| Series | Countries | Live Scores | Fixtures | Results | News |
Features
|
Photos | Video & Audio | Blogs | Statistics | Archive | Games | Mobile | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Preview by Alex Winter
June 30, 2012
![]()
|
|||
|
Related Links
Features : Morgan revival key to England's ODI hopes
Report : Morgan stars for all-round England Features : Resourceful Clarke comes up short Matches:
England v Australia at The Oval
Series/Tournaments:
Australia tour of England and Ireland
|
|||
Match Facts
The Big Picture
The win in the first ODI was against top class opposition - Australia are the World's No. 1 ODI team - who were fresh, prepared and motivated for the series. More wins against these type of teams will make people look more favourably on England's chances for the 2015 World Cup - which is what this series in particular is geared towards. Another England victory would also have them dreaming of claiming the No. 1 spot from Australia, which a 5-0 whitewash would achieve.
The only issue for the hosts is whether James Anderson is fit to play. Surrey's fast man Stuart Meaker has been called up as cover. Anderson was rested when fit for the Edgbaston Test so any sign of injury will surely see him whisked out of the side.
For the tourists, they didn't do too much wrong at Lord's but where their problems could lie is in the middle order. David Hussey looked troubled by the pace of Steve Finn - pace which will be accelerated by a hard Oval pitch - Steve Smith is yet to convince at No. 6 and Matthew Wade is perhaps batting too low for his talent and could often be coming in under pressure with the two players above him struggling to contribute.
Form guide
Players to watch
A harder, flatter pitch might help the quicker bowlers but it will also provide a perfect platform for David Warner. He hits the ball so hard and has a marvellous ability to hit cleanly through the line and use the pace of the ball to cut, again with immense power. He will enjoy The Oval.
Team news
Australia (probable) 1 Shane Watson, 2 David Warner, 3 George Bailey, 4 Michael Clarke, 5 David Hussey, 6 Steven Smith, 7 Matthew Wade, 8 Brett Lee, 9 Clint McKay, 10 Pat Cummins, 11 Xavier Doherty.
Pitch and conditions
Quotes
"We weren't outplayed at all yesterday, I just think that we lost our wickets in clumps, the Powerplay cost us and that little back part of the innings where they got 40-50 runs from the last few overs, they're the crucial moments that win it or lose it for you. We've got to fix those things up and then I reckon we're in good stead for the next four games."
David Warner identifies where Australia must improve at the Oval.
| ||||||
| Comments have now been closed for this article |
||||||
ICICI Bank M2I. Register Now and Get A Gift Offer.
Safe & simple online money transfer. Apply Now!
Buy Wisden 2013 & get a FREE Playfair
Available now at Cricshop
@R_U_4_REAL_NICK on (July 01 2012, 12:02 PM GMT) Hello again. I think you need a balance but I do wonder about Craig as a boundary or nothing sort of batsman. Still unsure about the balance , part of me would like to see a Buttler or Bairstow in there. While I like our top 4 my concern is if we have to chase a big total or have Bopara coming in when we may need 7+ per over.It's also a weird one re KP as we were all (and others) wondering what we'd do without him and although if KP made himself available again I'd try and shoe him in because I really believe he is THAT good , who would be dropped? Trott is still top 10 , Bell has come in and impressed , Cook is captain and has done little wrong and if Bopara continues his form... I like Morgan as he is one of those players who usually doesn't let the RR stagnate and keeps the scoreboard ticking with 1s and 2s til he is ready to fire
Posted by R_U_4_REAL_NICK on (July 1, 2012, 12:02 GMT)@JG2704 (Post on June 30 2012, 17:46 PM GMT): Yeah I know what you're saying. It is important to take into consideration the 'age and situation' of the innings. But I grew up watching guys like Graham Thorpe, Alec Stewart... These guys were hardly legendary in ODI's by today's standards - avergages of 37 and 31 respectively - but there was something aesthetically pleasing about them if they were brought in at the right time. Those 30 - 40 runs they almost always scored in all their games often turned out to be crucial! I just feel '4, 6 or out' batsmen alone are not enough to win ODI's... T20's you can maybe get away with it more.
Posted by jmcilhinney on (July 1, 2012, 9:26 GMT)@kevinpp24 on (July 01 2012, 08:55 AM GMT), I like the looks of that squad. I think England are still a bit wary and are in a consolidation phase. They have improved as an ODI side but are still yet to show a period of consistency. Until they do, I really can't see them dropping Trott and his average of 50. They'll settle for a lower strike rate for now to get such a solid performer. They'll also be loathe to move Bell for a while if he keeps up the good work as an opener, given how long it will have taken him to settle into ODIs. If Bell and Hales can both fulfil their apparent potential then that looks a really strong lineup.
Posted by kevinpp24 on (July 1, 2012, 8:55 GMT)When KP was there and Craig was opening it dint looked much of problem but now the top 4 looks too slow for ODIs these days. They are doing this in flat pitches as well thats the big problem here. I personally like to see a playing XI somewhat like this in a couple of years hopefully. Cook(C), Hales, Bell, Morgan, Davies(W)/Bairstow(W), Butler, Stokes/Bresnan/Samit, Broad, Swann/Briggs, Finn, Andersen. We seriously need a good batsmen who can bowl couple of overs. I'm pretty sure Andy is going towards that kinda squad.
Posted by JG2704 on (July 1, 2012, 8:46 GMT)@Shan156 on (July 01 2012, 03:33 AM GMT) Mate - not sure why this happens. It comes across as obsessive to me but I guess we all have different levels of humility and dignity
Posted byRecall inform Cameron White for Aus
Posted by jmcilhinney on (July 1, 2012, 7:37 GMT)Is Warner implying that if they had lost wickets at more regular intervals instead of in clumps that they would have done better? I'd say that they probably would have done worse in that case. This is cricket isn't it? England scored more runs than Australia and took more wickets. To me, that seems to be the very definition of being outplayed.
Posted by jmcilhinney on (July 1, 2012, 7:22 GMT)@subbass on (July 01 2012, 00:38 AM GMT), you may well be right about Finn being the best young fast bowler but don't let's forget that Cummins is barely 19. How good was Finn when he was 19? I honestly don't know the answer to that but there's no doubt that Cummins looks to be at least quite good right now and has great potential for the future. That potential doesn't help Australia right now of course and whether he will fulfils that potential to the degree predicted by some is still up for debate. Only time will tell but I'm sure that, barring injury, we'll be seeing Finn and Cummins up against each other for a long time to come and both will likely retire with excellent numbers.
Posted byWhy they continue playing Steven Smith in the ODI team is beyond me. When he bats, he looks like a tail-ender, and when he bowls he looks like a part-timer.
Posted by YorkshirePudding on (July 1, 2012, 6:39 GMT)@TheHoneymonster, Meaker is most likely to replace Anderson, as Dernbach isnt in the squad. Add on that its his home gound it will be good to see what the lad can do, although Cricinfo have meaker down as a Fast-medium, which suprised me as hes a yard quicker than Finn.