NatWest T20 Blast countdown May 14, 2014

The T20 entertainer England missed

Lionised in Taunton and championed for England by county fans everywhere, Peter Trego has not given up on bringing his brand of belligerence to the international stage
21

When England called up Ian Bell and Chris Woakes as replacements for their World T20 squad in Bangladesh, there was a slumping of shoulders from England supporters at the lack of inspiration. Fine cricketers both but not exciting new names to raise expectations. Might a jovial West Country allrounder have been the man to enthuse the fans?

The sight England have lost, spectators in this season's revamped NatWest T20 Blast can revel in. Peter Trego, beloved in Somerset and vociferously championed for years by much of the county cricket fraternity on social media, can be expected to bring his own brand of belligerence to Friday nights.

Trego provides entertainment. After many years at Somerset, with T20 experience around the world - although escaping the gaze of the IPL - and with high-class ability with both bat and ball, is Trego the man England have missed? Predictably overlooked for the upcoming Sri Lanka series, he begins a fresh new domestic T20 format with international ambitions still to be realised.

"That's the reason I wake up in the morning and want to play cricket," Trego said after another day delighting the Somerset public, this time with a counter-attacking innings against Nottinghamshire. "I'm not blind to the social media stuff, I get a lot of support from the general public saying they'd like to see me get a crack and that is completely my goal within my career.

"I know that I can do it. I've done it on the big stage against IPL franchises and world-class attacks and it's just about doing enough consistently to get that opportunity because I don't think anyone in English cricket wouldn't admit that there are spaces in the limited-overs England teams."

Trego moved into England circles in 2010 with 10 appearances for the Lions. But England were then at their peak. The team sheet may now have more blanks to fill than for many years but has this opening come too late for Trego, who will turn 33 next month and pushing the back-end of an average cricketers' lifespan by the time the next World T20 comes around in 2016? The best advice is to catch him in the Blast while he remains at his peak.

"Age doesn't concern me," a sanguine Trego said. "Statistically I'm probably one of the fittest cricketers in the country. I train and do triathlons on my days off for fun. From a physical point of view, I'm in the best shape I've ever been in in my life. I've worked relentlessly, especially over the last two years on my physical self and made some surprising ground even for myself. So it doesn't bother me. It's about putting up the numbers on the board."

And Trego's career numbers compare very well against the members of England's World T20 squad. In last year's Friends Life t20, he was among the leading all-round performers with 289 runs at 36.12 and a strike rate of 117.95. With the ball, his economy rate of 5.86 was the fourth best of bowlers to have played in 10 or more matches.

"I love the fact that I entertain and will continue to do so. T20 is a great opportunity to go out there and give the crowd exciting cricket and that's certainly what I'm trying to deliver"
Peter Trego

Not blessed with express pace and often asked to bowl during the Powerplay, Trego has developed a number of change-ups to ensure he remains unpredictable. His armoury contains an offcutter, legcutter, one out of the back of the hand and a seam-up delivery where he does not snap his wrist. He uses the yorker only as a last resort but has been working on the wide full delivery that is in vogue.

"I've almost got to bowl with a spinner's mentality," he says. "With three or four variations on my slower ball and making sure that my stock delivery into length is bowled hard into the pitch so if there is some seam movement I exploit that.

"I'm not a particularly strong yorker bowler, so I need to find different ways of tying the batsman down. When you're not blessed with huge amounts of speed you have to rely on a bit of craft so having different slower balls is pretty crucial."

Trego is also tasked with a top-order slot in the batting and made handy runs in last season's FLt20. But it was in the 40-over competition that he found his best form last season, with 745 runs at 82.77, the leading tally in the tournament as Somerset reached the semi-finals.

It would be easy to see Trego's heavily tattooed arms, hear the gentle West County burr in his voice, realise his love for entertaining and cast Trego as a happy-go-lucky cricketer. But success rarely comes without a plan and, like the careful thinking behind his bowling, he talks intelligently about tactics with the bat.

"I like to go in in the first 10-15 balls and just look to hit fours, not necessarily look to go aerial," Trego says. "I normally find that when I'm hitting the ball sweetly and piercing the gaps for fours, the sixes take care of themselves a bit.

