September 6, 2012

Indian cricket

Should Sehwag change his batting position in Tests?

Mohan Cudali Shridhar
Virender Sehwag hits out during his 38 off 33, India v New Zealand, 2nd Test, Bangalore, 4th day, September 3, 2012
Sehwag opening the batting may be the best option  © Associated Press
Enlarge

RELATED LINKS

Age inevitably slows down hand-eye co-ordination; high-risk batting and consistency are mutually exclusive on testing pitches; proactive decision making with the future kept in mind is the need of the hour. These are some of the many rather sound arguments being made in favour of Virender Sehwag dropping down the batting order in Test cricket. Pragmatic as it may sound, is it the most productive decision for the Indian team and for Sehwag himself? I'm not convinced it is. There are a few reasons why Sehwag partnering Gambhir at the top of the order remains the best option for India.

Firstly, a move down the order is not directly proportional to a fertile yield of runs in Sehwag's case. The swinging ball did trouble him in England but he did enter that series with one shoulder and one eye. Over the course of his career, Sehwag hasn't displayed a significant vulnerability against the new swinging red ball. He either compensates for the swing with his superhuman hand-eye coordination or compels the bowlers to stray from the fourth stump line.

As a matter of fact, he relishes the hard new ball coming on to his bat. Hence, protecting him from the swinging ball is not a dire necessity. In other words, if Sehwag bats at 4 or 5, it'd be unwise to expect his average to suddenly skyrocket.

Secondly, it's not very often that Sehwag gets dismissed for ducks or scores below 10 - 15. When he comes off, he has an impressive conversion rate. But, even when he doesn't he often gets quickfire 30s and 40s. The value of these knocks is perennially downgraded and the thing most remembered in such innings is his atrocious modes of dismissals. But, the fact that he consistently propels his team to starts of 60/1 - 70/1 goes unheralded. Home and away, a decent platform for the No. 3 batsman to walk in will never be a meager contribution.

The crucial aspect here is that he provides such starts in innings that are regarded as failures. How often do we get to see a batsman who makes a vital contribution to the team in failure? Conversely, a quickfire 30 from a No. 4 batsman fails to have nearly the same kind of effect as it does when it comes at the top. Assuming that Sehwag will bat at No.4 the same way he does at No.1, his bursts of strokeplay will cease to have the same value they currently possess.

On a contemplative note, does Sehwag really intend to be a middle-order batsman? "It's tough opening the innings after fielding for a day". These were his words when once interviewed after a tiring day of Test cricket. Fitness has never been Sehwag's forte. The generous waistline and leisurely running between the wickets indicate a general disregard to the importance of fitness. The question however is - Does Sehwag want to be a middle-order batsman because he believes he will find more success there or does he want to demote himself down the order because he thinks it'll be more comfortable? I suspect that the latter is the answer and the latter is just not good enough a reason for the balance of the team to be altered.

Finally, is there a better replacement available? Murali Vijay came, Murali Vijay went. Abhinav Mukund arrived, Abhinav Mukund faded away. Neither managed to leave a lasting impression. Ajinkya Rahane is waiting in the wings. To his credit, he does have an enviable domestic record to back him. But neither is he as battle hardened in the shorter formats as Virat Kohli nor has he grabbed international opportunities as desperately as Cheteshwar Pujara. Moreover, he's been batting No. 3 for Mumbai in the previous few Ranji seasons. The current "wait and watch" approach the team management is using with Rahane seems appropriate, not unjust.

Rahane aside, there is not a single opener knocking on the selector's doors. So, is there really a better alternative? Be it the following eight Tests against England and Australia or be it South Africa 2013, Sehwag in my opinion should continue opening the innings for as long as he continues to play Test cricket.

© ESPN EMEA Ltd.

Posted by BG Prasad on (November 28, 2012, 7:34 GMT)

A very well written article. Yes Sehwag should be out. His only strength is the “HEC “hand eye…….At any position he plays needs this which is weaning. So obviously, he cannot succeed at low down the batting order. Who else will replace is immaterial, as they say old order giveth and the new order taketh over. Samis true of SRT.

Posted by Leslie Soares on (October 8, 2012, 18:04 GMT)

If Sehwag wants to go down the order, there are very few options available. The current lot of openers are Gambhir (poor recent performances) Vijay (found unsuitable) Mukund (not capable) Rahane (not encouraged & given opportunities) & Jaffer (ignored though experienced but stated not to be considered due to age factor.)

