Middlesex v Somerset, Uxbridge, 4th day

Compton stars as Middlesex stay cagey

Tim Wigmore at Uxbridge

July 10, 2014

Comments: 5 | Text size: A | A

Somerset 264 for 9 dec (Compton 94, Hildreth 53) and 203 for 4 (Compton 83*, Hildreth 60) drew with Middlesex 338 (Malan 124, Gubbins 56, Stirling 56, Overton 4-84) and 315 for 5 dec (Gubbins 95, Morgan 62, Stirling 60)
Scorecard


Nick Compton drives behind square, Nottinghamshire v Somerset, County Championship, Division One, Trent Bridge, September 26, 2013
Nick Compton took on the extra pace of Uxbridge, and Steve Finn, with aplomb © Getty Images
Enlarge

When Nick Compton was dropped by England, it was suggested that his batting was too slow and stodgy. He didn't have enough shots and, with Alastair Cook and Jonathan Trott also in England's top three, the side would get stuck.

It always seemed a slightly peculiar logic. And slow batting was hardly England's problem during the Ashes series in Australia.

In the first innings Compton scored 94 off 278 balls. Laborious, perhaps, but without those runs - or if he had been taken by Paul Stirling at second slip on 16, when Eoin Morgan was off having been stung be a bee - Somerset may well have lost this game.

If Compton felt the need to show Angus Fraser, Middlesex's director of cricket and the watching England selector, that he could play more expansively, he took the opportunity the last day at Uxbridge presented. He pulled particularly pleasingly, displaying a relish for the short ball that those in England's Test side have sometimes lacked.

"He's at his best when he's facing the likes of Steven Finn on these type of pitches when there's a bit more bounce and a bit more pace," Marcus Trescothick purred.

For Chris Rogers, the upshot of Compton's defiance was to reflect once again on his declaration. He set Somerset 390 in 72 overs, which sounded on the cautious side, though he had a rapid outfield to consider as well as the memory of Nottinghamshire's heist of 385 last month.

"Hindsight is a wonderful thing. Maybe we could have pulled out a bit earlier but we had a hard loss a few weeks ago and that's in the back of our minds. I think if we were to lose this game we'd probably fall off that chasing group so it was probably important that we didn't lose."

Both sides retain title pretensions. Somerset are in third, and have both their games against Northamptonshire to play, while Middlesex go to Scarborough next week to play Yorkshire. "I think they'll be a bit wary of us and hopefully we can pull off an amazing win and then we'll be right up there," Rogers said.

The spectre of a drab final day, for all the fine cricket in the match, also prompted discussion over the lack of disintegration in the pitch. "I was hoping for a bit more up and down on day four but it didn't really do that. It was essential you used the new ball but after that it became a bit lifeless," Rogers said.

"With the sun out the wickets here become a bit dead and then it is hard to bowl teams out, particularly as they don't seem to be breaking up that much. I'm sure groundsmen are trying their best. They probably just need a bit of rain!"

If the crowd felt underwhelmed at the spectre of early handshakes, at least they had a morning of pyrotechnics to enjoy. Paul Stirling, promoted to number five, bristled with stocky intent. He followed an uppercut off Lewis Gregory for six with a bludgeoned straight drive and reached 50 in only 37 balls.

It was his fourth in five Championship innings in 2014, seemingly rendering his years marooned in the 2nd X1 all the more curious. But not to Rogers.

"He was still developing his own game and he'd be the first to say he had no form with the red ball but he's come round and he's doing very well," Rogers said. "It's great to say we should have picked him early in hindsight but that's a rubbish call. I'm just really happy he's doing well."

Rogers' new opening partner is also in fine form. Nick Gubbins reached 95, including lofting George Dockrell for six over midwicket, but was run-out after a mix-up with Stirling. Still, on the evidence of his composure and mature shot selection, Gubbins' maiden first-class century will not be long in coming.

Somerset's prospects of threatening their target always depended inordinately upon Trescothick, especially with Craig Kieswetter missing this game because of a family funeral.

He flickered briefly, swatting a few trademark late cuts, but when Eoin Morgan smartly took him at second slip a meandering draw seemed inevitable. With a lively spell that accounted for Chris Jones and Alviro Petersen, Toby Roland-Jones briefly offered the prospect of Rogers being vindicated.

