England v India, 3rd Investec Test, Ageas Bowl, 4th day July 30, 2014

Bonds strong, results weak for Vijay and Dhawan

For all their looking out for each other, M Vijay and Shikhar Dhawan have still not added fifty in an innings outside Asia.
18

Play 02:38

When Shikhar Dhawan hit an innocuous full toss back at Moeen Ali at Trent Bridge he had fallen one short of what would have been his and M Vijay's first 50-run opening stand outside Asia in 14 innings together. The 49 in what began mostly as a dead innings remains their highest outside Asia. The longest the opposition has had to wait for a wicket is 14 overs.

Opening partners are usually good mates. They look out for each other. They are open with each other. They don't mind letting each other know of their insecurities, their fears. Matthew Hayden used to say he and Justin Langer were almost like a couple. Might have good times, might have bad, but there for each other.

Virender Sehwag and Gautam Gambhir are friends off the field. Sehwag never minded asking Gambhir to take most of the strike when chasing a small total because Sehwag had a streak of losing interest when not facing a big task and thus throwing his wicket away. "Whenever I go onto the field and I have Sehwag at the other end, it gives me a lot of confidence," Gambhir once said. "No doubts about that. He has been one of my very good friends."

Vijay and Dhawan wouldn't have been great friends when they were picked to open the innings for Rest of India against Mumbai early in 2013. They had played against each other plenty of times in domestic cricket but had batted with each other only once in first-class cricket and four times in List A. They had both been in and out of the Indian team, and quite a few would have thought their best cricket had come and left them.

Vijay had scored 138 runs at 17.25 in Ranji Trophy yet had been picked in the Rest of India squad. Dhawan had been better, but 461 runs at 51.22 in Ranji Trophy is hardly the look-at-me-I'm-here stuff. Vijay was 29, Dhawan was 27. This punt from the new selectors allowed them a new lease of life. The existing India openers, though, were on their way out. Some might argue they should have been out earlier. These two now added 144. Vijay got a hundred, Dhawan a half-century, both were given what might have been one last India chance, and they added 289. They might not have known each other well earlier, but their comeback began together; a bond had been built.

By the time India went on to win their first overseas Test in three years - at Lord's - you could see the two were looking out for each other. When, fielding in the slips, Dhawan has something stuck in his eye, Vijay rushed to pluck it out. Vijay had batted exceptionally well at Lord's but had fallen five short of a century. When the win was achieved, Vijay looked to settle into the background in the celebrations, but Dhawan went back, plucked a stump and handed it over to Vijay. A quiet little acknowledgement from an opening batsman to the other when he might have been lost in the euphoria of Ishant Sharma and the bouncers.

Who knows they might have even have talked of a more public satisfaction when they score runs together. They haven't. In the last seven Tests, India have been 22 for 1 on an average. Vijay has scored runs in South Africa and here, Dhawan in New Zealand, but not together. Cheteshwar Pujara and Virat Kohli have been walking in to face tricky circumstances. "It is frustrating," Dhawan said of the lack of runs between the two. "Vijay has been batting really well, but unfortunately I haven't contributed much. I have been working hard on my game, sometimes you can't do much when you get out to good balls."

But the bond between Vijay and Dhawan has remained. The two look out for each other, running almost in Twenty20 fashion, pouncing on every slight opportunity they might get of getting the other guy off strike, making the bowler change his line of attack from a right-hand batsman to a left-hand batsman or the other way around. In the second innings here, with India needing a long opening stand to give them any hope of saving the Test, they were watchful, they ran 14 of the 26 runs together, they had seen off what looked like the first spells of Anderson and Stuart Broad. With the last ball of his sixth over, Anderson had sent square leg back, and Dhawan bunted one in that direction for a single. Singles, the building block these two have been after.

To the first ball of a bowler other than Anderson and Broad, Dhawan bunted one towards square leg again. Broad wasn't at the boundary this time, but was a little deep. This single was fair game for the pair. Dhawan set off right away, Vijay hesitated mildly. Yet they were making it comfortably. Vijay took it easy in the end. A moment of switching off. No stretch, no desperation to get the bat in. The bad Vijay, who takes catches casually, who takes his eye off the ball in the field. Not the one who has been leaving balls like his life depends on him. Not the one who has been sprinting hard to get his partner off strike. And bang, Broad hits the stumps direct. Well, not quite bang. The bails came off softly. They took their time. It will make Vijay even more distraught when he sees the replay.

