Warwickshire v Somerset, Edgbaston, 4th day

Gloom descends on Warks title hopes

Paul Edwards at Edgbaston

August 23, 2013

Comments: 6 | Text size: A | A

Warwickshire 407 (Evans 138, Javid 133) and 123 for 3 (Chopra 55*) drew with Somerset 340 (Kieswetter 148) and 255 (Compton 91, Patel 5-67)
Scorecard


Jeetan Patel finished with 4 for 60 in Notts' first innings, Warwickshire v Nottinghamshire, County Championship, Division One, Edgbaston, July, 17, 2013
Jeetan Patel's five-for has set up the chance of victory © Getty Images
Enlarge

There could have been no more appropriate metaphor for Warwickshire's chances of retaining the County Championship than the gloom which enshrouded Edgbaston on Friday evening.

Set 189 in 49 overs to beat Somerset and reduce the gap between themselves and leaders Yorkshire to a still formidable 38 points, openers Ian Westwood and Varun Chopra had proceeded in untroubled fashion to 101 for 0 in 24 overs before losing three wickets in 20 balls to Steve Kirby and Alfonso Thomas, both of whom bowled with considerable fire and skill to preserve the three points their side held for the draw.

All the same, with skipper Chopra going well on 55 and 18 overs left in which to score 66 runs, the Bears were still warm favourites if only conditions had remained as balmy and benevolent on the final evening as they had been on the previous three. Providing the weather held, there was no need to play million-dollar shots; fifty-cent pushes would do the job.

Alas for Warwickshire, while the rain that had been reported in Worcester, Bromsgrove, King's Heath and everywhere bar Edgbaston did not arrive until later, the light worsened sufficiently to cause Rob Bailey and Steve Gale to take the players off, despite the deployment of the floodlights, after the umpires' fourth consultation on the matter. "Why aren't you playing cricket?" roared a Warwickshire fan at the officials as they ambled out to inspect conditions. His angry query bore little fruit; further play was ruled out soon afterwards. But the spectators' frustrations were shared by Warwickshire's director of cricket Dougie Brown.

"It's another disappointing day with weather," Brown said. "You begin to wonder why you bother investing in floodlights when it's bright out in the middle and the umpires tell you it's too dark. It beggars belief really.

"The umpires came off because they said it was dangerous. I don't know who it was a danger to. The fielders were throwing themselves around and the batters were taking hook shots on and seeing the ball quite comfortably by their own admission. I'm staggered to know who was in danger."

The draw leaves Warwickshire in fifth place in Division One, 51 points behind Yorkshire with four games to play. The pennant will surely not be returning to Edgbaston. Somerset's concerns are of a different ilk. Though they fought with some grit to get the draw here, Derbyshire's victory over Middlesex leaves Marcus Trescothick's side occupying one of the two relegation places in Division One. Their home games against Derbyshire and Surrey in September are, as it were, 48-pointers.

Warwickshire's opportunity to keep their tissue-thin title chances alive had been created by some fine bowling by Jeetan Patel and Keith Barker in the morning and early afternoon. Together, the pair accounted for seven of the eight Somerset wickets to fall on the final day, Patel collecting his second five-wicket haul of the season and finishing with 5 for 67 off 36 exemplary overs.

Barker was equally as incisive on Friday and some would argue that he really does not suffer in comparison with Chris Woakes as an allrounder Barker bowled at a fair lick and moved the ball sufficiently to catch Nick Compton's inside edge in the ninth over of the morning when he had added only two boundaries to his overnight 83. That dismissal seemed to unnerve the rest of the visitors' batting. James Hildreth lost his leg stump to Patel when trying to work to leg and Kieswetter's fifth ball was also his last, Barker bringing one back in to beat the defensive shot and send the off stump tumbling away.

That left Somerset 159 for 5, an advantage of only 92, and the first session yielded only 59 runs in 29 overs for Trescothick's men as both Patel and debutant Gordon maintained a tight line. Gordon claimed the wicket of nightwatchman George Dockrell who gloved a lifter to Tim Ambrose and he then inflicted more damage of a different ilk when he struck Peter Trego so painfully on the hand that Trego was unable to take the field in Warwickshire's second innings.

The early afternoon session saw the visitors add 63 runs in 15.2 overs as the new ball bowlers Barker and Rikki Clarke came in for some rough treatment from Alex Barrow and Piyush Chawla but Patel accounted for both in successive overs before Barker removed Thomas. It had been a strong purposeful display by the home bowlers while Somerset's batting looked fragile and hesitant once Compton had departed.

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by JG2704 on (August 25, 2013, 21:51 GMT)

@Pyketts and others - Obviously I wasn't there but I go back to my comments re the umpires taking the players off for bad light when Clarke and co were chasing the win

1 - The umpires take a LM reading and ask the bowling side if they'll bowl spin/slow ..? 2- If the bowling side says yes , they stay out there , if they say no the batsmen get offered the choice. 3- If the batsmen decline , they come off and can't come back on til the light improves and if they stay out there they can't come off until it improves

There are loads of gripes I have with the organisations being more proactive with weather issues , scheduling etc which I've posted on here previously

Posted by ThirteenthMan on (August 24, 2013, 13:09 GMT)

Maybe we need a change to the rules to allow switching to a white ball if the light is poor. It would apply equally to all sides and surely would be better than abandoning matches.

Maybe even allow the batting side (who are the ones more in danger) to decide, with umpires having the right to override them if things are very dangerous.

Posted by Pyketts on (August 24, 2013, 10:25 GMT)

@JG2704 I suspose they could have accelerated earlier but it's hard predict when the light will fade so timing the chase will always be difficult.

It just seems like there's a chance to get a conclussion to a game, which is what most supporters will generally want, and it's thrown away because of some outdated rules.

We shouldn't forget that without the fans there will be no game,

Posted by MothMan on (August 24, 2013, 8:56 GMT)

Yes, the last 18 overs were lost for bad light, which would have been sufficient for the remaining 66 runs required. Somerset had enough time to beat Warwickshire at Taunton but couldn't, whereas Warwickshire would have won here but for going off so Somerset didn't win because Warwickshire kept them out whereas the weather saved Somerset this time.

Again, puzzling if the lights are good enough for day/night cricket why not here?

Posted by JG2704 on (August 23, 2013, 21:27 GMT)

@Pyketts on (August 23, 2013, 19:51 GMT) I half agree , but I suppose you have to draw the line somewhere. I may be wrong , but I don't think any time was lost and mayve Warwicks could have pressed on the accelerator earlier.

Anyway , I make it that the 2 teams are level (against each other) Somerset should have won at Taunton and Warwicks should have won this one - both for different reasons. And both teams may look back with the what if mentallity - at different ends of the table

Posted by Pyketts on (August 23, 2013, 19:51 GMT)

I assume the floodlights are good enough to play Limited overs cricket with a white ball so why not change the ball to a white one if that's the case?

Surely this should be more about getting a result than sticking to some old fashioned rules from long before floodlights.

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
County Results
Glamorgan v Gloucs at Cardiff - Sep 24-27, 2013
Glamorgan won by 8 wickets
Kent v Lancashire at Canterbury - Sep 24-27, 2013
Kent won by 2 wickets
Notts v Somerset at Nottingham - Sep 24-27, 2013
Match drawn
Surrey v Yorkshire at The Oval - Sep 24-27, 2013
Match drawn
Sussex v Durham at Hove - Sep 24-27, 2013
Sussex won by 6 wickets
All recent results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days