Chennai Super Kings v Mumbai Indians, IPL 2010, Chennai

How Chennai turned it around

Kanishkaa Balachandran at the MA Chidambaram Stadium

April 6, 2010

Comments: 21 | Text size: A | A

A par score of 165, defendable but not entirely secure, left the crowd at the MA Chidambaram Stadium a little concerned at the halfway stage. The presence of an in-form Sachin Tendulkar put the pressure on Chennai Super Kings to come up with a fluid display in the field, after the batsmen scratched around in the face of some disciplined Mumbai bowling. Certain crucial factors went Chennai's way after the Powerplay, which was the turning point of the match. Here's a look at what went Chennai's way.

M Vijay catches Kieron Pollard despite interference from Thilan Thushara, Chennai Super Kings v Mumbai Indians, IPL, Chennai, April 6, 2010
Chennai's fielding was top-drawer, and they managed to catch everything that came their way in the outfield © Indian Premier League
Enlarge

Team selection
While it's natural for teams to stick to winning units, Chennai knew they were still far from arriving at their best bowling combination. Their victory against Rajasthan Royals came on a rather forgettable day in the field, for all bowlers except Doug Bollinger. The two biggest culprits were Albie Morkel and Muttiah Muralitharan, who leaked 56 and 52 runs respectively. It is disturbing when your overseas picks let you down, more so in Murali's case, given he is one of the leading bowlers in the tournament. Chennai's selection issues were made easier by the injury that ruled out Morkel, who has struggled to settle into the opening bowler's role. Chennai replaced him with Thilan Thushara, and to rebalance the batting, Michael Hussey claimed Murali's overseas slot. That meant offspinner R Ashwin had to come in at the cost of a batsman, to fortify the spin-attack. Though Hussey was not at his best with the bat, the other two changes were masterstrokes. Thushara struck first ball, sending back Shikhar Dhawan to break the opening stand of 46, and later went on to dismiss a weary Tendulkar when the game was a lost cause for Mumbai. Ashwin exploited a slow pitch to pick two wickets and plug the scoring. He kept it simple, focusing on cramping the batsmen and bowling flatter deliveries as a defensive option. It was a big task for Ashwin to step into Murali's shoes, but he ensured the latter wasn't missed.

The quiet overs
The first six overs of the chase seemed to have stamped Mumbai's authority on the match. Tendulkar and Dhawan kept up with the asking rate, hitting at least one boundary per over. But at the stroke of the Powerplay, the match started to turn. A loose drive cost Dhawan his wicket, and Thushara conceded only three off that over. Shadab Jakati, who bowled the next, could have had Tendulkar stumped, or caught at short third man off a streaky outside edge. Tendulkar wasn't looking entirely comfortable - two overs earlier, he had squatted on the pitch after hitting Ashwin for a boundary, clearly struggling to deal with the weather. He was unhappy with his bat and asked for a replacement, but he was not the same batsman again. Dhawan's wicket, and Tendulkar's problems gave Chennai an opening. Thushara finished another boundary-less over just before the time-out. After conceding 46 off the first six, Chennai gave away only 16 off the next three. That passage shifted the momentum towards Chennai.

Tendulkar succumbs
At the end of nine overs, Tendulkar couldn't take it anymore. The elements had come to Chennai's rescue as he walked off the field, dehydrated. The short duration of Twenty20 doesn't allow an unwell batsman enough time to recuperate and return to the crease. Mumbai suddenly faced a stern examination of their batting depth and ability to finish the job without the safety net of Tendulkar. Mumbai had rarely found themselves in such a situation through this tournament and when they did, the middle order failed the test.

Rash shot-selection
It wasn't extraordinary field placements from MS Dhoni which caused Mumbai to combust. The batsmen only had themselves to blame, because their trigger-happy methods cost them their wickets. When Tendulkar walked off, Mumbai needed 104 off 66 - very gettable, with hitters like Kieron Pollard to come. They needed at least one player to take responsibility and bat through, but in the absence of a set plan, the batting wilted. Ambati Rayudu, fresh from his half-century against Deccan Chargers, sashayed down the track to loft Suresh Raina out of the ground but was beaten by the shortened length and the lack of turn to be stumped. Dwayne Bravo tried to clear long off but fell to a well-judged overhead catch by Thushara. Saurabh Tiwary was tied down at the other end, scratching at less than a run-a-ball. The slowness of the pitch, combined with the accuracy of the spinners was an irritant for Tiwary. Sweeps, nudges and pokes found the fielders as he tried to break free. A frustrated slog found midwicket and his misery came to an end. Pollard failed to live up to his price-tag of $750000, holing out to long-on for 5. A mis-judged single and a direct-hit sent back R Sathish before Ryan McLaren was caught plumb in front. The collapse of six for 23 prompted an SOS to Tendulkar.

Mumbai not only had to battle the elements, but also the crowd, which got more vociferous behind the home team. Support wasn't very forthcoming during the Powerplay, but the unexpected departure of Tendulkar and the sudden slew of wickets roused their spirits.

