Lancashire v Birmingham, NatWest T20 Blast final, Edgbaston August 23, 2014

Woakes denies Flintoff as Birmingham win Blast

21

Warwickshire 181 for 5 (Evans 53) beat Lancashire 177 for 8 (Brown 55, Hannon-Dalby 3-31) by four runs
Scorecard and ball-by-ball details

Play 00:56
Kimber: Flintoff not what he used to be

In the end, it came down to a battle between the past and the future. With the bat we had Andrew Flintoff, an England allrounder with an illustrious past, on the ground where he had produced some of his most memorable displays. With the ball we had Chris Woakes, an England allrounder at the start of his international career, on his home ground. Fourteen were required from the final over.

They are very different characters. While Flintoff appears to enjoy the spotlight, Woakes is modest and soft spoken. While Flintoff's reputation is all extravagant sixes and spells of blistering pace, Woakes' is about maintaining pressure and contributing to partnerships. While Flintoff gained the biggest cheers of the night, Woakes was quietly appreciated by supporters who have come to trust his ability to perform, with bat and ball, under pressure. You might even say that Flintoff is the showman and Woakes the diligent clerk.

It seemed fate had already decreed this was to be Flintoff's night. He had already taken a key wicket, Ian Bell, with his first ball of the match having only been drafted into the game as a late replacement when Kabir Ali suffered a recurrence of a shoulder problem. And he had just heaved the final two balls he had faced in the previous owner for six. Once he got himself back on strike by rushing through for a bye from the first ball of the final over it seemed destiny might be calling.

But Woakes, bowling with good pace and nailing his yorker time and again, was not to be denied. Perhaps Flintoff, in his prime, might have managed to find the boundary from one of the next three balls. Perhaps Flintoff, before the knee trouble and the five years away from the game, might have been able to turn for a second run from the fourth ball of the final over to get back on strike.

Instead, it was the younger man who prevailed. Woakes, holding his nerve and a ball becoming more slippery in the evening dew, hardly gave the older man a chance. He conceded only nine from the over - eight from the bat - and Birmingham won the NatWest T20 Blast for the first time.

It will be little consolation to Lancashire right now but, one day in the future, they will reflect on their part on a wonderfully entertaining day of T20 cricket. We saw powerful, inventive batting, we saw skilful, clever bowling, we saw - one or two dropped chances aside - some committed, athletic fielding. And all in front of a good-humoured, full house. If T20 is the shop window to the sport, this must be considered a thoroughly successful day.

In the shorter term, this result will hurt. They have now lost three finals and 11 semi-finals since 1998 and may feel that they enjoyed little fortune. Certainly Paul Horton might consider himself unfortunate to have been given out caught behind, though that is no excuse for his unusually sustained act of dissent towards the umpire that followed. Disciplinary action in the form of a Level Two charge is inevitable. "I was out of order," Horton admitted afterwards. "Sometimes these things happen in the heat of the moment, but it's no excuse. I showed dissent and I've accepted my penalty."

The evening started well for Lancashire, after an accomplished performance in the semi-final. Flintoff dismissed Bell early and Steven Croft delivered four of the most frugal overs of the evening with his mix of offspin and floaters. Birmingham thrashed 63 from the Powerplay overs, as an out-of-sorts James Anderson took particular punishment, but could then add only 60 in 10 overs in mid-innings as Lancashire's spinners gradually took control .

But 58 runs from the final four overs of the Birmingham innings changed everything. Man of the Match was Birmingham's Laurie Evans who, after a slow start, contributed a brilliant half-century. Having laboured for 16 balls over his first 11 runs, his next 13 brought 42 as he demonstrated his power, his fast hands and his excellent eye in hitting four sixes in 10 balls at one stage. An England T20 call-up in the coming days should notbe ruled out.

It is remarkable how fortunes can fluctuate. Only a couple of weeks ago, Evans was close to leaving the club for a fresh start at Nottinghamshire. And, when he dropped a relatively straightforward chance off Karl Brown when the batsman had scored just one, he feared, in his words "I was going to be the villain of the day, the man who dropped the T20 trophy."

