England v India, 4th npower Test, The Oval, 3rd day

India have become a laughing stock

They arrived as the world No. 1 team but will end the series embarrassed and, in all likelihood, whitewashed

Andrew Miller at The Oval

August 20, 2011

Comments: 369 | Text size: A | A

Suresh Raina was stumped for a duck, England v India, 4th Test, The Oval, 3rd day, August 20, 2011
Suresh Raina's 29-ball duck typified a series where India have been completely out-classed © AFP
Enlarge
Related Links

Shortly after the close of play at The Oval, a drunken punter in a furry penguin outfit attempted to run out to the middle of the pitch. He fell flat on his face after five steps, was pounced on by six security guards, and was hauled off to face the consequences of his actions. With the possible exception of Suresh Raina's 29-ball duck, it was the most pitiful sight on another extraordinary day of cricket, but at least we can be sure that he won't be allowed back in for more.

Alas for India's cricketers, they won't have the same get-out. On Sunday England will set about administering the last rites of a sorry series, and to judge by the manner in which they shed five prime wickets in 31 overs in the fading evening light, India seem more than capable of shrugging off their remaining 15 in 98. Mentally they have already turned their backs on a contest in which only the absent Praveen Kumar and the unfailingly admirable Rahul Dravid have come close to maintaining their reputations, let alone enhancing them.

Dravid remained steadfast to the bitter end, magnificent in his defiance of all circumstance - including the concussion suffered by Gautam Gambhir that obliged him to step up as an emergency opener for the fourth time out of seven innings in this series (or sixth out of seven if you take into account Virender Sehwag's king pair at Edgbaston). His presence, experience and example shine out as a beacon of everything that India have squandered on this trip - technical proficiency, guts and reputation chief among them.

Something dramatic has come to pass in the course of the past four fixtures, and though the BCCI can ignore if it chooses, it would be foolish to do so. Indian cricket has become the laughing stock of the world game, and while that might not seem to matter to a board that generates 70% of the sport's global income and has in its locker-room the World Cup trophy, no less, ridicule tends to be a corrosive disease.

For all its undeniable flaws, international cricket remains, for now, the benchmark by which the sport is judged, and India's success in international cricket has been the very reason why their spin-off products are so marketable. It's easy to forget how sniffy the BCCI was about their new favourite form of the game, Twenty20, until India's global triumph in 2007 opened their eyes to its potential. Ever since then, the hype of the IPL - while thrilling, lucrative, and epoch-defining - has been underpinned by the solid knowledge that Indian cricket really is the best in show.

Thanks to India's sheer demographics, it could yet be that the tipping point has been reached already - that it will no longer matter if their blue-riband product degenerates into a World Wrestling Federation-style circus, so long as enough of the game's key players subscribe, for want of a better phrase, to the Hayden Way. But India is committed to the Future Tours Programme until 2020, so there's no ducking the sanctity of Test cricket just yet. Besides, given how far they have travelled in the decade just gone, there's plenty of scope for regression if they don't mend their ways.

In the past few years, instead of using their wealth to form the structures required for self-perpetuation, the farce of this current tour has demonstrated how the BCCI has relied on the brilliance of its top players for too long. A golden generation of batsmen is hurtling towards the end of the line, the team's key bowlers are unfit, and as the struggles of Raina, Abhinav Mukund and even Yuvraj Singh have demonstrated, the next generation lack the all-round proficiency to fill such massive voids.

That latter point is precisely the reason why Duncan Fletcher was hired as India's coach. Almost to a man, the England batsmen who are shattering new records every day, will swear by his wisdom and expertise, particularly in analysing and ironing out technical flaws. During his seven years with England, he set the team up for as-then unparalleled success, and though he's now in danger of being remembered for two of the most humbling whitewashes of all time, this latter failure is in no way his fault.

That much was clear in a fractious end-of-day press conference, when India's bowling coach Eric Simons was served up to protest his team's commitment to the cause. "There's no doubt this Test can be saved, but there's no doubt who are favourites," he said, with the sort of wearied clichés that Andrew Flintoff fell back on during that Ashes whitewash of 2006-07. "We know Rahul Dravid can bat long periods of time, MS [Dhoni] is coming into his own and Gautam [Gambhir] will be back tomorrow. We need someone to bed in for a long period of time."