Taking catches
The team with possibly the most atrocious catching record in the tournament turned a new leaf. Chennai dropped three catches in their previous game and in Bangalore, let off Robin Uthappa twice before he butchered them. Tonight, nearly all the catches stuck. Thushara held Bravo's skier at long off, fell backwards and remained in that position to savour the moment. He attempted to take another steepler, but it slipped through his fingers as he tried to repeat the backward tumble. Thankfully for him, M Vijay who had run in from long on and positioned himself behind Thushara, somehow managed to take the catch. Barring a difficult return chance that Jakati out down, it was a clean display in the field.

Kanishkaa Balachandran is a sub-editor at Cricinfo

RSS Feeds: Kanishkaa Balachandran

© ESPN EMEA Ltd.

Comments: 21 
Posted by Yuvi911987 on (April 08 2010, 17:30 PM GMT)

From this match we can peculiarly say that a 20-20 match result depends specially/explicitly upon the captain's perfromance.Every time Tendulkar done good, or was around for awhile,Mumbai Indians were too good a competitor. Now that the Helmsman retired hurt, the whole ship lost its directions and sank pretty quickly. Captain's importance can be realized from Raj Royals matches, or from KKR's or from Kings11 (though in shades of blue). Next time Sachin succumbs out,Mumbai are out and done for sure,otherwise lads move aside, IPL2010 trophy has a label 'Made for Mumbai Indians' at the bottom of it.

Posted by cnksnk on (April 08 2010, 08:54 AM GMT)

I am truly amazed at some of the comments mentioned here. Chennai has one of the most knowledgable and appreciative cround in I ndia. the folks know their cricket and also acknowledge good perfromance. remember the standing ovation that they gave the Paksitan team even though I ndia had lost a close match. Support for the local team is always good, but appreciating a good performer and performance is a true reflection of a sport fan.. Chennai team did just that. I am sure most in the standium, would have liked Tendulkar to hit a centuary but CSK winning in the end.

Posted by   on (April 08 2010, 06:07 AM GMT)

Great article ...........Great experience at the stadium

Posted by jeromedascorp on (April 08 2010, 03:53 AM GMT)

I Love Sachin to death but that love goes away when he plays against CSK. This is because I love Chennai way more than any Indian cricketer. So yes, when Sachin bats against my hometown team, I do not cheer for him. And when he gets out, I am absolutely thrilled. I do find though that the crowd does get stupid at times. Its not about Sachin, they tend to cheer boundaries regardless of who is batting. But i must say that based on all the comments here and the crowd response, I am one of the few Chennai fans who wanted to see Sachin fail in Chennai. Oh well. Like I said, my home comes first!

Posted by CricketFanCSK on (April 07 2010, 22:29 PM GMT)

I am sure "CHENNAI" crowrd is called as intelligent crowd and when Sachin was batting the other end and if someone has heard the commentary from Sunil gavaskar ... "Chennai Crowd is cheering for Sachin and every 4's are cheered for sachin....." this is the statement you can hear on youtube on 8th over .. Everyone loves the popular cricketer in India everywhere ..... I am sure the author has his veiw on the way he had looked upon the Chennai Crowd...

Posted by saileshganesh on (April 07 2010, 19:02 PM GMT)

I cannot believe half the comments here. I support Mumbai, and Mumbai alone. In Mumbai, no one would even think of cheering for the opponent. That is the whole point of home advantage. Chennai fans should be proud of getting behind their home team. To say that the crowd was partisan is really a compliment, and here we have people complaining about it. Would you rather be known as the team whose fans support their opponents? I sure would hate to be associated with something like that.

Posted by   on (April 07 2010, 18:33 PM GMT)

Touch, touchy. Good to see the generally stodgy Madras crowd actually showing signs of life. And yes, they do love Sachin, but who doesn't?

Posted by Sridhar20-20 on (April 07 2010, 16:24 PM GMT)

Kanishka neither has a point nor linguistic eloquence to tell what was intended. Let the author alone to what she is best at. I still feel she did not intend to hurt the Chennai crowd but for her poor english. :P But, I second the opinion about the Chennai crowd. We are the most supportive and cricketing crowd all over the world. But lets not just put it into mere words and show it off at an arena (this article) that doesn't deserve it. Lets do it time and over again in Chepauk. Go Chennai! See you at Chepauk next game.

Posted by   on (April 07 2010, 15:59 PM GMT)

Why is everyone just talking about the crowd here? Won't a crowd support its home team? And, if Mumbai is a great team, then they don't need crowd support to win their matches! All I want to say is- I support CSK, CSK played brilliantly, they deserved that win! And as for Sachin- bad luck, but there's nothing we can do, can we? And I reckon that ganeshraam is partially right, except for that where he says- "The crowd should support the visiting team as well, if they do well"! CSK ROCKS!

Posted by swordsmen_XI on (April 07 2010, 14:22 PM GMT)

guess this author haven't seen the game....i've was there in stadium and the support to MI was gr8....whenever good cricket was displayed by either teams the crowd applauded and cheered...sachin and bhajji was well supported by the crowd....

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Kanishkaa BalachandranClose
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days
  • Cricinfo Widgets
Sponsored Links

Access your Indian Rupee earnings from anywhere in the world.

on registering and transfer of USD 250 and above.

At Cricshop.com