Lancashire v Warwickshire, Old Trafford, 1st day April 20, 2014

Lancashire struggle in Moores' farewell

Paul Edwards at Old Trafford
  shares 14

Warwickshire 63 for 0 trail Lancashire 247 (Horton 83, Agathangelou 48, Woakes 5-63, Barker 3-52) by 184 runs
Scorecard

"The coach is leaving!" These words, voiced in either expectation or panic, will be spoken in many pubs and clubs during the Easter weekend. This morning, though, they carried a very different meaning for Lancashire supporters, one far removed from excursions to Morecambe or the Bank Holiday trip to watch Bury at York.

However, while the news that Peter Moores had been reappointed as England coach may have disappointed the warmly-clad diehards as they made their way to Old Trafford for the first match of the season, it can scarcely have come as too much of a surprise; the 51-year-old had been strongly tipped to regain one of the top jobs. For their part, Lancashire officials were at pains to stress that they will not be rushed as they ponder their options in the wake of Moores's departure at the end of this game against Warwickshire.

"It's all pretty new," said director of cricket Mike Watkinson. "We're only 24 hours into this, so we need to take time and look at our best way forward. The feeling among the lads is outstanding and we need to ensure that we don't upset their equilibrium as we move through the season.

"We got this confirmed only 24 hours ago, so it's not a case of we're definitely going to do this or that. Glen Chapple's doing an excellent job as captain and we need to make sure that he's fully supported in every way and the players are fully resourced to help them achieve their aims and objectives. That won't change because Peter's moving on.

"We had Peter contracted until the end of 2015, so if you're following a natural succession plan we didn't expect that to change on Easter Saturday 2014 when we had a game starting on the Sunday. It's just a bit early at the moment and Peter will be part of the conversation we're having during this game to make sure that there is continuity in the structures he's put in place. We have a good staff and plenty of experience here as it stands and it's not as if we have to panic."

Well perhaps not, but Moores and Watkinson cannot have been too happy with the profligate manner in which Lancashire batsmen surrendered a good position on the first day of his game. Having won the toss on what looks a good wicket, the home side were decently placed on 168 for 3 in the 56th over when Luke Procter, who had played with fluency and confidence, flicked Oliver Hannon-Dalby to Ateeq Javid at square leg and departed for 37.

That dismissal, which occurred just after an out of shape ball had been changed, began a collapse either side of tea which saw seven wickets fall for 79 runs in 19.1 overs. Lancashire were eventually bowled out over an hour before the close for 247, three runs short of a second batting bonus point and perhaps 75 shy of a par score on this wicket.

By the close, visiting openers Varun Chopra and William Porterfield had added 63 runs in fairly untroubled fashion and firmly given the lie to any suspicion that this pitch conceals hidden demons. This was indisputably Warwickshire's day.

But the dominance of Ian Bell's side cannot be explained merely by reference to Lancashire's shortcomings. In cold, blustery conditions which were hardly ideal for either bowlers or fielders, Chris Woakes stuck to his task to finish with 5 for 63 from 16 overs, and Keith Barker offered fine support in taking 3 for 52.

True, the shot selection of some of the Lancashire batsmen helped the seamers: Andrea Agathangelou, for example, made 48 off 62 balls before perishing when playing an expansive drive on the stroke of lunch. But others were got out in admirable fashion: Ashwell Prince was caught behind for a second ball duck when Woakes compelled a shot at the beginning of the afternoon session. The best innings was played by Paul Horton, whose 253-minute 83 was a monument to his patience and craftsmanship; but far too few Lancashire batsmen were truly got out by for the comfort of home supporters.

All of which may prompt Lancashire supporters to urge their officials to appoint a new coach as soon as reasonably possible after Moores relinquishes his duties at the end of this game. There is, of course, no shortage of qualified candidates on the current staff at Old Trafford.

