India in New Zealand 2013-14 February 4, 2014

India need better hospitality, NZ seek home improvement

India have struggled to win away Tests recently; New Zealand have beaten only West Indies and Zimbabwe at home over the same period
22

India have not won an away Test since June 2011 when they beat West Indies at Sabina Park, Jamaica. Their current sequence of 12 consecutive away Tests without a win is their worst since 1993-2001, when they went 22 away Tests without a win. The bigger concern for India, however, is that they have lost nine of these 12 Tests, putting them at the bottom of the win-loss ratio table in overseas Tests, along with Zimbabwe.

Their last tour to New Zealand was the first time in 40 years they won a Test series there, and their only Test win in that series, in Hamilton, was their first Test win in New Zealand in 30 years. Before that, India won a Test in New Zealand in 1975-76, in Auckland. Overall in the last 30 years, India's win-loss record in New Zealand is their second-worst, after their record in Australia.

India's records at the two venues for the Test series present contrasting pictures. India play their first Test at Eden Park, where they are yet to lose a Test from four matches and have had two of their five wins in New Zealand. At the Basin Reserve, their record is poor: they have lost four of the six Tests that they have played at this venue, and have won only one. India won way back in 1967-68 in the third Test of their first away series against New Zealand. The hosts' win-loss ratio of 4 against India at the Basin Reserve is their best among teams that have played more than two Tests at this venue.

New Zealand have hosted the highest percentage of draws in Tests in recent times. In 12 Tests that have been played here since 2011, seven have ended in draws. This is the most draws played out in any country during this period. New Zealand have won only three of these 12 Tests, two in the recent series against West Indies and one against Zimbabwe in January 2011. Over the same period, Bangladesh are the only team to have done worse in terms of winning Tests at home. However, five of the seven draws have come against the top Test teams: three against South Africa - the strongest touring side in the recent years - and three against England.

New Zealand against India at Basin Reserve and Eden Park
Venue Mat Won Lost Draw W/L
Basin Reserve, Wellington 6 4 1 1 4.0
Eden Park, Auckland 4 0 2 2 0.0

New Zealand's batsmen have played a significant part in their holding better ranked teams to draws in Tests at home in the last couple of years. Their top-order batsmen (Nos 1 to No. 7) average 43.44 in Tests at home since January 2012, with 10 hundreds in as many Tests. Only South Africa's top order has done better in New Zealand, averaging 48.73 from three Tests. Ross Taylor has been one of the leading batsmen in Tests in the last year or so. He has scored 866 runs at 72.16 including three hundreds and four half-centuries in 17 innings since January 2013. In home Tests against India, Taylor has hit 327 runs at 64.40 with two centuries. One of those hundreds was in the second innings of India's last Test in Wellington, which denied India their second Test win of the tour. Jesse Ryder, who has been selected as back-up for Taylor for the series, has done well too, scoring 327 runs at 65.40 against India in Tests at home, including a career-best 201 in Napier in 2008-09.

New Zealand batsman against India at home
Batsman Inns Runs HS Ave 100/50
Jesse Ryder 5 327 201 65.40 2/0
Ross Taylor 5 322 151 64.40 2/0
Brednon McCullum 5 232 115 46.40 1/1

Taylor has played only one Test in Auckland, scoring 22 against England last year, but his record at the Basin Reserve is good. He has scored 748 runs at 62.33 including two hundreds and five half-centuries. Brendon McCullum and Peter Fulton are the other top run-scorers at the venues of this Test series, with Fulton scoring 291 at 72.75 in two Tests at Eden Park, including two hundreds in a Test against England the last time he played at the venue.

New Zealand batsmen at Eden Park and Basin Reserve
Batsman Inns Runs HS Ave 100/50
Brendon McCullum 29 915 104 32.67 1/6
Ross Taylor 16 770 129 55.00 2/5
Peter Fulton 11 453 136 41.18 2/1
Kane Williamson 9 411 102* 58.71 1/2
BJ Watling 6 197 65 32.83 0/2
Hamish Rutherford 5 86 37 17.20 0/0

Among India's current top-order batsmen, only MS Dhoni has played in Tests in New Zealand before this tour. He has hit 155 runs at 77.50 with two fifties in two Tests. The next-highest run-scorer for India from the current team is Zaheer Khan with 138 runs from five matches. Zaheer has made more significant contributions with the ball in New Zealand, taking 24 wickets from five Tests at 22.95 - his second-best bowling average in a country, after Zimbabwe. He has taken three of his seven overseas five-wicket hauls in Test in New Zealand, with two of them coming at the Basin Reserve. Ishant Sharma is the only other bowler in the India squad to have bowled in Tests in New Zealand, taking eight wickets at 41.75 from three Tests.

