Surrey v Worcestershire, CB40, The Oval

Pietersen makes headlines, but not many runs

Andrew McGlashan at The Oval

September 1, 2010

Comments: 12 | Text size: A | A

Worcestershire 376 for 6 beat Surrey by 286 by 90 runs

Kevin Pietersen walks out to start his innings, Surrey v Worcestershire, CB40, The Oval, September 1, 2010
Kevin Pietersen walks out to begin his innings; he returned with 38 to his name © Getty Images

Well played Vikram Solanki and Gareth Andrew but, despite hundreds that came from 68 and 58 balls respectively, they won't be making tomorrow's headlines. That honour, if making a headline can be called such a thing at the moment, will belong to a man who made 38. This was an evening of Kevin Pietersen-watching, which began with a grovelling apology for his Twitter outburst the previous day, and ended with him being caught-and-bowled by Shaaiq Choudhry, a 24-year-old left-arm spinner, in his sixth one-day match.

In the first of four Surrey appearances he is due to make between now and the end of the season Pietersen - in front of a crowd of 7,917, which is above-average for Surrey's CB40 matches this year - managed to locate the middle of the bat. That is more than happened at Lord's last week when his first-ball waft was the final push that Andy Flower needed to drop him for the first time in his career. Against one of the friendliest attacks he will have confronted since starting his international career six years ago, he faced 33 balls and struck six boundaries - one of which, an inside-out drive past mid-off, was more like the flamboyant batsman of old.

Pietersen had spent three hours watching Worcestershire pile up 377 for 6, the second-highest 40-over score in history behind Surrey's 386 against Glamorgan earlier this season, but he should have had a wicket when Matthew Spriegel dropped Andrew, albeit a tough chance, running round at long-off. Pietersen was then clubbed for two sixes and the over cost 17.

With Rory Hamilton-Brown blazing a trail during a 41-ball 80, Pietersen opened his batting account with a quick single to mid-on having been cheered to the crease but, on 25, was given a life when he gloved a sweep down the leg-side. However, even without the injured Shakib Al Hasan playing for Worcestershire, Pietersen couldn't escape his left-arm-spinner curse when he thumped a straight drive back at Choudhry. The bowler celebrated with the gusto that comes with dismissing a batsman with over 5000 Test runs.

Paul Sheldon, the Surrey chief executive, called the Pietersen deal "win, win, win" for the batsman, the county and England. It's not costing Surrey a penny due to Pietersen's central contract, and Sheldon insisted Chris Adams, the cricket manager, was fully behind the decision. But he refused to confirm any interest in Pietersen beyond the current loan spell, although with Middlesex out of the running there seem few other options for relocation.

With Steve Davies' call-up to the England squad, it has been painted as a straight swap when it comes to the Surrey starting XI, but that wasn't quite the case in this match with Davies still available. And when Davies departs, Surrey will need a wicketkeeper - Pietersen is probably reluctant to take that role - so Gary Wilson will come into the team, which means somebody who might have played had Pietersen not been here will miss out.

That could be Jason Roy, the 20-year-old batsman, who is rated by many as a future England star. He has broken into the first team at The Oval, and made 76 on his Championship debut against Leicestershire last week to go alongside an unbeaten 101 off 57 balls against Essex in the Friends Provident t20, but wasn't selected on Wednesday evening.

With Surrey out of the running for Championship promotion, the final two games of the season would be ideal experience for Roy. Ironically, the lack of dead matches in the two-division structure has meant counties have found it harder to blood youngsters and now Roy could miss out. Of course it might not be him, but the ECB look to have made a persuasive argument for Pietersen.

"This is more about England than about Surrey," Sheldon said. "We want England to win the Ashes and we want KP back in form and if we can assist in that way then we're absolutely delighted to do so."

Sheldon is right. Retaining the Ashes would have huge benefits to English cricket as a whole, but it will also be interesting to see if there is any reaction from the opposition should Pietersen have success which changes the course of end-of-season games. Surrey may be out of the running for prizes, but both their next two Championship opponents, Glamorgan and Gloucestershire, are gunning for promotion. Now they have to get past Pietersen, too.

Andrew McGlashan is an assistant editor at Cricinfo

RSS Feeds: Andrew McGlashan

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by puffin2 on (September 3, 2010, 11:54 GMT)

Isn't it obvious to anyone yet that the problem with Pieterson is the man, not his game. Says it all when Hampshire wouldn't accommodate his request for a game before the Tests - why should they when he was too high and mighty to turn out for them when they needed him. Middlesex don't want to know and smile as they may - Surrey aren't too chuffed are they!

Posted by sonofchennai on (September 3, 2010, 11:39 GMT)

@maximum6: KP should really be back for Ashes...all would either wud love to see him score some runs or fail miserably..hopefully ur law of averages will work for him..