"I think as a top-order batter in one-day cricket you have to back yourself to maybe see a few dots in the early part of your innings but with the confidence that you can catch up later on in your innings and get the boundaries flowing.

"I'll be looking to concentrate on my ball-striking really and making sure I'm connecting with balls in the right ways, not trying to over-hit too much. I think there were times when a lot of guys used to try and hit the ball three streets away whereas you only have to get it over the rope.

"With all the gym work we do nowadays and the big bats, it's all about timing really, the guys who are successful at T20 are good timers of the ball, they don't just go out swinging blindfolded."

Trego enjoys a T20 day - a refreshing affair after the rigours of four-day cricket, where at Taunton the games are difficult to get through for an allrounder. The shortest format also provides the best platform for his desire to please the crowd: "When I'm having fun is definitely when I'm at my best." The dashing 86 that lit up Somerset's last Championship match, a tame draw against Notts, demonstrates that he plays in the same way across all formats.

"I play with one of the greats of the modern era in Marcus Trescothick and it's a great feeling for me to have an equally loud clap when I walk to the wicket," Trego says. "I love the fact that I entertain and will continue to do so. T20 is a great opportunity to go out there and give the crowd exciting cricket and that's certainly what I'm trying to deliver."

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • on June 3, 2014, 13:47 GMT

    Too true they missed Trego. Hildreth as well. Trego's a power player which England don't have. He should have been tried as a replacement for Flintoff. We don't have an all-rounder to take it to the opposition. Makes one wonder when onensees the number of chances players like Root or Carberry gets. I really don't think our selectors watch international cricket. Australia now has several big hitters and pace bowlers who win games. even if we have them we ignore them. Don't miss out on the Overton twins : they have the raw ability to be real match-winners.

  • Juiceoftheapple on May 16, 2014, 12:22 GMT

    TREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEGO. A lot of sentiments in the article and posts that I agree with wholeheartedly. We seem obsessed with picking supposed 'international class' players while neglect to play specialist format players. In Trego, with medium pace and a bowling economy in T20s under 6, and an England power hitting crisis, we are missing a huge trick. Why not give him a go in an unimportant T20 tour match (there are so many) to see if he sinks or swims. We pick spray around fast bowlers or line and length, when the pace off bowlers frequently have the best stats (Yardy and Bopara come to mind). When I saw the make up of Moores one day sides, without Patel, and inevitably without Trego, I just resigned myself to not really caring. Englands loss, our gain & looking forward to Trego tonight putting one into the western sky in sight of the hills of Somerset.

  • JG2704 on May 15, 2014, 20:11 GMT

    @CodandChips on (May 15, 2014, 16:18 GMT) re Southern and Northern groups being much better - I'm not so sure. On paper yes but last season the 2 SF finals both involved unfancied sides from the SW group with one of the winning a trophy. I'd do exactly the same as the T20 with quarter finals/semi finals ....

    Not sure how you'd do it but I reckon the 9 teams (odd number) is a bad idea. You don't get any football league with an odd number of teams in it's league and I think it lends itself to poor scheduling

  • MikesSpinOnCricket on May 15, 2014, 19:47 GMT

    As a Somerset fan I, too, would have mixed feelings about losing Trego to England. As for Paul_Somerset's comments about second tier cricketers, I think that is more a matter of their sides sitting in Division Two DESPITE Carberry, Briggs, Tredwell, Moeen Ali (and Alastair Cook and Bopara?!) rather than BECAUSE of them.

  • CodandChips on May 15, 2014, 16:18 GMT

    @JG the multi format examples were about players who have truly dominated. I guess KP for a bit but he was poor in ODIs in recent years.

    Re Carberry don't hold back for fear of offending me. I think he's looked terribly uncomfortable playing for England. Many people in Hampshire think he batted slowly for England due to tactics and he did look nervous). When you factor in the poor fielding, sloppy dismissals and scores of 40 odd, I think it's clear he was not comfortable. Also I'm gutted to have him miss out on many T20 and championship matches to likely be drinks carrying for England with Chris Woakes.

