Middlesex v Sussex, Lord's, 2nd day

Prior controversy overshadows Middlesex's day

Vithushan Ehantharajah at Lord's

June 6, 2013

Comments: 6 | Text size: A | A

Sussex 147 for 7 (Rayner 3-37) trail Middlesex 499 for 8 dec (Rogers 184, Dexter 104, Robson 54, Simpson 50) by 352 runs
Scorecard


Matt Prior made a typically aggressive half-century, Surrey v Sussex, County Championship, Division One, The Oval, 3rd day, April 26, 2013
Matt Prior was at the centre of a heated situation after being given out on the second day © Getty Images
Enlarge

Sussex's unbeaten start to the County Championship looks to be coming to an end in rather bitter fashion. After toiling on an unresponsive pitch, they were greeted with some indifferent bounce and the occasional delivery sticking in the surface, but their biggest gripe is the manner in which their returning England star Matt Prior was sent on his way for 10.

Having defended a ball from Ollie Rayner, Prior watched on as Sam Robson - fielding at silly point - sprawled across the pitch to take the catch. There seemed a slight hesitation before he managed to exert full control over the ball, at which point a minor appeal went up. After some deliberation between Robson and Rayner, the bowler turned to put the question to Martin Saggers. "Out" was the reply.

A shocked Prior stood his ground, motionless for a second, before pointing with his bat to just in front of where the catch was taken - clearly of the belief that it had been grounded. Robson, as a rebuttal, re-assumed his position on the floor, ball in hand. As the Middlesex players came together, Alex Wharf made his way in from square leg and seemed to confirm that a legitimate catch was taken.

Eventually, Prior was on his way, looking back at the huddle of fielders at the scene of the "crime" with disdain.

"Things like that are sad for the game," said Sussex coach Mark Robinson, who refused to be drawn on commenting further on the incident. He did however rule out any discussion with Prior for his reaction, though it seems unlikely that the ECB will take the same stance.

Rayner, who finished the day with figures of 3 for 37, was happy with the manner in which Middlesex acted, suggesting that perhaps the profile of the player and the importance of the match enhanced the gravity of the situation.

"We didn't go mad" he said. "We asked the fielder and then the umpire. Sam is a very honest guy and he wouldn't try and pull the wool over anyone's eyes. It's a shame with the game going where it is that the fielder's word is not always taken.

"I think had it not been Matt Prior - an England player - coming back in a big clash at the top of the table and getting out in such a big moment, then I don't think it would be as big a deal."

It is a shame that Rayner was involved in the unsavoury incident as it detracts from what could be a real turning-point performance from the tall offspinner, who bowled exceptionally well with James Harris in the evening session as four key Sussex wickets fell for just 29 runs.

So often nothing more than a containing spinner, he took time and pride in each over, especially against Prior where he was backed by Chris Rogers with men around the bat and a pressing in-field. A former Sussex man, who grew up in the Mushtaq Ahmed era - who he noted "wasn't shy of an appeal" - he bounded with just as much glee as the Hove and Pakistan legend when he had Ed Joyce stumped; the ball holding its line as the Sussex skipper overbalanced when going forward.

Rogers and Neil Dexter started the day with some urgency. Some cuts and drives square of the wicket later, Middlesex had reached their third batting point, after which point Rogers skewed a shot off the bowling of Magoffin in the air, which Yardy did well to run back from mid-off and catch over his shoulder. It was the same combination that could have dismissed the Middlesex captain 181 runs earlier.

Dexter then motored on with the help of John Simpson to take the score past 400. The success of Rogers and Robson at the top of the order meant very little has been asked of Middlesex's middle order, but Dexter has looked in good touch when called upon, with his previous highest score of the season (82) setting up a win over Somerset. He eventually brought up a well crafted first Championship hundred of the campaign.

Sussex's reply got off to a subdued start as had Middlesex's. However when a chance did arrive, it was taken; Tim Murtagh finding the outside edge of Chris Nash's bat and Robson taking the catch at third slip. Wells then went to a misjudged pull that he could only spoon in the air to the man rushing in from midwicket, before Rayner and James Harris did their bit.

