Australia v England, 3rd Test, Perth

Different worlds collide as Clarke and Cook hit 100

Two very different men will have the honour of captaining their countries in their 100th Test with the Ashes at stake

Jarrod Kimber

December 12, 2013

Comments: 61 | Text size: A | A

Michael Clarke watches his wife, Kyly, pose for photographs, Melbourne, February 4, 2013
Michael Clarke: stylish on and off the field © Getty Images
Enlarge

Alastair Cook tweeting about his surprise wedding and putting up a picture of him leading his new bride on a white stallion would seem odd. As would a picture of Michael Clarke dressed in military fatigues or with a dead deer at his feet. Cook isn't about to make much of his body a canvas or become an underwear model. Clarke isn't likely to wear gumboots and tend to his livestock before dawn. Clarke and Cook are two very different human beings.

A Google image search of Michael Clarke will come back with a man who has posed for as many cameras as any wannabe starlet. Red carpets, underwear shots, shoots for GQ, he has done them all. If you're an Australian cricket fan under 20, you could be forgiven for thinking Michael Clarke has spent your entire life staring back at you in a sultry way or with a painted on smile.

Cook's image search is mostly made up on him looking stern or pensive. Generally on the field, or at a press conference. There are very few shots of him doing anything fun (painting nude girls and holding up a cricket bat in a naked shoot are the exceptions, not the rule). On the occasion he does pose, you often get a look at his hypnotising eyes, eyes that seem to trap you, and which would be better used by a dystopian dictator looking to instill fear into the population.

Clarke's image and game has been sharpened and pushed by a series of well-meaning people. Some who have made much money and great reputations from a stylish batsman. Like many working-class kids who find money and fame early on, he made the most of it. He bought showy cars, lived in the flashy part of town, ate at the cafes where the paparazzi hung out, and dated a C-grade celebrity.

Slowly he grew out of that. At its worst, his hometown paper called him a tosser, he felt the need to tweet an apology for not walking, and he was booed at the SCG in his first Test as captain.

Cook's life has always been a bit more straightforward. He went to Bedford, a school with Nobel Laureates, Olympians and the school attended by Sir George Arthur Harwin Branson, Richard Branson's grandfather. He was a chorister at St Paul's Cathedral School. Two-and-a half years into his international career he had his first book out. In it he tried hard to distance himself from his middle class background, but a few paragraphs later talked of how his family often skied.

He is barely seen off the cricket field, isn't the face of many products and almost unbelievably for a professional sportsman of his age, isn't on twitter. Cook left his wedding in a tractor.

The off-field images of them are also pretty accurate of the way they play.

Cook looks after himself, does what he has to do, isn't always stylish or pretty, but is damn effective. Leads from the front at No. 1. Takes few chances. It has been written that if he had to, Alastair Cook would give birth. It wouldn't be pretty, but he would get it done. Robotic and efficient, at his best he makes massive scores without a bead of sweat. The sort of leader his country has always respected.

Clarke is stylish on and off the field (I'm sure that line has been used in the thousands of lifestyle pieces on him). When he started he was brash and aggressive, now he is smooth and reliable. Bats down the order, in part, to shield himself from the swinging ball. Willing to gamble, but never as much as people say. A nervous starter with pretty feet who once set, especially in his home country, is almost impossible to dislodge. A new leader for a changing country.

But Cook and Clarke have had amazingly similar cricket careers. They even both married women they knew before they could realistically be presumed to be future Test captains.

Clarke started in Bangalore with a blazing hundred. Baggy green on his head, he was the symbol for Australia winning their final frontier in India. Cook started in Nagpur, holding England's top order together with a half century in the first innings. Then making a hundred in the second dig to push the game beyond India's reach.

Both had major obstacles to overcome once they had been in the side for a few years. Cook's technique had never been textbook, but with a stagnating career average (it was roughly 42 for 30 Tests), and a sudden angled bat that kept nicking off, Cook had to do something just to get on the tour to Australia in 10/11. In the second innings of a game Pakistan were dominating, Cook made 110. Two Tests later he would play Australia at the Gabba.

