Australia v Sri Lanka, CB Series, 3rd final, Adelaide March 8, 2012

Over-rate fine only blip in Australia's victory

Australia's stand-in captain Shane Watson will be in danger of a suspension during the ODI series in the West Indies after he and his team were fined for a slow over-rate in their triangular series final victory at Adelaide Oval. After a tense match, won by 16 runs, the ICC match-referee Chris Broad calculated that Australia were one over short of the required rate over the course of Sri Lanka's innings, meaning each member of the team lost 10% of their match-fee while Watson was docked 20%. Under the ICC's code of conduct, Watson will now effectively be on probation for the next 12 months, with another over-rate transgression while he is captaining in an ODI leading to a one-match suspension - the fate that befell India's captain MS Dhoni earlier in the triangular series.

The transgression was the one pitfall of a night on which Watson led Australia shrewdly in the field, and helped restrict Sri Lanka in their pursuit of a middling target on a slow pitch. After lifting the series trophy he said the team had finally come good in the field, following a patch of poor form.

"After getting 231 we knew we were going to have to bowl and field extremely well to defend that and we certainly did that through the whole 48-49 overs," Watson said. "That's what we've been talking about, to actually put it all together, and we were able to do that and that is very satisfying.

"We didn't always bowl to our plans over the last couple of games; in the first final in Brisbane we let it slip a bit, and nearly lost that game. So we needed an all-round bowling performance. We also needed a good fielding performance to keep the intensity throughout the 50 overs. It is brilliant to see that when the guys really set their minds to it we can do it, and we set a standard tonight."

Australia's squad departs for the West Indies via Sydney in the early hours of Friday morning, and Watson said the team would celebrate its victory as heartily as possible before the long-haul flight to the Caribbean. The squad has shown considerable signs of fatigue towards the end of a successful, if draining, summer, and now has more cricket ahead rather than rest.

"That's going to be the biggest challenge [to refresh themselves]," Watson said. "You've certainly got to enjoy the good times and the good wins. I think we have a 5.15am departure from the hotel, so there could be a few tired blokes after celebrating tonight. So as long as it's not too crazy and too hectic the guys have a bit of time to freshen up on the flight and make sure that once we get to the West Indies we're ready to go next Friday."

Watson, standing in for the injured Michael Clarke, has a remarkable thin resumé as a captain but, in the third final, showed an ability to lead by example with the ball, while also moving the field around in a suitably thoughtful manner.

"It's been a very exciting time for me; to be able to see the game from a different perspective has been a lot of fun," Watson said. "I suppose normally standing out on the fence you're trying to deflect a bit of banter that's coming your way, so actually being there around the bowlers all the time, communicating with them is a lot of fun, and it's nice when everyone sticks their hands up like they did tonight."

Edited by Dustin Silgardo

Daniel Brettig is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo. He tweets here

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • Wallaroo on March 9, 2012, 11:05 GMT

    @johntycodes Lee certainly was our most expensive bowler but he also took 3 wickets so one can forgive him. Having said this I'm not a big fan of his pump action after taking a wicket a bit OTT.

  • zenboomerang on March 9, 2012, 10:20 GMT

    @Daniel Brettig :- "The transgression was the one pitfall of a night on which Watson led Australia shrewdly in the field"... I must have watched another game... Yes Watsons captaincy was good but his opening with Lee & Doherty was poor planning - surely a slower pace bowler & Oz's best spinner should be opening... Lyon, Watson or McKay... Why weren't the most economical bowlers bowled out?... Watsons batting failure again shows his weakness as a top order batsman @24 for this series... If he bats at no.3 in the Tests it will be an insult to all previous top order batsmen that have played cricket for Oz...

  • zenboomerang on March 9, 2012, 10:13 GMT

    @johntycodes :- "Doesn't that make up time regarding the over rates"... No :) ... It is based on the time v overs bowled up to the end of that innings - Oz should have already bowled its last over... Still it does seem a bit over the top considering it was a final in a competition that is only played in Oz & really the ICC needs to look at that point... Probably should allow so time in the Asian cup as well for its finals...

  • johntycodes on March 8, 2012, 14:36 GMT

    Is watson for real saying that for the 49 overs they bowled well. For starters every one of brett lee's overs was garbage and by the way we finished the match without having to bowl the 50th over. Doesn't that make up time regarding the over rates.

