|Photos||Video & Audio||Blogs||Statistics||Archive||Shop||Mobile|
The true tailender
Down with the Mitchell Johnsons and the Brett Lees of the world. Give us back our Glenn McGraths. Or at least take away these wannabe allrounders' helmets, chest guards, elbow guards, thigh pads. It is boring to watch a No. 9 play classical straight drives with a high elbow - no fear of the bouncer, no backing away, no nervous grin. No wonder Chris Martin is adored: our only link to a world that once was, where bowlers did their jobs and batsmen theirs.
We'll never again hear Bill Lawry shout, "He's hit it into the gutter; it's all happening here at the MCG." Because the gutter, and the fence, are gone. Nor are we likely to see the kind of catch that Hrishikesh Kanitkar pulled off to send back Inzamam-ul-Haq in an ODI in Adelaide in 2000. Without the fence, it would definitely have been a six: Kanitkar leaned over the barrier, using it as support, parried the ball back into the field of play and caught it. Even if the fielder touched the fence and the ball at the same time, it wasn't considered a boundary back then; the ball had to either touch the gutter or the fence, or land beyond the fence.
The princely fat batsman
Arjuna Ranatunga left fairly early in the decade, and with Inzi went the last top-level fat batsman, beneath whose dignity it was to scamper for singles and chase the ball with urgency. Jesse Ryder has promise, but his diving saves and catches at gully are a disgrace to the role.
The limping, yorkered batsman
Search Youtube for "Waqar Younis Brian Lara". Chances are almost everyone has seen that particular yorker, from the 1997 Rawalpindi Test, swinging in late and following the toe like a possessed dog. Sadly we don't see batsmen limp back to the pavilion anymore.
The Test allrounder
We still have Jacques Kallis, but Chris Cairns finished with just 62 Tests, Andrew Flintoff with 79, and Abdul Razzaq 46. There is simply too much cricket happening for a proper allrounder to survive, and there is simply too much money in the shorter forms of the game to give up in order to focus on Tests alone. Who after Kallis? We know not. The closest are Shakib Al Hasan and Daniel Vettori: both would have lesser roles to play in stronger teams.
We don't hear any longer from teams visiting India about upset stomachs or the need to bring along baked beans. Instead we have Brett Lee - that ambassador for world harmony - namaste-ing, singing (if that's the term) in Hindi, the works. If the IPL has had even the slightest role to play in this collective change of attitude towards touring India, it should be stopped immediately.
The red-ball ODI
With day-night cricket came the white ball and coloured clothing. But a few day games - till as recently as India v Zimbabwe in Rajkot in 2000 - with the white clothing and the red ball provided some variety. The red ball definitely swung for longer. But since uniformity and standardising is the name of the limited-overs game, all matches are now played with the white ball.
The intensity of the India-Pakistan rivalry
When India met Pakistan in the 2003 World Cup, Sachin Tendulkar said he had been forced to live the match a year in advance. When India toured Pakistan in 2003-04, 15 years after their last tour there, Atal Behari Vajpayee, then India's Prime Minister, told the team: "Khel hi nahi, dil bhi jeeto [Don't just win the games, win hearts too]." At the end of the decade, amid the overkill, India-Pakistan matches have ceased to be a matter of life and death, or exercises in diplomacy. Chances are, the new generation of players on either side might never know what pressure really means.
The pure wicketkeeper
At various points during this decade, James Foster, Prasanna Jayawardene and Chris Read might have felt like sending out hitmen after Adam Gilchrist, who heralded a complete change in the role of the wicketkeeper of every international team. Purity of skill and aesthetic appeal behind the stumps ceased to matter; runs in front carried more than equal weight. Not to be ignored is the amount of hard work the likes of Gilchrist and MS Dhoni have put in in order to not be liabilities behind the stumps.
Yes there are military-medium bowlers around, but they don't quite do it like Chris Harris, who last played international cricket in 2004, used to. Nor might it be possible for dibbly-dobbly bowlers - whose main skill was to cut out scoring areas - to thrive, or even survive, in an era where the batsmen have opened up all parts of the field for scoring.
The crowd invasion
The one after Pakistan beat India in the Champions Trophy earlier this year was an aberration. With the ever-pervasive security these days, it is unlikely we will see many more.
Australia's domination of the Ashes
In this decade alone, England won the Ashes twice - two more times than in the 1990s. While England remained passionate about the series even in the nineties, the rest of the world, especially those whose cricket lives began post 1987-88, was introduced to the oldest rivalry in cricket.
The boring draw in Sri Lanka
Before the start of the year 2000, Sri Lanka had hosted 42 Tests, 20 of which were draws. Over this decade, though, with the rise of Muttiah Muralitharan, Sri Lanka has grown in confidence as a Test nation, and it has shown in the pitches prepared. Only 11 of the 54 Tests in the 2000s ended in draws (a result rate bettered only in Australia and South Africa among the top eight nations). Sri Lanka played out exciting series against Australia, India and Pakistan; and even some of the draws - notable among them the ones that England hung grimly on for in 2003 - were exciting Test cricket.
It all ended in a whimper: Zimbabwe upset Sri Lanka to make the last match of a quadrangular series, but were bowled out for 168 in the final against Pakistan. No one knew then that it would be the last of the 198 ODIs there - still a record expected to stay for at least 10 more years. There are arguments against the venue, like the one India presented in 2001 when barring its team from playing there, but almost every cricket fan has memories of Sharjah.
The dour opener
See off the new ball? A near-10-hour 125, like the one Michael Atherton produced in Karachi in 2000, is not likely to be replicated too many times in this day and age. The harder the conditions, the harder the modern opener goes after the bowling. On an easy pitch the new-age mantra is: the new ball travels faster, so let's score as many as we can before the fielding captain puts in a deep point and a deep midwicket and asks his offspinner and medium-pacers to slow things down.
Some stadiums still have them installed, but use them only in domestic games. Two lights, red and green, sometimes three including a yellow one. They looked like traffic lights, but signified the opposite. They came into play when the third umpire was called on: red told the batsman to walk, green told him to stay, and the crowds didn't know where to look. Oh for the good old chaos. Nowadays they have the big screen, the sponsors, and it's all sorted in big, bold letters.
The definition of a good pitch
Give them a road, and they all - without giving it a second thought - call it a "good wicket". Give the bowler some uneven bounce or some seam movement and there are calls for the venue to be banned. "Last time we came here, the bowlers got false confidence and the batters were looking for technical problems that didn't exist," Sachin Tendulkar said during the ODI leg of India's tour of New Zealand earlier this year. Fair enough about the previous tour, but what did we have this time around? Flat tracks, small fields where edges and dabs went for sixes and fours, and consequently, big totals. Entertainment for everybody. Didn't the statistics give some of the batsmen false confidence this time around? Isn't all this boundary-hitting a bit nauseating? Shouldn't administrators give the spectators more credit? A 414 v 411 ODI is one played on a "good pitch". We have forgotten the language of cricket.
The Caravan Man, Jason Gillespie, was the last to have something that remotely resembled one. The ICC should have a regulation whereby every Test team should have at least one mulleted fast bowler. And proper mullets, not the kind Ishant Sharma tried till recently to pass off as one. Headbands and wristbands are missed too, and again Chris Martin - shaved head and all - is the only saving grace.
Sidharth Monga is a staff writer at Cricinfo
© ESPN EMEA Ltd.
|Comments have now been closed for this article