Then try someone out of the hat

Posted by AA Sheik on (September 11, 2012, 13:19 GMT)

Shewag must be allowed to open the innings as it is better for the team. If he strikes he stirkes gold. It is good for the team. If he gets out quickly again it is good for the team as they can plan and execute properly with the remaining batsmen depending on target on hand (either to achieve or to set). Bringing him down the line will allow an element of inconsistancy still prevaiing in the team as no one knows whether he will strike or not.

Posted by Krishnan Anand on (September 11, 2012, 12:09 GMT)

Wholeheartedly agree. Sehwag playing down would mean a major let off for rivals as they do fear him. A Sehwag in good form means anything from 80 to 120 odd runs in about 15 to 20 hours. This is irrespective of venue, attack, etc.

With an average that most batsmen can only dream of, it is really only a matter of time before our Impact man regain form. Already there is evidence of it that one saw in the last test against Australia and the few innings against the Kiwis back home.

Sehwag has tendency to talk casually now and then. Let us not take him that seriously. He will deliver sooner than later.

Krishnan Anand

Posted by AS on (September 11, 2012, 8:00 GMT)

I believe its time that Shewag along with Tendulkar should retire from all sorts of international cricket and allow the youngsters to play enough matches before the world cup 2015 in Australia. I don't see either of the two going on to play the world cup 2015.

Posted by R.S.Kumar on (September 10, 2012, 11:23 GMT)

In test match conditions a 60 or 70/1 in 10-12 overs is not warranted although there is no denying the way Shewag treats some of the world class bowlers with utter disdain and a treat to watch for any Indian fan. Having said that if only Shewag converts his oft scores of 30-40 to some where around 60-70 with a slightly lesser degree of careful assault (which he certainly can if he tries) there is absolutely no denying why he should not open the innings.

Posted by Ninad on (September 10, 2012, 2:31 GMT)

According to me the test team should look like this: 1.Gautam Gambhir 2.Virender Sehwag 3.V.Kohli 4.S.Tendulkar 5.C.Pujara 6.Yuvraj Singh 7.M.Dhoni 8.R.Ashvin 9.Z.Khan 10.I.Sharma/P.Ojha(Based on Conditions) 11.U.Yadav

Sehwag should definitely open the innings. I really don't understand how did this thought about moving him down the order came in mind. Guys, He averages more than 50 with a str rate more than 90 in tests. What more do you expect from him. He has and will prove his critics wrong again.

And he is the only player who doesn't care about any personal milestones but cares only about the team to win, still he is the one who has those records which even the gr8's do not have!!!

I totally believe in him opening the inning, which format it might be!!!!

Posted by Krishnan on (September 10, 2012, 0:11 GMT)

All the batsmen go through lean patches. However, Sehwag's performance has not been that bad. Look at these stats:

Since 2000-2012, away from home, he has played 81 test innings and scored 3847 runs @44.73 with 10 centuries and 12 fifties and is 4th among the averages. During the same period, in India, he has scored 4376 runs in 79 innings @ 57.57 with 12 centuries and 19 fifties and is second in averages.

Going by the recent performance since Jan 01, 2010 at home in 20 innings, Sehwag has scored 1174 runs @61.78 with 3 centuries and 7 fifties and is 1st in averages. Away from home, he has scored 884 runs @34.00 with 2 centuries and 6 fifties and is 4th in averages.

His test records at home is pretty impressive but the records away from home is not too shabby. Most batsmen have struggled away from home.

He should continue to open the innings

Posted by dork29 on (September 9, 2012, 19:01 GMT)

It is an interestig proposition.Probably the time is right for Sehwag to slip down the order. There are basically four reasons why I would advocate this. He is not a spring chicken anymore and it is more the mental exhaustion than the physical strain, that is likely to get him. He is losing patience and getting out earlier. A clear sign that he is not enjoying himself at the top anymore. Second, with the exit of Dravid and Laxman and Tendulkar's contribution being next to nothing we need some stability in the middle. Sehwag can provide it. Third, he has wanted to play in the middle order forever.If we put him there, he might eschew some of his bravado and play with greater responsibility. Four, it will help when the second new ball is taken. With his experience of opening, he can pulverise the opposition when they least expect it. Drop Tondulkar, bring in Unmukt and make him open. Sehwag at number 4 sounds lovely.

Posted by Miloo on (September 9, 2012, 12:55 GMT)

Some fools are saying Sehwag is not good enough to open. An opening batsmen with a test match average of over 50 is not good enough to open? That's really laughable. Sehwag averages around 45 away from home ( including ~47 against Aus in Aus), how does that make him a bad opener? Anyway, Sehwag batting down the order serves no purpose, because he will always play aggressively, even at times when its not needed.

Comments have now been closed for this article