India in England 2014

England, India set for Anderson hearing

Sidharth Monga

July 31, 2014

Comments: 4 | Text size: A | A

James Anderson traps Ravindra Jadeja with an inswinging delivery, England v India, 3rd Investec Test, Ageas Bowl, 3rd day, July 29, 2014
The duel between James Anderson and Ravindra Jadeja may not continue at Old Trafford © Getty Images
Enlarge

The Southampton Test has ended but the tussle between the two sides will continue into a sixth day with the hearing into the Trent Bridge incident between James Anderson and Ravindra Jadeja scheduled on Friday, with massive implications on the series.

India charged Anderson with a Level 3 offence before the second Test, at Lord's, following an alleged altercation in the first. India contend that Anderson pushed Jadeja when the players were walking back for lunch on day two of the Trent Bridge Test. If found guilty, he could face a ban of up to four Tests.

The hearing will take place in India's team hotel, with the judicial commissioner Gordon Lewis listening in via Skype from Australia. Jadeja and Anderson will be mandatory presences. Apart from their legal team, India are likely to be have captain MS Dhoni, coach Duncan Fletcher and physiotherapist Evan Speechly in attendance. An ICC ethics and regulatory lawyer will be present.

The hearing will be almost like a court case, with oral witnesses, legal submissions, cross examinations and video evidence if it exists. If the video evidence doesn't exist, it is, like Sydney 2008, one team's word against the other. England's response during Jadeja's hearing was that the India allrounder had turned around aggressively, and that Anderson had acted in self-defence.

The onus will be on the ICC to provide evidence. Principles of natural justice will take effect: ICC's legal team will have to prove Anderson's guilt beyond reasonable doubt to get their desired result, a sentence under Level 3. Jadeja, who was found guilty under Level 1 (after being charged at Level 2) by match referee David Boon in the same case, has earned the right to appeal his verdict. His case will also come up for hearing during the same meeting.

Lewis will have 48 hours to deliver his verdict. If Anderson is found guilty under Level 3, there is a provision for an appeal against it. Only the player found guilty or the ICC CEO can appeal, within seven days of having received the verdict. The ICC's Head of Legal would then appoint an Appeals Panel, comprising three members from ICC Code of Conduct commission. However, Lewis' decision will remain in effect while under appeal, unless any properly convened Appeal Panel orders otherwise. India have no right of appeal if Anderson is not found guilty under Level 3.

Anderson's hearing will follow the day after he was adjudged Man of the Match in the Ageas Bowl Test. "I don't know what's going to happen," Anderson said. "I want to be playing at Old Trafford, my home Test, but we'll have to wait and see what happens.

"We've done brilliantly, the ECB have done a great job of keeping everything separate. So once we get to the ground it was all about the cricket and how we would win the Test match - and that's exactly what we did this week. Everyone did it brilliantly. Once we got on the field the only thoughts we had were winning."

Sidharth Monga is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo

RSS Feeds: Sidharth Monga

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by Puffin on (August 1, 2014, 10:21 GMT)

It's good to see this issue addressed. Perhaps a few bans would help calm things down worldwide and encourage players to play cricket, not rugby.

Posted by East_Ender on (August 1, 2014, 9:56 GMT)

If there is no video evidence and no admission then it's the word of one set of 'witnesses' against another. Impossible to choose unless one infers one side is being 'creative with the truth'. Let's hope only the facts as revealed on the day influence the decision and not outside forces.

Posted by   on (July 31, 2014, 20:37 GMT)

Everyone should wait and let the process go on.I would rather see this go away with a handshake and some sort of apology from the parties concerned. This is a minor incident and I am worried this will get carried on in the future series. Looks like Dhoni wants to prove a point,even though it may come back to haunt him.

Posted by SwamyCricketAnanda on (July 31, 2014, 19:16 GMT)

Whatever the verdict, the very fact Dhoni and co. have escalated this issue deserves applause. There is marked improvement in Anderson and England's on-field demeanour after the Level 3 charge. Unlike what some fans reckon, cricket is not about simply winning or losing at any costs. On-field behaviour of modern players has plumbed abysmal depths. The recent encounter with Pollard in the IPL is a case in point. Doni must not hesitate to escalate similar issues, if they occur, in the series against Australia.

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Sidharth MongaClose
Tour Results
England v India at Birmingham - Sep 7, 2014
England won by 3 runs
England v India at Leeds - Sep 5, 2014
England won by 41 runs
England v India at Birmingham - Sep 2, 2014
India won by 9 wickets (with 117 balls remaining)
England v India at Nottingham - Aug 30, 2014
India won by 6 wickets (with 42 balls remaining)
England v India at Cardiff - Aug 27, 2014
India won by 133 runs (D/L method)
More results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days