India in England 2014 August 5, 2014

Bhuvneshwar, Anderson evenly matched

James Anderson and Bhuvneshwar Kumar have been the leading bowlers in the series so far with similar stats, but in their head-to-head battles Bhuvneshwar is ahead
17

Virat Kohli v James Anderson was billed as one of the key battles in the series, but so far it's been a no-contest
Virat Kohli v James Anderson was billed as one of the key battles in the series, but so far it's been a no-contest © Getty Images

Over the last few days, all the talk has been about the off-the-pitch battle between James Anderson and Ravindra Jadeja. In this series, though, the more relevant on-the-pitch battle has been between Anderson and Bhuvneshwar Kumar. The new-ball bowlers from each team have been the two top wicket-takers in the series, and have led the attacks for their teams admirably.

The overall numbers for the two are remarkably similar so far: Anderson has bowled 26 more overs and has 16 wickets to Bhuvneshwar's 15, while their series averages are separated by a run. Against the top six batsmen, though, Anderson has done significantly better: when bowling to India's top six (Vijay, Dhawan, Pujara, Kohli, Rahane and Rohit), Anderson has achieved figures of 10 for 221, compared to figures of 6 for 163 when bowling to the rest of the Indian batsmen.

Bhuvneshwar, on the other hand, has been more successful against England's lower order than their top six. Against Cook, Robson, Ballance, Bell, Root and Moeen, he has only managed eight wickets at 33.12; against the other England batsmen, Bhuvneshwar has been outstanding, with figures of 7 for 76.

James Anderson v Bhuvneshwar Kumar, in the Test series so far
  Anderson Bhuvneshwar
  Overs Wkts Average Strike rate Overs Wkts Average Strike rate
Series stats 151.1 16 24.00 56.6 124.5 15 23.00 49.9
v top 6 batsmen* 98.5 10 22.10 59.3 102.3 8 33.12 76.9
v the rest 52.2 6 27.16 52.3 22.2 7 10.85 19.1
* Anderson v Vijay, Dhawan, Pujara, Kohli, Rahane and Rohit; and Bhuvneshwar v Cook, Robson, Ballance, Bell, Root and Moeen

Among India's top order, only two batsmen - Ajinkya Rahane and Murali Vijay - have averaged more than 40 against Anderson in this series. Rahane has been the best among them, scoring 51 off 100 balls and getting out just once - a superb caught-and-bowled effort when Rahane was batting with the tail and looking for quick runs at Lord's. Vijay has been extremely patient against Anderson, scoring 94 off 259 balls. Both Vijay and Rahane have similar control percentages against him.

Shikhar Dhawan has been Anderson's bunny in the series, getting out to him three times in 78 balls, but surprisingly, his control percentage isn't very different from those for Rahane and Vijay - in fact it's marginally higher. Jadeja has scored runs at a fair clip against Anderson, but his control factor is poor - only 62%. Cheteshwar Pujara has a much higher control factor, but has been kept scoreless for long periods.

However, the biggest non-contest of the series so far has been between Anderson and Virat Kohli. Coming into the series, they were the leading bowler and batsman for their respective teams, but while Anderson has lived up to that tag, Kohli has struggled. In their head-to-head battles, Kohli has scored two runs from Anderson, and been dismissed twice - in the first innings at Lord's and Southampton. Before this series, Kohli had 23 runs off 81 balls from Anderson in Tests, and had been dismissed once; now the numbers read 3 for 25 from 102 balls - average 8.33, runs per over 1.47.

In fact, the only batsman who has faced more than ten balls from Anderson without being dismissed by him in this series is Bhuvneshwar, whose numbers against England's leading bowler are excellent - 32 runs from 61 balls, and a control factor which is the best so far by any Indian batsman.

Indian batsmen v James Anderson in this series
Batsman Runs Balls Dismissals Average Run rate Control %
Murali Vijay 94 259 2 47.00 2.17 86.1
MS Dhoni 54 122 2 27.00 2.65 86.1
Ajinkya Rahane 51 100 1 51.00 3.06 86.0
Ravindra Jadeja 42 68 2 21.00 3.70 62.1
Cheteshwar Pujara 38 126 1 38.00 1.80 85.7
Shikhar Dhawan 32 78 3 10.66 2.46 87.2
Bhuvneshwar Kumar 32 61 0 - 3.14 90.2
Rohit Sharma 4 9 1 4.00 2.66 66.6
Virat Kohli 2 21 2 1.00 0.57 76.2
All batsmen 384 907 16 24.00 2.54 82.4

Among England's batsmen, Gary Ballance, Joe Root and Alastair Cook have all done pretty well against Bhuvneshwar so far, being dismissed only once each and achieving a pretty high control factor. Ian Bell and Sam Robson have been dismissed twice each, which is the highest number of times Bhuvneshwar has dismissed any England batsman in this series so far. Moeen Ali has a reasonable control factor against Bhuvneshwar, but has struggled to get him away for runs, scoring 10 off 63 balls.

