Gloucestershire v Sussex, NatWest T20 Blast, South Division, Bristol July 4, 2014

Light dies in Sussex chase

Gloucestershire 138 for 7 (Cockbain 52) beat Sussex 125 (Taylor 3-12) by 13 runs

It is perhaps best to declare an interest. This match was not just live on Sky, it was available on ESPN in the United States. So it is natural to insist that players should remain on the field in defiance of the gathering gloom for the sake of entertainment, especially when TV cameras can disguise how dark it is. And, as long as it is not dangerous, so they should stay on. The spectators who turned out on a mucky night in Bristol also got the respect they deserved.

Gloucestershire's victory takes them joint fifth in the South Group with Sussex, one place outside the quarter-final spots. How they will be regretting the two points that were deducted at the start of the season after the ECB ruled they had prepared an unfit pitch against Kent in 2013. Sussex came into the match with back-to-back wins against Middlesex and Kent but they have a raft of top players missing - Matt Prior, Chris Jordan, Mike Yardy, Ed Joyce, Rory Hamilton-Brown among them - and that was bound to weaken them.

Hindsight suggests that Sussex's stand-in captain, Chris Nash, should have taken half-decent batting conditions while he could after winning the toss. Instead, it was Ian Cockbain who hunted down Bristol's short leg-side boundaries with gusto, making 52 from 36 balls, and when he fell to a fine boundary catch from Matt Machan, Will Gidman's 26 from 16 maintained Gloucestershire's momentum. Even then, they had slipped to 116 for 7 with an over remaining before Graeme McCarter launched a late assault on Lewis Hatchett, taking 14 off the first three balls of the final over.

It ensured Gloucestershire achieved a challenging target in a match reduced to 15 overs. It is curious how these days a 20-over match is accepted by the majority as an excellent product - indeed, preferred by millions - but 15 overs is seen as a bit of make-do; a stubborn shoulder into the wind. They used to say that when 50 overs was cut to 30.

Sussex, to their credit, did not grumble about the light. Sides have left the field in conditions like this on numerous occasions - and not just in Championship cricket, when it is logical enough, but in limited-overs when the game has often displayed a rather too precious opinion of itself. But English cricket has a product to sell and they are trying to sell it when some grounds do not have floodlights - even international grounds like Bristol.

Hamish Marshall saw the ball well enough, leaping at deep midwicket to dismiss Will Beer off the offspinner Jack Taylor on the third ball of the last over. Instead of Sussex needing eight from three, they needed 14. The captain, Alex Gidman, ran backwards at mid-off to complete the job one ball later. Taylor, who had to remodel his action after it was declared illegal, bowls more round arm these days and stood up well to the pressure.

Nevertheless, the sooner the ECB openly insists on floodlights at every international ground the better. Such pressures are already being applied. They should not stop there, but demand they are available at the headquarters of all 18 first-class grounds. Not to do so - on nights like this - is to promote an inadequate product.

There were other positives for Gloucestershire. Adam Rouse is beginning to look like the loan signing of the season. Trialists can have a temporary rise in form courtesy of an early rise in spirits but he is making an excellent impression on his month's trial. If this form continues, he has every chance of gaining a full-time contract.

There are reasons why Rouse was an understudy at Hampshire before being released. He was blocked by a strong batsman-keeper in Nic Pothas and also by probably the most natural gloveman in the country in Michael Bates. After only two balls of Sussex's innings, he looked to the manor born, following up a slick take of a rising ball, standing up to Will Gidman, by catching Luke Wright for nought the next. There is undiscovered talent in English T20 - it just needs a vibrant and successful tournament to bring it to fruition.

July 5 - 1125 BST - Story updated to clarify the reason for Gloucestershire's two-point penalty

David Hopps is the UK editor of ESPNcricinfo

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • Mark on July 8, 2014, 9:30 GMT

    I too was thinking of that Lancashire game in 1971. Of course, Lancashire won it, batting in near darkness, as England did in 1984 in an ODI in India completed in near darkness and, 30 years after Old Trafford, also in the Lahore Test. While bad light is, undoubtedly, dangerous in normal circumstances, the three most famous matches finished in darkness were won by the batting side, so one wonders if bad light, in a tight finish, affects the fielding side as badly as the batting and thus evens things up.

    Anyway, as a Gloucester exile I enjoyed this amazing win. A Quarter-Final place is still just about possible and the side is, despite its massive injury crisis this season, managing to compete in a format that it has never really mastered.

  • Simon on July 5, 2014, 10:58 GMT

    Very many congratulations indeed to Gloucestershire for an excellent - if unlikely - win. Winning the toss seemed to have given Sussex a major advantage in a game starting 75 minutes late, reduced to 15 overs per side, so for Gloucestershire to bowl them out was a great achievement. The light was indeed poor and must have reminded Gloucestershire fans of the legendarily late finish to the 1971 Gillette Cup semi-final at Old Trafford - amazing footage can be found online. After the disappointments of the Somerset and Glamorgan games there was an exciting sense of occasion at last week's last-gasp Kent win and yesterday's triumph over Sussex. Having seating (almost) all the way around the ground helps create atmosphere (but yes, floodlights are needed.) The announcer was good - even if he mispronounced Hanham Abbots School! Good luck for Gloucestershire for a top-four finish.

  • Dummy4 on July 5, 2014, 7:32 GMT

    Gloucestershire did not 'lose two points for a slow over rate'. They were deducted two points after last year's tournament for allegedly preparing an unfit wicket with too much turn for a match against Kent. As the tournament had finished, the penalty was carried over to this season. This was a bizarre decision that has not only seriously hampered Gloucestershire - who would otherwise surely have one foot in the quarter finals - but undermined the integrity of the tournament itself. What is the point of carrying penalties across from year to year when completely different conditions may prevail?

    As an aside, the irony that Kent's pitches have routinely been criticised for being slow, low turners this season that lead to poor games of cricket without anything happening to them has not been lost on Gloucestershire supporters.

  • Paulo on July 4, 2014, 21:08 GMT

    The bits I saw on sky were interesting.

    Gloucestershire appear to be slowly removing their easy-game tag.

    Good to see the ex-Hants guys at playing. Releasing Rouse seamed bonkers at the time, as did signing Wheater. I only saw bits of Rouse in the seconds but it convinced me he was an excellent keeper. Some people at Hants think he's as good as or better than Bates. I'm glad Hopps agrees with me that Bates is "probably the most natural gloveman in the country". Better than Foster.

    Howell looked good at first for Hants but then struggled. It was sort of nice to see him get Gloucestershire a lot closer than they should have at the Ageas Bowl.

    It also appears that Gloucestershire have our old Ageas Bowl announcer. I liked him. Much better than the guy we had for the Glamorgan game.

    Agree all international grounds should have floodlights.

  • No featured comments at the moment.