England news July 5, 2014

The answer is in the outgrounds

The revival of some of county cricket's outgrounds can give groundstaff at county headquarters time to improve pitches in the NatWest Blast

County cricket has a lot of challenges to stare down if England's professional circuit is to regain its relevance of old. Because that it was it is - not just an anachronistic collection of counties with no link to the modern world, but a professional circuit that deserves to be the envy of the cricketing world.

Greed means that some of the challenges are virtually impossible to meet. Only in cricket could a new T20 format designed to thrust professional clubs into the limelight be undermined by the unavailability of the very players spectators most want to see.

An overcrowded England schedule makes their absence generally unavoidable, but there have been two occasions already this season when England's players - or the batsmen at least - could have been released without a detrimental effect, only for England to opt not just for rest but for sponsors' days, golf tournaments, talk shops and celebrity appearances at the Derby and Wimbledon.

But there is a way that the NatWest Blast can make progress - and that is in the quality of the pitches. Gordon Hollins, the ECB's chief operating officer, is right to applaud the sterling work of county groundsmen in onerous circumstances, his suggestion that scores in this season's NatWest Blast are on average 11 runs higher is also a cause for optimism, but there is a simple way to ease their plight.

It may sound counterintuitive, but the easiest way in which county cricket can modernise is to make a nod to the past. By staging a fortnight of Championship fixtures on outgrounds in the last two weeks of June, they can make life easier for their groundstaff when decent T20 surfaces are becoming difficult to find at headquarters.

The use of outgrounds has vastly diminished over the years not just because of changing circumstances but because counties have deemed many of them financially unviable. After investing heavily in their major grounds, they are determined to use them whenever they can. Until now, as much as the failure to spread county cricket around the county is regrettable, there has been a financial logic to it all.

Not now. Bad T20 pitches will cause a gradual slippage in attendances. If only 2,000 spectators in total are lost over the course of a T20 season, add in food and drink profits as well and that is a loss of at least £30,000. It sounds more than enough, with goodwill on all sides, to revive an outground for a single Championship fixture.

The problem for long-suffering groundstaff is not just a lack of unused pitches, it is a lack of opportunity to work on the squares where so much cricket is played. Remove Championship cricket from the grounds for a fortnight at the midway stage of the NatWest Blast and so much more remedial work can be done.

There are many issues with outgrounds of old. Many have disappeared for good, others can no longer afford to maintain the standards of old. There will be a few two-day finishes about, but it will benefit cossetted, modern-day batsmen to experience a slightly less reliable pitch or two and reacquaint themselves with the club grounds which are a vital component of English cricket.

There is a charm, now unknown to many, of playing Championship cricket on outgrounds. The smaller size of Championship crowds make it the perfect companion. It would not temporarily degrade the game; it would return to at least once a year to its roots and champion its part in English culture by doing so.

Not just the players, but the media, too, expect higher standards these days. Wifi remains desperately poor at several headquarters and the story at outgrounds tends to be even bleaker. But if the outcome is a more successful professional game, the suffering will be worthwhile.

There has not been a better reason for years for county cricket to go on holiday for a fortnight. Spread Championship cricket back into the forgotten communities and let the NatWest Blast benefit into the bargain. It is a virtuous circle.

If the ECB - and the counties themselves - are really serious about a proper transformation of county cricket, it is an ambition that should be seriously considered. It is no longer a matter that they can't afford to do it. It is a matter that they can't afford not to.

David Hopps is the UK editor of ESPNcricinfo

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • Dummy4 on July 8, 2014, 10:36 GMT

    My local county increased the price for T20 this season. I don't go anymore. I hear I am not the only one.

  • ian on July 7, 2014, 7:50 GMT

    It's something that generations departed instinctively appreciated: take the game to the people to save them the time and expense of travelling to the HQ. In this way the interest within a county remained high - and attendance at the annual fixture at the local ground took on the aura of a local rite. For example, Yorkshire's Broad Acres were served by fixtures at Hull, Bradford, Sheffield, Middlesborough, Scarborough, Harrogate, besides Leeds. That was fifty years ago, while Kent went to Dartford, Gravesend, T-Wells, Folkestone, Blackheath, Maidstone, Gillingham and Dover. Cricket has its roots in the country and is an integral part of the English summer country scene. It's where it belongs, where it is at ease with its surrounds. The retreat to the major grounds is regrettable and, if the argument was economic, it was short term, because it sacrificed the branches to save the trunk. With a huge fixture list, it's high time to reverse the trend and take format cricket to the corners.

  • Samuel on July 6, 2014, 9:41 GMT

    Returning to outgrounds would certainly help, as well as in general just reviving a wonderful old tradition that it's been a shame to see die out. I still think the answer lies in playing less first class cricket personally, though. Whether you do it by splitting the two divisions further into a three division tournament or do it regionally like the old T20 competition (you'd have to get a bit creative with the groups to avoid an obviously weak one, like the old Mid/West/Wales T20 group used to be) but cutting six first class games from the schedule of most of the counties (you'd have to have semi-finals & a final if you went to a regional tournament, perhaps swinging the argument in favour of the three division structure) would ease the pressure on groundsmen greatly, as well as freeing up the schedule so that England and Lions games don't clash with county ones, meaning England players could play for their counties & players wouldn't be taken out of Championship games for the Lions.

  • steven on July 6, 2014, 7:21 GMT

    I don't seam to recall Lancashire playing a season at Liverpool when the OT pitches were being turned having too much of a negative effect. (Champions) I totally agree on the article, If the counties work with the outgrounds to produce good pitches, then there is less reason to suggest there will be penalties. There will be hopefully higher quality cricket on show at the hq ground and therefore better attendances for the t20s hopefully and more money... It is not as if any 4 day games are going to have an attendance too high for an outground these days and I feel Liverpool and Blackpool are much nicer places to watch a serene 4 day game than a mostly empty OT.

  • Jon on July 5, 2014, 16:22 GMT

    @Ian Burnett. I can endorse your statement, having watched some excellent cricket at the United Services Ground until the remote Rosebowl was built. Warne vs Dravid, Nixon McLean steaming in from the Officer's Club End, the last game against the New Zealanders...surely it wouldn't be too hard to give the city one or two matches a year to bring cricket to a wider audience?

  • Cricinfouser on July 5, 2014, 15:44 GMT

    Essex used to play on several outgrounds. Then the ECB introduced penalties for 'poor' pitches and deprived them of a championship in 1989. If the penalties remain, why would any county risk a 2 day finish on a club pitch?

  • Dummy4 on July 5, 2014, 14:59 GMT

    What an excellant article ! Hampshire have brought everything into the souless Ageas Bowl losing Basingstoke, Bournemouth (lost longer though) and Portsmouth. Many of the past players enjoyed using the out grounds - Malcolm Marshall loved playing at Portsmouth because of the pace and carry for example. It would also bring back fans who feel isolated now

  • Dummy4 on July 5, 2014, 14:46 GMT

    Surely first-class cricket requires the best conditions, which mostly come from first-class grounds?

    Why not stage the 20/20 games on outgrounds instead, and if you think the spectators want games reaching 200 runs+ per side, then find grounds with artificial strips and bowl tennis balls at them.

    Degrade County Championship cricket in favour of 20/20....bizarre indeed.

  • No featured comments at the moment.