Anderson has done well to be dismissed only once from 42 balls against him, but Bhuvneshwar can point to the control factor to show that he has been edging their head-to-head contest. (It's also pertinent to point out here that Bhuveshwar has a first-class batting average of 30.59, compared to Anderson's 10.40.) The overall control factors for batsmen against Bhuvneshwar and Anderson are also very similar, indicating there's been little to separate the two bowlers so far.

England batsmen v Bhuvneshwar Kumar in this series
Batsman Runs Balls Dismissals Average Run rate Control %
Gary Ballance 86 160 1 86.00 3.22 86.2
Joe Root 51 92 1 51.00 3.32 89.0
Sam Robson 43 127 2 21.50 2.03 84.7
Alastair Cook 42 97 1 42.00 2.59 89.7
Ian Bell 33 76 2 16.50 2.60 85.5
James Anderson 25 42 1 25.00 3.57 65.8
Stuart Broad 13 9 2 6.50 8.66 66.7
Moeen Ali 10 63 1 10.00 0.95 87.3
Ben Stokes 0 10 2 0.00 0.00 80.0
All batsmen 341 749 15 22.73 2.72 83.5

Where the runs have been scored v Anderson and Bhuvneshwar

Where the runs have been scored against James Anderson and Bhuvneshwar Kumar
Where the runs have been scored against James Anderson and Bhuvneshwar Kumar © ESPNcricinfo Ltd

Much has been said and written about the number of runs scored through the third man region in this Test series, and the wagon-wheel of runs scored against Anderson bears this out. Out of the 55 fours that have come off his bowling, 23 have been behind the wicket, either through third man or backward point; in all, 126 out of the 384 runs he has conceded have come in that region. Against Bhuvneshwar the runs scored in that region are considerably lesser, possibly because of his lesser pace. On the other hand, Bhuvneshwar has been hit through the covers more often, conceding 13 fours, and 88 runs, in that region.

S Rajesh is stats editor of ESPNcricinfo. @rajeshstats

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • Greatest_Game on August 6, 2014, 21:32 GMT

    @ bobagorof on asks "Rather than saying Anderson looks good because the batsmen are bad, why isn't it the case that the batsmen look bad because Anderson is good?"

    Because he is not good. Really, he is bog standard, average 30! His wickets have come against a predominantly failing top order. Apart from Vijay & Rahane, the Indian bottom order/tail are scoring the runs.

    In the 2nd inns of all 3 tests, Anderson has totaled just 4 wickets - 25% of his tally. Test one - 1/47. Test 2 - 1/77. Test 3 - 2/24. Total - 4/148, ave 49.3. He is a 1st inngs bully, and a 2nd inngs failure!

  • on August 6, 2014, 5:54 GMT

    Replace dhawin with gambir, rohit with ashwin, shami/pankaj with pandey. Aaaron does not deserve a place as much as pandey does. Pandeys FC record is also better than aaron.

  • on August 6, 2014, 3:34 GMT

    I hope that towards the end they should have put up a little table of number of runs scored, batting average and control factor for the two. That is one area where Bhuvi has dominated Anderson by a long long shot. While Bhuvi has batted like a proper middle order player, Anderson has been a tailender baring one good innings. Not to forget that there are still two more tests to go.

  • bobagorof on August 6, 2014, 0:58 GMT

    @Greatest_Game: While certainly not denying that Kohli and Dhawan haven't contributed much, the argument you give could also be used to illustrate just how well Anderson has done. Rather than saying Anderson looks good because the batsmen are bad, why isn't it the case that the batsmen look bad because Anderson is good?

  • bobagorof on August 6, 2014, 0:00 GMT

    Can someone elighten me as to what this 'control factor' is? I've seen it on the live scorecards over the past few matches but I have no idea how it is calculated. I imagine it is indicative of the percent of balls the batsman has under control, but does this include leaves that barely miss the stumps, or shots that aren't out of the middle but go into a vacant area?

  • kmpm on August 5, 2014, 23:08 GMT

    Numerically this all looks logical. Lets not forget the support that these two got from their respective bowling units. With Shami or Jadeja doing most of the bowling in tandem, Bhuvis figures suffered. Having said that, given the match context, Anderson stepped up much better.

