England v India, 2nd Test, Trent Bridge

Will an embattled Harbhajan step up?

The conditions may have played a part in his misery at Lord's but Harbhajan Singh knows he's been struggling for a while. Going in to the Trent Bridge Test, there is an urgent need to set things right

Nagraj Gollapudi at Trent Bridge

July 28, 2011

Comments: 54 | Text size: A | A

Harbhajan Singh struggled for wickets, England v India, 1st Test, Lord's, 2nd day, July 22, 2011
Harbhajan Singh: Under the radar © Getty Images
Enlarge
Related Links
Players/Officials: Harbhajan Singh | Saqlain Mushtaq
Series/Tournaments: India tour of England
Teams: India

He was not being indulgent. He was furious. You could sense that, sitting in the stands behind the bowler's arm at the Trent Bridge pavilion end. The lofted drives landed in the stands frequently - to the frustration of the members and autograph hunters - as Harbhajan Singh used the long handle immediately into the training session on Wednesday. "No wonder he can't bowl," remarked an angry, grey-haired crew-cut gentleman, one of the Nottinghamshire County Cricket Club members, with his arms folded.

Don't be surprised to see someone carrying a banner with similar words on it during the next five days if Harbhajan comes up with another muted performance, like he did at Lord's last week. In that match, which India lost by 196 runs, Harbhajan had a match haul of one wicket (56-4-218-1). As only the second offspinner to bag 400-plus wickets, more was expected of Harbhajan.

Perhaps, therein lies the problem. We know what Harbhajan is capable of and can do, and we expect him to live up to that. As India's lead spinner and the senior-most bowler in the line-up, he was expected to not only restrict the England run machine, but also create huge dents. He failed miserably and questions about his position in the side resurfaced. Statistics show Harbhajan to be poor in series-openers - 30 wickets in 14 matches at an average of 60.40 since 2001.

Let's consider Harbhajan's position at Lord's. MS Dhoni won the toss and elected to bowl in overcast conditions. He began with three fast bowlers at his disposal. In two hours, the number dropped to two after Zaheer Khan pulled his right hamstring. In that England's first innings spread across the better part of the first two days, conditions remained friendly for the fast bowlers. Ishant Sharma struggled for rhythm, Praveen Kumar persevered. There was hardly any spin in the track. Harbhajan failed.

On the fourth morning, on a much drier surface, Harbhajan found all the pieces needed to get the jigsaw in shape: sun, turn, slow pace. He trapped Andrew Strauss, who looked in a dominant mood. For about an hour before the lunch break he inserted doubts in the new batsmen as Ishant found his mojo at the other end. It was the best session for India in the match. In the middle session Matt Prior and Stuart Broad quickly re-arranged England's broken house and put it back in shape. The vultures returned, on the lookout for Harbhajan.

But Harbhajan is not the only Indian spinner to have had difficulty bowling at Lord's. Even Anil Kumble, who played three Tests at the venue, averaged 41. Harbhajan was playing his first Lord's Test (his fourth in England) and still coming to grips with the slope.

Saqlain Mushtaq, the former Pakistan offspinner, who now lives in Leicester, is another strong supporter of Harbhajan. "Look at the conditions at Lord's - they were swinging. Even [Graeme] Swann who took two wickets - first was of [Suresh] Raina who tried playing on the back foot and the second was [Gautam] Gambhir who was injured. So Swann did not do any damage at all. It was their fast bowlers who did that," Saqlain said.

According to Saqlain, the Lord's Test was a "fast bowler's match" and he was aghast that Harbhajan was being blamed for the bowling woes. "Now if India had scored 400 runs (in the first innings) then the situation would've been different. Sachin [Tendulkar] was not feeling well, Gambhir was injured, [Virender] Sehwag is not there in the batting line-up. Then why are you putting pressure on Harbhajan?"

At the back end of his own career with Pakistan, Saqlain stagnated largely due to his over-reliance on the doosra and was eventually ignored. He went on to represent Surrey and Sussex in the county cricket. Last year, he helped Saeed Ajmal during Pakistan's Test series in England. Ajmal bagged a five-for at Edgbaston and then played a key role in the victory at The Oval, finishing as the second-best bowler for Pakistan. Ajmal, though, could bank on the two Mohammads - Amir and Asif - to never take their foot off the pressure pedal at the other end. Harbhajan does not have the luxury in the absence of Zaheer.

Saqlain says the key is to understand the conditions, something many captains don't grasp easily. "You can't trust the weather, never in England. When I played county cricket the weather would be a big factor. Notice how England bowled Swann and their fast bowlers. They utilised Swann smartly. In the evening there is a light breeze and the spinner is under pressure. It is the middle session during which the spinners usually come into play. You have to be calculative. You have to use him sensibly."

The conditions apart, Harbhajan knows he's been struggling. He understands wickets don't come easily to him anymore, that the pressure of being the India's lead spinner will always remain. Earlier this year, Harbhajan had said that Swann's success inspired him to do well on the tour of South Africa, where he picked up 15 wickets in three Tests. He said he learned to give himself a chance, bowl wicket-to-wicket lines and lengths, just like Swann. He will do well to remember those words again.