    Re regional teams the issue might be different groups of different strength. Look at T20 where the North and South groups have clearly been stronger than the mid/west/Wales.

    Re your second proposal. Why not just give Scotland and Ireland a team each in division 2? Or Unicorns? Or 3 leagues of 6?

  • JG2704 on May 15, 2014, 13:51 GMT

    @CodandChips on (May 15, 2014, 10:42 GMT) ctd

    2 - In CC - have one division of 8 and one of 10 rather than 2 groups of 9. This would mean that every team will play their games simultaneously to the other teams in that division - Somerset were without a game for a week or so and it would happen to all the teams. Having an even number of teams would spread out the fixtures more and it may also enable an idea of playing 5 day CC games which would produce more results and maybe be better prep for test cricket?

  • JG2704 on May 15, 2014, 13:48 GMT

    @CodandChips on (May 15, 2014, 10:42 GMT) I think there are more examples about multi format cricketers and I have seen Steyn do well in T20 - a format where I think the best can have a bad day. I know you're a Hants fan so I'll try not to offend you but I felt Carberry didn't show the aggression/flambouyance in England colours. Trego may be the same but he should be given a go. Division status matters not a jot as there is no divisional status for shorter formats where the groups are separated by regions in T20 and drawn randomly in 50 over cricket. Actually 2 changes I would make is

    1 - Have 50 over group stage cricket regionalised rather than randomly drawn. It surely makes sense for travelling fans etc ...

  • Paul_Somerset on May 15, 2014, 13:43 GMT

    @CodandChips and JG2704: Players and teams look very handy in Div. 2 when they're playing in Div. 2. Put them in Div. 1 and they're immediately out of their depth. Derbyshire went straight back down, Surrey survived just 2 seasons of struggle, while Northants and Lancs have just been thrashed by an innings and 10 wickets and look certainties for immediate relegation.

    Persistently sticking these players into an international environment in any format is just plain cruel - Kerrigan, Parry, Meaker are further examples.

    Anyhow, ultimately I agree with JG. It's my County I care about, and Trego at Somerset will always be a legend to me in a way that would be impossible in the peculiar environment in which England currently absorbs itself.

  • CodandChips on May 15, 2014, 10:42 GMT

    @JG I agree it's absurd that players that specialise in a format don't play in it but play in others. Bar AB DeVilliers and recently Virat Kohli, nobody currently dominates all 3 formats. Look at the way Steyn is struggling this IPL.

    Woakes is not a white-ball cricketer. Bresnan is not an any form cricketer.

    I also agree with you re divisional status Perhaps I'm a bit biased, but there are some very handy teams and players in div 2.

  • JG2704 on May 15, 2014, 10:22 GMT

    @Paul_Somerset on (May 14, 2014, 21:15 GMT) To be fair I'd say the division status of the team a player plays for should be irrelevant. We must remember that there is no higher or lower division status in shorter formats anyway. Trego didn't have the greatest 2012 but had a great 2013 and now is the best time to try him. I have no issue with Bopara and Tredwell who have been our most consistent bowlers and no major issue with Briggs/Dernach who are both still young and Ali has done well in a struggling Wors side so no issues there either but If it's an age issue then why are they going back to Carberry who like I said looked timid in England colours. Already mentioned re my issues with Bresnan/Woakes. Just wish they'd pick players on merit. Why can't we have test players playing test cricket and shorter format specialists play SFs?

  • on June 3, 2014, 13:47 GMT

    Too true they missed Trego. Hildreth as well. Trego's a power player which England don't have. He should have been tried as a replacement for Flintoff. We don't have an all-rounder to take it to the opposition. Makes one wonder when onensees the number of chances players like Root or Carberry gets. I really don't think our selectors watch international cricket. Australia now has several big hitters and pace bowlers who win games. even if we have them we ignore them. Don't miss out on the Overton twins : they have the raw ability to be real match-winners.

