaps the acupuncture treatment made him more relaxed and inclined to greater frankness, but it is unlikely that he has been biding time and planning a hit.

Yet hit he did. Not only at Bennett King, towards whom his remarks were scathing, but also at his former captain, Brian Lara. Sarwan was bitter as he spoke of the circumstances under which he was dropped for the second Test against Pakistan at Multan in 2006.

"I was in the dressing room on the morning of the Test preparing to go out for batting practice when Brian approached me and said I was not playing," he recounted. "I was very shocked, but I said nothing and went out to do some batting drills. I don't think my omission was justified. I was very angry because there was no specific reason given for the decision to drop me. It made me understand that the sport is also about politics and that people would do what's necessary to accomplish their own goals, whatever that might be. It was a very humiliating experience, but I think it has made me stronger as a person."

The incident was one Lara had explained as aimed at sending a message to Sarwan to help him improve his game. Indeed, reports were circulating behind the scenes that Sarwan's behaviour at the time was arrogant and that he heeded no one.

Was it appropriate to tell him on the morning of the Test that he was not playing? He was not the first to have been summarily dropped, but surely he was not clueless about the impact of his behaviour. Remember, Clive Lloyd had been asked (after Garry Sobers was unavailable) to come out to join the team to help with player relations.

Sarwan's ego was reasonably wounded by the cut. With many non-cricket months under his belt since, one expects that he would have revisited the circumstances mentally and tried to assess the situation from a distance. If he has done so, and still arrives at the conclusion that his being dropped was a politically motivated move to facilitate other people's goals, that says a great deal about Sarwan, about his relationship with Lara, and about the general atmosphere in which these players huddle (or don't).

Sarwan's criticism of King follows similar statements, notably by Marlon Samuels, about the relationship between coach and players. Perhaps Sarwan's claims are true about King's manner being rough, but then there is also the question of how rough is rough. I don't doubt that Sarwan believes what he says. I also think there is evidence that the players have not been inclined to regard coaching instructions, and those concerning nutrition and physical fitness, with respect. Some months ago a physio's report was circulated that cited some serious slackness within the outfit in each of these areas.

Sarwan himself is not known to be keen on training. In the same Toronto interview he spoke of his ambivalence as he went after the ball, attempting to field which he injured himself. "I wanted to dive earlier, but by the time I realised I was very close to the boundary, I lunged forward and fell awkwardly. Looking back, it was obviously not the right thing to do."

Is it that they are not trained on how to slide and dive, or is it that they ignore the training? Coaches galore have come and gone, most complaining that they cannot get the team to comply. Even Malcolm Marshall threw up his hands in despair. Is it a coach problem, a team problem, or the inability of both sides to understand each other's roles and responsibilities?

Sarwan may have inadvertently started another debate over what ails West Indies cricket. Whether his remarks were intemperate or not should not cloud the issue because, right or wrong, he has communicated quite clearly that these flawed relations are as much to blame for poor performance as anything else. The new board would do well to address that, rather than seek to employ the old method of disciplining the messenger.

Mathew Varghese is sub-editor (stats) at Cricinfo

RSS Feeds: Mathew Varghese

© ESPN EMEA Ltd.

Posted by ricardo on (August 25, 2007, 15:13 GMT)

Both players ,coach and the wibc are resposible for this downfall in discipline senior players began showing indiscipline and were excused because of their excellent contribution to the team, this did not happen overnight with sarwan or King this situation was building up for years but blinded by performance when west indies cricket hit the bottom then we all decided oooops something is wrong!

For the players quit complaining and begin playing cricket, show stats then complain.

Posted by anil on (August 25, 2007, 2:34 GMT)

west indies players have to forget about the money. play hard cricket, play for pride.like in the 70s, 80s and early 90s.

Posted by r s. dasai Maryland USA on (August 24, 2007, 23:49 GMT)

Training and respect for authority are a must for the players and the game. No one is bigger than the game as Kippins would say. Remember, the more one trains, the more his luck improves.

Posted by Evance Hector on (August 19, 2007, 11:24 GMT)

I have read quite a few of the letters about Sarwan's comments.I find it rather interesting just how many people are for or against what is reported that He said,also the Writer of the article.Friends,I would just ask that we all calm down,and realise that Cricket is a wonderful game,the Championship goes around. We had a very long time of being the Best team in the world,and now the mantle is past on to another Nation.I do not like it,but that's the reality. What I am sad about,is that when we were at the top,our Administrators did not invest in our Game and put in place that which was needed to produce more Brilliant Cricketers to fill the places vacated by the Greats of our Team of the Seventies and Eighties.This was shortsitedness, hence our demise so dramatically.As of now we have a wonderful opportunity, to build on the Legacy of the world Cup.I am looking forward to see that the Administration,takes up the challenge,make the necessary changes and I believe that our wonderful Talents will come through,and make West Indies Great again.Keep the Faith friends,and encourage our lads,do not stand for slackness,soon our Team will be world Beaters again.Stay Blessed.