Academy director John Stanworth and second team coach Gary Yates are just two of them, and already many Red Rose supporters are pressing the claims of the current skipper Chapple. Watkinson acknowledged Chapple's expertise as a Level 4 coach, but having quickly ruled himself out of contention - "I'm only wearing a tracksuit because it's cold," he quipped - the he counselled caution and careful thought before any decision is made.

"Glen is a very experienced captain and he's developing his coaching role, too," he said. "It's his dressing room but he is also our go-to cricketer and he would find it tough to spend hours in the nets as well. His leadership role will not be diluted and it may well be strengthened, certainly in the short term. He'll play a major part in selecting the team as he has now, and he has a hunger to play but he also has a great passion for the next chapter of his life.

"We appointed someone Paul Downton described yesterday as the best coach of his generation and he's done a great job for us in the last five years. We need to make sure we don't lose momentum. What that looks like in the months and years ahead we've yet to determine. We need to make sure that everything remains on an even keel during the run of matches we have coming up.

"If we wanted to do a thorough, robust recruitment process now, it would take months. Getting through to the end of the season and maintaining our aims and objectives as they are now is our priority. I spoke to the players this morning and I told them that we will do everything we can to make sure they have the resources they need. There will be a coach with the team at Northampton next week."

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • POSTED BY on | April 22, 2014, 17:20 GMT

    I doubt Stuart Law would get the job- he fell out with the top brass when he criticised the sacking of Dominic Cork, and was shown the door himself not too long after.

  • POSTED BY whatawicket on | April 21, 2014, 12:32 GMT

    as he had little genuine quality during his lancs time i would think he did ok, i myself hope they go for someone like stewey law or similar. i did not want giles for england or for that matter for us now

  • POSTED BY Thomas_Atwood on | April 21, 2014, 10:35 GMT

    If Lancashire have any sense they'll offer the job to Giles as fast as they can. Proved himself to be an excellent county coach, got Warwickshire promoted, won the county championship, went very close to winning it, won a one day final and could easily have been two. Also showed himself to be an excellent refurbisher of players whose careers were on the skids, Ricki Clarke, Varun Chopra, Chris Wright and Laurie Evans.Looking at the Lancs team they could do with a few similar acquisitions.

  • POSTED BY CricketingStargazer on | April 21, 2014, 9:55 GMT

    @codanchips There is definitely an opening there for someone. We have a mixture of county 'keepers who have been tried and discarded (Davies, Foster, Ambrose, Read, GO Jones, ...) and those who don't yet convince. A few years ago Glamorgan's Wallace was very close to a call-up, but he's had his day too.

    Agreed that I would certainly not pick Matt Prior solely on the basis of a single innings in the first match of the season when he didn't even take the gloves. He needs to do a lot more and a long-term injury means that he is a big risk.

  • POSTED BY on | April 21, 2014, 9:36 GMT

    the frightening thing for Lancashire fans should not be that Moores is leaving, it should be that Giles is a free agent

  • POSTED BY CodandChips on | April 21, 2014, 9:05 GMT

    @Nutcutlet @CricketingStargazer I have been flying the Davies flag for a while. Surely he must be a better shout than Bairstow, whose batting has looked poor in all formats for England, not to mention his keeping. Prior's loss of form was a concern, and I doubt just one county hundred will bring him back to where he was. His keeping in Aus wasn't great either, and his injury won't help his cause. Buttler has a poor first class record and should be left to establish himself in the white-ball England sides before being considered for test cricket. Foakes has played for the Lions but doesn't even keep for Essex. Davies can bat and keep, and hopefully he'll show this today against Essex.

  • POSTED BY CricketingStargazer on | April 21, 2014, 8:33 GMT

    @Andy John Well, with everyone saying what a great guy Peter Moores is for winning the Championship in 2011, a post-pennant record of "relegation, promotion, relegation" would not strike me as a great endorsement of his long-term planning! However, I have to agree with you. When Jimmy A. leaves, unless it's a hot dry summer that brings Kerrigan into play, it may be a long season for Lancashire, who look weak on batting depth too.

