Pakistan's over-reliance on the two Ys and Inzi

How Pakistan are lost without their three batting heavyweights

S Rajesh

November 23, 2007

Text size: A | A



Mohammad Yousuf and Younis Khan in tandem with Inzamam-ul-Haq have accounted for over half of Pakistan's Test runs over the last three years © AFP
Enlarge

Pakistan's start to the Test series against India was far from ideal, but the one heartening aspect was that a batsman other than one of the two Ys stepped up when the team desperately needed at least one of the top six to fire. For too long, Mohammad Yousuf, Younis Khan and the recently retired Inzamam-ul-Haq have carried the batting. In this line-up one ul-Haq has replaced another, and Pakistan will be thrilled if Misbah translates his recent successes in Twenty20 and one-day cricket into the Test arena as well.

Since Younis returned to the Test team in October 2004, he along with Yousuf and Inzamam, has been head and shoulders above the rest of the Pakistan batsmen, which the table below confirms. Shahid Afridi and Shoaib Malik have done reasonably well, but the other specialist batsmen - Imran Farhat, Salman Butt, Yasir Hameed and Mohammad Hafeez, to name a few - have all had very modest success.

Pakistan batsmen in Tests since October 2004
Batsman Tests Runs Average 100s/ 50s
Mohammad Yousuf 25 2903 67.51 12/ 7
Younis Khan 27 2876 59.91 9/ 10
Inzamam-ul-Haq 25 1930 52.16 6/ 10
Shahid Afridi 12 903 43.00 3/ 4
Shoaib Malik 15 944 41.04 1/ 6
Imran Farhat 16 1013 33.76 0/ 9
Kamran Akmal 29 1511 33.57 4/ 6

Most teams tend to rely on three or four batsmen more than others, but in Pakistan's case the difference between the contribution of the three stars and the rest is stark. In the 19 Tests that Yousuf, Younis and Inzamam have played during this period, they've averaged 61.24, scored more than 52% of the team's total runs and 78% of the hundreds. Remove the three from the equation, and Pakistan have only averaged 24 runs per wicket.

Comparing the top three with the rest of Pakistan's batting in matches in which all three played since October 2004
Tests Runs Average 100s/ 50s
The entire team 19 10783 35.47 27/ 45
Yousuf, Younis & Inzi 19 5634 61.24 21/ 19
The rest 19 5149 24.29 6/ 26

In these 19 Tests Pakistan have won seven, and lost and drawn six each. Younis and Inzamam have been the outstanding performers in victories, but it's remarkable how poorly Inzamam has performed in games Pakistan have lost. From an average of 80 in victories, his mean score plummets to 16 in defeats.

Yousuf, Younis and Inzi in Test wins when all three have played since October 2004
Batsman Tests Runs Average 100s/ 50s
Younis Khan 7 865 86.50 2/ 3
Inzamam-ul-Haq 7 641 80.12 2/ 4
Mohammad Yousuf 7 604 54.90 3/ 0

Yousuf, Younis and Inzi in Test defeats when all three have played since October 2004
Batsman Tests Runs Average 100s/ 50s
Mohammad Yousuf 6 636 57.81 3/ 1
Younis Khan 6 543 49.36 2/ 1
Inzamam-ul-Haq 6 179 16.27 0/ 0

Let's look at how Pakistan's reliance on the super trio compares with other teams' dependence on their three best batsmen during the same period. Clearly, the team of Yousuf, Younis and Inzamam have outperformed the group of champion batsmen from other teams. Sri Lanka's Kumar Sangakkara, Mahela Jayawardene and Tillakaratne Dilshan have, in the Tests that all three have played, scored almost 50% of the team's runs, at an average touching 55; the rest of the team, on the other hand, have averaged less than 26. The numbers for South Africa are similar - Jacques Kallis, Graeme Smith and Ashwell Prince have averaged 54, more than double the average of the rest of the team.