Given how India's batsmen largely struggled against New Zealand's fast bowlers in the recent ODI series, the bowlers are expected to come hard at the India batsman in conditions that have been helpful to fast bowlers. As expected, fast bowlers have tasted greater success at both the venues, but more so at the Basin Reserve where they average nearly 10 runs fewer than the spinners. The hosts will be banking on their fast bowlers - who bowled exceedingly well in the recent series against West Indies, taking 54 of the 60 wickets to fall - to improve their win-loss record at home, even as India look to end their winless streak in away Tests.

Pace v Spin at Eden Park and Basin Reserve, since 2004
Bowler Type Mat Wkt Ave SR BBI BBM 5w/10w
Eden Park, Auckland
Pace 4 104 33.30 64.9 6/68 11/180 6/1
Spin 4 28 38.03 82.8 4/44 7/140 0/0
Basin Reserve, Wellington
Pace 14 342 29.58 54.7 6/23 10/80 17/1
Spin 14 87 39.29 86.0 7/130 10/118 2/2

Shiva Jayaraman is a sub-editor (stats) at ESPNcricinfo.com

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • sk123 on February 5, 2014, 19:22 GMT

    @Jordanmacmillan88 - So, are the pitches in India flat or spinner friendly? They can't be both at the same time ;) ... Let's just say that most Indian batsmen are bad against bouncy pacers and most batsmen from other countries can't play spin. Both spin and pace are a big part of the game so you can't measure the success against each with a different yardstick only because it seems to fit your conclusion. Every nation is a lion in their own den and Eng was in 1st back to back Ashes tour, Australia in the 2nd - so is India, and now NZ. Chill out and enjoy the different aspects of the game.

  • sk123 on February 5, 2014, 19:07 GMT

    @rizwan - Even though I'm not in favor of the BIG3 set up in ICC, I still can't stop myself from responding to your illogical statement. The fact that India is a BILLION people gives it that might where it can dictate terms in ICC. The money in the game comes from the sponsors and the sponsors sell their products to "people", which makes the nation with the biggest following THE place where these companies will want to sell. If Pepsi doesn't have a billion people watching their ads during cricket games, they won't pump in a billion dollars towards that game. Now, if you think that defies logic, there's only one person who is delusional here.

  • JasonGray on February 5, 2014, 15:06 GMT

    @modernumpire. ya, joking right mate. nz out performs india, in soccer and most other sports. even the sports u mentioned, india has done okay. india is inept in basketball, rugby, league, soccer etc. always the spectator ay. kiwis way better. only 4.5 too :)

  • anoop3301 on February 5, 2014, 15:02 GMT

    @ Jordanmacmillan88: Your comparison doesn't make much sense. First of all, half of the one billion indians are worried about from where the next meal is going to come from. At least 90% of Indians do not have any access to the expensive training facilities which every Kiwi can afford to enjoy. Despite all these, we have managed to win 3 world cups where as the Kiwis haven't even tasted the finals yet. Now, that is some example of being over-rated. India as a cricket team definitely needs to improve its overseas performances but that doesn't mean some strange logic can be used ridiculously. After all, New Zealand's overseas performance through out its history is a hell lot poorer than India.

  • ModernUmpiresPlz on February 5, 2014, 12:29 GMT

    @Jordanmacmillan88 Just to be fair here, India do actually do well at sports that aren't cricket, they just don't happen to be the same sports that NZers would care about at all. Hockey, badminton, shooting for example. Just wanted to broaden that horizon a tad. Not to mention that the opportunity available to the average New Zealander is much greater than the average Indian, as well as facilities on offer etc.

  • on February 5, 2014, 12:26 GMT

    Stats showing that India will not take 20 wickets in Away tests. A hard fact for us but it is true.

  • rizwan1981 on February 5, 2014, 12:13 GMT

    I truly admire the Kiwis - with a population of 3 million , they have the best Rugby team in the world . Also , their Rowing team is fantastic with the Gold Medal winning Pair unbeaten for years.Both Rugby and Rowing are sports that are popular in Europe and North America unlike Cricket which has only 10 nations in the Club.

    Therefore, Indian fans should view the success of the team in context and be humble of their achievements.

  • Kirk_Levin on February 5, 2014, 11:53 GMT

    Just shows, how flawed the ICC ranking system is. India deserves to be placed at no.8, not 2.