    @Nutcutlet Prior is a worry and a risk with his Achilles injury. As you say, Davies is an option, but it's not impossible that England could even go with Craig Kieswetter, who is still only 26, if he shows some early form. I don't think that Buttler is ready and I don't think that Jonny Bairstow is up to it.

  • POSTED BY on | April 21, 2014, 7:49 GMT

    Totally agree with George_Leeds. Lancs. are in trouble. Batsmen continue to get themselves in and out with poor shot selection. We've produced no batsmen of note and even in our Championship winning year the batting was unreliable. A look at their career averages tells its own story!! If the batting isn't strengthened, somehow, then Lancs. will return to Division 2 long before this season ends!!!

  • POSTED BY Nutcutlet on | April 21, 2014, 7:14 GMT

    Posted by landl47 on (April 21, 2014, 4:20 GMT): I can go along with your eleven, with the exception of Prior. He hasn't kept for Sussex so far in their two wins. Indeed, he didn't play in the second fixture. I'm backing Davies (born to keep) to get an early shot at staking a claim. He should be given the SL series to settle in. It's far too early for Buttler at Test level, but if he progresses at Lancs, then he's the next cab on the rank to my thinking. Somerset might have been smarter than I once thought: by retaining CW in preference to JB, they shoudn't be bothered by too many international calls.

  • POSTED BY CodandChips on | April 21, 2014, 6:55 GMT

    @Landl47 @CricketingStargazer I personally feel Woakes would best serve the side as a seam-bowling allrounder, especially after a good Lions Tour. I actually think he is better than Stokes- more consistent and his bowling would provide more control. But Woakes has had a miserable start to the season, so it's good for him to take some wickets.

    However the only way a seam-bowling allrounder can play is if England pick a front-line spinner, and we don't exactly have a lot of options there. My favourite front-line spinner is Kerrigan, who might be able to put his debut behind him with his county coach Moores in charge and having spent time with James Anderson at Lancashire. However I reckon England are more likely to go with a batsman who bowls spin, such as Ali or Borthwick.

  • POSTED BY on | April 22, 2014, 17:20 GMT

    I doubt Stuart Law would get the job- he fell out with the top brass when he criticised the sacking of Dominic Cork, and was shown the door himself not too long after.

  • POSTED BY whatawicket on | April 21, 2014, 12:32 GMT

    as he had little genuine quality during his lancs time i would think he did ok, i myself hope they go for someone like stewey law or similar. i did not want giles for england or for that matter for us now

  • POSTED BY Thomas_Atwood on | April 21, 2014, 10:35 GMT

    If Lancashire have any sense they'll offer the job to Giles as fast as they can. Proved himself to be an excellent county coach, got Warwickshire promoted, won the county championship, went very close to winning it, won a one day final and could easily have been two. Also showed himself to be an excellent refurbisher of players whose careers were on the skids, Ricki Clarke, Varun Chopra, Chris Wright and Laurie Evans.Looking at the Lancs team they could do with a few similar acquisitions.

  • POSTED BY CricketingStargazer on | April 21, 2014, 9:55 GMT

    @codanchips There is definitely an opening there for someone. We have a mixture of county 'keepers who have been tried and discarded (Davies, Foster, Ambrose, Read, GO Jones, ...) and those who don't yet convince. A few years ago Glamorgan's Wallace was very close to a call-up, but he's had his day too.

    Agreed that I would certainly not pick Matt Prior solely on the basis of a single innings in the first match of the season when he didn't even take the gloves. He needs to do a lot more and a long-term injury means that he is a big risk.

  • POSTED BY on | April 21, 2014, 9:36 GMT

    the frightening thing for Lancashire fans should not be that Moores is leaving, it should be that Giles is a free agent

  • POSTED BY CodandChips on | April 21, 2014, 9:05 GMT

    @Nutcutlet @CricketingStargazer I have been flying the Davies flag for a while. Surely he must be a better shout than Bairstow, whose batting has looked poor in all formats for England, not to mention his keeping. Prior's loss of form was a concern, and I doubt just one county hundred will bring him back to where he was. His keeping in Aus wasn't great either, and his injury won't help his cause. Buttler has a poor first class record and should be left to establish himself in the white-ball England sides before being considered for test cricket. Foakes has played for the Lions but doesn't even keep for Essex. Davies can bat and keep, and hopefully he'll show this today against Essex.

