Lancashire v Birmingham, NatWest T20 Blast final, Edgbaston

Woakes denies Flintoff as Birmingham win Blast

George Dobell at Edgbaston

August 23, 2014

Comments: 21 | Text size: A | A

Warwickshire 181 for 5 (Evans 53) beat Lancashire 177 for 8 (Brown 55, Hannon-Dalby 3-31) by four runs
Scorecard and ball-by-ball details

Highlights: Birmingham clings on late to hold off Lancashire by four runs in NatWest T20 Blast Final


Chris Woakes helped close out the victory, Birmingham v Lancashire, NatWest T20 Blast final, Edgbaston, August 23, 2014
Chris Woakes closed out the innings as Andrew Flintoff threatened one last miracle © Getty Images
Enlarge

In the end, it came down to a battle between the past and the future. With the bat we had Andrew Flintoff, an England allrounder with an illustrious past, on the ground where he had produced some of his most memorable displays. With the ball we had Chris Woakes, an England allrounder at the start of his international career, on his home ground. Fourteen were required from the final over.

They are very different characters. While Flintoff appears to enjoy the spotlight, Woakes is modest and soft spoken. While Flintoff's reputation is all extravagant sixes and spells of blistering pace, Woakes' is about maintaining pressure and contributing to partnerships. While Flintoff gained the biggest cheers of the night, Woakes was quietly appreciated by supporters who have come to trust his ability to perform, with bat and ball, under pressure. You might even say that Flintoff is the showman and Woakes the diligent clerk.

It seemed fate had already decreed this was to be Flintoff's night. He had already taken a key wicket, Ian Bell, with his first ball of the match having only been drafted into the game as a late replacement when Kabir Ali suffered a recurrence of a shoulder problem. And he had just heaved the final two balls he had faced in the previous owner for six. Once he got himself back on strike by rushing through for a bye from the first ball of the final over it seemed destiny might be calling.

But Woakes, bowling with good pace and nailing his yorker time and again, was not to be denied. Perhaps Flintoff, in his prime, might have managed to find the boundary from one of the next three balls. Perhaps Flintoff, before the knee trouble and the five years away from the game, might have been able to turn for a second run from the fourth ball of the final over to get back on strike.

Instead, it was the younger man who prevailed. Woakes, holding his nerve and a ball becoming more slippery in the evening dew, hardly gave the older man a chance. He conceded only nine from the over - eight from the bat - and Birmingham won the NatWest T20 Blast for the first time.

It will be little consolation to Lancashire right now but, one day in the future, they will reflect on their part on a wonderfully entertaining day of T20 cricket. We saw powerful, inventive batting, we saw skilful, clever bowling, we saw - one or two dropped chances aside - some committed, athletic fielding. And all in front of a good-humoured, full house. If T20 is the shop window to the sport, this must be considered a thoroughly successful day.

In the shorter term, this result will hurt. They have now lost three finals and 11 semi-finals since 1998 and may feel that they enjoyed little fortune. Certainly Paul Horton might consider himself unfortunate to have been given out caught behind, though that is no excuse for his unusually sustained act of dissent towards the umpire that followed. Disciplinary action in the form of a Level Two charge is inevitable. "I was out of order," Horton admitted afterwards. "Sometimes these things happen in the heat of the moment, but it's no excuse. I showed dissent and I've accepted my penalty."

The evening started well for Lancashire, after an accomplished performance in the semi-final. Flintoff dismissed Bell early and Steven Croft delivered four of the most frugal overs of the evening with his mix of offspin and floaters. Birmingham thrashed 63 from the Powerplay overs, as an out-of-sorts James Anderson took particular punishment, but could then add only 60 in 10 overs in mid-innings as Lancashire's spinners gradually took control .

But 58 runs from the final four overs of the Birmingham innings changed everything. Man of the Match was Birmingham's Laurie Evans who, after a slow start, contributed a brilliant half-century. Having laboured for 16 balls over his first 11 runs, his next 13 brought 42 as he demonstrated his power, his fast hands and his excellent eye in hitting four sixes in 10 balls at one stage. An England T20 call-up in the coming days should notbe ruled out.

It is remarkable how fortunes can fluctuate. Only a couple of weeks ago, Evans was close to leaving the club for a fresh start at Nottinghamshire. And, when he dropped a relatively straightforward chance off Karl Brown when the batsman had scored just one, he feared, in his words "I was going to be the villain of the day, the man who dropped the T20 trophy."