 
 
Clarke not the tactical genius he gets credit for, nor the terrible man manager everyone assumed. Cook's captaincy is predictable and safe. His team currently look a bit like him, out of answers, and unable to capture the magic they had previously
 

Clarke was the golden boy of Australian cricket. He had won in India. Taken on the English bowlers. And seemed indestructible. But he got trapped in a vicious cycle as the boy who didn't want to be dropped. The worse his form got, the more the press talked about this once in a generation boy not being the missing link. It seemed like he could think of little else. Eventually he was dropped. But thanks to a gift that has happened to many Australian batsmen (a Shane Watson injury) Clarke was brought back, cleaned up his game, kept the ball on the ground and made lots of runs.

They both know what it's like to play in one of their countries' most successful teams. Clarke came into the team in 2004, has won a World Cup, and enjoyed everything that goes with being the number one Test team in the world. Cook was a major part of England becoming number one, and producing a new, if albeit brief, golden era for English cricket.

Both were also the apprentices for the top job well before they got it. Despite much psychological testing, a thorough interview process and England's endeavour to do things by the book, Alastair Cook was only not getting the job if he shot Giles Clarke in a hunting accident.

In the modern era no new Australian captain has been as hated as Michael Clarke was. Yet, there simply was not another option when Ricky Ponting stepped down. Strauss and Cook would appear far more similar than Ponting and Clarke, but the "break your arm" comment would suggest that both men learn from their seniors.

As captains, both men have averaged more than their career average. Cook even managing to do so without the very constant daddy hundreds he made under Strauss. His overall average should still be higher, but despite this he will retire England's highest-ever scoring Test batsman, unless a giant anvil lands on him within the next two years. Clarke is averaging a staggering 63 as captain despite the fact he took over after one of the worst summers of his career. In the summer of 2010/11 Clarke averaged 17 in seven Tests. Suddenly being called a tosser and booed wasn't his biggest problem.

They both changed their careers, and public perceptions, with Everest runs. Before Cook's innings at the Gabba last Ashes, he was seen as a one-dimensional plodder who could score handy runs but wasn't a game or series changer. That one innings, followed up with Adelaide, changed how everyone saw him. In two series against India he did it again. And suddenly the plodder became a batting monolith.

Clarke had taken over as full-time captain for tours to Sri Lanka and South Africa. As is often the way, Australian tours, Ashes aside, are not really poured over the same way. Instead of 20 to 40 press in the box, it's two to four. Instead of free to air, it's cable. So, even though Clarke played one of his greatest innings in South Africa and drew an away series with a heavyweight, few noticed.

They did notice when Australia managed only to draw a home series against New Zealand. So in his next series, against a rapidly declining India, he had to win, and win grand. The winning took care of itself when at Sydney he changed his public perception (probably forever) with a triple century whilst wearing the baggy green. Tosser pretty boy was gone; true Australian hero was born.

As captains, both men lead much as they play. Clarke is attacking and stylish, yet still flawed. He's not the tactical genius he gets credit for, nor the terrible man manager everyone assumed. He has survived two coaches being sacked, stood down from his selectorial duties and is currently running a team much in his own image. Not for the first time Australian cricket looks like it could be getting something right, but it's fallen hard on its face in recent times after good series. Whether they are playing well or not, Australia still seems one massive collapse from a disaster, something Clarke's batting will try to hold together.

Cook's captaincy is well thought out, predictable and safe. He took over a machine that had just started to show some wear and tear. Strauss, Hugh Morris and Geoff Miller are all gone or going, Andy Flower is the only one who remains from England's amazing two years. When Cook took over, he fixed the broken Pietersen situation, defeated India from behind and then won the Ashes. He was on a roll.

Now his team has run into Mitchell Johnson, every flaw they had has been opened up. His team currently look a bit like him, out of answers, and unable to capture the magic they had previously. But they are still the team that made it to number one, with most of the original playing parts still here. Cook and his team can still turn this around.


England captains Alastair Cook and Charlotte Edwards muck in on Cricket Force day at Harrow Town CC, London, April, 5, 2013
Alastair Cook: down to earth (as the photo suggests) © Getty Images
Enlarge

Somehow these two men with similar cricket histories and vastly different personalities have ended up playing their 100th Tests together. Thanks to Mitchell Johnson, the news is not really about them. And with Sachin clocking up 200, and many other players passing 150, 100 Tests is no longer the number played by the only the iron men of cricket. Clarke has brought his up in under 10 years, Cook in under eight.

