County news June 2, 2014

Flintoff return a 'challenge' for Lancashire - Moores

Play 00:21
Freddie Flintoff takes stunning catch off own bowling

Peter Moores, the new England coach, has given a lukewarm response to the idea of Andrew Flintoff coming out of retirement to represent Lancashire in T20 cricket.

Moores, who was the Lancashire coach until April, accepted that Flintoff, at his best, would be an asset to any side but warned that his return could present a challenge to the club management and risks destabilising a side that has started well in this year's NatWest T20 Blast. Lancashire are currently top of the North Division, with four wins in their first five games.

While interest in Flintoff's return has led to a flurry of ticket sales ahead of Lancashire T20 Roses clash against Yorkshire at Old Trafford, Moores warned that his selection should only be made for "cricketing reasons" and not simply as a marketing tool. He also suggested that it could be a distraction for the rest of the team.

"It's a sensitive issue with the players that are there," Moores said. "They are playing really good cricket at the moment, so definitely you'd think it would be a tough side to get into.

"A fit, strong, playing-well Andrew Flintoff is going to add to any side. But he is coming back from retirement, so they have got to make the assessment of where he is, against what they have in their current staff.

"To know that, you'd have to be on the inside. You have to be watching people practise and play and decide that it's not too much of a distraction and if it's going to work. It's got to be a cricketing decision.

"It's a challenge and it has to be handled well. But you have to pick the best side to play for Lancashire. That's what the supporters are going to watch, and that's the most important thing."

Glen Chapple, who stepped up to take responsibility for Lancashire's first team after the departure of Moores, also offered a note of caution, despite the momentum building behind a Flintoff return against Yorkshire. "It would not be an easy game to come back in," Chapple said, after the second day of Lancashire's Championship match against Somerset.

"In terms of him playing, we will just have to see how things go," he said. "The team will be picked on merit. When and if he plays, it will be very exciting for everybody who comes to watch.

"They have all been tough teams to pick. We are leaving out good players all the time, which is difficult to do. We have won the last four games and the squad will understand that. All we can do is pick the team we feel is the right one.

"The players who are in possession have done a fantastic job, especially our bowlers. We won't be taking any liberties with their positions. They are doing really well. The way 'Fred' plays his cricket, you can see him being beneficial for any time. Let's wait and see what Friday morning brings."

George Dobell is a senior correspondent at ESPNcricinfo

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • on June 3, 2014, 12:53 GMT

    people will pay to see him .. end of story.

  • geoffboyc on June 3, 2014, 12:46 GMT

    People at Old Trafford would give more credence to Peter Moores' remarks (which I partly agree with) if he hadn't left Lancashire with the team in disrepair and having to play batsmen who have already shown they are not good enough regularly enough. Player development on his watch has been minimal in spite of the laudable Championship success three years ago.

  • wibblewibble on June 3, 2014, 11:30 GMT

    Lets put it this way - on Friday Yorkshire play Lancashire in the blast. It's on TV. If Fred is playing, I'll be watching.

  • pom_don on June 3, 2014, 10:11 GMT

    I think a 'no comment' from Moores should have been his answer, good on Freddie & Lancs too, if it helps the finances & puts bums on seats then good on 'em. As for Moores I think he has enough on his plate & should be channeling all his attention towards England......he was not my pick for the coaching job either but he is in the role so that is what he should concentrate on.

  • YorkshirePudding on June 3, 2014, 8:09 GMT

    @whatawicket, he has every right to express an opinion if asked a question, and being a former Lancs coach he has every right to have his say.

    I wish him well but in the end its simply a ploy to get some cash and possibly make a name so that he falls into consideration in the IPL or other leagues around the world.

  • Harlequin. on June 3, 2014, 7:50 GMT

    'his selection should only be made for "cricketing reasons" and not simply as a marketing tool' - hahahaha! This is T20, the whole thing was created as a marketing tool. Lancashire will exploit Freddie as much as they can to get ticket sales up, and so they should. If it were FC cricket then you could understand hesitancy, but it's fine for bashball.

