|Photos||Video & Audio||Blogs||Statistics||Archive||Shop||Mobile|
'India is the catalyst for the freelancer crisis'
Players as free agents, West Indies' dilemma, the ICC awards, a two-tier Test structure and more (08:57)
September 28, 2009
The Tony Greig Show
'India is the catalyst for the freelancer crisis'September 28, 2009
Champions Trophy round-up Last week I picked South Africa, Australia and India as my favourites for the Champions Trophy. I also said I was reluctant to underestimate Pakistan. Now that Pakistan has comprehensively beaten India, and Sri Lanka have upset South Africa, things have changed but not too dramatically.
It seems to me that the Wanderers pitch holds the key because it is fast, bouncy and also two-paced. South Africa and Australia will both be hoping for a Wanderers semi-final, while Sri Lanka and Pakistan would prefer to play at Centurion, where conditions are similar to those at home.
At the time of recording New Zealand have got off to a great start against Sri Lanka, but I have no strong inclination to change my prediction of an Australia-South Africa final. But Sri Lanka and Pakistan are now my preferred other semi-finalists.
It's a risky business predicting the outcome in any limited overs tournaments, and Australia will be a little worried about their overall form, especially after their match against the very weak West Indies. South Africa will certainly have been rocked by their defeat at the hands of Sri Lanka, but these things happen and good teams recover. South Africa have the added problem of their so-called jinx when it comes to winning a major tournament, but I think that is now a thing of the past.
West Indies' participation in the Champions Trophy There has been plenty of debate about whether or not the ICC should have barred West Indies from taking part in the Champions Trophy on the basis that their team after losing at home to Bangladesh is no longer in the top eight. I don't think this would have been fair. The unrest in West Indies cricket has been around for a long time and in situations like this, when it does seem that things have well and truly come to a head, there is no point in the ICC imposing itself on the WICB and their players. It is now up to these two groups to resolve their issues once and for all. If they don't do this before their scheduled tour of Australia then there is no doubt in my mind that Cricket Australia will seek a replacement team. It's acceptable to allow West Indies cricket time to sort out their issues, but not too much time. Hopefully the compromise they come up with will be a lasting one, but I am certainly not holding my breath. There is so much bad blood between the factions that lasting peace in the current climate seems highly unlikely.
The two-tier Test structure The concept of a two-tier Test structure is doing the rounds, and while the teams who are likely to end up in the top tier will not be unduly worried, it's the group in the second tier that will be opposed to having their status changed. I am not in favour because the only reason we are in this position is because we have allowed weak teams like Bangladesh and Zimbabwe to retain Test status when they clearly don't deserve it. West Indies could find themselves in a similar position if they don't resolve their problems.
I am more inclined to encourage the ICC to withdraw Test status from those countries not living up to the standards we expect in Tests. Here again we have a problem because the votes of Bangladesh and Zimbabwe tend to go to India, who have no intention of backing any move that will reduce their influence. This is where we need to see change. India has to take control of some of these major issues. We need to hear what Sharad Pawar and his colleagues think should happen, so we can then form a view on their logic. In the meantime I would maintain the status quo.
The absence of South African players in the ICC awards shortlists It is ridiculous that no South African player features in the final shortlists of the ICC annual awards. How is it that a team can perform so well as a unit and also have eight players in the top 10 in the batting and bowling rankings for Tests and ODIs and still have no representation? That's just not on, and I can certainly understand why the South Africans are crying foul. All I can suggest is that those given the responsibility of making this decision did so in a haphazard way. The ICC is always in search of credibility and whether they like it or not this is not the way to go about acquiring it. Perhaps they should have a good look at those they have selected to make these decisions.
The sex dossier I never thought that I would live to see the day when a coach, or anyone else for that matter, would put in writing suggestions to cricketers on what they should or shouldn't do sexually on the night before a match. Well, it's happened. The Indian players have now got a dossier explaining explicitly what they should do. The advice appeared under the heading "Does sex increase performance?" and went on to say, "Yes it does, so go ahead and indulge," before detailing the benefits of a good sex life and even suggesting "going solo" if no partners were available. According to the dossier, "having sex increases testosterone levels, which causes an increase in strength, energy, aggression and competitiveness". Gary Kirsten expressed his deep hurt at the quotes attributed to him, that he has been trying to encourage the players towards sexual activity. The former South African opener said the report was prepared by mental conditioner Paddy Upton just to provide information to the players - not for implementation or to be used as team strategy. Thank God for that.
|"I am not in favour of a two-tier Test structure because the only reason we are in this position is because we have allowed weak teams like Bangladesh and Zimbabwe to retain Test status when they clearly don't deserve it"|
Why the modern cricketer prefers freelancing England's Andrew Flintoff has refused an ECB central contract and chosen, instead, to become what is being described as a freelance player. What Flintoff is saying to the ECB is that he doesn't want to be bound to the terms of this type of contract, which naturally requires the player to make himself available to play in all of England's games. Flintoff no longer needs the security of a guaranteed wage because he has made enough cash, and now he wants to be able to pick and choose when he will be available to play for England.
There is a good reason why he has decided to go down this path. He has made enough money to dictate to the ECB, and he wants to make more by seeing to it that he is available for the IPL and every other money-spinning Twenty20 tournament going.
The coming English summer, England will possibly have matches that clash with the IPL, so obviously he will not be available for England. But when the IPL is over he may then let it be known that he is available again. Alternatively he may choose to have a break or go off and play elsewhere. The ECB have no option other than to treat Flintoff as if he has retired. If they don't, they run the risk of other England players doing the same.
The England authorities could refuse to grant him the letter of consent required for him to take part in the IPL, but they will be hesitant to take a firm stand against Flintoff for fear of once again being taken to court and beaten. This happened in the late seventies when the Australian board tried to stop Kerry Packer's World Series players from earning a living.
Mind you, this is different in so much as in those days our problem was that we were paid so badly that we were justified in seeking to secure our futures. Flintoff, on the other hand, could retire tomorrow and be financially secure. It won't be long now before many of the cricket boards around the world realise that they had better come up with a formula that accommodates all those with a vested interest in the game. When this happens they will realise that India is the catalyst for the crisis and they will have to find a way of seeing to it that India is part of the plan to ensure that players remain loyal to their respective boards.
West Indies are the first to seriously feel the impact of the security offered by the IPL. This guarantee of big money for only two months work has fortified the West Indies players, who in the past have been inclined to compromise with the WICB. Now the WICB have players who aren't any longer financially dependent on playing Tests, ODIs or Twenty/20 matches for West Indies.
I would be highly surprised if quite a few cricket boards around the world aren't already ganging up in an effort to extract from India further undertakings regarding the participation of non-Indian players in the IPL. These undertakings will not only relate to firming up on the letter-of-consent process, but also some form of reimbursement by India for the use of players from other countries. After all, why should India be allowed to profit from the assets of the other cricket boards in the world? This is not fair and simply can't last.
|Comments have now been closed for this article
Mar 1, 2010 Tendulkar's achievement, premature retirements, and why India needs to step up and make big decisions (10:15)
Feb 15, 2010 Why South Africa are likely to leapfrog India in the rankings, and the problem with Twenty20 overkill (10:16)
Highlights: One-handed catches, direct hits, hundreds, and a nail-biting finish. Who made the No.1 play from the first week of the Champions League? (01:46) | Sep 22, 2014
News and Analysis: A one-minute round-up of the top stories on September 22, 2014 (00:57) | Sep 22, 2014