You could argue who is greater and who has achieved more, but such conversations are mostly useless and should be kept in bars or 2am twitter fights where they belong. They're both pretty damn good. And they both have interesting futures as leaders.

Clarke will hope this isn't a fluke and Australia is finally back. Cook will be trying to work out what has caused this decline, and what to do next.

Before this series Clarke had the Ashes loss and Ricky Ponting's book to contend with. People had openly started questioning whether he was the right man to lead Australia forward. Mike Hussey's book brought back the Clarke/Katich rift, and even the Hussey/Clarke rift, even if in both cases Hussey was trying to be nice. Alastair Cook just tended to his sheep and gave the occasional positive press conference.

There are still many photos to be taken of them in their careers, or even in this series. Clarke's current twitter avatar is one of him looking disappointed in the rain of Old Trafford. The promotional photos for the Ashes before the series have Cook with an easy smile on his face, next to a stern Michael Clarke. Right now, those photos could be reversed.

Jarrod Kimber is 50% of the Two Chucks, and the mind responsible for cricketwithballs.com

RSS Feeds: Jarrod Kimber

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by   on (December 17, 2013, 8:22 GMT)

@jagger that point marks the nonsense pat in you u failed to look over the career span of tendulkar I bet u ,he is the worst player only if one in 100 international players in ny coming generation Can able to dream abt that career And No One can You may started to watch clarke , wen the television come to ur house But tendulkar,he is from a generation older dat

Posted by Jagger on (December 16, 2013, 6:02 GMT)

@ akpy - There are currently 20 players with better career averages than Tendulkar. Clarke is just an average of 1 run behind him, so may in fact go past Tendulkar this Ashes series.

It makes me laugh when people say Tendulkar is second only to Bradman. Many argue he wasn't even first of his generation.

Posted by brisCricFan on (December 16, 2013, 0:04 GMT)

@akpy; I don't see it that way... you are saying that Tendulkar is as good as Cook and Clarke combined... I see it that if you look at half his tests, then he is only as good as either Cook or Clarke... If both Cook and Clarke were to play 200 test you would expect that they too would have similar stats to Tendulkar...

We just may never see a 16 year old make a Test debut ever again so his longevity will never be matched...

Posted by akpy on (December 15, 2013, 0:10 GMT)

Cook + Clarke = 200 tests, 15919 runs, 51 centuries, 60 fifties. Sachin Tendulkar = 200 tests, 15921 runs, 51 centuries, 68 fifties

Yeeks, the little master could bat, eh !

Posted by Bonehead_maz on (December 14, 2013, 2:11 GMT)

Although I respect these two guys immensely, I believe years should determine long lasting class. That's why Jack Hobbs is the master.

Posted by Vishnu27 on (December 13, 2013, 23:33 GMT)

Lunge has truly embarrassed himself this time. There's no getting away from it. That is THE most absurd utterance ever on this forum, which hears a lot of absurdity. Lunge, I suggest actually watching some cricket might help. Time to do something more worthy with your ever waking moment

Posted by Int.Curator on (December 13, 2013, 21:53 GMT)

Both great batsmen, BUT

Michael is a far superior captain an tacticianer than Alistair. To report anything else is biased.

One captain is agressive, calculated and constantly dictating the game to get a result.

The other passive, plays negatively to get draw, indecisive and constantly consults his team.

Posted by   on (December 13, 2013, 18:36 GMT)

The writer failed to mention that they are good looking too!!!My girlfriend absolutely drools over both of them:-P

Posted by Front-Foot-Lunge-Needs-A-Hug on (December 13, 2013, 16:04 GMT)

Before Lunge had us believe England would canter to victory and nip back home for the open top bus parade (we don't make a fuss about beating England, it happens so frequently). Now come the excuses. Lack of preparation? Is that what caused the almighty England to be hammered? Whatever Lyon is doing he is doing it a lot better than Swann, in fact Lyon's zooter is virtually unplayable!

Posted by valvolux on (December 13, 2013, 13:48 GMT)

Cook is no strauss. Just like ponting was no waugh. When you inherit a good team, your personal batting and team results take care of themselves. Clarke inherited a team on decline, which has apparently only got worse, but has taken his batting to a whole new level with zero support from others and has a captaincy style that makes a mediocre team sometimes beat the best. Cook is a class bat, but hes no clarke. In terms of captaincy, cook is even further behind.

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Jarrod KimberClose
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days