  • JasonGray on February 5, 2014, 10:49 GMT

    India is a overrated side. Their loud fans fail to realize, how pathetic this team really is, despite occasional brilliance. NZ is a small country, and Cricket is not even our 3rd most followed sport. Yet, we can punch above our weight and beat India, which only plays one sport decently, despite having the 2nd largest population in the world. I mean, we won more medals than India, at the last Olympics. Proud of the Kiwi lads.

  • JasonGray on February 5, 2014, 10:44 GMT

    India has always been a minnow side, in away matches. They have yet to win test series in Aussie, SA etc, where non-flat pitches makes life tough for them. A clear example is the tour of SA, where they were humiliated. They failed to win a single match, despite choosing grounds where the Saffas had poor records and pitches similar to India. India is able to win matches at home, because they prepare pitches to suit their batsman's and spinners, leaving their fast bowlers in the lurch. But at the end of the day, a nation of a billion, which only plays a single sport successfully, shouldn't struggle to win matches home or away consistently. India is very much ordinary. Go Kiwis lads

  • sk123 on February 5, 2014, 19:22 GMT

    @Jordanmacmillan88 - So, are the pitches in India flat or spinner friendly? They can't be both at the same time ;) ... Let's just say that most Indian batsmen are bad against bouncy pacers and most batsmen from other countries can't play spin. Both spin and pace are a big part of the game so you can't measure the success against each with a different yardstick only because it seems to fit your conclusion. Every nation is a lion in their own den and Eng was in 1st back to back Ashes tour, Australia in the 2nd - so is India, and now NZ. Chill out and enjoy the different aspects of the game.

  • sk123 on February 5, 2014, 19:07 GMT

    @rizwan - Even though I'm not in favor of the BIG3 set up in ICC, I still can't stop myself from responding to your illogical statement. The fact that India is a BILLION people gives it that might where it can dictate terms in ICC. The money in the game comes from the sponsors and the sponsors sell their products to "people", which makes the nation with the biggest following THE place where these companies will want to sell. If Pepsi doesn't have a billion people watching their ads during cricket games, they won't pump in a billion dollars towards that game. Now, if you think that defies logic, there's only one person who is delusional here.

  • JasonGray on February 5, 2014, 15:06 GMT

    @modernumpire. ya, joking right mate. nz out performs india, in soccer and most other sports. even the sports u mentioned, india has done okay. india is inept in basketball, rugby, league, soccer etc. always the spectator ay. kiwis way better. only 4.5 too :)

  • anoop3301 on February 5, 2014, 15:02 GMT

    @ Jordanmacmillan88: Your comparison doesn't make much sense. First of all, half of the one billion indians are worried about from where the next meal is going to come from. At least 90% of Indians do not have any access to the expensive training facilities which every Kiwi can afford to enjoy. Despite all these, we have managed to win 3 world cups where as the Kiwis haven't even tasted the finals yet. Now, that is some example of being over-rated. India as a cricket team definitely needs to improve its overseas performances but that doesn't mean some strange logic can be used ridiculously. After all, New Zealand's overseas performance through out its history is a hell lot poorer than India.

  • ModernUmpiresPlz on February 5, 2014, 12:29 GMT

    @Jordanmacmillan88 Just to be fair here, India do actually do well at sports that aren't cricket, they just don't happen to be the same sports that NZers would care about at all. Hockey, badminton, shooting for example. Just wanted to broaden that horizon a tad. Not to mention that the opportunity available to the average New Zealander is much greater than the average Indian, as well as facilities on offer etc.

  • on February 5, 2014, 12:26 GMT

    Stats showing that India will not take 20 wickets in Away tests. A hard fact for us but it is true.

  • rizwan1981 on February 5, 2014, 12:13 GMT

    I truly admire the Kiwis - with a population of 3 million , they have the best Rugby team in the world . Also , their Rowing team is fantastic with the Gold Medal winning Pair unbeaten for years.Both Rugby and Rowing are sports that are popular in Europe and North America unlike Cricket which has only 10 nations in the Club.

    Therefore, Indian fans should view the success of the team in context and be humble of their achievements.

  • Kirk_Levin on February 5, 2014, 11:53 GMT

    Just shows, how flawed the ICC ranking system is. India deserves to be placed at no.8, not 2.

  • JasonGray on February 5, 2014, 10:49 GMT

    India is a overrated side. Their loud fans fail to realize, how pathetic this team really is, despite occasional brilliance. NZ is a small country, and Cricket is not even our 3rd most followed sport. Yet, we can punch above our weight and beat India, which only plays one sport decently, despite having the 2nd largest population in the world. I mean, we won more medals than India, at the last Olympics. Proud of the Kiwi lads.

