A fortnightly talk show hosted by one of India's most popular cricket commentators

'Unsettled sides, but India start favourites'

Rahul Dravid, Ian Chappell, and Harsha Bhogle look ahead to India's next big home assignment (31:44)

Producers: Siddhartha Talya and Suketu Mehta

February 21, 2013


'Unsettled sides, but India start favourites'

February 21, 2013

Shane Watson flicks through the on side during his 84, India A v Australians, Tour game, 2nd Day, Chennai, February 17, 2013
Shane Watson: opener first, change bowler second © ESPNcricinfo Ltd

A new-look Australian side visits India at a time when the hosts are desperately seeking a boost in Test cricket after having lost three major series, including at home against England, in a span of one and a half years. Former captains Rahul Dravid and Ian Chappell join Harsha Bhogle to discuss what could be in store.

Excerpts below. The numbers in the brackets are the duration for each segment

The series is missing several senior cricketers, who played in the last India-Australia series in 2011-12. (1.34 - 3.43)

Rahul Dravid: Some of the people who have been integral to India-Australia series over the last decade and a half will be missing, on both sides. It'll be different from that point of view. An India-Australia series will still be high profile. It'll probably be a series that will throw up new faces, and both sides will hope they'll be faces that will go on to play and sustain a rivalry for the next decade or so.

Ian Chappell: One of Australia's big problems at the moment is that they are not producing good batsmen. Most of our debutants of late have been in their late 20s, even 30s. So that's a major problem for Australia. There might be one or two players who might make a name for themselves but I would be much happier if there were some good young batsmen coming through or, in fact, some good young batsmen on this tour.

Are Australia looking very unsettled on this trip to India? (3.44 - 5.38)

IC: I don't think there is any doubt that they are unsettled. But there is a lot of malarkey spoken about Shane Watson [not bowling]. Watson is an opening batsman as far as I am concerned, even when he is fully fit. I won't be using him much as a bowler. I'd be using him as a change bowler. He's there to score runs at the top of the order, as far as I am concerned. There is absolutely no doubt about where he should bat. He should open. If David Warner is fit, then Warner and Watson are the opening combination. But yes, Australia are very unsettled.

I'm sick to death of hearing how the guys are training the house down, how they've never looked better in the nets. I've never held much store over what happens in the nets. You never get any runs, you never get any wickets in the nets. Make them out in the middle and that means something.

A bigger opportunity for India if Australia are weaker than England… (5.40 - 7.27)

RD: Australia are less experienced than England in the batting department and especially in the spin-bowling department. Australia have some quality fast bowlers. They have come here with bowlers who can make an impact if the conditions suit them. I can't see that happening. I can't see India preparing tracks that will help the Australian fast bowlers. England came here with a couple of really good spinners, guys who had played over 40 Tests, over 200 wickets each, had played in these conditions before, had success in India before. As soon as India prepared turning tracks, England were able to capitalise and their spinners outbowled India.

I am not sure Australia will have that kind of quality and experience to be able to do that, unless they can unearth a brilliant cricketer from the ones we have seen. People like Nathan Lyon and Xavier Doherty, we've seen them before. There's a new left-arm spinner they're talking about [Ashton Agar], who has played a couple of games. Unless he shows us something unique, Australia might struggle to get India in trouble even on turning tracks in these conditions.

Should Australia play three seamers and one spinner? How big a problem is the absence of a quality spinner? (7.28 - 9.59)

IC: They are going to have to pick their best bowlers and that'll be three quickies and one spinner. They'll probably start with Siddle and Starc. They might go with Henriques and then use a batsman who can bowl a bit, like Maxwell. They might go that way, but it won't surprise me if they go with three quicks and just the one frontline spinner, and then they'll have Maxwell in reserve as a second spinner.

What went on in the warm-up games told us everything. The fact that Agar, who went there to get some experience, bowl to the team in the nets… that they kept him on - you had the feeling that if Agar had got four or five wickets in that second warm-up match, they probably would have played him in the Test match. You talked about uncertainty before. That, to me, is the definition of uncertainty.