For all their looking out for each other, Vijay and Dhawan have still not added fifty in an innings outside Asia. Pujara, who might have wanted to walk in at a big score for one, should be so lucky.

Sidharth Monga is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • Aashiyer on August 4, 2014, 20:39 GMT

    Drop Dhawan put in Gambhir. India should win.

  • on August 1, 2014, 8:56 GMT

    Radical opinion - how about switching the place of Dhawan and Rahane? Rahane has the technique to see off the new ball, and Dhawan has the ability to destroy the opposition provided the ball isn't completely new!! That would make an interesting watch!! I would also plead with Dhoni to drop Rohit and include another bowler, if he feels that Binny isn't good enough he needs another bowler for a containing job at least. that itself would build pressure and bring other attacking bowlers into contention! That is really what India lacked this test match!!

  • CricketChat on July 31, 2014, 20:44 GMT

    Well, this bond will most likely be broken for the 4th test and probably for good.

  • Vijimv11 on July 31, 2014, 10:05 GMT

    The best opening pairs have usually been best of friends and this helps a lot. Dhawan and Vijay are a good pair. They need to work harder and develop together. India needs a strong opening pair. These opening pairs have been important in winning India test matches overseas. Gambhir could come in place of Dhawan for the next game. It will help Dhawan find his form and vigor back.

  • TestisRealTest on July 31, 2014, 8:34 GMT

    Settled opening pair plays a very crucial role in test success. Going beyond the runs scored by the openers, it makes life easier for the middle order batsmen by taking the shine of the ball and the lustre off opposition team's enthusiasm. Pair of Sehwag and Gambhir played aa pivotal role in India's test success over the years. However, as much as I would like it to be false, they seem past their prime. For Sehwag it was always about hand eye coordination and it was a matter of time before age caught up. But it was a wonderful era while it lasted. Dhawan was my replacement for Sehwag when he burst to the scene with his swashbuckling ton. Having a fast scoring opener is the supreme weapon in modern day test armoury. Opposition captains think twice before declaring to set targets, opposition team morale is destroyed in first session of a game, audience flock back to test circket arena. Fix the openers and the middle order will be back in its spring bloom.

  • siddhartha87 on July 31, 2014, 6:15 GMT

    Dhawan deserves more chances. Gambhir is a walking wicket in seaming pitches.

  • starincricket on July 31, 2014, 5:58 GMT

    @ BGKrishna : i agree your point of view. For one bad innings , this much analysis is not at all required for a player who has leading runs in the tournament for india. why not even 50% is analysed for the same on kohli or pujara.. 1st of all selection also wrong for this test match when u c d conditions

  • on July 31, 2014, 5:46 GMT

    kohali first class avg is below 50..while rohit..rahane..pujara..badrinath..manoj tiwari nearly about 60.... kohali a test batsman no never he is only a odi player

  • Unbiased-views on July 31, 2014, 5:16 GMT

    @MelbourneMiracle sanga's avg in SA -- 35 Mitchel Johnson's avg in SA -- 45....Now tell me who is the better batsman in SA condition ? BTW, Kohli's avg in SA is 68!!!

  • on July 31, 2014, 4:59 GMT

    Please don't compare Kohli to Bhuvaneshwar Kumar....

  • Aashiyer on August 4, 2014, 20:39 GMT

    Drop Dhawan put in Gambhir. India should win.

  • on August 1, 2014, 8:56 GMT

    Radical opinion - how about switching the place of Dhawan and Rahane? Rahane has the technique to see off the new ball, and Dhawan has the ability to destroy the opposition provided the ball isn't completely new!! That would make an interesting watch!! I would also plead with Dhoni to drop Rohit and include another bowler, if he feels that Binny isn't good enough he needs another bowler for a containing job at least. that itself would build pressure and bring other attacking bowlers into contention! That is really what India lacked this test match!!

  • CricketChat on July 31, 2014, 20:44 GMT

    Well, this bond will most likely be broken for the 4th test and probably for good.