  • Juiceoftheapple on May 16, 2014, 12:22 GMT

    TREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEGO. A lot of sentiments in the article and posts that I agree with wholeheartedly. We seem obsessed with picking supposed 'international class' players while neglect to play specialist format players. In Trego, with medium pace and a bowling economy in T20s under 6, and an England power hitting crisis, we are missing a huge trick. Why not give him a go in an unimportant T20 tour match (there are so many) to see if he sinks or swims. We pick spray around fast bowlers or line and length, when the pace off bowlers frequently have the best stats (Yardy and Bopara come to mind). When I saw the make up of Moores one day sides, without Patel, and inevitably without Trego, I just resigned myself to not really caring. Englands loss, our gain & looking forward to Trego tonight putting one into the western sky in sight of the hills of Somerset.

  • JG2704 on May 15, 2014, 20:11 GMT

    @CodandChips on (May 15, 2014, 16:18 GMT) re Southern and Northern groups being much better - I'm not so sure. On paper yes but last season the 2 SF finals both involved unfancied sides from the SW group with one of the winning a trophy. I'd do exactly the same as the T20 with quarter finals/semi finals ....

    Not sure how you'd do it but I reckon the 9 teams (odd number) is a bad idea. You don't get any football league with an odd number of teams in it's league and I think it lends itself to poor scheduling

  • MikesSpinOnCricket on May 15, 2014, 19:47 GMT

    As a Somerset fan I, too, would have mixed feelings about losing Trego to England. As for Paul_Somerset's comments about second tier cricketers, I think that is more a matter of their sides sitting in Division Two DESPITE Carberry, Briggs, Tredwell, Moeen Ali (and Alastair Cook and Bopara?!) rather than BECAUSE of them.

  • CodandChips on May 15, 2014, 16:18 GMT

    @JG the multi format examples were about players who have truly dominated. I guess KP for a bit but he was poor in ODIs in recent years.

    Re Carberry don't hold back for fear of offending me. I think he's looked terribly uncomfortable playing for England. Many people in Hampshire think he batted slowly for England due to tactics and he did look nervous). When you factor in the poor fielding, sloppy dismissals and scores of 40 odd, I think it's clear he was not comfortable. Also I'm gutted to have him miss out on many T20 and championship matches to likely be drinks carrying for England with Chris Woakes.

    Re regional teams the issue might be different groups of different strength. Look at T20 where the North and South groups have clearly been stronger than the mid/west/Wales.

    Re your second proposal. Why not just give Scotland and Ireland a team each in division 2? Or Unicorns? Or 3 leagues of 6?

  • JG2704 on May 15, 2014, 13:51 GMT

    @CodandChips on (May 15, 2014, 10:42 GMT) ctd

    2 - In CC - have one division of 8 and one of 10 rather than 2 groups of 9. This would mean that every team will play their games simultaneously to the other teams in that division - Somerset were without a game for a week or so and it would happen to all the teams. Having an even number of teams would spread out the fixtures more and it may also enable an idea of playing 5 day CC games which would produce more results and maybe be better prep for test cricket?

  • JG2704 on May 15, 2014, 13:48 GMT

    @CodandChips on (May 15, 2014, 10:42 GMT) I think there are more examples about multi format cricketers and I have seen Steyn do well in T20 - a format where I think the best can have a bad day. I know you're a Hants fan so I'll try not to offend you but I felt Carberry didn't show the aggression/flambouyance in England colours. Trego may be the same but he should be given a go. Division status matters not a jot as there is no divisional status for shorter formats where the groups are separated by regions in T20 and drawn randomly in 50 over cricket. Actually 2 changes I would make is

    1 - Have 50 over group stage cricket regionalised rather than randomly drawn. It surely makes sense for travelling fans etc ...

  • Paul_Somerset on May 15, 2014, 13:43 GMT

    @CodandChips and JG2704: Players and teams look very handy in Div. 2 when they're playing in Div. 2. Put them in Div. 1 and they're immediately out of their depth. Derbyshire went straight back down, Surrey survived just 2 seasons of struggle, while Northants and Lancs have just been thrashed by an innings and 10 wickets and look certainties for immediate relegation.