They seem a bit concerned about Lyon. The big concern has been that he had a couple of opportunities to bowl Australia to victory in the fourth innings; he couldn't do it in Adelaide against South Africa and he then struggled in Sydney against the Sri Lankans, and that has got them a little bit worried. So I am not sure how they're going to go. I think Lyon is a decent bowler but he seems to go for quantity of deliveries rather than quality in those situations - when it's the fourth innings and the feeling is that he's got to bowl Australia to victory. He seems to rush everything, and that to me seems to have created a few problems for him. He just needs to settle things down a little bit.

Are the Indian spinners good enough? How many should they play? (10.00 - 11.32)

RD: I generally like to play a balanced side. If you've got two good spinners and they can't do the job on a turning track, I don't know how much the third or the fourth guy is going to do. But India, having picked Jadeja now as a floating allrounder, I think they might play three spinners, but I do hope they play two quicks as well. Reverse swing can be a factor in India. I just like the balance of it - Jadeja batting at No. 7, Dhoni at 6, Ashwin at 8 - they can maybe afford to play three spinners and two fast bowlers. I'd like to see that balance. Going with four spinners and one fast bowler, I'm not a big fan of that. If the track is a square turner, two guys should do the job for you. You are better off having an extra batsman on a track like that.

The return of Harbhajan Singh - should he play in the XI, and is his inclusion an indicator that there aren't too many other options? (11.33 - 12.49)

RD: Ashwin and Ojha didn't bowl particularly well against England, though I think Ojha was India's best spinner against England. As we know, there isn't a lot of spin-bowling talent in India in domestic cricket. If you look around, there hasn't been any young spinner who has stood up and said, "Look, pick me, I'm the next guy and I can deliver for you." In some ways, they have been forced to go back to Harbhajan. It's nice for them to have someone of Harbhajan's experience and quality in the wings, who they can call on to play in the series. He does well against Australia. He has particularly bowled well against them in India. That must have weighed in his favour. Having picked him, I would think they would play him now in the XI, and I guess they should.

"Having Gambhir sitting out is going to put pressure on the Indian selectors. He scored a hundred in the side game... That's going to put some pressure on Sehwag as well" Rahul Dravid

Where should Michael Clarke bat? (12.50 - 14.48)

IC: No. 4. The best batsman in your side must bat no lower than No. 4. I don't necessarily agree with the business about your best batsman bats at No. 3. Certainly in Australia that's a bit of a hangover from Bradman.

I always worked on the basis that I'd much rather come in at one for not very many than two for not very many. But I'd certainly rather come in at 2 for not very many than three for not very many. Australia have got out of trouble, even against India, a lot of times after being 3 for 30 or 3 for 40. Clarke, Ponting, it was on that occasion, and Hussey got them out of trouble. Maybe you can get away with it when you've got Ponting at 4 and Hussey at 6. But no way in the wide world should Clarke bat at 5 in this side. Even more reason for it because I am sure India will hit Australia with a lot of spin and Clarke is far and away the best player of spin in the Australian side. So you don't want to come in for not very many with the Indian spinners well and truly on top.

How unsettled are India? (15.59 - 17.15)

RD: India didn't bat particularly well against England as well. There are a few young, inexperienced players. They are talented, and they are good players. Pujara and Kohli have shown they can play. There is a little bit of inexperience. There is that No. 6 position, whether it's Rahane or Jadeja that will play. Even in the bowling department: who partners Ishant, who himself has been in and out of the side due to injury? Is it Bhuvneshwar Kumar or Ashok Dinda? For a large part of the decade, the Indian side almost picked itself except for one or two players.

Is this Sehwag's last chance? (17.16 - 19.25)

RD: He still averages 50 in Test match cricket. That's something to note. He's been having a tough time of late, [but] he scored a hundred against England in Ahmedabad and it is the only Test match India won. There is something to be said for someone who can play the way he does and give him a bit of leeway. But after this, India play three Test series away from home, and Viru hasn't done particularly well away from home in the last four or five series he's played. From that point of view, the selectors will want him to score a few runs, at least at home, so that when he goes to South Africa, he has some runs behind him.

Having Gambhir sitting out is going to put pressure on the Indian selectors as well. He is someone who has gone out and scored a hundred in the side game against Australia. No doubt he is going to score runs in domestic cricket. That's going to put some pressure on Sehwag as well; an experienced batsman sitting out, if he slips up, the selectors have to look back at Gambhir. But India would like him to do well. He is the kind of player who can turn a series in a session at times. So I think they'll persist with him as long as they can.