  • whatawicket on June 2, 2014, 20:03 GMT

    i did not want PM as england coach, and find him pushing his nose into something that does not concern him now, hard to take. if hes 50% of what he was he will do for me.plus bums on seats will help swell the coffers

  • on June 3, 2014, 12:53 GMT

    people will pay to see him .. end of story.

  • geoffboyc on June 3, 2014, 12:46 GMT

    People at Old Trafford would give more credence to Peter Moores' remarks (which I partly agree with) if he hadn't left Lancashire with the team in disrepair and having to play batsmen who have already shown they are not good enough regularly enough. Player development on his watch has been minimal in spite of the laudable Championship success three years ago.

  • wibblewibble on June 3, 2014, 11:30 GMT

    Lets put it this way - on Friday Yorkshire play Lancashire in the blast. It's on TV. If Fred is playing, I'll be watching.

  • pom_don on June 3, 2014, 10:11 GMT

    I think a 'no comment' from Moores should have been his answer, good on Freddie & Lancs too, if it helps the finances & puts bums on seats then good on 'em. As for Moores I think he has enough on his plate & should be channeling all his attention towards England......he was not my pick for the coaching job either but he is in the role so that is what he should concentrate on.

  • YorkshirePudding on June 3, 2014, 8:09 GMT

    @whatawicket, he has every right to express an opinion if asked a question, and being a former Lancs coach he has every right to have his say.

    I wish him well but in the end its simply a ploy to get some cash and possibly make a name so that he falls into consideration in the IPL or other leagues around the world.

  • Harlequin. on June 3, 2014, 7:50 GMT

    'his selection should only be made for "cricketing reasons" and not simply as a marketing tool' - hahahaha! This is T20, the whole thing was created as a marketing tool. Lancashire will exploit Freddie as much as they can to get ticket sales up, and so they should. If it were FC cricket then you could understand hesitancy, but it's fine for bashball.

  • whatawicket on June 2, 2014, 20:03 GMT

    i did not want PM as england coach, and find him pushing his nose into something that does not concern him now, hard to take. if hes 50% of what he was he will do for me.plus bums on seats will help swell the coffers

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • whatawicket on June 2, 2014, 20:03 GMT

    i did not want PM as england coach, and find him pushing his nose into something that does not concern him now, hard to take. if hes 50% of what he was he will do for me.plus bums on seats will help swell the coffers

  • Harlequin. on June 3, 2014, 7:50 GMT

    'his selection should only be made for "cricketing reasons" and not simply as a marketing tool' - hahahaha! This is T20, the whole thing was created as a marketing tool. Lancashire will exploit Freddie as much as they can to get ticket sales up, and so they should. If it were FC cricket then you could understand hesitancy, but it's fine for bashball.

  • YorkshirePudding on June 3, 2014, 8:09 GMT

    @whatawicket, he has every right to express an opinion if asked a question, and being a former Lancs coach he has every right to have his say.

    I wish him well but in the end its simply a ploy to get some cash and possibly make a name so that he falls into consideration in the IPL or other leagues around the world.

  • pom_don on June 3, 2014, 10:11 GMT

    I think a 'no comment' from Moores should have been his answer, good on Freddie & Lancs too, if it helps the finances & puts bums on seats then good on 'em. As for Moores I think he has enough on his plate & should be channeling all his attention towards England......he was not my pick for the coaching job either but he is in the role so that is what he should concentrate on.

  • wibblewibble on June 3, 2014, 11:30 GMT

    Lets put it this way - on Friday Yorkshire play Lancashire in the blast. It's on TV. If Fred is playing, I'll be watching.

  • geoffboyc on June 3, 2014, 12:46 GMT

    People at Old Trafford would give more credence to Peter Moores' remarks (which I partly agree with) if he hadn't left Lancashire with the team in disrepair and having to play batsmen who have already shown they are not good enough regularly enough. Player development on his watch has been minimal in spite of the laudable Championship success three years ago.

  • on June 3, 2014, 12:53 GMT

    people will pay to see him .. end of story.