But there were several heroes in the Birmingham performance. There was the captain, Varun Chopra, who remained cool throughout the Flintoff barrage and contributed 30 brisk runs of his own. There was Rikki Clarke, the great England allrounder than never was, contributing solid performances with bat and ball. There was Boyd Rankin, who bowled with pace and hostility on a sluggish surface to put the squeeze on the opposition. There was Woakes who, apart from his nerveless final over, dismissed the dangerous Brown with a yorker

And there was the gentle-paced giant Oliver Hannon-Dalby, who might not have played had Birmingham had a full-strength side to pick from and, until he conceded 12 from his final two balls, had bowled with admirable calm and control.

This victory is notable, even for a club of Warwickshire's size and history. Not only do they have a modest record in the format, and had not reached Finals Day since the first year of the competition in 2003, but they were without two of their leading seamers (Chris Wright and Keith Barker) and were unsettled by the news earlier this week that the club captain, Jim Troughton, had been forced to retire due to a long-standing back injury. They also took the brave and somewhat controversial decision to drop Jonathan Trott from their side.

Furthermore, it seemed they were destined to be knocked out in the early stages. Had Nottinghamshire not beaten Yorkshire in the final group game, Warwickshire's late run of good results in winning their final three group games would have been irrelevant. As it was, they have now won six T20 games in succession and, for the first time, are domestic T20 champions.

It is 20 years since a Warwickshire side coached by Bob Woolmer and including Brian Lara and Dermot Reeve won three major trophies in the season. While it is probably premature to talk of a repeat this season, it is worth noting that Warwickshire remain in contention in both of the other competitions.

George Dobell is a senior correspondent at ESPNcricinfo

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • bobmartin on August 24, 2014, 20:53 GMT

    I'm not a great fan of T20 cricket.. but one thing is for sure.. if we in England are going to put it on.. then for goodness sakes let's do it with some style.. like the IPL or the Big Bash do....They may be brash.. they may be brazen.. they may be loud and over-the-top... but isn't that what the game is all about ?

  • Peterincanada on August 24, 2014, 15:04 GMT

    Nobody has mentioned this but I think Horton missed a trick putting Flintoff at nine. If he had come in at six or seven Lancs might have done it.

  • JG2704 on August 24, 2014, 13:16 GMT

    @ Andrew Simon Carr on (August 24, 2014, 12:06 GMT) I recorded it and skipped through much of it. Yes there should be some sort of review thing - even if not a full DRS - here

    Re the cut off time - they indicated on Sky that they were just inside so I'm not sure

  • JG2704 on August 24, 2014, 13:12 GMT

    @ CodandChips - Re Maxwell - I still think he's one of the most dangerous T20 players in the world. I'd still rather have him in my side as I think it's always good to have someone that can do that someting extra special every once in a while. We missed Buttler in that respect although he had a bad day. Re Wheater - I think he scored a big ton in a 50 over game which has prob kept him in the saide for a while. Also , how often is it the case that a team who sneaks through the group stages goes on to win it?

  • JG2704 on August 24, 2014, 13:05 GMT

    @ bobmartin on (August 24, 2014, 11:31 GMT) I'm not sure if Horton will get into trouble for dissent. I hope common sense will prevail here. I'm wondering if they should have just 1 DRS review per side in this format or even just a modified version which can only overturn decisions such as catches where it clearly hasn't hit the bat or out decisions for LBW if there is a clear edge. Maybe just a review not based on DRS so Hotspot and Snicko aren't used but just the TV umpire's common sense?

  • on August 24, 2014, 12:06 GMT

    DRS should be compulsory for Finals Day given the poor umpiring - the dismissal of Horton especially...

    Why weren't Birmingham fined 6 runs for starting the final over after the cutoff time? Did the umpires not know the regulations for this format?

    Although a Kent fan, feel great sympathy for Lancs who were robbed by incompetence.

    For a showpiece event, the absence of DRS and of umpires clearly not knowing the applicable regulations is simply not good enough.