What about Tendulkar, who has scored a couple of centuries in the domestic season? (19.26 - 22.01)

RD: Tendulkar at 45, maybe with a stump will score a hundred in domestic cricket, he is that good. I'm not knocking domestic cricket in India, but if he puts his mind to it, he'll score runs in domestic cricket in India. There was never going to be a doubt in that. He needs runs as well, early on in the series. There are young batsmen coming through, and if India keep losing consistently, and the senior players don't keep scoring runs, the selectors could be tempted to think, "Look, let's blood some young kids in, we're losing in any case."

IC: In Australia, I think it had a huge effect, everyone worrying about whether or not he'll score his 100th hundred. To me, it consumed the team. I thought it was a huge problem there. If people are going to keep on "Will he or won't he retire? Will he keep his place or won't he keep his place?" - particularly in a place like India, where the individual stars mean a hell of a lot more than in Australia… Australia has a history of moving very good senior players on when the selectors think it is time to make that move. That doesn't happen in India, so I think it's very much a distraction that India can do without.

How big a challenge is this for Michael Clarke and MS Dhoni? (22.02 - 25.40)

IC: Clarke is a very good captain, and he is one of the few advantages I see Australia having. I thought Dhoni started out as a very good Test match captain. What I've seen of him, of late, particularly in that series in England and in Australia, I thought at times he was just going through the motions as a captain, and I felt it was the time for him to move on. Maybe retain the one-day captaincy, but I thought he'd run his race as a Test captain. If he starts going through the motions and putting fielders back and takes the pressure off the Australian batsmen, then he will pay for it. Clarke is a very good captain, and if he gets the opportunity to put some pressure on India and if his bowlers back him up, that could be one of Australia's only advantages - Clarke's captaincy.

RD: You need to produce results, as a player and as a captain as well. In the last three high-profile series, India has lost. This is the fourth one and India will expect Dhoni and the team to start producing results. I've said earlier that he is the right man to lead India at this point, because I'm not really sure India have got an alternative in the short term. But if India keep losing, he could become weary himself, and that could be a problem as well for India. In India, with the kind of attack he has, Dhoni is a better captain because of the kind of bowlers he has and the conditions he plays in. In Australia and England, where India just didn't have the bowling attack to put any pressure, it becomes very difficult for a captain to create any sort of pressure.

I think that is a challenge Clarke may face in this series. The only time Australia won here in 2004 was when Shane Warne backed up the fast bowlers by being able to bottle up one end and not giving too many runs, and keeping the pressure on. But when Australia came subsequently, they always had good fast bowlers, but whether it was Nathan Hauritz, Jason Krejza, whoever came in always leaked runs at the other end. That put a lot of pressure on whoever was the Australian captain then to keep bringing his fast bowlers back on, and at some stage they are going to get tired.

That's going to be Clarke's biggest challenge: how is he going to stem the run flow when his spinners are bowling? If he can find a way to do that, then his fast bowlers become effective. But if he doesn't, the longer the series goes on - and it's a long series in these conditions, it's going to get hotter and hotter in India - Australia might just start wilting.

Harbhajan Singh took three wickets, Punjab v Hyderabad, Group A, Ranji Trophy, Mohali, November 5, 2012
Will Harbhajan be able to have the same hold over Australia that he had in the past? © ESPNcricinfo Ltd

Who would you pick as a favourite? (25.41 - 26.57)

IC: India have got to start favourites. If it was a normal Indian side with dominant spinners, I'd say they would win in a canter. But I don't think they've got spinners of that ilk at the moment, and that gives Australia a chance. But I have to say, India have to start favourites in this series.

RD: I would agree. It'll be interesting to see the kind of wickets that are produced, especially in Hyderabad and Mohali, two venues that may give the Australian fast bowlers a chance to get some reverse swing going early. If they can get into the middle order and get a couple of their senior batsmen out early at the start of the series, India could be distracted by a lot of things. But India, I think, would still start favourites.

Numbers Game (27.02 - 31.16)

Of the last five series Australia have played in India, in how many of those have the spinners averaged more than 50 runs a wicket?

Posted by   on (February 22, 2013, 4:07 GMT)

Nice Talk!! Very honest!! India surely start favourites, I guess we would win 2-1.