  • POSTED BY CricketingStargazer on | April 21, 2014, 8:33 GMT

    @Andy John Well, with everyone saying what a great guy Peter Moores is for winning the Championship in 2011, a post-pennant record of "relegation, promotion, relegation" would not strike me as a great endorsement of his long-term planning! However, I have to agree with you. When Jimmy A. leaves, unless it's a hot dry summer that brings Kerrigan into play, it may be a long season for Lancashire, who look weak on batting depth too.

    @Nutcutlet Prior is a worry and a risk with his Achilles injury. As you say, Davies is an option, but it's not impossible that England could even go with Craig Kieswetter, who is still only 26, if he shows some early form. I don't think that Buttler is ready and I don't think that Jonny Bairstow is up to it.

  • POSTED BY on | April 21, 2014, 7:49 GMT

    Totally agree with George_Leeds. Lancs. are in trouble. Batsmen continue to get themselves in and out with poor shot selection. We've produced no batsmen of note and even in our Championship winning year the batting was unreliable. A look at their career averages tells its own story!! If the batting isn't strengthened, somehow, then Lancs. will return to Division 2 long before this season ends!!!

  • POSTED BY Nutcutlet on | April 21, 2014, 7:14 GMT

    Posted by landl47 on (April 21, 2014, 4:20 GMT): I can go along with your eleven, with the exception of Prior. He hasn't kept for Sussex so far in their two wins. Indeed, he didn't play in the second fixture. I'm backing Davies (born to keep) to get an early shot at staking a claim. He should be given the SL series to settle in. It's far too early for Buttler at Test level, but if he progresses at Lancs, then he's the next cab on the rank to my thinking. Somerset might have been smarter than I once thought: by retaining CW in preference to JB, they shoudn't be bothered by too many international calls.

  • POSTED BY CodandChips on | April 21, 2014, 6:55 GMT

    @Landl47 @CricketingStargazer I personally feel Woakes would best serve the side as a seam-bowling allrounder, especially after a good Lions Tour. I actually think he is better than Stokes- more consistent and his bowling would provide more control. But Woakes has had a miserable start to the season, so it's good for him to take some wickets.

    However the only way a seam-bowling allrounder can play is if England pick a front-line spinner, and we don't exactly have a lot of options there. My favourite front-line spinner is Kerrigan, who might be able to put his debut behind him with his county coach Moores in charge and having spent time with James Anderson at Lancashire. However I reckon England are more likely to go with a batsman who bowls spin, such as Ali or Borthwick.

  • POSTED BY CricketingStargazer on | April 21, 2014, 5:24 GMT

    Precisely, @landl47 but, after a poor tour, it is down to Jimmy A. to show that he is still the man for the job. The attack that you propose looks pretty good to me. With Root and/or Moeen, there are spin options, maybe not top class but, then, how many top-class spinners are there in Test cricket these days? Mid-term, Kerrigan will most likely be the answer, but that debut will hang over him for a long time, as will Cook's lack of confidence in him.

  • POSTED BY landl47 on | April 21, 2014, 4:20 GMT

    @Cricketing Stargazer: provided he's fit, I don't see Jimmy Anderson's place being under threat from Chris Woakes. However, if Woakes is bowling well and making some runs, he'd be a better option than Ben Stokes at the moment. Stokes is hugely talented, but needs more first-class experience if he's to be a consistent allrounder for England.