But there were several heroes in the Birmingham performance. There was the captain, Varun Chopra, who remained cool throughout the Flintoff barrage and contributed 30 brisk runs of his own. There was Rikki Clarke, the great England allrounder than never was, contributing solid performances with bat and ball. There was Boyd Rankin, who bowled with pace and hostility on a sluggish surface to put the squeeze on the opposition. There was Woakes who, apart from his nerveless final over, dismissed the dangerous Brown with a yorker

And there was the gentle-paced giant Oliver Hannon-Dalby, who might not have played had Birmingham had a full-strength side to pick from and, until he conceded 12 from his final two balls, had bowled with admirable calm and control.

This victory is notable, even for a club of Warwickshire's size and history. Not only do they have a modest record in the format, and had not reached Finals Day since the first year of the competition in 2003, but they were without two of their leading seamers (Chris Wright and Keith Barker) and were unsettled by the news earlier this week that the club captain, Jim Troughton, had been forced to retire due to a long-standing back injury. They also took the brave and somewhat controversial decision to drop Jonathan Trott from their side.

Furthermore, it seemed they were destined to be knocked out in the early stages. Had Nottinghamshire not beaten Yorkshire in the final group game, Warwickshire's late run of good results in winning their final three group games would have been irrelevant. As it was, they have now won six T20 games in succession and, for the first time, are domestic T20 champions.

It is 20 years since a Warwickshire side coached by Bob Woolmer and including Brian Lara and Dermot Reeve won three major trophies in the season. While it is probably premature to talk of a repeat this season, it is worth noting that Warwickshire remain in contention in both of the other competitions.

George Dobell is a senior correspondent at ESPNcricinfo

RSS Feeds: George Dobell

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by bobmartin on (August 24, 2014, 20:53 GMT)

I'm not a great fan of T20 cricket.. but one thing is for sure.. if we in England are going to put it on.. then for goodness sakes let's do it with some style.. like the IPL or the Big Bash do....They may be brash.. they may be brazen.. they may be loud and over-the-top... but isn't that what the game is all about ?

Posted by Peterincanada on (August 24, 2014, 15:04 GMT)

Nobody has mentioned this but I think Horton missed a trick putting Flintoff at nine. If he had come in at six or seven Lancs might have done it.

Posted by JG2704 on (August 24, 2014, 13:16 GMT)

@ Andrew Simon Carr on (August 24, 2014, 12:06 GMT) I recorded it and skipped through much of it. Yes there should be some sort of review thing - even if not a full DRS - here

Re the cut off time - they indicated on Sky that they were just inside so I'm not sure

Posted by JG2704 on (August 24, 2014, 13:12 GMT)

@ CodandChips - Re Maxwell - I still think he's one of the most dangerous T20 players in the world. I'd still rather have him in my side as I think it's always good to have someone that can do that someting extra special every once in a while. We missed Buttler in that respect although he had a bad day. Re Wheater - I think he scored a big ton in a 50 over game which has prob kept him in the saide for a while. Also , how often is it the case that a team who sneaks through the group stages goes on to win it?

Posted by JG2704 on (August 24, 2014, 13:05 GMT)

@ bobmartin on (August 24, 2014, 11:31 GMT) I'm not sure if Horton will get into trouble for dissent. I hope common sense will prevail here. I'm wondering if they should have just 1 DRS review per side in this format or even just a modified version which can only overturn decisions such as catches where it clearly hasn't hit the bat or out decisions for LBW if there is a clear edge. Maybe just a review not based on DRS so Hotspot and Snicko aren't used but just the TV umpire's common sense?

Posted by   on (August 24, 2014, 12:06 GMT)

DRS should be compulsory for Finals Day given the poor umpiring - the dismissal of Horton especially...

Why weren't Birmingham fined 6 runs for starting the final over after the cutoff time? Did the umpires not know the regulations for this format?

Although a Kent fan, feel great sympathy for Lancs who were robbed by incompetence.

For a showpiece event, the absence of DRS and of umpires clearly not knowing the applicable regulations is simply not good enough.

Posted by bobmartin on (August 24, 2014, 11:31 GMT)

I'm neutral.. since my team, Somerset didn't qualify, but for me.. one of the biggest let-downs of the night was that horrendous decision by umpire Bailey to give Horton out. You wouldn't expect something as blatant as that in a village game on a Sunday afternoon from an amateur umpire...Even as it happened my wife was yelling "That was nowhere near his bat". And to think that they can endlessly check whether or not a ball carried.. or a foot was lifted during a stumping...or a run-out attempt .. or whether a fielder touched the boundary marker.. but not something as basic as whether or not the ball and bat made contact.. seems incredibly stupid... You should either use the TV umpire for every decision or none at all.. There should be no half measures..

