Hampshire v Essex, Ageas Bowl, 1st day September 24, 2013

Carberry backs up Ashes call with runs

Hampshire 398 for 8 (Carberry 85, Wheater 82, Vince 82, Smith 4-47) v Essex
Scorecard

Michael Carberry's selection for the Ashes tour was greeted with a few suspicions but as the last of the summer wine was opened at the Ageas Bowl he again demonstrated why he is a solid selection.

Although showing little of the strokeplay that has caught the eye in one-day cricket, and opened the door back into international cricket, against the red ball Carberry played like a functional opening batsman, successfully did his job and was slightly unlucky to be superbly caught for 85 and miss out on a century.

There were plenty of pointers to why the selectors believe Carberry can slot in for England without too much concern. Conditions were similar to those often found in Australia - a hard, flat wicket with some grass left on offering some early help for the bowlers.

The amount of assistance Essex were hoping for having decided to bowl first didn't quite materialise but Carberry was still required to be careful against Graham Napier's bustling seamers - a svelte version of Ryan Harris perhaps - the pace of Tymal Mills - doing a reasonable Mitchell Johnson impersonation - and Monty Panesar's left-arm spin - as big a spin challenge as anything Australia will throw up in the winter.

Carberry showed good judgement around his off stump and was his usual compact, punchy self in attack. He waited for scoring opportunities in his preferred areas - mostly any length off his legs - and when they arrived showed good timing. His most pleasant stroke before lunch was a clip through midwicket off a lacklustre Sajid Mahmood, who conceded 80 from his 12 overs which included 12 no-balls.

He is tighter against the red ball, displaying little of the flamboyance he often shows facing the white one, and not since 2010 has he regularly dominated attacks in the County Championship. His 602 runs at an average of 40.13 this season is testament to that. While many of his colleagues showed a greater range of strokes and were more pleasant to watch, Carberry showed some of the grit and judgement he had to use against Johnson last week.

On the same flight to Australia will be Panesar, sufficiently rehabilitated at Essex to prove his mental state is worthy of a place on the tour as England's second spinner. But Panesar's record since joining Essex is not the form England hoped their back up to Graeme Swann would be taking down under.

Here, Panesar found his work very hard on an non-too-responsive surface. He quickly had sweepers out on both sides of the wicket and was picked off at will by James Vince, who used his feet well to play over mid-off and mid-on. Panesar dragged plenty of deliveries short and was pulled and cut too often for a finger spinner. It took until the penultimate over of the day for him to take a wicket, when No. 9 Danny Briggs played forward to a delivery that didn't turn and was lbw.

That part-time offspinner Greg Smith, who sometimes sends down little seamers if the situation demands, outbowled Panesar should leave him feeling very disappointed. Smith had more control through a consistent line and length - he was Essex's most economical bowler - and did enough to force four errors from the batsmen. The delivery to dismiss Carberry being the exception: a short ball that was pulled just high enough off the ground to give Mills the chance to dive and take a fine catch at midwicket.

A century would have been the tonic Carberry desired to toast his selection for Australia. There were plenty of runs to be had on an excellent batting surface. Hampshire's score came at above four-an-over and squeezed out the slender hopes of promotion Essex still harboured.

James Foster fancied his best chance of the victory his side require was to get first use of a wicket that perhaps contained some moisture from the misty September morning. That Panesar was bowling in the 12th over reflected the success of that idea. It took seven overs for Napier to induce a play and miss from Jimmy Adams, whose off drive on the up in just the third over of the day provided evidence of just how difficult a result will be on this wicket. It does not tend to deteriorate too much, although Hampshire first team manager Giles White suggested this surface was showing signs of gripping more than previous wickets.

Alex Winter is an editorial assistant at ESPNcricinfo. He tweets here.

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • Gloucsfan on September 25, 2013, 11:13 GMT

    Why have Essex played a weakened first xi. Doesn't make any sense, surely there's a chance!

  • ZCFOutkast on September 25, 2013, 10:16 GMT

    Carberry - top player! Sean Ervine back, same old story - woeful with the bat, potentially useless with the ball as well. As the primary batting-seam bowling allrounder, his underwhelming returns have been the reason why Hamps were relegated, and have gone on to be horrible in the bottom tier too! Find a capable youngster and groom him for this role, but leave Sean to the FLT20&CB40 squads.

  • SDHM on September 25, 2013, 9:52 GMT

    I personally would have taken Compton - scoring runs in Division One against better attacks and who only six or so months ago was scoring Test centuries (this idea he puts pressure on Cook is waffle too, when you look at their partnership statistics) - but I am delighted for Carberry the man, as I think he is extremely unlucky not to have played more international cricket. The Hampshire man I have my eye on though is Vince - more runs here to cap off an excellent first class season. Has always had the talent, just needed to find the application and consistency. Think he could be an England man before too long.

  • pragmatist on September 25, 2013, 9:44 GMT

    Vince is having a really good second half of the season and has to be close to the "next in line" group for England. He's a better player than Bairstow and arguably Taylor. A good Performance squad showing and he should be the next cab off the rank.

  • Paul_Somerset on September 24, 2013, 22:57 GMT

    Carberry (and Panesar) demonstrate how counter-productive it is for the likes of James Taylor to move to Div.1 counties to further their England careers. Cheap runs and wickets in Div.2 are the key to selection.