  • Vijimv11 on July 31, 2014, 10:05 GMT

    The best opening pairs have usually been best of friends and this helps a lot. Dhawan and Vijay are a good pair. They need to work harder and develop together. India needs a strong opening pair. These opening pairs have been important in winning India test matches overseas. Gambhir could come in place of Dhawan for the next game. It will help Dhawan find his form and vigor back.

  • TestisRealTest on July 31, 2014, 8:34 GMT

    Settled opening pair plays a very crucial role in test success. Going beyond the runs scored by the openers, it makes life easier for the middle order batsmen by taking the shine of the ball and the lustre off opposition team's enthusiasm. Pair of Sehwag and Gambhir played aa pivotal role in India's test success over the years. However, as much as I would like it to be false, they seem past their prime. For Sehwag it was always about hand eye coordination and it was a matter of time before age caught up. But it was a wonderful era while it lasted. Dhawan was my replacement for Sehwag when he burst to the scene with his swashbuckling ton. Having a fast scoring opener is the supreme weapon in modern day test armoury. Opposition captains think twice before declaring to set targets, opposition team morale is destroyed in first session of a game, audience flock back to test circket arena. Fix the openers and the middle order will be back in its spring bloom.

  • siddhartha87 on July 31, 2014, 6:15 GMT

    Dhawan deserves more chances. Gambhir is a walking wicket in seaming pitches.

  • starincricket on July 31, 2014, 5:58 GMT

    @ BGKrishna : i agree your point of view. For one bad innings , this much analysis is not at all required for a player who has leading runs in the tournament for india. why not even 50% is analysed for the same on kohli or pujara.. 1st of all selection also wrong for this test match when u c d conditions

  • on July 31, 2014, 5:46 GMT

    kohali first class avg is below 50..while rohit..rahane..pujara..badrinath..manoj tiwari nearly about 60.... kohali a test batsman no never he is only a odi player

  • Unbiased-views on July 31, 2014, 5:16 GMT

    @MelbourneMiracle sanga's avg in SA -- 35 Mitchel Johnson's avg in SA -- 45....Now tell me who is the better batsman in SA condition ? BTW, Kohli's avg in SA is 68!!!

  • on July 31, 2014, 4:59 GMT

    Please don't compare Kohli to Bhuvaneshwar Kumar....

  • Sexysteven on July 31, 2014, 4:50 GMT

    It's time to drop dhawan for sure he's had plenty of time but hasn't produced they prob will bring gambhir back but he has issue on juicy pitches so I would put rahane to open his technique is suited to opening I think and should be able to see off the new ball

  • MelbourneMiracle on July 31, 2014, 3:10 GMT

    Kholi's average in 6 innings: 16.83 Bhuvaneshwar's avg in 5 innings: 57.00

    And now can someone please tell me who's the better batsman in English conditions from these two?

  • Mr_Anonymous on July 31, 2014, 3:07 GMT

    They are both good players although they haven't clicked together abroad as yet. I also think that Dhawan needs to tighten up his game in Tests (he still plays many risky shots) and that he may be out of form. Opening with Rahane is an option although I personally do think it is time for Gambhir to be given a chance to open instead of Dhawan in the next match.

  • here2rock on July 31, 2014, 2:38 GMT

    Shikhar Dhawan has major technical flaws in this batting, he can be exciting but is a liability for India at no 1. Wriddhiman Prasanta Saha should be considered as a replacement for opening the next test match.

  • on July 31, 2014, 2:00 GMT

    Dhawan is clearly out of depth when the ball swings or when he defends against spin. He just got lucky that his go-after-it style stuck it gold for a couple of games. But the conditions and the poor opposition (no Mitchell Johnson, demoralized opposition, low bounce wickets) helped. We over extrapolated what was possible, felt he was our best answer after Sehwag, gave him massive media coverage and whoosh, we are back to the drawing board. In a horses for courses strategy, Dhawan should not be picked for any test team outside India. In fact, Ravi Ashwin will fit the opener role better and give India a better slip fielder and spin option

  • BGKrishna on July 31, 2014, 1:38 GMT

    Too harsh on just the openers particularly Vijay who has battled hard this tour. Why is there no criticism of star players- Pujara: he hasn't converted a single start, Kohli who has not scored a single worthwhile innings, today he didn't even make an attempt and Dhoni: whether he has technique or not why hasn't he battled in recent tests incl this one? What about stroke less wonder Rohit who has the backing of the captain- he threw his wkt in first innings and got a life in second innings too. Just because Vijay is not a star player, doesn't mean that he is crucified for a rare mistake!

