Derbyshire v Warwickshire, Derby, 1st day September 24, 2013

Woakes repels fighting Derbyshire

Warwickshire 285 for 8 (Woakes 102*, Groenewald 4-67) v Derbyshire
Scorecard

Derbyshire's last throw of the dice began with a demonstration of faith in the team has taken them to the last round of games clinging to the possibility that they still might not go down, in spite of the weight of evidence, when they lost for the seventh time in 11 matches in mid-July, that theirs was a hopeless cause.

They were trounced by Durham on this ground two weeks ago, bowled out for 63 in the second innings as Graham Onions, then in enthusiastic pursuit of the Ashes tour spot for which he has been bizarrely overlooked, appeared in the words of a bemused Karl Krikken to have the ball on a string.

But there was no panic. Krikken, their head coach, made sure his younger players remained focused on the three wins in four that had preceded the Durham defeat and resisted the temptation to make changes, even though he could have recalled Chesney Hughes, who has returned to the country from paternity leave in the United States, and has Wes Durston, Mark Turner and Peter Burgoyne available.

Wayne Madsen won the toss and asked Warwickshire to bat and it would have been their day beyond dispute but for Chris Woakes, who demonstrated for the second time in a week that he is becoming a batsman of outstanding quality. Indeed, well though he played against Surrey last week in a match-winning partnership with Ateeq Javid, he was more impressive still.

Where last week he took runs against a Surrey attack whose heads were dropping visibly as their relegation became inevitable, this time there was genuine pressure. Derbyshire may be similarly imperilled, but when Woakes came to the crease their tails were up. The loss of Rikki Clarke to the second ball after lunch had Warwickshire 89 for 4. They were 278 for 8 with three overs remaining in the day when he completed a century spanning more than four hours.

Woakes, who made his Test debut in the final match of the Ashes series just finished, is another puzzling omission from England's winter plans, featuring in neither the main touring party not the group selected for the Performance Programme.

Derbyshire's task here is straightforward in that to have any prospect of overtaking Nottinghamshire or Somerset and avoiding Surrey's fate they must win, and preferably handsomely, although even that might not be enough. A high-scoring draw between Nottinghamshire and Somerset could have the effect of closing Derbyshire out to the benefit of both their rivals, a result that may be a possibility after Somerset's decision to insert backfired at Trent Bridge.

This match at least features two sides committed to winning. Warwickshire have the incentive of finishing third in the Championship table, with a prize of more than £100,000.

In conditions that helped the ball swing, Derbyshire enjoyed early rewards for putting Warwickshire's batting to the test. Mark Footitt began untidily, sending down four no-balls in his first over, but quickly put that aberration behind him, inducing an edge to third slip from Ian Westwood with the last ball of his second over, then trapping Varun Chopra in front playing back in his third.

Footitt would have added Javid's wicket had Tom Poynton not committed the first of two mistakes in quick succession. He dropped the right-hander, who made an accomplished hundred against Surrey, on six and did so again on 13, when Tony Palladino was the bowler.

To an extent, Javid made them pay. But with neither Laurie Evans nor Clarke able to put down roots Warwickshire were 120 for 5 when Poynton held on to a chance down the leg side and Javid was gone for 46. Stuart Poynter, the Ireland international who is Warwickshire's fourth wicketkeeper in as many matches after the injuries to Tim Ambrose, Peter McKay and Jamie Atkinson, fell in the same Tim Groenewald over, driving the ball straight at the bowler. Groenewald claimed his fourth wicket when Keith Barker followed one outside off stump.

With Barker's departure, Warwickshire were 148 for 6 but Derbyshire could not find a way to dislodge Woakes, who remained clear-headed and calm and did not make a serious error until he went to pull Footitt on 83 and sent the ball very high into the air off the top edge. He had jogged through to the bowler's end by the time the ball came down, expecting to continue back to the pavilion. Footitt appeared to watch it all the way, so it was a surprise that he dropped it, so much that you suspect the proximity of Woakes must have put him off, although there was no question of obstruction.

