The former England captain's take on the fortnight in cricket

'Zaheer Khan has been sensational'

Gambhir's rise as a Test opener, Dhoni's learning curve as captain, and South Africa's climb to the top (10:51)

April 13, 2009

View comments (6)

Transcript

The Tony Greig Show

'Zaheer Khan has been sensational'

April 13, 2009

2
Tony Greig: "Let's not detract from Gambhir's most recent performances - he has become a very good Test opener." © Getty Images
 

News this week:

There is little doubt that the Indian team is now one of the best in the world and having said that, I found Sachin Tendulkar's comments this week very interesting. Tendulkar credits coach Gary Kirsten with helping the team become a force in world cricket again. He thinks the secret to India's recent success revolves around the players being encouraged to play their natural game, that he says can only happen if the atmosphere is good and the mind is free of any kind of pressure. Tendulkar says natural instincts then take over and that can be credited to Gary Kirsten - high praise indeed, especially in a decade when the role of the coach is often questioned by players of yesteryear.

It is however fair to point out that India's historic win in New Zealand has been slightly overplayed because the Indians haven't visited New Zealand that often. It is also pertinent to draw attention to the fact that the New Zealand side at the moment are seriously struggling in the bowling department in particular. That said, a win is a win, and this may just be the start of a good run of series victories for India.

Gautam Gambhir will be extremely satisfied with his progress having scored 445 runs in six innings in New Zealand. His performance in the second innings of the second Test - 137 off 436 balls in over 10½ hours was a landmark performance for a natural strokemaker even if he is known for being a bit flashy. This innings showed that Gambhir has a great temperament - believe me there is plenty of satisfaction in saving a match, especially when to do so requires a serious test of one's concentration. Gambhir passed with flying colours and his innings helped India escape with a memorable draw. There has been speculation that Gambhir is vulnerable in seaming conditions but who isn't. These days many of the best players also seem to have problems when the ball swings but let's not detract from Gambhir's most recent performances - he has become a very good Test opener.

MS Dhoni has already built a reputation for himself as a captain to be reckoned with, but there were plenty of us who couldn't fathom why he left his declaration so late in the third Test. Let's face it, New Zealand could only save the Test if the rain came and as a result India's bowlers were deprived of the time they needed to do the job. That's exactly what happened and now many of us will reserve our judgement as to whether or not Dhoni will go down the same path as his predecessors and turn out to be a conservative, as opposed to an attacking captain. Don't get me wrong here, declarations are only part of the job and Dhoni has handled the tactics, and more importantly the big stars in his side, very well so far. I do think he is a quick learner and I am sure given the same set of circumstances again he would be a little more adventurous.

The big change to India's team has come in the fast bowling department. Zaheer Khan's contribution after his comeback to the Indian team a couple of years back has been nothing short of sensational. He has qualities that good batsmen don't like - he can swing the ball late, he hits the seam, he bowls a good bouncer and he has stamina. These qualities combined with the fact that he has Ishant Sharma as an opening partner make India so much more effective.

I am very reluctant to write New Zealand off as a force in Test cricket because I have often seen them bounce back when all seemed lost. The loss of Shane Bond to the ICL definitely took some sting out of their attack and Jacob Oram's injury made things worse. New Zealand have some fine batsmen in Brendon McCullum, Jesse Ryder, Ross Taylor and now Martin Guptill and there are others who have indicated that with a little more experience they too may step up. To win Tests with a 'run of the mill' attack is hard and I'm afraid that while Vettori, Martin, O'Brien, Mills and Southee are all game tryers on flat pitches they will continue to find it hard to take the required 20 wickets. ODIs and Twenty20 cricket are a different matter altogether.

South Africa has taken a 2-1 lead in the one-day series against Australia. After losing the first ODI, South Africa bounced back to beat Australia comprehensively in the next two games. With two matches to go, South Africa looks set to retain the number one spot in the ICC's one day rankings. There is no doubt that the confidence Graeme Smith's team gained on their tour of Australia has transformed this team. Their batting is solid, their bowling aggressive and tight, and it's backed up by their usual high standards in the field. Any team that boasts a batting lineup that includes seven players of the calibre of Gibbs, Smith, Kallis, De Villiers, Duminy, Albie Morkel, and Boucher, has a good chance of posting a competitive score. Add to this the firepower of Steyn, the swing of youngster Parnell, the experience of Kallis and Ntini and a spin department that includes Botha, Duminy and Smith and bingo, you have a wonderfully balanced team. Confidence against Australia in particular has been lacking in the past but not any more so. I think South Africa is going to be up there with the best in all forms of the game for a few years to come.