It's not fair to mock Simons for his hopeless optimism. He is a diligent professional with a decade of experience in an international coaching set-up, but the futility of his role within India's lumbering unit, and by extension Fletcher's, is just one of many facets that has been ripped asunder in this series. For the bulk of his 15 minutes in front of the media, Simons fielded a range of frenzied questions including one monologue from an Indian journalist, the gist of which was: "When will the BCCI realise Zaheer Khan is not Superman?"

The answer, however, is not in Simons' remit, as Anirudh Chaudhary, India's team manager, made abundantly clear with his regular interjections. "Eric would not know about that," he stated on one occasion, after an enquiry about India's request for an extra practice match on this winter's tour of Australia.

Why would a senior member of India's coaching staff not be in the loop about such an issue, especially given that the seeds of their downfall on this trip were sown during their undercooked display down at Taunton in July? The question is rhetorical, because the answer is plain to see. But that's not to say that it should be allowed to remain that way.

India are not the first team to be humiliated in a Test series and they will not be the last, but rarely has such a shocking result been inflicted on a side with such pre-series expectations. Australia's 4-0 battering in South Africa in 1969-70, or England's Ashes disaster in 1958-59 are among the most notable parallels.

But every now again, such jolts to the system can only be A Good Thing. While it was ghastly to endure at the time, England's own whitewash five years ago was in many ways the best thing that could have happened to the team at the time. The result obliged a malfunctioning outfit to conduct a root-and-branch reassessment of their game, and while the resultant Schofield Report was criticised in places for its vapidity, it made some key recommendations which set out to protect the sanctity of the national team.

First among those was the introduction of a managing director of the England team. Hugh Morris's new position was soon tested to the limits by the Pietersen-Moores debacle of early 2009, but having survived that acid test, it came into its own in the exhaustive planning for the Ashes campaign of 2010-11. The presence of a conduit capable of reaching into the heart of the ECB, and delivering on virtually every one of Andy Flower's requests, guaranteed that that campaign would triumph where every other trip of the previous 24 years had failed.

It's no coincidence that Cricket Australia has aped many of England's methods in their newly unveiled Argus Report. Australia have a burning desire to return from whence they fell, and resume their long-held status as the best international team in the world. Do the BCCI have the same desire? For the sake of the sport, we have to hope so. But for the time being, they need to be mocked. It's the best incentive going.

Andrew Miller is UK editor of ESPNcricinfo

RSS Feeds: Andrew Miller

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by Hammond on (August 22, 2011, 21:59 GMT)

@Angad11 "Who cares about Test cricket anymore"? Umm- the people who sold out the Oval test you just watched (including Indian fans) the people that sell out the ashes every time it is played, and the millions upon millions of TV viewers that watch it. And England has won the T20 world cup or didn't you hear about that? Savour the ODI cricket while it lasts, it has become too predictable and boring and will be extinct soon. Then what will India be able to brag about? Nothing. Maybe they will all play football then.

Posted by andrew-schulz on (August 22, 2011, 13:17 GMT)

Still think it was 'hopeless optimism' from Simons? I do hope India lose because they deserve to be whitewashed, but your assessment is still dismal, Miller.

Posted by Bang_La on (August 22, 2011, 5:25 GMT)

If, in case, table is turned and for some obvious reasons India needed to play most of their matches abroad, what would happen? I know one for sure, the sales of most consumer items will drop, poor CocaCola et. el. :)

Posted by Angad11 on (August 22, 2011, 3:09 GMT)

Who cares about Test cricket anymore, its for old, lethargic people living on social security income and have nothing else to do in life. ODI and T20's are the future of cricket and where all the fun is. Now suddenly, the English have started to talk about cricket. Seriously? You have not won a world cup since inventing the game, even SL has won and in a few years Bdesh will also but you will never win.