  • JasonGray on February 5, 2014, 10:44 GMT

    India has always been a minnow side, in away matches. They have yet to win test series in Aussie, SA etc, where non-flat pitches makes life tough for them. A clear example is the tour of SA, where they were humiliated. They failed to win a single match, despite choosing grounds where the Saffas had poor records and pitches similar to India. India is able to win matches at home, because they prepare pitches to suit their batsman's and spinners, leaving their fast bowlers in the lurch. But at the end of the day, a nation of a billion, which only plays a single sport successfully, shouldn't struggle to win matches home or away consistently. India is very much ordinary. Go Kiwis lads

  • Sultan2007 on February 5, 2014, 10:43 GMT

    Often numbers dont tell the right story. When one looks at the last 18 months, everything gets influenced by the 2 white washes in England and Australia. Guys, England was an aberration. Please, the bowling was by Praveen kumar and an RP Singh called in from his vacation sporting a gut! Everytime India came to bat they were staring at big totals. Yes, Australia could have been better and the challenge there was exceptional bowling matched against a batting line up in transition. I think SA is a truer start and we should initialise all statistical analysis to start from there. HAving said that, unless India sort out their bowling attack, the numbers are unlikely to flatter them

  • rizwan1981 on February 5, 2014, 9:12 GMT

    How can a nation of 3 Million people have a better record than India with over a BILLION ? Just shows , the big 3 are deluded if they think might is right !

  • Yuosufahmed on February 5, 2014, 3:03 GMT

    Thanks Shiva for the nice piece of writing. This presents a clear picture of where we are nowadays. Even I failed to realize this truth along with most of my Ind fans and tried to justify our performance by using past statistics. Further, we together started to bash other countries and players specially our arch rivals Pak, Lankans, Ausies and Saffas as they were playing better than us recently.

    I can't believe that we are at the last position along with Zim in away test matches from July 2011. We managed to draw only 2 while we lost 9 matches. SA, Pak, Aus and SL leading the table while Ban, NZ and WI are also ahead us. Also, we have 3-2 win-loss ratio in Zim, which is the worst among other major test playing countries against Zim. We have won only 2 matches against mighty Ausies when we loose 14.

    I don't agree with you on one point. This should be the worst away loss coz we lost 9 from 11 matches as compared to 9 from 22 in 1993-2000 period.

  • on February 4, 2014, 20:22 GMT

    NZ pace bowlers should aim between heart and head of the Indian batsmen with short pitch and real pacy deliveries. Indian Batsmen with the exception of Kohli and Dhoni showed that they are afraid of Short Pitch bowling. NZ can do some psychological damage that would spill into next India's overseas series in England. I hope NZ team stretches India's overseas record by another 2 Test Matches. 0 Wins in 12 Tests should read 0 Wins and 11 losses in 14 overseas Test matches. There is no way India can win this series. They do not have the bowlers, with the exception of Zaheer to take 20 Wickets even in a 7 day Test Match.

  • kalyanbk on February 4, 2014, 18:07 GMT

    The last time India won a test (and the series in NZ) on their way to No. 1 in tests, a certain Sachin Tendulkar scored 160 with a certain Harbhajan Singh taking 6 wickets. To be fair Ishant Sharma took 4 wickets in the first innings. One has retired and two have had their performance levels fall away. Just looking at that team lineup in 2009 shows how imposing that batting lineup was to rattle up 520 away from home. Our young guns should watch a video of that innings to get pumped up.

  • siddhartha87 on February 4, 2014, 15:01 GMT

    if India really wants to be counted among top teams then they should beat New Zeland comprehensively. Be it home or abroad New Zeland is one of the easiest opponent in tests as they lack quality batsmen in longer form of the game.If India draws or loses this series India should stop bragging about being a top team in Test arena.

  • on February 4, 2014, 14:44 GMT

    India have won 1 test only unbelievable

  • Rajiv007 on February 4, 2014, 11:38 GMT

    India hasn't actually played that badly to lose the ODIs unlike in SA. Infact NZ played beautifully which they never did before with some help from Indian Bowlers. For Tests, India need to BAT first and should post a decent 350+ total and that will invoke some confidence to the bowlers.

  • muzika_tchaikovskogo on February 4, 2014, 11:25 GMT

    Its not surprising that India have such a dismal record in New Zealand. Whereas they have toured nearly every other test playing country thrice in this century, they've only been to New Zealand twice. In the 41 years between their series wins in 1967-68 and 2008-09, they played just 5 test series in New Zealand (apart from a one-off test in 1994).

