THE CORDON HOME

BLOGS ARCHIVES
SELECT BLOG
December 7, 2013

English cricket's pointless brainwaves

Sam Blackledge
Whether it's a "Blast" or a "Boom" or anything else, fans eventually care about the quality of the cricket  © Associated Press
Enlarge

Next year's English domestic T20 competition will have a new title. The counties will line up for the start of the NatWest T20 Blast, rebranded to "attract a wider audience", who will "combine a weekend night out with watching cricket", according to ECB chief executive David Collier.

Fair enough, I suppose. T20 was invented ten years ago as a way to liven up the English game, to inject some razzmatazz into what was seen by many as a slow, dull and stilted sport. At first it seemed to work - shorter matches, more sixes and extraneous entertainment put bums on seats, and the T20 model exploded worldwide. In hindsight it may be seen as the most revolutionary idea of cricket's modern age. But the authorities clearly feel the original format needs an overhaul.

Next year every team will play 14 qualifying matches, up from ten previously. They will mostly be played on Friday evenings, to fit in with the "night out at the cricket" theory. So rather than a short, sharp competition slotted in between the longer formats, T20 will be integrated as part of the regular season. The intentions behind this seem sound - cricket is entertainment, and the more people enjoy it the better, financially and otherwise. The problem is, the ECB doesn't seem to know its target market. Is it, as Collier suggests, aiming T20 at adults looking for a Friday night out? Or does it, as the poor embattled soul who controls the ECB's Twitter feed said, see it as "a great way for families to spend time together"?

The "Blast" rebrand smacks of just another pointless fiddle, a blue-sky boardroom brainwave that will only confuse fans. I am loath to make a comparison to the horrid game of association football, but there is a lesson there. Ask a regular football fan: what is the name of the main domestic cup competition? After discarding his Millwall scarf and smashing a pint glass in your face, he will look at you like you have just arrived from Mars and say "the FA Cup". As long as that competition exists it will always be the FA Cup, no matter who sponsors it or how many suited dignitaries line up at Wembley for a photo op with the winning team.

Over the last 35 years English cricket's cup contests have had so many name changes it's hard for even the most ardent fan to keep up. Deep breath…

The Gillette Cup became the NatWest Trophy, which became the C&G Trophy. For one year it was known as the ECB Trophy due to lack of a sponsor. Then it became the Friends Provident Trophy. Then it died.

The John Player Special League became the Refuge Assurance Cup (I had to look that one up). Then it was the Sunday League, then the Axa Equity and Law League, then the National League, and finally the Pro40 Cricket League. At the end of last season it too was put to sleep, to be replaced by a new 50-over tournament called the Royal London One Day Cup. Still with me?

The CB40 became the YB40. The good old Benson & Hedges Cup retained its smoky sponsor right through from 1979 to the moment it spluttered its last cough in 1992. And domestic T20 action was propped up by Friends Provident, then Friends Life. Which may or may not be the same thing.

My point, if you're still awake at the back, is that too much faffing makes people lose interest. Cricket fans - real fans, who will invest in the game's grassroots and whose children will be the real fans of the future - don't care about all this. Sure, the coloured clothes are nice and the odd bit of music as the stumps fly out of the ground can be quite exciting. But what will keep these people coming back is not whether the billboards outside the ground say "Blast", "Boom", "Big Bash" or "David Collier's Big Bad Cricketing Extravaganza Sponsored by Pot Noodle". (Actually that sounds quite good).

What will keep the turnstiles turning and the cash registers chiming is good-quality cricket. Money should be used to invest in clubs, infrastructure and young players. Writing back in April, the Telegraph's Scyld Berry put this all better than I ever could.

Oh, and in next season's T20 whatever-it-is, Warwickshire are no more. Instead they will be known as the Birmingham Bears. I was planning to make that the subject of this rant. But I suppose it can keep for another day. For a flavour of what fans have made of the announcement, type #BirminghamBears into Twitter. They are not happy.

RELATED LINKS

Sam Blackledge is a journalist with a local newspaper in Devon

Keywords: Hype

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by DRS_Flawed_NeedsImprovement on (December 9, 2013, 13:19 GMT)

t20 is the future for cricket and for players whether few accept it or not?

Posted by py0alb on (December 9, 2013, 12:41 GMT)

I don't think many people even notice the sponsor's name, let alone have a strong opinion about it. We just call them "the T20" (the one we all go and watch and kinda care about a little bit), "the championship" (the one we care about the most but don't watch) and "the other one" (the one that no-one cares about and most fans are barely even aware exists).

Spreading the T20 out through the season is a great initiative, both for the cup itself and for the CC.

Posted by   on (December 8, 2013, 8:52 GMT)

Sorry to be pedantic but the Refuge Assurance Cup was the knockout end-of-season bunfight for the top four in the Refuge Assurance League. At least back then you knew when what format was played - with the reduction of County Championship matches to a straight round-robin it was very simple. CC match and "Sunday League" match tied together against the same county. The B and H was always the early season tournament - group games in May with knock out matches through a final in early July. NatWest Trophy 1st round around 24th June and then matches every two to three weeks until a Lords final in Early September if you progressed. Each competition had its own character - e.g. Minor County and Combined Unis involvement, Scotland, Ireland and Holland involved. Now the variety seems to be only what franchise moniker exists.

Comments have now been closed for this article