  • chilled_avenger on March 8, 2012, 14:09 GMT

    I have a technical question to ask: For example in this scenario if Shane Watson is danger of being banned if it happens again and he might have to captain against WI if Clarke's not fit! So in that case suppose Australia officially name David/Michael Hussey(Or anyone else for that matter) as the stand-in Captain and sends him to the toss and afterwards let Shane do the captain's job(use bowlers,set fields) because as far as I know its not exactly a rule that only the captain has the right to do that! I know its too far-fetched and pointless to some extent but what I want to know is that will it be considered illegal or breaking the rules? That could be technicality in the situation.......

  • Wallaroo on March 9, 2012, 11:05 GMT

    @johntycodes Lee certainly was our most expensive bowler but he also took 3 wickets so one can forgive him. Having said this I'm not a big fan of his pump action after taking a wicket a bit OTT.

  • zenboomerang on March 9, 2012, 10:20 GMT

    @Daniel Brettig :- "The transgression was the one pitfall of a night on which Watson led Australia shrewdly in the field"... I must have watched another game... Yes Watsons captaincy was good but his opening with Lee & Doherty was poor planning - surely a slower pace bowler & Oz's best spinner should be opening... Lyon, Watson or McKay... Why weren't the most economical bowlers bowled out?... Watsons batting failure again shows his weakness as a top order batsman @24 for this series... If he bats at no.3 in the Tests it will be an insult to all previous top order batsmen that have played cricket for Oz...

  • zenboomerang on March 9, 2012, 10:13 GMT

    @johntycodes :- "Doesn't that make up time regarding the over rates"... No :) ... It is based on the time v overs bowled up to the end of that innings - Oz should have already bowled its last over... Still it does seem a bit over the top considering it was a final in a competition that is only played in Oz & really the ICC needs to look at that point... Probably should allow so time in the Asian cup as well for its finals...

  • johntycodes on March 8, 2012, 14:36 GMT

    Is watson for real saying that for the 49 overs they bowled well. For starters every one of brett lee's overs was garbage and by the way we finished the match without having to bowl the 50th over. Doesn't that make up time regarding the over rates.

  • chilled_avenger on March 8, 2012, 14:09 GMT

    I have a technical question to ask: For example in this scenario if Shane Watson is danger of being banned if it happens again and he might have to captain against WI if Clarke's not fit! So in that case suppose Australia officially name David/Michael Hussey(Or anyone else for that matter) as the stand-in Captain and sends him to the toss and afterwards let Shane do the captain's job(use bowlers,set fields) because as far as I know its not exactly a rule that only the captain has the right to do that! I know its too far-fetched and pointless to some extent but what I want to know is that will it be considered illegal or breaking the rules? That could be technicality in the situation.......

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • chilled_avenger on March 8, 2012, 14:09 GMT

    I have a technical question to ask: For example in this scenario if Shane Watson is danger of being banned if it happens again and he might have to captain against WI if Clarke's not fit! So in that case suppose Australia officially name David/Michael Hussey(Or anyone else for that matter) as the stand-in Captain and sends him to the toss and afterwards let Shane do the captain's job(use bowlers,set fields) because as far as I know its not exactly a rule that only the captain has the right to do that! I know its too far-fetched and pointless to some extent but what I want to know is that will it be considered illegal or breaking the rules? That could be technicality in the situation.......

  • johntycodes on March 8, 2012, 14:36 GMT

    Is watson for real saying that for the 49 overs they bowled well. For starters every one of brett lee's overs was garbage and by the way we finished the match without having to bowl the 50th over. Doesn't that make up time regarding the over rates.

  • zenboomerang on March 9, 2012, 10:13 GMT

    @johntycodes :- "Doesn't that make up time regarding the over rates"... No :) ... It is based on the time v overs bowled up to the end of that innings - Oz should have already bowled its last over... Still it does seem a bit over the top considering it was a final in a competition that is only played in Oz & really the ICC needs to look at that point... Probably should allow so time in the Asian cup as well for its finals...

  • zenboomerang on March 9, 2012, 10:20 GMT

    @Daniel Brettig :- "The transgression was the one pitfall of a night on which Watson led Australia shrewdly in the field"... I must have watched another game... Yes Watsons captaincy was good but his opening with Lee & Doherty was poor planning - surely a slower pace bowler & Oz's best spinner should be opening... Lyon, Watson or McKay... Why weren't the most economical bowlers bowled out?... Watsons batting failure again shows his weakness as a top order batsman @24 for this series... If he bats at no.3 in the Tests it will be an insult to all previous top order batsmen that have played cricket for Oz...

  • Wallaroo on March 9, 2012, 11:05 GMT

    @johntycodes Lee certainly was our most expensive bowler but he also took 3 wickets so one can forgive him. Having said this I'm not a big fan of his pump action after taking a wicket a bit OTT.