  • vj3478 on July 31, 2014, 0:59 GMT

    The wonderful partnership of Sehwag-Gambhir that took Ind to #1 was broken and both were fired as they were inconsistent. Dhawan is wonderfully justifying his inclusion... a thorough inconsistent performance! The best part is his unwillingness to learn(getting out playing hook/pull short every other match)

  • Indiaforever on July 30, 2014, 20:18 GMT

    It is a good point, when you look at all the great openers they have all been great friends. Sachin and Ganguly understood each others games soooo well that they would help each other a lot when in the middle. Likewise, this bond will get better and their runs will start to flow. Today was probably the first time when India have got through the new ball without losing Dhawan in a long time and you feel that a big partnership is coming soon, if India allow it.

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • Indiaforever on July 30, 2014, 20:18 GMT

    It is a good point, when you look at all the great openers they have all been great friends. Sachin and Ganguly understood each others games soooo well that they would help each other a lot when in the middle. Likewise, this bond will get better and their runs will start to flow. Today was probably the first time when India have got through the new ball without losing Dhawan in a long time and you feel that a big partnership is coming soon, if India allow it.

  • vj3478 on July 31, 2014, 0:59 GMT

    The wonderful partnership of Sehwag-Gambhir that took Ind to #1 was broken and both were fired as they were inconsistent. Dhawan is wonderfully justifying his inclusion... a thorough inconsistent performance! The best part is his unwillingness to learn(getting out playing hook/pull short every other match)

  • BGKrishna on July 31, 2014, 1:38 GMT

    Too harsh on just the openers particularly Vijay who has battled hard this tour. Why is there no criticism of star players- Pujara: he hasn't converted a single start, Kohli who has not scored a single worthwhile innings, today he didn't even make an attempt and Dhoni: whether he has technique or not why hasn't he battled in recent tests incl this one? What about stroke less wonder Rohit who has the backing of the captain- he threw his wkt in first innings and got a life in second innings too. Just because Vijay is not a star player, doesn't mean that he is crucified for a rare mistake!

  • on July 31, 2014, 2:00 GMT

    Dhawan is clearly out of depth when the ball swings or when he defends against spin. He just got lucky that his go-after-it style stuck it gold for a couple of games. But the conditions and the poor opposition (no Mitchell Johnson, demoralized opposition, low bounce wickets) helped. We over extrapolated what was possible, felt he was our best answer after Sehwag, gave him massive media coverage and whoosh, we are back to the drawing board. In a horses for courses strategy, Dhawan should not be picked for any test team outside India. In fact, Ravi Ashwin will fit the opener role better and give India a better slip fielder and spin option

  • here2rock on July 31, 2014, 2:38 GMT

    Shikhar Dhawan has major technical flaws in this batting, he can be exciting but is a liability for India at no 1. Wriddhiman Prasanta Saha should be considered as a replacement for opening the next test match.

  • Mr_Anonymous on July 31, 2014, 3:07 GMT

    They are both good players although they haven't clicked together abroad as yet. I also think that Dhawan needs to tighten up his game in Tests (he still plays many risky shots) and that he may be out of form. Opening with Rahane is an option although I personally do think it is time for Gambhir to be given a chance to open instead of Dhawan in the next match.

  • MelbourneMiracle on July 31, 2014, 3:10 GMT

    Kholi's average in 6 innings: 16.83 Bhuvaneshwar's avg in 5 innings: 57.00

    And now can someone please tell me who's the better batsman in English conditions from these two?

  • Sexysteven on July 31, 2014, 4:50 GMT

    It's time to drop dhawan for sure he's had plenty of time but hasn't produced they prob will bring gambhir back but he has issue on juicy pitches so I would put rahane to open his technique is suited to opening I think and should be able to see off the new ball

  • on July 31, 2014, 4:59 GMT

    Please don't compare Kohli to Bhuvaneshwar Kumar....

  • Unbiased-views on July 31, 2014, 5:16 GMT

    @MelbourneMiracle sanga's avg in SA -- 35 Mitchel Johnson's avg in SA -- 45....Now tell me who is the better batsman in SA condition ? BTW, Kohli's avg in SA is 68!!!