  • Hammond7249 on September 24, 2013, 21:39 GMT

    Carberry's call up is well deserved and I'm delighted for him. Don't really get why you think he isn't as deserving as those you mention. He's been consistently good over the years. And anyone that can score a triple century after coming back from a life-threatening illness proves that he can handle anything. The reasons for picking him were also fully explained, perhaps you should have listened.

  • Iddo555 on September 24, 2013, 19:02 GMT

    Carberry shouldn't have been called up in the first place. There are people like Compton, Chopra, Robson and Lumb who have far better averages this year in first class cricket, they all play in Division 1 and they all could open the innings.

    There's been a lot of media talk about Carberry and that seems to have taken over the cold hard facts, there are people who deserve it more.

  • Gloucsfan on September 25, 2013, 11:13 GMT

    Why have Essex played a weakened first xi. Doesn't make any sense, surely there's a chance!

  • ZCFOutkast on September 25, 2013, 10:16 GMT

    Carberry - top player! Sean Ervine back, same old story - woeful with the bat, potentially useless with the ball as well. As the primary batting-seam bowling allrounder, his underwhelming returns have been the reason why Hamps were relegated, and have gone on to be horrible in the bottom tier too! Find a capable youngster and groom him for this role, but leave Sean to the FLT20&CB40 squads.

  • SDHM on September 25, 2013, 9:52 GMT

    I personally would have taken Compton - scoring runs in Division One against better attacks and who only six or so months ago was scoring Test centuries (this idea he puts pressure on Cook is waffle too, when you look at their partnership statistics) - but I am delighted for Carberry the man, as I think he is extremely unlucky not to have played more international cricket. The Hampshire man I have my eye on though is Vince - more runs here to cap off an excellent first class season. Has always had the talent, just needed to find the application and consistency. Think he could be an England man before too long.

  • pragmatist on September 25, 2013, 9:44 GMT

    Vince is having a really good second half of the season and has to be close to the "next in line" group for England. He's a better player than Bairstow and arguably Taylor. A good Performance squad showing and he should be the next cab off the rank.

  • Paul_Somerset on September 24, 2013, 22:57 GMT

    Carberry (and Panesar) demonstrate how counter-productive it is for the likes of James Taylor to move to Div.1 counties to further their England careers. Cheap runs and wickets in Div.2 are the key to selection.

  • Hammond7249 on September 24, 2013, 21:39 GMT

    Carberry's call up is well deserved and I'm delighted for him. Don't really get why you think he isn't as deserving as those you mention. He's been consistently good over the years. And anyone that can score a triple century after coming back from a life-threatening illness proves that he can handle anything. The reasons for picking him were also fully explained, perhaps you should have listened.

  • Iddo555 on September 24, 2013, 19:02 GMT

    Carberry shouldn't have been called up in the first place. There are people like Compton, Chopra, Robson and Lumb who have far better averages this year in first class cricket, they all play in Division 1 and they all could open the innings.

    There's been a lot of media talk about Carberry and that seems to have taken over the cold hard facts, there are people who deserve it more.

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • Iddo555 on September 24, 2013, 19:02 GMT

    Carberry shouldn't have been called up in the first place. There are people like Compton, Chopra, Robson and Lumb who have far better averages this year in first class cricket, they all play in Division 1 and they all could open the innings.

    There's been a lot of media talk about Carberry and that seems to have taken over the cold hard facts, there are people who deserve it more.

  • Hammond7249 on September 24, 2013, 21:39 GMT

    Carberry's call up is well deserved and I'm delighted for him. Don't really get why you think he isn't as deserving as those you mention. He's been consistently good over the years. And anyone that can score a triple century after coming back from a life-threatening illness proves that he can handle anything. The reasons for picking him were also fully explained, perhaps you should have listened.

  • Paul_Somerset on September 24, 2013, 22:57 GMT

    Carberry (and Panesar) demonstrate how counter-productive it is for the likes of James Taylor to move to Div.1 counties to further their England careers. Cheap runs and wickets in Div.2 are the key to selection.

  • pragmatist on September 25, 2013, 9:44 GMT

    Vince is having a really good second half of the season and has to be close to the "next in line" group for England. He's a better player than Bairstow and arguably Taylor. A good Performance squad showing and he should be the next cab off the rank.

  • SDHM on September 25, 2013, 9:52 GMT

    I personally would have taken Compton - scoring runs in Division One against better attacks and who only six or so months ago was scoring Test centuries (this idea he puts pressure on Cook is waffle too, when you look at their partnership statistics) - but I am delighted for Carberry the man, as I think he is extremely unlucky not to have played more international cricket. The Hampshire man I have my eye on though is Vince - more runs here to cap off an excellent first class season. Has always had the talent, just needed to find the application and consistency. Think he could be an England man before too long.

  • ZCFOutkast on September 25, 2013, 10:16 GMT

    Carberry - top player! Sean Ervine back, same old story - woeful with the bat, potentially useless with the ball as well. As the primary batting-seam bowling allrounder, his underwhelming returns have been the reason why Hamps were relegated, and have gone on to be horrible in the bottom tier too! Find a capable youngster and groom him for this role, but leave Sean to the FLT20&CB40 squads.

  • Gloucsfan on September 25, 2013, 11:13 GMT

    Why have Essex played a weakened first xi. Doesn't make any sense, surely there's a chance!