Posted by KAIRAVA on (August 22, 2011, 1:39 GMT)

The recently concluded series against WI should have served as an ideal reminder of India's shortcomings ahead of an all-important tour to WI where a top ranked Indian test team was supposed to beat a bottom ranked West Indies side 3-0 but instead India struggled to scrape past to win it by the narrowest of margins of 1-0. Indian bowlers struggled to pick tailenders wickets on pitches favouring the bowlers and even bought an out-of-form & out-of team batsman like Shiv Chanderpaul to score a match saving century against them. @PrajithR: Yes, India blanked Australia 2-0 but in both the matches, the results go have gone either way as the Aussies posed relentless challenge & India were a tad bit lucky to win atleast one of the matches in that exciting series. @ bhaloniaz: Yes it is ok to lose but its not ok when you lose a series in a blatant manner like this where Indians were outclassed in every department & in every session of the series. No excuses for such pitiful performances.

Posted by KAIRAVA on (August 22, 2011, 1:21 GMT)

Being an avid follower of Indian cricket for the past 20 years, I, for once agree with Andrew Miller that India has indeed become the laughing stock of test cricket during the past 5 months starting from the IPL circus. Inspite of the interest that it has generated among the cricket lovers in India, IPL doesn't create passionate Indian cricket players who put their nation before the humongous amount of money that they earn for just appearing for 2 months for their respective clubs in a tournament created by a money minded BCCI & being run by a bunch of the corporates & businessmen. Sehwag, Gambhir, Zaheer, Harbhajan & to some extent even the legend Sachin Tendulkar are guilty of such an undeniable & unpardonable offence. Harbhajan is in the team for his spin bowling & now he seems to have forgotten how to spin thanks to IPL. Even though he is 38 years old, Sachin had no business to miss the WI test series in what would have been his last appearance in the Caribbean. (CONTINUED)

Posted by crickeyt on (August 21, 2011, 22:59 GMT)

India has played poorly in this series, but to consider the likes of Tendulkar, Dravid, Laxman and Sehwag as laughing stocks just shows poor taste. They have performed legendary deeds in Test cricket over 15-20 years. And one bad series makes them a laughing stock? The Indian team is the most overworked one out there and its achievements are in spite of an antagonistic BCCI. Such articles show no respect for the game, or its great players. One would expect Cricinfo's writers to have better taste, judgment and sense of history.

Posted by 5wombats on (August 21, 2011, 22:18 GMT)

@maddy20 - YOU lecturing people here about being childish!!! Incredible. Are you TOTALLY shameless? And why the hell are you still talking about the World Cup? For Gods sake. @Master01; similarly brazen ridiculous comments; "wait till you come to the subcontinent"….. la da la da la da. You boys have been crowing for months. I can't wait for the end of the series - then I and many other cricket supporters won't have to read your trash anymore.

Posted by   on (August 21, 2011, 22:05 GMT)

I am wondering what took the world so long to laugh! India hardly wins on the road.

Posted by   on (August 21, 2011, 21:31 GMT)

@PrajithR - Is that you Ravi Shastri?

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Andrew MillerClose
Andrew Miller Andrew Miller was saved from a life of drudgery in the City when his car caught fire on the way to an interview. He took this as a sign and fled to Pakistan where he witnessed England's historic victory in the twilight at Karachi (or thought he did, at any rate - it was too dark to tell). He then joined Wisden Online in 2001, and soon graduated from put-upon photocopier to a writer with a penchant for comment and cricket on the subcontinent. In addition to Pakistan, he has covered England tours in Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, South Africa, Australia and New Zealand, as well as the World Cup in the Caribbean in 2007
Tour Results
England v India at Cardiff - Sep 16, 2011
England won by 6 wickets (with 10 balls remaining) (D/L method)
England v India at Lord's - Sep 11, 2011
Match tied (D/L method)
England v India at The Oval - Sep 9, 2011
England won by 3 wickets (with 7 balls remaining) (D/L method)
England v India at Southampton - Sep 6, 2011
England won by 7 wickets (with 5 balls remaining)
England v India at Chester-le-Street - Sep 3, 2011
No result
More results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days