Pakistan is set to play Australia in Dubai and Abu Dhabi and we now hear that Pakistan plans to play their home Internationals in places like Malaysia, Ireland and Scotland until the security situation returns to normal in Pakistan. This must break the hearts of the lovers of cricket in Pakistan and will certainly impact on the future of the game in the area, because youngsters will be robbed of the chance of watching quality cricket and their cricket heroes live on their home soil. While this is a sad state of affairs we have to be realistic and accept the situation while at the same time we must be considerate of the plight of Pakistan cricket. These days the TV, radio and internet coverage at least allows all of us to watch, listen and follow cricket played everywhere and one has to hope that this will at least sustain the love of cricket in Pakistan. It is also vital that the PCB see to it that the best possible domestic cricket programme is maintained.

2
Tony Greig: "I think Andy Flower deserves the job of England coach and will get it." © AFP
 
The ECB were quick to sack Peter Moores as coach but are now being criticised for marking time on appointing his replacement. Andy Flower and Graham Thorpe are according to the English media, the favourites, but there is no rush. Flower was appointed to do the job on a temporary basis in the West Indies and that tour has just finished. Hopefully, the ECB are discussing the position with Andrew Strauss because it is Strauss who is going to have to work with the new coach and the ECB wont want a repeat of the messy situation that resulted in their last captain and coach being kicked out because they didn't see eye to eye. John Dyson, Mickey Arthur and many others have been mentioned as candidates but I think Andy Flower deserves the job and will get it. If I were the ECB I would write into the new coach's contract a clause stating that should the captaincy change, it will be the prerogative of the new captain, in consultation with the ECB, to review his position. I say this because I feel strongly that the captain should always have a say who his coach should be.

Andy Atkinson, the ICC's pitch consultant, has warned that pitches around the world are becoming too batsman-friendly, largely because of the volume of one-day and Twenty20 cricket played around the world, He is of the view that some groundsmen have lost the art of preparing a five-day pitch. This is a very generic statement and will not go down well with those groundsmen who are still doing a good job. In Australia, for example, the pitches are great with the exception of the MCG pitch. It is a 'drop in' and I would certainly agree that 'drop in' pitches are highly overrated. They are used when grounds have to be converted from, in the case of the MCG, an Aussie Rules football ground to a cricket ground. Atkinson should know what he is talking about because it is he who has to have a look at grounds and pitches that are reported as substandard. If he is right we will soon find out because Twenty20 cricket has only just started to impact on cricket programmes around the world. There is also no doubt that that batsmen have had a good run, one only has to watch all the batsmen in the world struggle against the swinging or seaming ball to know that to be true.

What's eating Tony Greig?

The old question of whether or not cricket should be available on free to air TV is raising its head again in England. It's not commonly known but 60% of UK viewers can't get any live international cricket because the ECB in their wisdom sold the rights to the pay TV operator Sky in the UK. To be fair, they did this because Sky was prepared to pay far more than anyone else for exclusive rights. There are those of us who ten years ago warned that this move would be bad for English cricket and now with Australia about to tour England the Ashes will not be on free-to-air TV for the first time and we are about to hear some serious complaining. Just to back up my view, The Pro-Active South London Schools Survey for 2008 in which more than 26,000 children at secondary schools were asked which three sports they would like more access to: football was first, badminton eighth, cricket 21st. Even among boys alone, it ranked no higher than twelfth. Such findings show that the hold on the public imagination which cricket had in 2005 has been lost completely and this should ring like a fire alarm at the ECB's offices.

Question of the week:

Comes from G Prakash, New Delhi - In the nineties India had a good team but they were only labelled as "Tigers at home". It was inevitable those days that India will lose the series by nil when they go to South Africa, Australia or England. What do you think has caused Indian cricket transformation in recent years while playing abroad?

Well Prakash, this has a lot to do with the talent in the side and how much this talent is exposed to bouncy wickets and fast bowlers. These days there is far more cricket, so far more exposure. There is also no doubt that India has a tremendous batting side and I think all their batsmen are better at handling the short ball. Add to this a balanced bowling attack that has in its ranks bowlers as capable as any of dishing out the short stuff. It's as simple as that Indian batsmen are no longer passive when confronted with bouncers they are just as likely to hook them for six as the Aussies are.