Posted by sonofchennai on (September 3, 2010, 11:35 GMT)

@Ben: Spot on, ishant sharma is also logic would explain his IPL contracts after his exploits in the aus tour...i wudn't agree on MSD..this is a man of limited talent who has risen through the ranks by sheer hardwork and commitment..pls do not compare KP with him who has zero commitment to his mother country,adopted country..what else explains his recent twitter blast...and please do not crib about the rankings if you do not know how it is based on the last 3 yrs performance and no one can do anything on this...better ask ICC to change the way they rank if you want England to be on top...I do agree England has a got a very fine bowling unit compared to India and most other teams with Struass and Colly to lead the batting..lets see how they fare in Ashes

Posted by sgh142 on (September 2, 2010, 17:46 GMT)

Watching Petersens comical performance with the bat and looking like a lost schoolboy in the field with none of his pals playing, the selectors must feel completely vindicated. I feel sorry for the Worcs and Surrey players that had to put up with his self promotion circus before, during and after the game.

Posted by STondulkar on (September 2, 2010, 15:44 GMT)

KP is certainly a very good batsman and will come back strongly. He is the most intimidating batsman England is having at the moment because of the way he scores his runs. He got to spend some time at the crease and bury his own daemons with spin bowling.

Posted by 2.14istherunrate on (September 2, 2010, 11:27 GMT)

@sonofchennai-KP will be back.There is NO DOUBT about it, and better for it.Look at Strauss,Collingwood, Bell. Given the duration of most lean patches, sometime in December is my reckoning.Maybe earlier.Perhaps next week. Batsmen are not machines. Re Hamilton Brown-he hits a mean ball or two, and could be in ODI squad after WC.

Posted by   on (September 2, 2010, 9:17 GMT)

"Regaining the Ashes would have huge benefits to English cricket"

Can I be very pedantic and point out that England don't have to regain the ashes as they already hold them.

Posted by   on (September 2, 2010, 8:52 GMT)

@sonofchennai - see, I think Ishant Sharma, MS Dhoni, and most of India's current side are more overrated. Dhoni is a slapdash keeper, and a woefully inconsistent batsman. Sharma's recent record speaks for itself, and India's batting looks brittle past the top 3, and the bowling looks worse, yet they are still touted to be the top ODI side in the world by people. The difference is, KP IS class. He is WORLD class. It doesn't matter what people say, the guy is a very talented player who has the ability to make bowling line-ups crumble against him!

Posted by WilliamFranklin on (September 2, 2010, 8:52 GMT)

Roy is certainly a talent but he has not been scoring runs in the CB40 (which you fail to mention of course) so I think it might have been the right time to give him a break anyway.

Pietersen batted pretty well, some classy shots. The caught and bowled was a good take by Choudhry in a situation where Surrey needed KP to hit out. But why let that get in the way of another negative story.

Nice touch to see the way he congratulated RHB on his 50 and clapped him off after he got out btw.

Posted by sonofchennai on (September 2, 2010, 6:53 GMT)

@maximum6: KP has not done anything in the last 6 months..dats the reason evryone is grumbling...if there is an award of most overrate players, KP wud make the bill

Comments have now been closed for this article

Email Feedback Print
Andrew McGlashanClose
Andrew McGlashan Assistant Editor Andrew arrived at ESPNcricinfo via Manchester and Cape Town, after finding the assistant editor at a weak moment as he watched England's batting collapse in the Newlands Test. Andrew began his cricket writing as a freelance covering Lancashire during 2004 when they were relegated in the County Championship. In fact, they were top of the table when he began reporting on them but things went dramatically downhill. He likes to let people know that he is a supporter of county cricket, a fact his colleagues will testify to and bemoan in equal quantities.
County Results
Somerset v Warwickshire at Lord's - Sep 18, 2010
Warwickshire won by 3 wickets (with 6 balls remaining)
Durham v Somerset at Chester-le-Street - Sep 13-16, 2010
Match drawn
Glamorgan v Derbyshire at Cardiff - Sep 13-16, 2010
Match drawn
Gloucs v Surrey at Bristol - Sep 13-16, 2010
Surrey won by 10 runs
Hampshire v Warwickshire at Southampton - Sep 13-16, 2010
Warwickshire won by 10 wickets
Lancashire v Notts at Manchester - Sep 13-16, 2010
Match drawn
Northants v Leics at Northampton - Sep 13-16, 2010
Leics won by 10 wickets
Worcs v Sussex at Worcester - Sep 13-16, 2010
Worcs won by 4 wickets
Yorkshire v Kent at Leeds - Sep 13-16, 2010
Kent won by 4 wickets
All recent results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days