  • bobmartin on August 24, 2014, 11:31 GMT

    I'm neutral.. since my team, Somerset didn't qualify, but for me.. one of the biggest let-downs of the night was that horrendous decision by umpire Bailey to give Horton out. You wouldn't expect something as blatant as that in a village game on a Sunday afternoon from an amateur umpire...Even as it happened my wife was yelling "That was nowhere near his bat". And to think that they can endlessly check whether or not a ball carried.. or a foot was lifted during a stumping...or a run-out attempt .. or whether a fielder touched the boundary marker.. but not something as basic as whether or not the ball and bat made contact.. seems incredibly stupid... You should either use the TV umpire for every decision or none at all.. There should be no half measures..

  • on August 24, 2014, 11:21 GMT

    I know it doesn't sit well with the Star obsessed Media but cricket Is a team game & Warwickshire (Hope they dump the 'Birmingham' Bears monicker but doubt I) had the momentum timed perfectly without any big heads sorry stars.

  • CodandChips on August 24, 2014, 10:47 GMT

    (continued)

    So perhaps 1.Hales 2.Roy 3.Taylor 4.Morgan (C) 5.Buttler 6.Bopara 7.Willey/Smith 8.Jordan 9.Tredwell (Briggs/Parry reserve, personally I think Briggs deserves another shot, but perhaps a bit biased there- though I'd much rather he be involved in the promotion race, (though we've signed Tahir!)) 10.Gurney 11.Fletcher

    @JG2704 "I think I wanted Hants to win it for CodandChips" thanks however I'm kind of glad we didn't win as we were far from deserving and it would have masked clear flaws that have gone about unchanged such as why Wheater plays ahead of Bates despite Bates being a much better keeper and Wheater's batting being overrated while Bates' underrated. Why were underperforming players like Carberry and Ervine and Maxwell persisted with for so long.

    Also we nicked the trophy in 2010. We shouldn't have done it again this year. Lancs, Warwickshire were more deserving (even if Warwickshire barely qualified)

  • CodandChips on August 24, 2014, 10:37 GMT

    Now the domestic comp is over, any ideas for the T20I team?

    Although Bell and Woakes did surprisingly well today, I think both need to do a lot more to prove their worth in T20 cricket. Bell hasn't played enough T20 recently to merit a place, though his innings in the semis proved he isn't as out of touch with the format as many of us first thought.

    Roy has to play after a brilliant tournament. Hales, Morgan, Buttler obviously. Morgan captain as better than Broad and won't need to be rested as doesn't play tests. Root or Taylor at 3 as both can score quickly while being solid. I'd go with Taylor since he is just too good to be ignored completely.

    Bopara was excellent in the Blast and is much improved internationally with bat and ball so he makes my side. I'd like another allrounder, ideally Willey, though with his injury worries and bowling inconsistency perhaps a safer option would be Tom Smith. Jordan, Tredwell, Gurney. I like Luke Fletcher to bowl yorkers.

  • bobmartin on August 24, 2014, 20:53 GMT

    I'm not a great fan of T20 cricket.. but one thing is for sure.. if we in England are going to put it on.. then for goodness sakes let's do it with some style.. like the IPL or the Big Bash do....They may be brash.. they may be brazen.. they may be loud and over-the-top... but isn't that what the game is all about ?

  • Peterincanada on August 24, 2014, 15:04 GMT

    Nobody has mentioned this but I think Horton missed a trick putting Flintoff at nine. If he had come in at six or seven Lancs might have done it.

  • JG2704 on August 24, 2014, 13:16 GMT

    @ Andrew Simon Carr on (August 24, 2014, 12:06 GMT) I recorded it and skipped through much of it. Yes there should be some sort of review thing - even if not a full DRS - here

    Re the cut off time - they indicated on Sky that they were just inside so I'm not sure

  • JG2704 on August 24, 2014, 13:12 GMT

    @ CodandChips - Re Maxwell - I still think he's one of the most dangerous T20 players in the world. I'd still rather have him in my side as I think it's always good to have someone that can do that someting extra special every once in a while. We missed Buttler in that respect although he had a bad day. Re Wheater - I think he scored a big ton in a 50 over game which has prob kept him in the saide for a while. Also , how often is it the case that a team who sneaks through the group stages goes on to win it?