Posted by   on (August 24, 2014, 11:21 GMT)

I know it doesn't sit well with the Star obsessed Media but cricket Is a team game & Warwickshire (Hope they dump the 'Birmingham' Bears monicker but doubt I) had the momentum timed perfectly without any big heads sorry stars.

Posted by CodandChips on (August 24, 2014, 10:47 GMT)

(continued)

So perhaps 1.Hales 2.Roy 3.Taylor 4.Morgan (C) 5.Buttler 6.Bopara 7.Willey/Smith 8.Jordan 9.Tredwell (Briggs/Parry reserve, personally I think Briggs deserves another shot, but perhaps a bit biased there- though I'd much rather he be involved in the promotion race, (though we've signed Tahir!)) 10.Gurney 11.Fletcher

@JG2704 "I think I wanted Hants to win it for CodandChips" thanks however I'm kind of glad we didn't win as we were far from deserving and it would have masked clear flaws that have gone about unchanged such as why Wheater plays ahead of Bates despite Bates being a much better keeper and Wheater's batting being overrated while Bates' underrated. Why were underperforming players like Carberry and Ervine and Maxwell persisted with for so long.

Also we nicked the trophy in 2010. We shouldn't have done it again this year. Lancs, Warwickshire were more deserving (even if Warwickshire barely qualified)

Posted by CodandChips on (August 24, 2014, 10:37 GMT)

Now the domestic comp is over, any ideas for the T20I team?

Although Bell and Woakes did surprisingly well today, I think both need to do a lot more to prove their worth in T20 cricket. Bell hasn't played enough T20 recently to merit a place, though his innings in the semis proved he isn't as out of touch with the format as many of us first thought.

Roy has to play after a brilliant tournament. Hales, Morgan, Buttler obviously. Morgan captain as better than Broad and won't need to be rested as doesn't play tests. Root or Taylor at 3 as both can score quickly while being solid. I'd go with Taylor since he is just too good to be ignored completely.

Bopara was excellent in the Blast and is much improved internationally with bat and ball so he makes my side. I'd like another allrounder, ideally Willey, though with his injury worries and bowling inconsistency perhaps a safer option would be Tom Smith. Jordan, Tredwell, Gurney. I like Luke Fletcher to bowl yorkers.

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
George DobellClose
County Fixtures County Results
Hampshire v Kent at Southampton - Sep 15-18
Match drawn
Notts v Sussex at Nottingham - Sep 15-18
Sussex won by 191 runs
Somerset v Middlesex at Taunton - Sep 15-18
Match drawn
Final: Durham v Warwickshire at Lord's
Sep 20, 2014 (10:30 local | 09:30 GMT | 05:30 EDT | 04:30 CDT | 02:30 PDT)
Derbyshire v Leics at Derby
Sep 23-26, 2014 (10:30 local | 09:30 GMT | 05:30 EDT | 04:30 CDT | 02:30 PDT)
Essex v Worcs at Chelmsford
Sep 23-26, 2014 (10:30 local | 09:30 GMT | 05:30 EDT | 04:30 CDT | 02:30 PDT)
Glamorgan v Hampshire at Cardiff
Sep 23-26, 2014 (10:30 local | 09:30 GMT | 05:30 EDT | 04:30 CDT | 02:30 PDT)
Kent v Gloucs at Canterbury
Sep 23-26, 2014 (10:30 local | 09:30 GMT | 05:30 EDT | 04:30 CDT | 02:30 PDT)
Lancashire v Middlesex at Manchester
Sep 23-26, 2014 (10:30 local | 09:30 GMT | 05:30 EDT | 04:30 CDT | 02:30 PDT)
Northants v Sussex at Northampton
Sep 23-26, 2014 (10:30 local | 09:30 GMT | 05:30 EDT | 04:30 CDT | 02:30 PDT)
Warwickshire v Durham at Birmingham
Sep 23-26, 2014 (10:30 local | 09:30 GMT | 05:30 EDT | 04:30 CDT | 02:30 PDT)
Yorkshire v Somerset at Leeds
Sep 23-26, 2014 (10:30 local | 09:30 GMT | 05:30 EDT | 04:30 CDT | 02:30 PDT)
Complete fixtures »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days