On the eve of the Trent Bridge Test, after batting for 20 minutes, in which he focussed on leaving the ball, he went back to bowling in the nets briefly. He later turned to the pitch, bent down on his knees as if he was praying, and checked the surface at both ends. He then stood with his back to the pavilion, visualised bowling from that end and walked away. Yesterday Harbhajan was flinging hail stones. Today, much calmer, he did what he knows best. Angry fans can sit still. And expect.

Nagraj Gollapudi is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo

RSS Feeds: Nagraj Gollapudi

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by kalyanbk on (July 29, 2011, 15:09 GMT)

India has adequate spin replacements in Mishra, Ojha, Ashwin or even Murali Karthik who has county experience. The difference is that Harbhajan is an attacking batsman unlike these others. India is perhaps picking a bowler based on his batting skills. At present even Yuvraj could have a better outing as a spinner.

Posted by KrazyCricketKid on (July 29, 2011, 14:57 GMT)

Harbhajan Singh should be dropped. Ravichandran Ashwin should be given a chance in test matches!

Posted by B.C.G on (July 29, 2011, 14:47 GMT)

Swann didn't fail at all.He kept pressure onthe batsmen.Tremlett picked only 4 wickets,yet he troubled.In 2007 at TrentBridge,Sidebottom bowled as well as Zaheer.Yet he got only 1 wicket for his efforts.See the replays before commenting ignorantly.

Posted by getsetgopk on (July 29, 2011, 13:15 GMT)

the turbanator is over hyped because thats the best a country of over a billion can come up with. had there been a bowler of slightly better quality none would've heard about him. you need a bowler who can strike when most needed. stacking up useless wickets to your name wont make you a match winner.

Posted by SouthPaw on (July 29, 2011, 13:06 GMT)

The funny thing is that Harbajan is not interested in bowling. He thinks that he is a batsman, thanks to a couple of hundreds and some 50s. Look at him walk to the nets with 5 bats, gloves and a batting helmet in his hands!

Posted by Positive_Critic on (July 29, 2011, 12:05 GMT)

In England you don't expect spinners to run through sides... We needed a steady spinner.. Who better than a decent left arm orthodox spinner.. Poor Ojha, the last I recall of him was bowling really well against the Lankans... Ojha would have been a perfect foil coz he has that ability to take 2 roles, one of an attacker if and when there is help from the wicket and can also defend if needed

Posted by Jose on (July 29, 2011, 10:11 GMT)

Best spinner India has at the moment is R Ashwin and Indian selectors should have gambled him. I am sure England would struggle with his variations and carrom balls.

Posted by   on (July 29, 2011, 10:09 GMT)

Bhajji has being predictable & he has to repair just that. He has to try & get the key players out. If needed he should quit T20 (including IPL) & concentrate on the longer formats of the game. And not only Bhajji, but also the others should step up.

We can win this series in England. We can even handle them a 3-1 scoreline. Their pace attack is far less menacing than the last time we were here (in 2007).

We must keep in mind a 11-man English team got the better of a 9-man Indian team on their best turf at Lords. If India could have saved this match (which was surely possible), it would have been remarkable.

Nevertheless, India should play better cricket in the upcoming tests. This English team is nothing more than a "piece of cake"...

Posted by Positive_Critic on (July 29, 2011, 8:55 GMT)

There are 2 ways to look at it... 1. Harbhajan is a brilliant off spinner with 400+ wickets to his name... He is India's leader in the Spin department... Most experienced bowler.... If these factors are taken into consideration than I believe Bhajji has not done justice to his reputation.. If Bhajji himself believes himself to be that great a bowler than I feel he has let himself n his nation down.. For one he cannot lead like Kumble did... he doesnt have it in him to groom younger spinners.. Another thing is on a helpful wicket he is deadly.. spits venom but on a wicket that doesnt bounce/spin he is utterly useless ... As an experienced bowler he is expected to be helpful to the team cause by either blocking one end up but he is no good at that.. The likes of Warne did not always have favoring conditions.. but over the period of time warne/kumble developed methods to be potent on unfavorable conditions.. Bhajji has not evolved like these guys

Posted by Sukumar_Kantri on (July 29, 2011, 8:13 GMT)

The bowler's stats mainly depends on the playing conditions and the fielders support.Bhajji hd many dropped catches in the last 2 series which eventually had not fetched results for him and the team.Had Dhoni caught Prior in 1st innings of Bhajji, the scenario would have become different who made 71 and had a good stand with Kevin.Consider this case, Dhoni had caught Prior for duck off Bhajji in 1st innings, Eng 375 allout. India 286.Eng Lead 89 runs, this would have made a greater impact and Eng would have been in a position to fight hard back in 2nd innings for a lead of 450.It happened the other way and people keep blaming a spinner for not taking wickets on pace friendly track. The so called best spinner now-Swann too failed, who notices that? Why blame on Bhajji alone when India had only 3 bowlers and the pacers dint make much impact? you expect spinner to attack on pace wicket???

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Nagraj GollapudiClose
Tour Results
England v India at Cardiff - Sep 16, 2011
England won by 6 wickets (with 10 balls remaining) (D/L method)
England v India at Lord's - Sep 11, 2011
Match tied (D/L method)
England v India at The Oval - Sep 9, 2011
England won by 3 wickets (with 7 balls remaining) (D/L method)
England v India at Southampton - Sep 6, 2011
England won by 7 wickets (with 5 balls remaining)
England v India at Chester-le-Street - Sep 3, 2011
No result
More results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days