    An England attack of Anderson, Broad, Jordan and Woakes would be a nice mixture of styles and Woakes would be a very good #8 bat. With Cook and Robson to open, Root at #3, Bell and Ballance #4 and 5, Moeen at 6 and Prior #7 England would have a decent side, especially for English conditions. The lack of a front-line spinner would hurt in the sub-continent, but the fact is there isn't one at the moment. That should be a top priority for Moores; fortunately, he's got a couple of years to work on it.

  • POSTED BY George_Leeds on | April 20, 2014, 23:05 GMT

    Lancs are in deep trouble after only five days of cricket. Despite all the praise Moores has received the fact remains that in five years he has not significantly improved, or brought on, any real talent in the Lancashire top six. Promotion came on the back of phenomenal batting from Katich and Prince, and although Rees looks promising there doesn't seem to be anyone capable of showing true grit and composure to bat big, as epitomized by today's performance. It has been a long time since a English-born batsman hit a double ton for Lancs- or represented England at test level. By the end of the season batting points may play a significant role in determining whether Lancs are relegated or not, as from the evidence so far, Lancs look like one of the weakest sides.

  • POSTED BY CricketingStargazer on | April 20, 2014, 20:00 GMT

    There are probably seven sides that see themselves as Championship contenders, so someone is going to be very disappointed at the end of the season. Today has done nothing to dispel the suspicion that Lancashire's resources are very thin for a Division 1 campaign and that they may well be sweating come September.

    With doubts about England's attack, the Woakes-Anderson duel may yet be significant in a month or so. For the first time since 2008 Jimmy Anderson's place must be in some doubt and he needs some strong performances to show that his powers are not on the wane, with Broad and Jordan looking likely to take two of the fast bowling spots. In English conditions Chris Woakes has to be a contender if he is taking wickets and showing good form, as he has today.

    Interesting to see how Ian Bell does as a captain. It will do no harm to Alistair Cook to see another member of the side doing well in the job.

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • POSTED BY CricketingStargazer on | April 20, 2014, 20:00 GMT

    There are probably seven sides that see themselves as Championship contenders, so someone is going to be very disappointed at the end of the season. Today has done nothing to dispel the suspicion that Lancashire's resources are very thin for a Division 1 campaign and that they may well be sweating come September.

    With doubts about England's attack, the Woakes-Anderson duel may yet be significant in a month or so. For the first time since 2008 Jimmy Anderson's place must be in some doubt and he needs some strong performances to show that his powers are not on the wane, with Broad and Jordan looking likely to take two of the fast bowling spots. In English conditions Chris Woakes has to be a contender if he is taking wickets and showing good form, as he has today.

    Interesting to see how Ian Bell does as a captain. It will do no harm to Alistair Cook to see another member of the side doing well in the job.

  • POSTED BY George_Leeds on | April 20, 2014, 23:05 GMT

    Lancs are in deep trouble after only five days of cricket. Despite all the praise Moores has received the fact remains that in five years he has not significantly improved, or brought on, any real talent in the Lancashire top six. Promotion came on the back of phenomenal batting from Katich and Prince, and although Rees looks promising there doesn't seem to be anyone capable of showing true grit and composure to bat big, as epitomized by today's performance. It has been a long time since a English-born batsman hit a double ton for Lancs- or represented England at test level. By the end of the season batting points may play a significant role in determining whether Lancs are relegated or not, as from the evidence so far, Lancs look like one of the weakest sides.

  • POSTED BY landl47 on | April 21, 2014, 4:20 GMT

    @Cricketing Stargazer: provided he's fit, I don't see Jimmy Anderson's place being under threat from Chris Woakes. However, if Woakes is bowling well and making some runs, he'd be a better option than Ben Stokes at the moment. Stokes is hugely talented, but needs more first-class experience if he's to be a consistent allrounder for England.

    An England attack of Anderson, Broad, Jordan and Woakes would be a nice mixture of styles and Woakes would be a very good #8 bat. With Cook and Robson to open, Root at #3, Bell and Ballance #4 and 5, Moeen at 6 and Prior #7 England would have a decent side, especially for English conditions. The lack of a front-line spinner would hurt in the sub-continent, but the fact is there isn't one at the moment. That should be a top priority for Moores; fortunately, he's got a couple of years to work on it.