    Persistently sticking these players into an international environment in any format is just plain cruel - Kerrigan, Parry, Meaker are further examples.

    Anyhow, ultimately I agree with JG. It's my County I care about, and Trego at Somerset will always be a legend to me in a way that would be impossible in the peculiar environment in which England currently absorbs itself.

  • CodandChips on May 15, 2014, 10:42 GMT

    @JG I agree it's absurd that players that specialise in a format don't play in it but play in others. Bar AB DeVilliers and recently Virat Kohli, nobody currently dominates all 3 formats. Look at the way Steyn is struggling this IPL.

    Woakes is not a white-ball cricketer. Bresnan is not an any form cricketer.

    I also agree with you re divisional status Perhaps I'm a bit biased, but there are some very handy teams and players in div 2.

  • JG2704 on May 15, 2014, 10:22 GMT

    @Paul_Somerset on (May 14, 2014, 21:15 GMT) To be fair I'd say the division status of the team a player plays for should be irrelevant. We must remember that there is no higher or lower division status in shorter formats anyway. Trego didn't have the greatest 2012 but had a great 2013 and now is the best time to try him. I have no issue with Bopara and Tredwell who have been our most consistent bowlers and no major issue with Briggs/Dernach who are both still young and Ali has done well in a struggling Wors side so no issues there either but If it's an age issue then why are they going back to Carberry who like I said looked timid in England colours. Already mentioned re my issues with Bresnan/Woakes. Just wish they'd pick players on merit. Why can't we have test players playing test cricket and shorter format specialists play SFs?

  • RakarthIX on May 15, 2014, 10:22 GMT

    As a bowler alone Trego should get the nod ahead of Dernbach and with his added ability with the bat it should be an absolute no brainer.

  • JG2704 on May 14, 2014, 21:43 GMT

    I'm not going to scream for Trego's inclusion.

    As a Somerset fan (more than an England fan) I'd rather he played for a club where he is fully appreciated and we all remember last year when England would not let our (then match winner) Buttler play in an important semi final and to rub salt into the wounds they released 2 Notts England internationals to play the same game.

    But , Trego surely deserves an opportunity above Woakes (who has never shown any white ball form even at domestic level , Bresnan (who surely has had as many undeserved chances as he's had pies) , Carberry (who looked timid in the ODI side) and Bell (who although a class player England had no confidence in to even play a warm up game when part of the WT20 squad).They seem obsessed with resting players so why not just keep him as an ODI/test player and have him playing some county cricket? Another thing not mentioned here is that he is an excellent fielder too.

  • Paul_Somerset on May 14, 2014, 21:15 GMT

    In international terms Trego will forever have to his credit the pivotal role he played in getting a below-strength Somerset into the Champions League semi-final, opening both the batting and bowling.

    He's not missing anything by avoiding an England spot under Andy Flower's ruinous regime. No cricketer with talent is allowed to flourish there. He'd be treated like Luke Wright - brilliant for Sussex, brilliant in the Big Bash League, drained of all confidence by England.

    Besides, the key to an England call-up is to get your team relegated - Moeen Ali, Carberry, Briggs, Tredwell, Bopara, Dernbach - the list of cricketers who have taken their clubs permanently into Division 2 and been rewarded with an England call-up is endless. Presumably these proven second-raters are favoured because they offer no threat to Flower's leadership.

    The guts, brilliance and consistency with which Trego has helped keep Somerset punching above their weight in Division One would look like a threat.

  • CodandChips on May 14, 2014, 19:28 GMT

    @R_U_4_Real_NICK I actually agree with your assessment on Bell. I know that in the past I have slated Bell for being unwilling to take risks and score quickly but I do seem.to blame Bell too much. With Trott gone Bell is an important player in English conditions. And don't forget Bell's stats are deflated by his early appearances in ODIs. Also at that time ODIs were a completely different game. Dobell did an excellent article on Bell recently, which also showed he's averaging better than anyone else.