It leaves Sussex 202 runs behind the follow-on target, with Luke Wright and Will Beer still at the crease. For Middlesex, they have an opportunity to make an example out one of the form teams in the league and take themselves back to the top of the table

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by adyoxford on (June 7, 2013, 21:28 GMT)

I was at the game and my initial reaction was that it was a clean catch. All the Middlesex fielders appealed and when Prior stood his ground, the fielders appealed to the umpire who raised his finger straightaway. I was waiting outside the pavilion after play with some friends and was disappointed to hear Prior claim - "It was the worse case of cheating he had ever known". I know the Middlesex players fairly well and they are a really honest bunch of guys. I think Prior was really out of line with his comment and should apologise for firstly not initially accepting the decision, and secondly for what he publicly said after the game. England players are role models and this was a poor example of hiow to behave.

Posted by CricketingStargazer on (June 7, 2013, 8:18 GMT)

@nursery_ender The whole incident was bizarre. I was listening to the commentary and the whole thing seemed to take players, umpires and commentators alike by surprise. The TV replay was totally blocked by the batsman and the photo sequence is not conclusive, although it is suggestive. If the umpires did confer and the Square Leg umpire confirmed that the catch was clean, there should be no argument: at worst you can say that the decision was dubious, but it was not an outright error. However, as one of the commentators was suggesting that "there was something not quite right about the dismissal", you can understand the doubts.

It's rather like what was termed "the battle of Alan Lamb's boot" in 1985, when the Australians were convinced that the ball had hit the ground and that a bad decision had cost them the match and the Ashes when, in truth, they were being well beaten even before. The frustration of impending defeat probably had a lot to do with the reaction to the incident.

Posted by nursery_ender on (June 7, 2013, 7:53 GMT)

Robinson is quite right. No-one likes to see a batsman refuse to leave the crease when given out and then, when he finally does leave, turn and give verbals to either the umpires or the fielding side.

At least I assume that's what Robinson was talking about as being 'sad' as it was the only part of the episode that was remotely out of order.

Posted by CricketingStargazer on (June 6, 2013, 21:09 GMT)

Ps: Interesting comments, as usual, Kaspar!

Posted by CricketingStargazer on (June 6, 2013, 21:07 GMT)

The photo sequence *suggests* that the catch was clean but, as it was taken at only 9 frames per second, there is significant doubt. Sam Robson should be praised for amazing reactions and making it into a chance, what is a little odd is that it seemed that the umpires did not consult as to whether or not the ball had carried and the catch was clean.

What is absolutely clear is that Sussex were already suffering from a siege mentality after a disastrous insertion and seeing the Middlesex bowlers bowl superbly and get significant help from the pitch early. Wickets were going down and at least one batsman got himself out because he was thinking more of that catch than his own batting. The Sussex mindset seemed all over the place.

It should still be a hard slog for Middlesex to win this. Surrey dismissed them cheaply and could only watch as Middlesex made a huge score following on: that may well happen here. However, I just get the feeling that Sussex are in no mood to stand and fight.

Posted by KDLarsen on (June 6, 2013, 20:09 GMT)

Seen a photo sequence of the Prior dismissal and it really is a toss-up. In an age when batsmen no longer feel the need to walk on nicks, it was refreshing to see that the word of the fielder was eventually accepted. Besides, Adam London suffered an equally dodgy dismissal yesterday, so I suppose it's been balanced out a bit.

Having said that, Sussex really seemed to show a lack of application (especially the middle order), playing some very rash shots and hurrying out of the crease to play the slower bowlers. And in a situation where they needed to get runs on the board, there was some rather poor running as well, with only ones and twos being taken when they could easily have run two or three respectively.

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
County Results
Glamorgan v Gloucs at Cardiff - Sep 24-27, 2013
Glamorgan won by 8 wickets
Kent v Lancashire at Canterbury - Sep 24-27, 2013
Kent won by 2 wickets
Notts v Somerset at Nottingham - Sep 24-27, 2013
Match drawn
Surrey v Yorkshire at The Oval - Sep 24-27, 2013
Match drawn
Sussex v Durham at Hove - Sep 24-27, 2013
Sussex won by 6 wickets
All recent results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days