But James Hildreth made a second silky half-century of the game, adding 93 with Compton. As he accelerated, unfurling a reverse-sweep, Somerset may have entertained fanciful notions of a run chase. He was caught at long on to end those. No matter: Compton remained unperturbed.

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by CricketingStargazer on (July 14, 2014, 7:09 GMT)

@Tolerator So one is only permitted to comment if they have played first class cricket? That would definitely put us fans in our place!

OK, so one declaration went wrong due to a not very good bowling performance where Middlesex were unsure whether to bowl straight for wickets and risk going for a few runs, or go for a more economical line and defend the target, but without trying to bowl the opposition out. Maybe once bitten, twice shy applies, but if you want to win the Championship you have to win matches. If you play for draws as you suggest, other side who do want to win get 16 points instead of the 5 for the draw. The maths is quite simple in the end!

Posted by JG2704 on (July 11, 2014, 21:14 GMT)

@Tolerator

1 - Whether or not I have played comp sport or not I'm ok at reading it and decent at maths 2- Vs Notts - I'd still say it was a decent gamble as the odds were in Middx's favour - it just worked out that Notts batted exceptionally well in the 2nd inns 4 - Vs Nhants - surely you would take the gamble vs a side who have not won (lost 8) all season? 5 - Vs Somerset , Rogers could still have declared with the likelihood of Somerset winning remote but still giving Middx a realistic chance of winning?

Listen I'm not a Middx fan - I'm a Somerset fan and I'm happy to take only 1 point less than you in a game that you were very much on top of and we have been on the wrong end of the dodgy points system a couple of times this season but if I was a Middx fan I'd be much more annoyed at missing out on potential wins vs Somerset and Nhants than I would at setting a very stiff target which a team chased down.We saw what happened in the Eng/SL series with Cook declaring too late

Posted by Tolerator on (July 11, 2014, 15:49 GMT)

It is with interest that I follow the match reports of Mr Wigmore and the comments of JG2704 and Cricketing Stargazer. Firstly Mr Wigmore and the selection of Paul Stirling. Was he pushing for him to be picked erlier in the season when he was struggling to get runs in t20 and 2nd XI cricket. I fear not. Wisdom after the event I feel. In the game he reported Morgan was dropped at 2nd slip - it was 3rd, he said Compton was caught at square leg - it was fine leg, and that Trescothick's 2nd innings dismissal was a flash outside off stump - it was a forward defensive. I would suggest he watches the game a little more closely. re JG2704. Middlesex do not deserve to win the title after dominating a fellow challenger for the first three days of the match? An interesting perception from someone who has obviously played little competitive sport. and Mr Stargazer, if Middlesex had not declared against Notts they would be in second place ahead of Somerset and Notts.

Posted by JG2704 on (July 11, 2014, 8:53 GMT)

Middx's attitude means that they don't deserve to win the title. I possibly went a little ott re suggesting that they should declare overnight but I was equating the BBC weather forecast in where it looked like there may be alot of time lost. However it was a pretty pointless declaration but then if Rogers isn't going to back his bowlers vs Northants then he isn't going to do so against any side. Luckily for both teams and esp Notts/Warwicks Yorks could not quite enforce the win. I obviously hope I'm wrong but I reckon our chances are between slim and zero with slim leaving town

Posted by CricketingStargazer on (July 11, 2014, 5:34 GMT)

It looks like a "must not lose" declaration, looking over the shoulder at relegation more tan being determined to kick the door down and join the Championship battle. If you are serious about a top-3 finish you have to risk defeat sometimes to get the extra points.

For Somerset, this was a good draw. Two games against Northants are coming up. Win both and Somerset know that they will be right in the middle of the Championship fight.

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
County Results
Kent v Gloucs at Canterbury - Sep 23-26, 2014
Gloucs won by 244 runs
Lancashire v Middlesex at Manchester - Sep 23-26, 2014
Match drawn
Northants v Sussex at Northampton - Sep 23-26, 2014
Match drawn
Yorkshire v Somerset at Leeds - Sep 23-26, 2014
Match drawn
Derbyshire v Leics at Derby - Sep 23-25, 2014
Derbyshire won by 408 runs
Essex v Worcs at Chelmsford - Sep 23-25, 2014
Essex won by an innings and 92 runs
Glamorgan v Hampshire at Cardiff - Sep 23-25, 2014
Hampshire won by 291 runs
Warwickshire v Durham at Birmingham - Sep 23-25, 2014
Warwickshire won by an innings and 13 runs
All recent results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days