Woakes reacted by going into his shell a little, although by this time Derbyshire had the new ball. Maurice Chambers, who has a career average of 5.80, was doggedly resistant at the other end, and by the time Woakes completed the seventh first-class century of his career, the fast bowler had batted for more than 90 minutes for his nine not out.

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • CricketCoachDB on September 25, 2013, 18:30 GMT

    Even without his now FC-best score added, Woakes averages 2 more with the bat and 2 less with the ball than Stokes in FC cricket. I rest my case.

  • lioneart on September 25, 2013, 16:49 GMT

    Chris Woakes will certainly be knocking on the door of the selectors again next season and I'll be very surprised if he isn't an England 1st XI regular within the next 5 years

  • pragmatist on September 25, 2013, 9:30 GMT

    The Ashes selections are tough on Woakes. After a tough initial spell I thought he looked pretty good with bat and ball at the Oval. It's almost like his association with Kerrigan is dogging him here. He's certainly closer to the finished article than Stokes.

  • ThirteenthMan on September 25, 2013, 8:51 GMT

    Woakes isn't in because Boycott talked him out. After his repeated criticism Michael Vaughn chipped in as well (TMS, final test).

    Woakes has taken wickets at about 26 over his career and very close to 2 per innings (including his early years)...about 3.5 per match.

    His batting average is just under 40. For much of his career he was seen as a bowler who could bat a bit. Now he is a genuine high quality all rounder.

    In the test he took some stick in his first spell but was able to put it behind him and keep it very tight in his second spell. He batted well under pressure. He just scored a ton under pressure after hearing he had been pushed aside by England. His has a very good temperament.

  • Lmaotsetung on September 25, 2013, 8:35 GMT

    To me if England go the 5-1-5 route then I would pick Woakes ahead of Stokes to bat at #6 whereas Stokes can defintely become a 3rd seamer who can bat at #7 or #8 just for the fact that he has the extra pace that Woakes lacks.

  • JG2704 on September 25, 2013, 7:55 GMT

    Woakes still has better CC stats - albeit in fewer games - than Stokes. I wonder if they've (Eng selectors) read too much into his one test and shorter formats games. Also would we now think of batting as his stronger asset?

  • CricketingStargazer on September 24, 2013, 19:59 GMT

    Impressive stuff from Woakes. He just needs to keep pushing his case.

    One has to feel a little for Derbyshire. I believe only twice before has a team won four games and been relegated. Derbyshire have made an amazing attempt to stay up after looking totally out of their depth for two thirds of the season.

  • Pyketts on September 24, 2013, 19:16 GMT

    Totally agree. He lacks a bit as a bowler at the minute but I'd take him ahead of Tremlett and if not certainly in the Performance squad.

  • Iddo555 on September 24, 2013, 18:51 GMT

    Woakes has some amazing stats this year in county cricket. He averages 23 with the ball and 53 with the bat. Why is he not in either the test squad or the performance squad?

  • CricketCoachDB on September 25, 2013, 18:30 GMT

    Even without his now FC-best score added, Woakes averages 2 more with the bat and 2 less with the ball than Stokes in FC cricket. I rest my case.

  • lioneart on September 25, 2013, 16:49 GMT

    Chris Woakes will certainly be knocking on the door of the selectors again next season and I'll be very surprised if he isn't an England 1st XI regular within the next 5 years

  • pragmatist on September 25, 2013, 9:30 GMT

    The Ashes selections are tough on Woakes. After a tough initial spell I thought he looked pretty good with bat and ball at the Oval. It's almost like his association with Kerrigan is dogging him here. He's certainly closer to the finished article than Stokes.

  • ThirteenthMan on September 25, 2013, 8:51 GMT

    Woakes isn't in because Boycott talked him out. After his repeated criticism Michael Vaughn chipped in as well (TMS, final test).

    Woakes has taken wickets at about 26 over his career and very close to 2 per innings (including his early years)...about 3.5 per match.

    His batting average is just under 40. For much of his career he was seen as a bowler who could bat a bit. Now he is a genuine high quality all rounder.