Posted by   on (February 22, 2013, 2:34 GMT)

This series will be an interesting one Australia haven't done well in India for ages partly because of our lack spin options .But India haven't been hot lately either the spin factor will be a major issue in this series Australia have had a mixed summer at home I really have a view that in this series will call time on their rotation policy. Australia can't do what they did before the Perth test this year against South Africa again and change up the side so many times if we want to win the Ashes both in England and Australia this year. it is time for Australia to get serious when picking a test team

Posted by Silverbails on (February 22, 2013, 1:25 GMT)

India is favourite...who do they think that they're kidding?? Dravid is hoping; and, Chappell is playing mind games with this pathetic Indian Test team, knowing FULL WELL that the Aussies are the REAL favourites here, given both their respective recent Test forms...

Posted by NP_NY on (February 21, 2013, 18:16 GMT)

I beg to differ with the experts - India are NOT automatically favorites in India anymore. And we only have to go back as far the last series to see it. Spin used to be India's weapon but in the last series Panesar-Swann were infinitely better than the Indian spinners. And with the pace bowling as bad as ever, how is India going to get 20 Australian wickets?!

Posted by StatisticsRocks on (February 21, 2013, 14:23 GMT)

As an Indian fan, even I fail to understand why and how India are favourites in this series. We have at the best club level bowlers who cannot take 10 wickets let alone 20 to win a test match. This is by far the worst Indian side playing at home. Don't even get me started on our batting. No one batsmen wants to stay at the crease for a long time. Thanks to IPL....I think Australia will win this series as they have a very good bowling attack, at least better than India.

Posted by mano.mcse on (February 21, 2013, 12:19 GMT)

Master blaster will prove his talent....Also Jadeja want to prove his all round performance...and bhajji one of the great bowler in Indian cricket and he want to prove his power.

Posted by brusselslion on (February 21, 2013, 12:16 GMT)

Dravid's comment at 5.40 - 7.27 says it all really. One (the only?) hope for Australia is that Dhoni manages to mess things up and cements his place as the world's worst Test match captain.

Posted by   on (February 21, 2013, 11:44 GMT)

Hi .. what abt Rahul Sharm .. no new on him .. to my knowledge, he would be the best bet Indian Spinner who can replicate Kumble in Indian Conditions

Posted by Warm_Coffee on (February 21, 2013, 10:40 GMT)

Not another India-Australia series? they played eachother last year and Indian were thrashed. Just shows how unpopular Cricket is :)

Posted by CricketMaan on (February 21, 2013, 10:21 GMT)

Indias challenge will be if they can put consistently 350+ on board, especailly in the first innings. They have not done that for a very long time. If they do then they start as fav in every test! On the other hand, if Aus can trouble Viru, SRT that will wear the Indian line up and put too much pressure on CP and VK. Both spinners are not in thier best form and all are playing for thier places. Starc will be the key for Indians have always had issues with left arm fast medium. Vass, Colins, Akram, Johnson have all troubled SRT immensly and that is key. Siddle will be looking fwd to his contest with Viru, while Vijay if he can scrap a 50 with edges and nudges could still play first 2 tests. if he fails then most likely Guati will be back as I see Viru play all 4 tests. I'll be saddened to see 3 spinners and 1 fast medium in Bhajji, RA, PO, IS. The only possitive in that case is AR will bat No.6. Good luck Ind but beware of Oz

Comments have now been closed for this article

Play Audio
'A travelling roadshow with no real meaning'

Sep 16, 2013 Ian Chappell and Mark Butcher highlight the flaws in the ODI system and suggest an ideal balance between formats (31:59)

Play Audio
'Bowl your overs faster or play in worse conditions'

Aug 30, 2013 Mark Nicholas and Daryl Harper on the inter-related issues of slow over rates and the light rule in Test cricket (41:33)

Play Audio
'It's up to the WICB to win the players over'

Bowl at Boycs: Geoffrey Boycott talks about the troubles in West Indian cricket, Steven Smith's recent catch against Pakistan, and fast bowling in India (20:18) | Oct 23, 2014

Play Video
Middle order tussle for Proteas

News and Analysis: South Africa may look to shake up the middle order for the second ODI against New Zealand (01:33) | Oct 22, 2014

Play Video
Is the West Indies World Cup under threat?

News and Analysis: ESPNcricinfo senior correspondent George Dobell on the scenarios the West Indies could face if the ICC gets involved in the dispute between the BCCI and WICB (02:34) | Oct 22, 2014