  • JG2704 on August 24, 2014, 13:05 GMT

    @ bobmartin on (August 24, 2014, 11:31 GMT) I'm not sure if Horton will get into trouble for dissent. I hope common sense will prevail here. I'm wondering if they should have just 1 DRS review per side in this format or even just a modified version which can only overturn decisions such as catches where it clearly hasn't hit the bat or out decisions for LBW if there is a clear edge. Maybe just a review not based on DRS so Hotspot and Snicko aren't used but just the TV umpire's common sense?

  • on August 24, 2014, 12:06 GMT

    DRS should be compulsory for Finals Day given the poor umpiring - the dismissal of Horton especially...

    Why weren't Birmingham fined 6 runs for starting the final over after the cutoff time? Did the umpires not know the regulations for this format?

    Although a Kent fan, feel great sympathy for Lancs who were robbed by incompetence.

    For a showpiece event, the absence of DRS and of umpires clearly not knowing the applicable regulations is simply not good enough.

  • bobmartin on August 24, 2014, 11:31 GMT

    I'm neutral.. since my team, Somerset didn't qualify, but for me.. one of the biggest let-downs of the night was that horrendous decision by umpire Bailey to give Horton out. You wouldn't expect something as blatant as that in a village game on a Sunday afternoon from an amateur umpire...Even as it happened my wife was yelling "That was nowhere near his bat". And to think that they can endlessly check whether or not a ball carried.. or a foot was lifted during a stumping...or a run-out attempt .. or whether a fielder touched the boundary marker.. but not something as basic as whether or not the ball and bat made contact.. seems incredibly stupid... You should either use the TV umpire for every decision or none at all.. There should be no half measures..

  • on August 24, 2014, 11:21 GMT

    I know it doesn't sit well with the Star obsessed Media but cricket Is a team game & Warwickshire (Hope they dump the 'Birmingham' Bears monicker but doubt I) had the momentum timed perfectly without any big heads sorry stars.

  • CodandChips on August 24, 2014, 10:47 GMT

    (continued)

    So perhaps 1.Hales 2.Roy 3.Taylor 4.Morgan (C) 5.Buttler 6.Bopara 7.Willey/Smith 8.Jordan 9.Tredwell (Briggs/Parry reserve, personally I think Briggs deserves another shot, but perhaps a bit biased there- though I'd much rather he be involved in the promotion race, (though we've signed Tahir!)) 10.Gurney 11.Fletcher

    @JG2704 "I think I wanted Hants to win it for CodandChips" thanks however I'm kind of glad we didn't win as we were far from deserving and it would have masked clear flaws that have gone about unchanged such as why Wheater plays ahead of Bates despite Bates being a much better keeper and Wheater's batting being overrated while Bates' underrated. Why were underperforming players like Carberry and Ervine and Maxwell persisted with for so long.

    Also we nicked the trophy in 2010. We shouldn't have done it again this year. Lancs, Warwickshire were more deserving (even if Warwickshire barely qualified)

  • CodandChips on August 24, 2014, 10:37 GMT

    Now the domestic comp is over, any ideas for the T20I team?

    Although Bell and Woakes did surprisingly well today, I think both need to do a lot more to prove their worth in T20 cricket. Bell hasn't played enough T20 recently to merit a place, though his innings in the semis proved he isn't as out of touch with the format as many of us first thought.

    Roy has to play after a brilliant tournament. Hales, Morgan, Buttler obviously. Morgan captain as better than Broad and won't need to be rested as doesn't play tests. Root or Taylor at 3 as both can score quickly while being solid. I'd go with Taylor since he is just too good to be ignored completely.

