|Photos||Video & Audio||Blogs||Statistics||Archive||Shop||Mobile|
Points table for matches completed by 28 Jun 2010
Points by match: North Group
|2 Jun 2010||Derbyshire||2||Leics||0||Table | Match|
|3 Jun 2010||Derbyshire||2||Yorkshire||0||Table | Match|
|4 Jun 2010||Worcs||2||Yorkshire||0||Table | Match|
|6 Jun 2010||Durham||1||Worcs||1||Table | Match|
|8 Jun 2010||Leics||2||Northants||0||Table | Match|
|9 Jun 2010||Lancashire||2||Northants||0||Table | Match|
|10 Jun 2010||Yorkshire||2||Durham||0||Table | Match|
|11 Jun 2010||Notts||2||Derbyshire||0||Table | Match|
|13 Jun 2010||Derbyshire||1||Durham||1||Table | Match|
|14 Jun 2010||Durham||2||Leics||0||Table | Match|
|15 Jun 2010||Notts||2||Lancashire||0||Table | Match|
|16 Jun 2010||Warwickshire||2||Notts||0||Table | Match|
|17 Jun 2010||Yorkshire||2||Lancashire||0||Table | Match|
|18 Jun 2010||Warwickshire||2||Worcs||0||Table | Match|
|20 Jun 2010||Lancashire||2||Warwickshire||0||Table | Match|
|21 Jun 2010||Derbyshire||2||Worcs||0||Table | Match|
|22 Jun 2010||Lancashire||2||Durham||0||Table | Match|
|23 Jun 2010||Leics||2||Warwickshire||0||Table | Match|
|24 Jun 2010||Yorkshire||2||Notts||0||Table | Match|
|25 Jun 2010||Lancashire||2||Leics||0||Table | Match|
|26 Jun 2010||Northants||2||Durham||0||Table | Match|
|27 Jun 2010||Notts||2||Warwickshire||0||Table | Match|
Points by match: South Group
|1 Jun 2010||Sussex||2||Somerset||0||Table | Match|
|2 Jun 2010||Kent||2||Essex||0||Table | Match|
|3 Jun 2010||Sussex||2||Middlesex||0||Table | Match|
|4 Jun 2010||Glamorgan||2||Gloucs||0||Table | Match|
|8 Jun 2010||Gloucs||2||Surrey||0||Table | Match|
|9 Jun 2010||Somerset||2||Middlesex||0||Table | Match|
|10 Jun 2010||Essex||2||Surrey||0||Table | Match|
|11 Jun 2010||Middlesex||2||Kent||0||Table | Match|
|12 Jun 2010||Surrey||2||Somerset||0||Table | Match|
|13 Jun 2010||Middlesex||2||Essex||0||Table | Match|
|15 Jun 2010||Middlesex||2||Glamorgan||0||Table | Match|
|16 Jun 2010||Essex||2||Somerset||0||Table | Match|
|17 Jun 2010||Surrey||2||Middlesex||0||Table | Match|
|18 Jun 2010||Sussex||2||Hampshire||0||Table | Match|
|19 Jun 2010||Hampshire||2||Gloucs||0||Table | Match|
|20 Jun 2010||Sussex||2||Surrey||0||Table | Match|
|22 Jun 2010||Surrey||2||Hampshire||0||Table | Match|
|23 Jun 2010||Surrey||2||Kent||0||Table | Match|
|24 Jun 2010||Middlesex||2||Kent||0||Table | Match|
|25 Jun 2010||Somerset||2||Sussex||0||Table | Match|
|26 Jun 2010||Glamorgan||2||Middlesex||0||Table | Match|
|27 Jun 2010||Essex||2||Hampshire||0||Table | Match|
|28 Jun 2010||Somerset||2||Glamorgan||0||Table | Match|
21.9 Points System in the Twenty20 Competition Group Stage
21.9.1 Each team will play all other teams in its group home and away. Two points will be awarded for a Win, one point for a Tie or No Result and no points for a Loss.
21.9.2 The two Groups are as detailed in the Rules for ECB Competitions section.
21.9.3 The top four teams from each group will qualify for the Quarter-finals. The team finishing first in each group will receive a home draw and play against the team finishing fourth in the opposite group. The team finishing second in each group will receive a home draw and play against the team finishing third in the opposite group.
21.9.4 The tie-breakers for teams finishing on equal points will be:
a When teams have equal points, the teams will be ordered according to which team achieved the most points in the matches played between them.
b If still equal, the team with the higher net run rate in the Group Matches will be placed in the higher position (see below).
c If still equal, the team with the higher number of wickets taken per balls bowled in the Group Matches in which results were achieved, will be placed in the higher position.
d In the event that teams cannot be separated by (a) to (c) above, this will be done by drawing lots.
21.9.5 Net Run Rate
A team's net run rate is calculated by deducting from the average runs per over scored by that team, the average runs per over scored against that team. In the event of a team being all out in less than its full quota of overs, the calculation of the net run rate of both teams shall be based on the full quota of overs to which the batting team would have been entitled and not on the number of overs in which the team was dismissed. Only those matches where results are achieved will count for the purpose of net run rate calculations.
Where a match is abandoned, but a result is achieved under Duckworth/Lewis, for net run rate purposes Team 1 will be accredited with Team 2's Par Score on abandonment off the same number of overs faced by Team 2. Where a match is concluded but with Duckworth/Lewis having been applied at an earlier point in the match, Team 1 will be accredited with 1 run less than the final Target Score for Team 2 off the total number of overs allocated to Team 2 to reach the target.
As West Indies play their 500th Test, here's an interactive journey through their Test history
Also, high scores and low averages, most ducks in international cricket, and the 12-year-old Test player
In their pomp, West Indies had a 53-13 win-loss record; in their last 99, it is 16-53. That, in a nutshell, shows how steep the decline has been
Former New Zealand seamer Gavin Larsen talks about wobbly seam-up bowling, the 1992 World Cup, and his role in the next tournament
Following the bowling ban on Saeed Ajmal, ESPNcricinfo picks five bowlers Pakistan may replace him with for the time being
Teams need to start strategising now for next year's event by picking the right men for various roles. England need to get on it sooner than most
The planned reorganisation of their domestic structure should help the region recapture some of the glory it enjoyed in the past
To formally instruct Yorkshire that the club captain should have no part in the trophy presentation, leaving him fearful even to chat to the media about the season that meant so much to him, felt like an overreaction
Hundred in a session? Easy peasy for Doug Walters