|Photos||Video & Audio||Blogs||Statistics||Archive||Shop||Mobile|
July 1, 2012
India Women 230 for 5 (Raj 94*, Raut 60) beat England Women 229 (Brindle 58, Das 4-61) by five wickets
Captain Mithali Raj struck an unbeaten 94 as India Women beat England Women by five wickets to take a 1-0 lead in their five-match ODI series. The result, which was achieved with three balls to spare despite India losing two wickets in three deliveries at the end, ended England's run of seven consecutive wins in one-day internationals.
Raj, who paced her 111-ball innings supremely well, was involved in a hundred-run stand for the second wicket with Poonam Raut (60) and added a further 89 with Harmanpreet Kaur. However, Kaur's dismissal with 14 required from 15 balls led to a brief wobble, as Danielle Wyatt had Veda Krishnamurthy caught off the final ball of the 49th over - with two still needed - and Sulakshana Naik was run out without scoring from the second delivery of the final over. That dismissal brought Raj on strike, though, and she stroked the winning runs.
England's total was built around Arran Brindle's innings of 58 but India outfielded their opponents and struck at regular intervals to prevent them building partnerships. Nagarajan Niranjana claimed 3 for 28 from her 10 overs, while Archana Das took four wickets despite being more expensive. For England, who lost star opener Charlotte Edwards for a ten-ball 1, six players made between 12 and 38 but were unable to go on, as the hosts were dismissed with five balls of their allocation remaining.
© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.
|Comments have now been closed for this article
In January 2005, Shane Watson made his Test debut. What does he have to show for a decade in the game?
Three Australia players made half-centuries on day one at the MCG; for each of them, the innings' meant different things
A look at some of cricket's most memorable strokes - and their makers
To consider banning it in the wake of Phillip Hughes' death may be knee-jerk, but to refuse to consider the pros and cons of a ban is unwise