    Bopara was excellent in the Blast and is much improved internationally with bat and ball so he makes my side. I'd like another allrounder, ideally Willey, though with his injury worries and bowling inconsistency perhaps a safer option would be Tom Smith. Jordan, Tredwell, Gurney. I like Luke Fletcher to bowl yorkers.

  • Charlie101 on August 24, 2014, 9:35 GMT

    I thought after the 2 sixes that Freddie was going to do it. I feel he really performed when it counted and there is plenty of life left in the old dog and he vindicated his comeback .

  • JG2704 on August 24, 2014, 8:18 GMT

    Congrats Warwicks - sorry I mean Birmingham

    Well - the 2 England stars Buttler and Anderson were a huge let down. Bell,Porterfield and Roy batted beautifully in the 1st game. I think I wanted Hants to win it for CodandChips but they folded when chasing a big target after starting so well with the ball. Not sure why there are neg comms re Flintoff. He wasn't the worst bowler on show and he took Lancs close in the end

  • on August 24, 2014, 7:21 GMT

    I lost interest when the competition became a circus..Flintoff in my opinion should NEVER be allowed back into the PROFESSIONAL game. I hope his club have found ways to offset his insurance costs other than extra charge to the paying public. As soon as I knew Lanc were in the final four I cancelled all plans to attend the final. In any case Surrey didapppinted. Perhaps they did me a favoir not having to watch Flintoff..

  • Arif_Khan_Bangladeshi on August 24, 2014, 4:00 GMT

    What a game. Great to see Freddie back and playing once again. Well done mate.

  • chechong0114 on August 24, 2014, 2:37 GMT

    Today the sport of cricket and the organizers of this tornament can take a bow for doing something that is desperately needed in this game and that was provide some real entertainment and give the fans value for their money. Cricket has always been a self absorbed sport only caring about its stupid rules and tons of punishment for every and anything, all the while alienating the real issues that be, but today was a cricket fans paradise. 3 deciding games in one full day at the same venue, bringing back Flintoff and having James Anderson play in 2games fresh off a huge test series win, priceless. This move by the organizers was truly a big one and how did the fans repay the tornament, by a sold out crowd for all the matches. I followed this tornament from the first game this year and there were tons of empty seats at many of the venues which was very appalling to see but a little imagination has paid of today and hats off to all those involved.

  • CodandChips on August 24, 2014, 2:24 GMT

    Once again I had a terrific day at finals day. Great atmosphere at Edgbaston, one of the best grounds I've been to. Great location also.

    Despite many overseas players being unavailable such as Khan and Maxwell, the cricket was exciting and there were some high quality moments. England had the sense to release their players for today, and there were also messers Flintoff and Pietersen.

    Warwickshire and Lancashire both deserved to win their semis. My team Hampshire were just rubbish, but the batting bar Adams has struggled all tournament and I think they were lucky to be where they were. Surrey will probably admit they were too reliant on Roy, who looks a fantastic player.

    Lancashire have been the team of the tournament for me. I was thinking Flintoff would have his hero moment. But Warwickshire delivered when mattered. Good team effort.

    Bell and Woakes also showed good white-ball ability to keep their doubters like me quiet. Woakes seems to have improved and bowled excellently.

  • WarwickshireRulesOk on August 24, 2014, 1:39 GMT

    Well done Warwickshire!

    Great advert for T20 and well done to Lancashire for putting up such a great fight. Far better quality of suspense, batting,bowling and fielding than anything served up in IPL. So many great performances from both sides and a rich vein of talent for England to tap into from both sides.

    Nice to see Freddie play such a great role as well. I was worried!

    Still on for 3 trophies like the great Warks side of 20 years ago. You did us proud!

  • ChristopherG on August 24, 2014, 0:22 GMT

    Congratulations to the WARWICKSHIRE team in their win.

  • SaracensBob on August 23, 2014, 23:08 GMT

    Well done 'Bears'! Can we plese go to back to being Warwickshire when we play in this tournament next year?

  • Saintstreet on August 23, 2014, 22:17 GMT

    Congratulations Bears! A great day and a great victory despite being underdogs in three successive games. Well done to the whole squad. This one's for you Jimmy Troughton!