  • POSTED BY CricketingStargazer on | April 21, 2014, 5:24 GMT

    Precisely, @landl47 but, after a poor tour, it is down to Jimmy A. to show that he is still the man for the job. The attack that you propose looks pretty good to me. With Root and/or Moeen, there are spin options, maybe not top class but, then, how many top-class spinners are there in Test cricket these days? Mid-term, Kerrigan will most likely be the answer, but that debut will hang over him for a long time, as will Cook's lack of confidence in him.

  • POSTED BY CodandChips on | April 21, 2014, 6:55 GMT

    @Landl47 @CricketingStargazer I personally feel Woakes would best serve the side as a seam-bowling allrounder, especially after a good Lions Tour. I actually think he is better than Stokes- more consistent and his bowling would provide more control. But Woakes has had a miserable start to the season, so it's good for him to take some wickets.

    However the only way a seam-bowling allrounder can play is if England pick a front-line spinner, and we don't exactly have a lot of options there. My favourite front-line spinner is Kerrigan, who might be able to put his debut behind him with his county coach Moores in charge and having spent time with James Anderson at Lancashire. However I reckon England are more likely to go with a batsman who bowls spin, such as Ali or Borthwick.

  • POSTED BY Nutcutlet on | April 21, 2014, 7:14 GMT

    Posted by landl47 on (April 21, 2014, 4:20 GMT): I can go along with your eleven, with the exception of Prior. He hasn't kept for Sussex so far in their two wins. Indeed, he didn't play in the second fixture. I'm backing Davies (born to keep) to get an early shot at staking a claim. He should be given the SL series to settle in. It's far too early for Buttler at Test level, but if he progresses at Lancs, then he's the next cab on the rank to my thinking. Somerset might have been smarter than I once thought: by retaining CW in preference to JB, they shoudn't be bothered by too many international calls.

  • POSTED BY on | April 21, 2014, 7:49 GMT

    Totally agree with George_Leeds. Lancs. are in trouble. Batsmen continue to get themselves in and out with poor shot selection. We've produced no batsmen of note and even in our Championship winning year the batting was unreliable. A look at their career averages tells its own story!! If the batting isn't strengthened, somehow, then Lancs. will return to Division 2 long before this season ends!!!

  • POSTED BY CricketingStargazer on | April 21, 2014, 8:33 GMT

    @Andy John Well, with everyone saying what a great guy Peter Moores is for winning the Championship in 2011, a post-pennant record of "relegation, promotion, relegation" would not strike me as a great endorsement of his long-term planning! However, I have to agree with you. When Jimmy A. leaves, unless it's a hot dry summer that brings Kerrigan into play, it may be a long season for Lancashire, who look weak on batting depth too.

    @Nutcutlet Prior is a worry and a risk with his Achilles injury. As you say, Davies is an option, but it's not impossible that England could even go with Craig Kieswetter, who is still only 26, if he shows some early form. I don't think that Buttler is ready and I don't think that Jonny Bairstow is up to it.

  • POSTED BY CodandChips on | April 21, 2014, 9:05 GMT

    @Nutcutlet @CricketingStargazer I have been flying the Davies flag for a while. Surely he must be a better shout than Bairstow, whose batting has looked poor in all formats for England, not to mention his keeping. Prior's loss of form was a concern, and I doubt just one county hundred will bring him back to where he was. His keeping in Aus wasn't great either, and his injury won't help his cause. Buttler has a poor first class record and should be left to establish himself in the white-ball England sides before being considered for test cricket. Foakes has played for the Lions but doesn't even keep for Essex. Davies can bat and keep, and hopefully he'll show this today against Essex.

  • POSTED BY on | April 21, 2014, 9:36 GMT

    the frightening thing for Lancashire fans should not be that Moores is leaving, it should be that Giles is a free agent