    I actually think that the tactics are the problem. We ask our finishers of too much to do. Finishers and consistency hardly go hand in hand. Look at Eoin Morgan. He isn't actually consistent. Finishers can't deliver all the time. Ms Dhoni is a freak in that respect. Should I really be blaming Bell for a problem that is tactics-related? The tactics are fine in theory, especially in England, but it asks unreal expectations of the finishers.

  • R_U_4_REAL_NICK on May 14, 2014, 15:59 GMT

    @yorkshire-86 (post on May 14, 2014, 13:24 GMT): I share your doubts over Bell with regards to T20's, and personally would prefer he stay away from them; but in ODI's Bell deserves his place, and has a better average than the likes of Trego in this format. With the absence of Trott, I think Bell is even more crucial in ODI's now. His conversion rate (lack of ODI centuries) is undoubtedly poor; but he averages 37 for a reason, = consistency. 75 is by no means the lowest SR I've seen for ODI's either from a senior player, so don't understand all the moaning about him scoring too slow for ODI's from other posters on these threads.

    Trego should be given a go in T20's. He should have played instead of Luke Wright previously perhaps...

  • Jammynem on May 14, 2014, 14:59 GMT

    Trego has been at the top of the MVP rankings for the past few years along with Samit Patel. He is immense at the top of the order and a handy bowler. Never understood why England won't look at him, but he makes things happen in every game. With England all too often looking stodgy a dynamic player like Tregs would shake stuff up a bit. It will never happen, but as a Somerset member that's good news for me, as I can keep enjoying watching take attacks apart. Totally underrated...

  • on May 14, 2014, 13:53 GMT

    I always enjoyed watching Trego when he was batting for Somerset. Last year in the YB40 competition, he scored, I think if my memory serves me right, four successive fifties and a hundred against Leceistershire which was a joy to watch. He opened the inning for Somerset at that time.

  • Nutcutlet on May 14, 2014, 13:47 GMT

    Posted by crockit on (May 14, 2014, 13:17 GMT): I'm always guarded when stats are used as the arbitrating factor in cricket arguments. They are not, and IMO, will never be the final word. The 'stat' that is missing is the impact effect - and that is what Trego is: an impact player. No game is ever lost if PT has a bat in his hands. Likewise, his crafty medium is always likely to spring a surprise. Why he hasn't been selected by England for the short format game is a mystery. Perhaps he is too much his own man - the usual reason for England passing over a player - or so it seems to me.

  • yorkshire-86 on May 14, 2014, 13:24 GMT

    They seem to think Bell is a lot better player than he really is. He is a decent batsmen good enough to hold down a place in the five day game, but no more.

  • crockit on May 14, 2014, 13:17 GMT

    career stats suggest he is a good county player but not necessarily someone who England have missed given they already have a canny spinner (Tredwell) and canny medium pacer (Bopara) for the middle overs

  • on May 14, 2014, 13:14 GMT

    Yup. Been wanting him in the England squad for quite awhile now. Useful bowler and powerful run-scorer. What's not to like?

    Bit too much of a radical selection for England though, I fear.

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • on May 14, 2014, 13:14 GMT

    Yup. Been wanting him in the England squad for quite awhile now. Useful bowler and powerful run-scorer. What's not to like?

    Bit too much of a radical selection for England though, I fear.

  • crockit on May 14, 2014, 13:17 GMT

    career stats suggest he is a good county player but not necessarily someone who England have missed given they already have a canny spinner (Tredwell) and canny medium pacer (Bopara) for the middle overs

  • yorkshire-86 on May 14, 2014, 13:24 GMT

    They seem to think Bell is a lot better player than he really is. He is a decent batsmen good enough to hold down a place in the five day game, but no more.

  • Nutcutlet on May 14, 2014, 13:47 GMT

    Posted by crockit on (May 14, 2014, 13:17 GMT): I'm always guarded when stats are used as the arbitrating factor in cricket arguments. They are not, and IMO, will never be the final word. The 'stat' that is missing is the impact effect - and that is what Trego is: an impact player. No game is ever lost if PT has a bat in his hands. Likewise, his crafty medium is always likely to spring a surprise. Why he hasn't been selected by England for the short format game is a mystery. Perhaps he is too much his own man - the usual reason for England passing over a player - or so it seems to me.