  • daisyhayseed on August 23, 2014, 22:06 GMT

    Yoouuu bears! What a day, great to see so many household names playing.

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • daisyhayseed on August 23, 2014, 22:06 GMT

    Yoouuu bears! What a day, great to see so many household names playing.

  • Saintstreet on August 23, 2014, 22:17 GMT

    Congratulations Bears! A great day and a great victory despite being underdogs in three successive games. Well done to the whole squad. This one's for you Jimmy Troughton!

  • SaracensBob on August 23, 2014, 23:08 GMT

    Well done 'Bears'! Can we plese go to back to being Warwickshire when we play in this tournament next year?

  • ChristopherG on August 24, 2014, 0:22 GMT

    Congratulations to the WARWICKSHIRE team in their win.

  • WarwickshireRulesOk on August 24, 2014, 1:39 GMT

    Well done Warwickshire!

    Great advert for T20 and well done to Lancashire for putting up such a great fight. Far better quality of suspense, batting,bowling and fielding than anything served up in IPL. So many great performances from both sides and a rich vein of talent for England to tap into from both sides.

    Nice to see Freddie play such a great role as well. I was worried!

    Still on for 3 trophies like the great Warks side of 20 years ago. You did us proud!

  • CodandChips on August 24, 2014, 2:24 GMT

    Once again I had a terrific day at finals day. Great atmosphere at Edgbaston, one of the best grounds I've been to. Great location also.

    Despite many overseas players being unavailable such as Khan and Maxwell, the cricket was exciting and there were some high quality moments. England had the sense to release their players for today, and there were also messers Flintoff and Pietersen.

    Warwickshire and Lancashire both deserved to win their semis. My team Hampshire were just rubbish, but the batting bar Adams has struggled all tournament and I think they were lucky to be where they were. Surrey will probably admit they were too reliant on Roy, who looks a fantastic player.

    Lancashire have been the team of the tournament for me. I was thinking Flintoff would have his hero moment. But Warwickshire delivered when mattered. Good team effort.

    Bell and Woakes also showed good white-ball ability to keep their doubters like me quiet. Woakes seems to have improved and bowled excellently.

  • chechong0114 on August 24, 2014, 2:37 GMT

    Today the sport of cricket and the organizers of this tornament can take a bow for doing something that is desperately needed in this game and that was provide some real entertainment and give the fans value for their money. Cricket has always been a self absorbed sport only caring about its stupid rules and tons of punishment for every and anything, all the while alienating the real issues that be, but today was a cricket fans paradise. 3 deciding games in one full day at the same venue, bringing back Flintoff and having James Anderson play in 2games fresh off a huge test series win, priceless. This move by the organizers was truly a big one and how did the fans repay the tornament, by a sold out crowd for all the matches. I followed this tornament from the first game this year and there were tons of empty seats at many of the venues which was very appalling to see but a little imagination has paid of today and hats off to all those involved.

  • Arif_Khan_Bangladeshi on August 24, 2014, 4:00 GMT

    What a game. Great to see Freddie back and playing once again. Well done mate.

  • on August 24, 2014, 7:21 GMT

    I lost interest when the competition became a circus..Flintoff in my opinion should NEVER be allowed back into the PROFESSIONAL game. I hope his club have found ways to offset his insurance costs other than extra charge to the paying public. As soon as I knew Lanc were in the final four I cancelled all plans to attend the final. In any case Surrey didapppinted. Perhaps they did me a favoir not having to watch Flintoff..

  • JG2704 on August 24, 2014, 8:18 GMT

    Congrats Warwicks - sorry I mean Birmingham

    Well - the 2 England stars Buttler and Anderson were a huge let down. Bell,Porterfield and Roy batted beautifully in the 1st game. I think I wanted Hants to win it for CodandChips but they folded when chasing a big target after starting so well with the ball. Not sure why there are neg comms re Flintoff. He wasn't the worst bowler on show and he took Lancs close in the end