Posted by rrmy on (August 19, 2007, 11:14 GMT)

The WI players should be made to read the comments coming in from WI fans. They will soon see that blaming the coach, Board etc is not fooling the WI public. Mouthings such as recently reported from Sarwan are only intended to deflect the fact that this current generation of WI players dos not want to put in the work necessary to perform at the highest level. They want to be paid like proffesionals but be allowed to perform like amatuers. Mr Sarwan, if you don't perform (do your job) in the real world you get fired. Think about it.

Posted by Keith Benson on (August 19, 2007, 7:30 GMT)

I first saw the WI play in Australia in 1968 as a young lad. I have followed WI cricket since. I have noticed major shift in attitude since the early 1990's. It is like the players feel they are above the game and can do what they want when they want to, irrespective of the effect on the team. Many of the players feel they are bigger and more important than the team and they shouldn't have to do what the others do. Lara was a classic. Samuels, Sarwan, Gayle and others also fit into this category. They are more concerned for themselves than the team and WI cricket. Many of those very players have as much potential as many of the previous great WI players but it is attitude that finally shows whether you make it or not. These guys all fall short. The likes of Sobers, Lloyd, Richards, Walsh, Marshall, Hall, Holding, etc have all expressed some disappointment with the players of the recent era. The guys of the 1990's and 21st century that I have named [and some others not named] are not interested in the best for WI cricket or the team. If they were they would be committed to their own fitness and their attitude would be one of seeking to give their all for the team all the time and not playing for themselves or their averages or the money. WI cricket somehow needs to find a way through this or it will continue to drop further behind the rest in Test cricket. Politics must stop affecting decisions being made. The coach needs to be given freedom to prepare the team in what he feels is the best way and then is supported by the WI board. WI players have become too big for their boots, or put another seemingly bigger than the game/the team. You can't win the game of cricket that way. If Sarwan continues as captain he must lead by example and get serious about conditioning and a work ethic so different to his past years in cricket. Otherwise step aside now and let someone else lead the team who will give his all for the team - like Walsh did.

Posted by Horace Gopeesingh on (August 19, 2007, 0:00 GMT)

Both Sarwan and Samuels have demonstrated time- after-time their lack of discipline and purpose. These players are paid very well. They need to be fit and fully prepared to eat right, train hard and put on their best performance. They need to EARN their pay. Wasn't Lara the "water boy" on his first tour to England when the EXPERTS felt he was too young to play.

Posted by Deo on (August 18, 2007, 18:59 GMT)

Too much is made out of this Sarwan fiasco. Everyone has the right to express their views on any particular situation. This state of WI cricket rest directly with the WI cricket board of control. They sadly lack communication skills. This has filtered down the chain. Don't blame Sarwan. Lara, Sarwan, Ganga or Gayle - whoever is chosen to lead a team must not only be good at batting or bowling. These are important but the most important are these qualities: Good communicator Excellent leadership qualities The ability to influence the thinking and behaviour of people Be able to lead while maintaining control. Many of us think we are leaders but the fact remains the we can't even force a toad to hop.

Posted by Sonny on (August 18, 2007, 18:42 GMT)

If, the employee does not respect his employer than there wont be any work done.As for coaches they has the sole responsibility to get their team in a wining condition. All blame is rest on the coach when his team loses. As for discipline,What's going to happen in the Gayle case?What are we going to say we need him?. That's the root of our problem. And Lara,was for Lara.When he made runs,we lose.

Posted by Jamoz on (August 18, 2007, 18:30 GMT)

This not just a coach/player problem. This was something that had been brewing for many many years through a lackadaisical board.

These same players lack the discipline that our former players had. The cricketing landscape has changed. Where once players could play first class cricket in England they can no longer do so and with a poor regional system it leaves our players technically weak.

The current players also don't seem to understand that playing against England or Australia is the pinnacle. I remember hearing some years ago that the very same Sarwan said he saw playing against England was "just another series". These players don't play for the thrill or the kill, they play for money and money alone. They can't understand why it was so important to beat England.

As long as the board doesn't change to create a more competitive playing environment then we'll stay where we are.

Comments have now been closed for this article

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Mathew Varghese
Sub-editor (stats) After graduating in Economics from St Xavier's College, Mathew Varghese did a journalism course before joining Cricinfo. Born and brought up in Bombay, Mathew thought hailing from the same city as Sachin Tendulkar would automatically make him inherit some of the genius. Sadly, besides a low grip on the bat handle, he acquired nothing else. He still dreams of being the perfect cricketer - a Bradmanesque batsman who can blend aggression with dour defence; a bowler who can perform the roles of McGrath, Lee and Warne; a fielder in the Jonty class; and a captain-cum-coach with an unprecedented record.

All articles by this writer