Lancashire v Sussex, Div 1, Old Trafford, 3rd day May 6, 2014

Lancashire fail to get the point

Sussex298 and 216-5 (Yardy 45, Hamilton-Brown 44, Machan 44*) lead Lancashire191 (Davies 59, Smith 49, Magoffin 4-36) by 323 runs

Batting is a matter of technique and temperament, timing and tempo. Of that quartet, it is probably tempo which receives the least attention. As Lancashire's spectators watched Sussex's batsmen build a formidable lead during the last two sessions of the third day of this match they would have been excused for wishing their own batsmen could exhibit such calm control.

Despite losing the wickets of both Chris Nash and Luke Wells quite early, the visiting batsmen went about their business with the air of cricketers who were confident in their own ability to implement a clear plan. Building on a first innings lead of 107, Sussex had extended their advantage to 205 by tea and 323 at the close with Matt Machan displaying some fine enterprise and invention late in the evening session.

Skipper Nash should not want any more runs on the fourth morning before declaring and hoping his bowlers can embarrass Lancashire again. Even then, it remains quite likely that the weather will have the last word. All the same, if this game does end in a draw, the points distribution - 10 to Sussex, 8 to Lancashire - will hardly reflect the merits of the two teams

Sussex's pace of scoring may still have disturbed supporters who had consulted a weather forecast and therefore wanted their batsmen to get a wriggle on. Yet what remained noticeable was the security shown by Michael Yardy and, later, Rory Hamilton-Brown, and their obvious awareness of their part in an overall strategy. Neither batsman looked like getting out until Yardy gave Steven Croft the charge after tea and was well caught one-handed by Horton at slip. Around half an hour before the close, Hamilton-Brown was bowled by Simon Kerrigan for a 114-ball 44. Both batsmen did their jobs.

On the basis of their performances in the 2014 campaign so far, Lancashire supporters probably expect their own favourites to get out at any point in their innings. Far too infrequently have Red Rose batsmen looked like hanging round for a session or two. Instead, their often brief stays have been characterised by frenetic insecurity. That was why the hard-nosed resilience of Alex Davies was so welcome for Lancashire on the second day of this game.

Lancashire's young wicketkeeper collected his maiden first-class fifty in the first session of Tuesday's play before he skied an attempted drive off Luke Wright to Ashar Zaidi at mid-off. By that time, his partner in obduracy, Tom Smith, had also been dismissed thanks to a fine catch by Ben Brown, standing up to the stumps, off Jon Lewis.

With Glen Chapple at the other end, Kerrigan might have been expected to hold up an end and watch the fun, a task he is well capable of performing. Instead, and rather inexplicably, he gave Zaidi the charge and was stumped for a single.

When Kyle Jarvis was lbw to the excellent Steve Magoffin for a duck, Lancashire had failed to reach 200 for the third time this season. In four of the last five seasons the side collecting the fewest batting bonus points have been relegated; Glen Chapple's team have garnered just one such point in 2014.

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • david on May 7, 2014, 12:56 GMT

    i guess its going to be a long season. not only have we nothing in the pace bowling options but our batting is woeful.

    we waited while the club were in the red, but with a million + profit, why did we not go out and put more quality into the squad.

    then we pick the captain to also be coach, i am not knocking chappie, as we could have gone for Watkinson ( god forbid ). we want a quality team run by a quality coach. we have waited to long

  • Jez on May 7, 2014, 10:12 GMT

    @ ChristopherG - you may be right but Lancs will have already have played 5 of their 14 T20 games by then and they could also need snookers to prevent them being relegated from the CC1 for the 2nd time in 3 years as 6 of their 16 4 day games will have been played by 1st June. Lancs needed a strong overseas batsman mainly for the championship and then brought in a powerful hitting batsman for the T20. I don't understand an overseas bowler for T20 as he can bowl 4 overs whereas a batsman can bat for 20. And lets face it a power hitting batsman puts bums on seats which would make the signing pay for itself almost

  • Chris on May 7, 2014, 8:35 GMT

    I don't think those in charge at Lancashire like adverse publicity and I'm sure they'll be upset with all the criticism they're getting about the lack of batting prowess in the team.

    The Indian T20 competition finishes on June 1st. I won't be surprised if we soon get a big announcement, in a marketing push just before the start of the English domestic T20s, that Lancashire's iron-fisted finance department has relented to pay the wages of David Warner and has signed him up.

  • Graem on May 7, 2014, 7:02 GMT

    It is hard to believe that the draw could be considered the most likely result given how Sussex have dominated. For Sussex to win, they need two things to go their way, the weather has to be much better than the forecast was showing and Lancashire's batters need to perform worse than they did in the 1st innings. Batting is much easier when you have a lead of 107 and Sussex were never under pressure. I would have been far happier if Nash had asked Lancashire to to start batting again last night.

  • Jez on May 6, 2014, 21:55 GMT

    I don't understand the logic behind the decisions at Lancashire over the past 12 months. They sign Jarvis probably on a very good contract and haven't played him until now. They break the bank for Buttler who will miss half the season on international duty. They don't replace one of only 2 class batsmen they had (Katich) and the only overseas signing so far is another seam bowler to join the other 5 or 6 that we already have. Absolute madness but don't worry because Freddie has had a couple of nets and we made £3.5m profit last year

  • No featured comments at the moment.