Australia's case is something else, and it demonstrates why they are so far ahead of the rest: their top three, Ricky Ponting, Matthew Hayden and Justin Langer, average 52, but the rest of their batsmen are hardly laggards - they average nearly 34 too, which is significantly higher than the corresponding average for the other teams. India's Sachin Tendulkar, Rahul Dravid and Virender Sehwag have scored only 44.5% of their team's runs - much lower than the corresponding 52.25% for Pakistan - which indicates that India's support cast has contributed relatively more runs than Pakistan's. Further down the list, the numbers for England and New Zealand indicate that the runs have been shared around much more equitably. And the fact that Daniel Vettori makes it into the list of top three New Zealand run-scorers shows just how miserably inadequate their top-order batting has been.

Top three for each team in Tests since October 2004
Team Top three Team - runs, ave Top 3 - runs, ave The rest - runs, ave
Sri Lanka Sangakkara, Jayawardene, Dilshan 9775, 35.16 4878, 54.81 4897, 25.91
South Africa Kallis, Smith, Prince 10,317, 34.85 5087, 54.12 5230, 25.89
Australia Hayden, Ponting, Langer 14440, 39.88 6560, 52.06 7880, 33.90
India Dravid, Tendulkar, Sehwag 8829, 31.53 3929, 46.77 4900, 25.00
West Indies Lara, Gayle, Chanderpaul 8311, 28.17 3957, 43.49 4354, 21.34
England Pietersen, Strauss, Bell 14,366, 32.13 5889, 41.18 8477, 27.88
New Zealand Fleming, Astle, Vettori 6983, 28.61 2864, 39.23 4119, 24.09

Murali loses his magic
It was supposed to be the series in which Muttiah Muralitharan would go past Shane Warne and become the world's leading wicket-taker in Test cricket. As it turned out, he didn't even come close. The Australian batsmen played him so well that Murali ended up with just four wickets from 116 overs. His average of 100 is the fourth-most expensive in a series for Sri Lanka among bowlers who bowled at least 100 overs in the series. Murali himself has been there once before - against India a decade ago - but that was before he discovered the variations that have made him such a fearsome prospect in international cricket.

The table below lists the five most expensive bowling averages in a series for Sri Lanka. Asoka de Silva, now an international umpire, makes two appearances, while Chaminda Vaas takes the other slot.

Most exorbitant series averages for Sri Lankan bowlers (at least 100 overs bowled)
Bowler Tests Wickets Average Strike rate Series
Asoka de Silva 3 1 338.00 708.0 Sri Lanka in India, 1986-87
Chaminda Vaas 3 4 108.50 217.7 Sri Lanka in England, 2002
Muttiah Muralitharan 2 3 103.66 242.0 Sri Lanka in India, 1997-98
Muttiah Muralitharan 2 4 100.00 174.0 Sri Lanka in Australia, 2007-08
Asoka de Silva 3 4 98.25 222.0 Sri Lanka in New Zealand, 1990-91

S Rajesh is stats editor of Cricinfo.

RSS Feeds: S Rajesh

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
S RajeshClose
S Rajesh Stats editor Every week the Numbers Game takes a look at the story behind the stats, with an original slant on facts and figures. The column is edited by S Rajesh, ESPNcricinfo's stats editor in Bangalore. He did an MBA in marketing, and then worked for a year in advertising, before deciding to chuck it in favour of a job which would combine the pleasures of watching cricket and writing about it. The intense office cricket matches were an added bonus.
Tour Results
Australia v Sri Lanka at Melbourne - Feb 29, 2008
Sri Lanka won by 13 runs
India v Sri Lanka at Hobart - Feb 26, 2008
India won by 7 wickets (with 106 balls remaining)
Australia v Sri Lanka at Melbourne - Feb 22, 2008
Australia won by 24 runs (D/L method)
India v Sri Lanka at Adelaide - Feb 19, 2008
India won by 2 wickets (with 5 balls remaining)
Australia v Sri Lanka at Perth - Feb 15, 2008
Australia won by 63 runs
More results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days