Right now, a bit of news going forward - I am going to take a break for a few weeks. It's been a wonderful journey so far and I shall be back with a new version of The Tony Greig Show very soon. So watch this space. That's all for now, this is Tony Greig for Cricinfo Talk signing off.

Posted by PradeepR on (April 13, 2009, 22:53 GMT)

I am an Indian for the record and I think this series victory over NZ is way overrated. NZ at best have only one quality player in Jesse Ryder. Brendon McCullum is an overrated batsman. He is at best a two or three-stroke player. Daniel Vettori and Ross Taylor are okay. The rest of the NZ team is not even worth mentioning. So, I feel that there is no need for us Indians to be too happy and there is no need for the commentators especially the non-Indian commentators to say good things about the team just to make the Indians happy. Dhoni is a very good captain but there is no need to praise him sky high. We had an opportunity to win the series 2-0, but we didn't because of the defensive mindset of the team. With this mindset I don't see the team reaching the number one position anytime soon. I know our team has been worse in the past, but I don't see anything great about the Indian team being #3 out of 8 teams especially with the money and resources available with the BCCI.

Posted by Mozie on (April 13, 2009, 20:40 GMT)

sidhu dont make me laugh. sa was in india early last year only to draw in very controvesy. they slipt up against aus early this year but they are back again. lets wait till india comes to africa. then decide who is the best

Posted by Nitin_21 on (April 13, 2009, 18:02 GMT)

South Africa deserve their number one status in ODI's, they have been the most consistent team in ODI's ever since their readmission to limited over's cricket in 1991, their success rate in ODI's is better than all the ODI teams, even better than that of Australia, unfortunately World Cup is the only trophy which is missing from South Africa's arsenal, hopefully 2011 World Cup will be theirs. Also South Africa have won ODI's against all nations in whichever conditions they have played in, unlike some of the so called "Great Teams", who dominate on batting conditions, but get scared the moment they see grass on the pitch. They might have lost 4-0 to England, but it was just a momentary lapse, as they got carried away by their test series victory in England after almost 4 decades. However like all great champions, they quickly learnt their lesson from that series loss, and thrashed Australia 4-1 in the ODI's in their own den (after winning the test series)...cont'd

Posted by philafelo on (April 13, 2009, 16:02 GMT)

"... and this may just be the start of a good run of series victories for India." Ahem, Mr.Greig, in case you have not noticed, this team has won recent series against Australia and England. New Zealand is just another check point.

However, if you meant to say that this is the start of a good run of series victories while on tour, then it gives some credence to your comment.. Then again, this team has won in England, Pakistan and West Indies in the recent past, not to mention the acrimonious series loss in Australia in early 2008. Aus along with South Africa and Sri Lanka, represent the true test of mettle for this Indian team. Can't wait for the South African safari.

Posted by DeepakBhakoo on (April 13, 2009, 10:25 GMT)

Tony, I've always respected your views on any cricket topic and I keep looking forward to your new articles/columns. I have always enjoyed your TV commentary alongside Mr. Benaud, as the two of you are a Bank Of Cricket Knowledge.

Posted by Sidhu1919 on (April 13, 2009, 9:05 GMT)

I think India is better than South Africa.SA lost 0-4 in ODIs to England.The same England side was beaten 5-0 by India.To me the order has to be 1.India 2.South Africa 3.Australia 4.Srilanka 5.West Indies.

Comments have now been closed for this article


Play Audio
'Cricket needs leadership from India'

Mar 1, 2010 Tendulkar's achievement, premature retirements, and why India needs to step up and make big decisions (10:15)

Play Audio
'Cricket at the Olympics? You've got to be joking'

Feb 15, 2010 Why South Africa are likely to leapfrog India in the rankings, and the problem with Twenty20 overkill (10:16)


Play Video
Highlights: Chennai win big over Dolphins

Highlights: McCullum, Raina, and Jadeja set a massive total of 242. Dolphins started well but couldn't stay afloat to out-score Chennai on a 400-run day in Bangalore (05:32) | Sep 22, 2014

Play Video
Raina's 90 gives Chennai sturdy foundation

Highlights: Chennai Super King's India international Suresh Raina smashed 90 runs from just 43 deliveries against Dolphins, in Bangalore (01:30) | Sep 22, 2014

Play Video
Super Kings make gigantic total of 242

Highlights: Suresh Raina, Brendon McCullum, and Ravindra Jadeja combined for 179 runs of Chennai's massive 242-run total against Dolphins, in Bangalore (03:48) | Sep 22, 2014