  • on May 14, 2014, 13:53 GMT

    I always enjoyed watching Trego when he was batting for Somerset. Last year in the YB40 competition, he scored, I think if my memory serves me right, four successive fifties and a hundred against Leceistershire which was a joy to watch. He opened the inning for Somerset at that time.

  • Jammynem on May 14, 2014, 14:59 GMT

    Trego has been at the top of the MVP rankings for the past few years along with Samit Patel. He is immense at the top of the order and a handy bowler. Never understood why England won't look at him, but he makes things happen in every game. With England all too often looking stodgy a dynamic player like Tregs would shake stuff up a bit. It will never happen, but as a Somerset member that's good news for me, as I can keep enjoying watching take attacks apart. Totally underrated...

  • R_U_4_REAL_NICK on May 14, 2014, 15:59 GMT

    @yorkshire-86 (post on May 14, 2014, 13:24 GMT): I share your doubts over Bell with regards to T20's, and personally would prefer he stay away from them; but in ODI's Bell deserves his place, and has a better average than the likes of Trego in this format. With the absence of Trott, I think Bell is even more crucial in ODI's now. His conversion rate (lack of ODI centuries) is undoubtedly poor; but he averages 37 for a reason, = consistency. 75 is by no means the lowest SR I've seen for ODI's either from a senior player, so don't understand all the moaning about him scoring too slow for ODI's from other posters on these threads.

    Trego should be given a go in T20's. He should have played instead of Luke Wright previously perhaps...

  • CodandChips on May 14, 2014, 19:28 GMT

    @R_U_4_Real_NICK I actually agree with your assessment on Bell. I know that in the past I have slated Bell for being unwilling to take risks and score quickly but I do seem.to blame Bell too much. With Trott gone Bell is an important player in English conditions. And don't forget Bell's stats are deflated by his early appearances in ODIs. Also at that time ODIs were a completely different game. Dobell did an excellent article on Bell recently, which also showed he's averaging better than anyone else.

    I actually think that the tactics are the problem. We ask our finishers of too much to do. Finishers and consistency hardly go hand in hand. Look at Eoin Morgan. He isn't actually consistent. Finishers can't deliver all the time. Ms Dhoni is a freak in that respect. Should I really be blaming Bell for a problem that is tactics-related? The tactics are fine in theory, especially in England, but it asks unreal expectations of the finishers.

  • Paul_Somerset on May 14, 2014, 21:15 GMT

    In international terms Trego will forever have to his credit the pivotal role he played in getting a below-strength Somerset into the Champions League semi-final, opening both the batting and bowling.

    He's not missing anything by avoiding an England spot under Andy Flower's ruinous regime. No cricketer with talent is allowed to flourish there. He'd be treated like Luke Wright - brilliant for Sussex, brilliant in the Big Bash League, drained of all confidence by England.

    Besides, the key to an England call-up is to get your team relegated - Moeen Ali, Carberry, Briggs, Tredwell, Bopara, Dernbach - the list of cricketers who have taken their clubs permanently into Division 2 and been rewarded with an England call-up is endless. Presumably these proven second-raters are favoured because they offer no threat to Flower's leadership.

    The guts, brilliance and consistency with which Trego has helped keep Somerset punching above their weight in Division One would look like a threat.

  • JG2704 on May 14, 2014, 21:43 GMT

    I'm not going to scream for Trego's inclusion.

    As a Somerset fan (more than an England fan) I'd rather he played for a club where he is fully appreciated and we all remember last year when England would not let our (then match winner) Buttler play in an important semi final and to rub salt into the wounds they released 2 Notts England internationals to play the same game.

    But , Trego surely deserves an opportunity above Woakes (who has never shown any white ball form even at domestic level , Bresnan (who surely has had as many undeserved chances as he's had pies) , Carberry (who looked timid in the ODI side) and Bell (who although a class player England had no confidence in to even play a warm up game when part of the WT20 squad).They seem obsessed with resting players so why not just keep him as an ODI/test player and have him playing some county cricket? Another thing not mentioned here is that he is an excellent fielder too.