    In the test he took some stick in his first spell but was able to put it behind him and keep it very tight in his second spell. He batted well under pressure. He just scored a ton under pressure after hearing he had been pushed aside by England. His has a very good temperament.

  • Lmaotsetung on September 25, 2013, 8:35 GMT

    To me if England go the 5-1-5 route then I would pick Woakes ahead of Stokes to bat at #6 whereas Stokes can defintely become a 3rd seamer who can bat at #7 or #8 just for the fact that he has the extra pace that Woakes lacks.

  • JG2704 on September 25, 2013, 7:55 GMT

    Woakes still has better CC stats - albeit in fewer games - than Stokes. I wonder if they've (Eng selectors) read too much into his one test and shorter formats games. Also would we now think of batting as his stronger asset?

  • CricketingStargazer on September 24, 2013, 19:59 GMT

    Impressive stuff from Woakes. He just needs to keep pushing his case.

    One has to feel a little for Derbyshire. I believe only twice before has a team won four games and been relegated. Derbyshire have made an amazing attempt to stay up after looking totally out of their depth for two thirds of the season.

  • Pyketts on September 24, 2013, 19:16 GMT

    Totally agree. He lacks a bit as a bowler at the minute but I'd take him ahead of Tremlett and if not certainly in the Performance squad.

  • Iddo555 on September 24, 2013, 18:51 GMT

    Woakes has some amazing stats this year in county cricket. He averages 23 with the ball and 53 with the bat. Why is he not in either the test squad or the performance squad?

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • Iddo555 on September 24, 2013, 18:51 GMT

    Woakes has some amazing stats this year in county cricket. He averages 23 with the ball and 53 with the bat. Why is he not in either the test squad or the performance squad?

  • Pyketts on September 24, 2013, 19:16 GMT

    Totally agree. He lacks a bit as a bowler at the minute but I'd take him ahead of Tremlett and if not certainly in the Performance squad.

  • CricketingStargazer on September 24, 2013, 19:59 GMT

    Impressive stuff from Woakes. He just needs to keep pushing his case.

    One has to feel a little for Derbyshire. I believe only twice before has a team won four games and been relegated. Derbyshire have made an amazing attempt to stay up after looking totally out of their depth for two thirds of the season.

  • JG2704 on September 25, 2013, 7:55 GMT

    Woakes still has better CC stats - albeit in fewer games - than Stokes. I wonder if they've (Eng selectors) read too much into his one test and shorter formats games. Also would we now think of batting as his stronger asset?

  • Lmaotsetung on September 25, 2013, 8:35 GMT

    To me if England go the 5-1-5 route then I would pick Woakes ahead of Stokes to bat at #6 whereas Stokes can defintely become a 3rd seamer who can bat at #7 or #8 just for the fact that he has the extra pace that Woakes lacks.

  • ThirteenthMan on September 25, 2013, 8:51 GMT

    Woakes isn't in because Boycott talked him out. After his repeated criticism Michael Vaughn chipped in as well (TMS, final test).

    Woakes has taken wickets at about 26 over his career and very close to 2 per innings (including his early years)...about 3.5 per match.

    His batting average is just under 40. For much of his career he was seen as a bowler who could bat a bit. Now he is a genuine high quality all rounder.

    In the test he took some stick in his first spell but was able to put it behind him and keep it very tight in his second spell. He batted well under pressure. He just scored a ton under pressure after hearing he had been pushed aside by England. His has a very good temperament.

  • pragmatist on September 25, 2013, 9:30 GMT

    The Ashes selections are tough on Woakes. After a tough initial spell I thought he looked pretty good with bat and ball at the Oval. It's almost like his association with Kerrigan is dogging him here. He's certainly closer to the finished article than Stokes.

  • lioneart on September 25, 2013, 16:49 GMT

    Chris Woakes will certainly be knocking on the door of the selectors again next season and I'll be very surprised if he isn't an England 1st XI regular within the next 5 years

  • CricketCoachDB on September 25, 2013, 18:30 GMT

    Even without his now FC-best score added, Woakes averages 2 more with the bat and 2 less with the ball than Stokes in FC cricket. I rest my case.