  • on February 4, 2014, 10:57 GMT

    put rain in the equation and one can understand the high number of draws - how many have been affected by the weather where a probable result was expected?

  • CricketMaan on February 4, 2014, 10:53 GMT

    The BANE has always been our bowling. Pak for all its flamboyance in batting always had/have bowlers that can pick 20 wickets on any wicket which India despite thier legacy in batting never have had in decades! As it stands today, we have the worst bowling line up to pick 20 wickets outside sub-continent, so no matter how Kholis and Pujaras, Rahanes bat, its the bowling that's hurting us!

  • Foxymoron on February 4, 2014, 10:46 GMT

    India have won 1 test in NZ in 40 years!! You had my curiosity now you have my attention. This series is going to be closer than I thought.

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • Foxymoron on February 4, 2014, 10:46 GMT

    India have won 1 test in NZ in 40 years!! You had my curiosity now you have my attention. This series is going to be closer than I thought.

  • CricketMaan on February 4, 2014, 10:53 GMT

    The BANE has always been our bowling. Pak for all its flamboyance in batting always had/have bowlers that can pick 20 wickets on any wicket which India despite thier legacy in batting never have had in decades! As it stands today, we have the worst bowling line up to pick 20 wickets outside sub-continent, so no matter how Kholis and Pujaras, Rahanes bat, its the bowling that's hurting us!

  • on February 4, 2014, 10:57 GMT

    put rain in the equation and one can understand the high number of draws - how many have been affected by the weather where a probable result was expected?

  • muzika_tchaikovskogo on February 4, 2014, 11:25 GMT

    Its not surprising that India have such a dismal record in New Zealand. Whereas they have toured nearly every other test playing country thrice in this century, they've only been to New Zealand twice. In the 41 years between their series wins in 1967-68 and 2008-09, they played just 5 test series in New Zealand (apart from a one-off test in 1994).

  • Rajiv007 on February 4, 2014, 11:38 GMT

    India hasn't actually played that badly to lose the ODIs unlike in SA. Infact NZ played beautifully which they never did before with some help from Indian Bowlers. For Tests, India need to BAT first and should post a decent 350+ total and that will invoke some confidence to the bowlers.

  • on February 4, 2014, 14:44 GMT

    India have won 1 test only unbelievable

  • siddhartha87 on February 4, 2014, 15:01 GMT

    if India really wants to be counted among top teams then they should beat New Zeland comprehensively. Be it home or abroad New Zeland is one of the easiest opponent in tests as they lack quality batsmen in longer form of the game.If India draws or loses this series India should stop bragging about being a top team in Test arena.

  • kalyanbk on February 4, 2014, 18:07 GMT

    The last time India won a test (and the series in NZ) on their way to No. 1 in tests, a certain Sachin Tendulkar scored 160 with a certain Harbhajan Singh taking 6 wickets. To be fair Ishant Sharma took 4 wickets in the first innings. One has retired and two have had their performance levels fall away. Just looking at that team lineup in 2009 shows how imposing that batting lineup was to rattle up 520 away from home. Our young guns should watch a video of that innings to get pumped up.

  • on February 4, 2014, 20:22 GMT

    NZ pace bowlers should aim between heart and head of the Indian batsmen with short pitch and real pacy deliveries. Indian Batsmen with the exception of Kohli and Dhoni showed that they are afraid of Short Pitch bowling. NZ can do some psychological damage that would spill into next India's overseas series in England. I hope NZ team stretches India's overseas record by another 2 Test Matches. 0 Wins in 12 Tests should read 0 Wins and 11 losses in 14 overseas Test matches. There is no way India can win this series. They do not have the bowlers, with the exception of Zaheer to take 20 Wickets even in a 7 day Test Match.

  • Yuosufahmed on February 5, 2014, 3:03 GMT

    Thanks Shiva for the nice piece of writing. This presents a clear picture of where we are nowadays. Even I failed to realize this truth along with most of my Ind fans and tried to justify our performance by using past statistics. Further, we together started to bash other countries and players specially our arch rivals Pak, Lankans, Ausies and Saffas as they were playing better than us recently.

    I can't believe that we are at the last position along with Zim in away test matches from July 2011. We managed to draw only 2 while we lost 9 matches. SA, Pak, Aus and SL leading the table while Ban, NZ and WI are also ahead us. Also, we have 3-2 win-loss ratio in Zim, which is the worst among other major test playing countries against Zim. We have won only 2 matches against mighty Ausies when we loose 14.

    I don't agree with you on one point. This should be the worst away loss coz we lost 9 from 11 matches as compared to 9 from 22 in 1993-2000 period.