Mike Holmans November 7, 2008

True colours

There is still a long way to go before we achieve a society in which ethnicity is irrelevant in Britain, but little by little we are moving towards the more perfect union

The election of Barack Obama prompts a thought or two. Before he could become the first African-American President of the USA, smaller mountains had to be climbed by other African-Americans. Long before there could be a black president, Jackie Robinson had to be the first black major league player in baseball, our sister bat-and-ball-sport.

Professional sport is one of the things which drives ethnic integration in a society. In the end, teams which want to win will hire the best players no matter what colour they are. Bigoted fans who initially object eventually come round when the “wrongly” coloured player keeps winning games for them, and so society gradually evolves.

The English population contained very few non-white people until the government encouraged large-scale immigration from the Caribbean and South Asia after World War II. Those immigrants’ children grew up in England, and by the late 1970s some naturally became good enough at cricket to be hired by counties.

When Roland Butcher, Norman Cowans and others were picked for England in the early 1980s, a number of people choked on their gin-and-tonics and said these players were not English and should not be playing for England. In one sense they had a point because the players had not been born here, but the true nature of their objection was proved by them not protesting about, for instance, the Zambia-born Phil Edmonds. The press was full of articles debating what it meant for English cricket, what it meant for the national identity and so on.

In 1998, an enlightened friend and I were discussing the merits of Nasser Hussain and Mark Ramprakash, the two obvious candidates to replace Alec Stewart as the next captain of England. A thought struck us. The next captain of England would be a man with brown rather than pink skin. That in itself did not seem particularly remarkable to us: what caused us to feel good about it was that we could not see that anyone would turn a hair – and we were right. When Hussain was appointed, even the right-wing newspapers failed to run any splenetic diatribes, and most pieces which commented on his being the first non-white England captain had a tone of slight surprise that it hadn’t happened before.

Yorkshire were very slow to hire non-white players. Until 1991, the county insisted that their players had to have been born in Yorkshire, which clearly prevented them hiring non-white overseas players, but there were strong suspicions that the county were deliberately ignoring players who were born in Yorkshire but had surnames like Patel or Choudhury rather than Illingworth or Sidebottom.

The club stoutly maintained that it was not so, but a lot of the Yorkshire fans were very happy that Asian-descent cricketers were not progressing through the county’s ranks. I remember having an unpleasant conversation in about 1985 with a man we’ll call Seth, who was proud he never left the borders of Yorkshire if he could possibly help it and wanted all the immigrants to go back home.

Last season, Seth was sitting with some of his cronies at a table in the Long Room at Headingley, and I overheard part of their conversation as they grumbled about the uselessness of the Yorkshire team this year.

“Nay, nay,” Seth was saying, “yon Rashid’s no bloody immigrant. ‘E were born in Bradford, and ‘e’s got a Yorkshire accent just like thee.”

There is still a long way to go before we achieve a society in which ethnicity is irrelevant in Britain, but little by little we are moving towards the more perfect union of which the President-elect spoke so movingly back in March.

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • testli5504537 on September 8, 2012, 20:16 GMT

    Feb. 24, 2006 First PostPosted by GlennHi Sue and Dave, Just a few lines to say hello. The Blog looks great. It allows polepe to comment on each entry you make,(which is what I am doing now). You can control who can comment through your control panel. You can set it so that anyone can comment, or just selected friends our you can completely turn off the comment facility so that no one can comment.Kind regards Glenn

  • testli5504537 on August 13, 2010, 4:15 GMT

    Pretty nice site you've got here. Thanks for it. I like such topics and everything connected to this matter. I definitely want to read more on that blog soon.

    Avril Smith

  • testli5504537 on November 11, 2008, 5:52 GMT

    "...the true nature of their objection was proved by them not protesting about...the Zambia born Phil Edmonds". Yes, well...ofcourse. We all know that Edmonds could've enjoyed a prolific international career with Zambia don't we? (roll eyes).

    "...even the right wing newspapers failed to run any spenetic ditribes". You mean indulging in the kind of clumsy stereotype of the kind I've just quoted? But you're right: They didn't now did they? So do you care to revisit your own prejudice and change your mind about them?

    Come on. If a society can change then so can an individual...You can: Can't you?

  • testli5504537 on November 10, 2008, 4:34 GMT

    I don't think so, Karno. Just looking at the surnames of the Australian team for the last 10 years tells you that several players have had at least a little bit of non-Anglo blood - it's just that most people don't bother to think of them as anything other than Australian. That's before we get to state players with Chinese, Greek, Portuguese and Pakistani origins. As the biggest group of non-Anglos in Australia with a cricketing heritage, perhaps we would expect to see more South Asians, but actually they are only a bit more than 1% of the population, compared with 5.5% in UK. (Note also that cricket is less popular among Anglos in UK - and NZ? - than in Aus.)

    SA is another matter altogether - whites are a minority and the issue is more whether others want to play the game than selection, especially with quotas.

  • testli5504537 on November 9, 2008, 4:43 GMT

    Sport can unite a nation even in the darkest hour. Sadly the reverse is also true. I'm sure Seth's case is an example of the former.

    I have to say cricket in Australia is facing the racial card. Its rare to see a non-anglo (let alone non-white) in the cricket system. Compare that to the Rugby,Football, NRL and even the Olympic squad where at least 30% are non-white. Thats why Symonds has been a blessing in that regard. In comparison NZ have produced (or borrowed in Deepik Patel's case) a fair few non-whitess despite the smaller population. South Africa no doubt leads the way but thats because of their history. Until recently India didn't have many players outside a few geographical areas either. The Windies are another one where they've played sub-continent backgrounds and even the inclusion of a white player in the standford twenty20 practice game. Not sure about the rest.

  • No featured comments at the moment.