  • Sultan2007 on August 5, 2014, 16:18 GMT

    It is terrific for Bhuvi to even be compared with Anderson. The latter is a great in home conditions. Great compliment to Bhuvi that he compares so favourably

  • cricket_lover1 on August 5, 2014, 14:28 GMT

    Bhuvi needs to raise his pace to higher 135s and he can be more deadly. For fourth and fifth Aaron & Ishwar should be given chance to prove..if they fail look for the next talent..but they should be given chance in the next two test matches. In absence of Bhuvi and Ishant..Shami should lead the attack. Pace bowlers for fourth test (Shami + Aaron + Ishwar)... Also bring back Binny in place of Jadeja. Ashwin also needs to be given a chance in next two test matches. This can be playing XI - Gambhir, Vijay, Pujara, Rahne, Kohli, Dhoni, Binny, Ashwin, Shami, Aaron, Ishwar.

  • Greatest_Game on August 5, 2014, 14:02 GMT

    Anderson has had more success against India's top six because Kohli & Dhawan have been unrelentingly horrible, & Pujara bad. Vijay has had good scores, & Rahane has made runs consistently. Whether no. 6 is Dhoni or Jadega, even they are better than Kohli & Dhawan, and they are both averaging 28. Only Vijay & Rahane average above 50, with Kumar next at 45, then Pujara at 30 leads the procession of failure. Not too difficult to get good figures against that batting.

    And, if @ Farooq3 thinks India's is "arguably" the top batting lineup in the world, he, and whoever he is arguing with, don't seem to know much about cricket. Only Pujara is in the top 10, at no. 10! One more bad match & he will be gone.

    Both lineups are ranked below the top 5: SA, SL, Aus, Pak, & NZ. Eng's 3rd & 5th best ranked are KP & Trott!

    The funniest of all? The best bowling figures of the tour are Ave 6, Econ 3, SR 12 …. belong to Cook!!!

  • on August 5, 2014, 13:50 GMT

    If Bhuvi has some more pace then he would be more deadly than Anderson in conditions like England .....!!!!!!!!!

  • Greatest_Game on August 6, 2014, 21:32 GMT

    @ bobagorof on asks "Rather than saying Anderson looks good because the batsmen are bad, why isn't it the case that the batsmen look bad because Anderson is good?"

    Because he is not good. Really, he is bog standard, average 30! His wickets have come against a predominantly failing top order. Apart from Vijay & Rahane, the Indian bottom order/tail are scoring the runs.

    In the 2nd inns of all 3 tests, Anderson has totaled just 4 wickets - 25% of his tally. Test one - 1/47. Test 2 - 1/77. Test 3 - 2/24. Total - 4/148, ave 49.3. He is a 1st inngs bully, and a 2nd inngs failure!

  • on August 6, 2014, 5:54 GMT

    Replace dhawin with gambir, rohit with ashwin, shami/pankaj with pandey. Aaaron does not deserve a place as much as pandey does. Pandeys FC record is also better than aaron.

  • on August 6, 2014, 3:34 GMT

    I hope that towards the end they should have put up a little table of number of runs scored, batting average and control factor for the two. That is one area where Bhuvi has dominated Anderson by a long long shot. While Bhuvi has batted like a proper middle order player, Anderson has been a tailender baring one good innings. Not to forget that there are still two more tests to go.

  • bobagorof on August 6, 2014, 0:58 GMT

    @Greatest_Game: While certainly not denying that Kohli and Dhawan haven't contributed much, the argument you give could also be used to illustrate just how well Anderson has done. Rather than saying Anderson looks good because the batsmen are bad, why isn't it the case that the batsmen look bad because Anderson is good?

  • bobagorof on August 6, 2014, 0:00 GMT

    Can someone elighten me as to what this 'control factor' is? I've seen it on the live scorecards over the past few matches but I have no idea how it is calculated. I imagine it is indicative of the percent of balls the batsman has under control, but does this include leaves that barely miss the stumps, or shots that aren't out of the middle but go into a vacant area?

  • kmpm on August 5, 2014, 23:08 GMT

    Numerically this all looks logical. Lets not forget the support that these two got from their respective bowling units. With Shami or Jadeja doing most of the bowling in tandem, Bhuvis figures suffered. Having said that, given the match context, Anderson stepped up much better.

  • Sultan2007 on August 5, 2014, 16:18 GMT

    It is terrific for Bhuvi to even be compared with Anderson. The latter is a great in home conditions. Great compliment to Bhuvi that he compares so favourably

  • cricket_lover1 on August 5, 2014, 14:28 GMT

    Bhuvi needs to raise his pace to higher 135s and he can be more deadly. For fourth and fifth Aaron & Ishwar should be given chance to prove..if they fail look for the next talent..but they should be given chance in the next two test matches. In absence of Bhuvi and Ishant..Shami should lead the attack. Pace bowlers for fourth test (Shami + Aaron + Ishwar)... Also bring back Binny in place of Jadeja. Ashwin also needs to be given a chance in next two test matches. This can be playing XI - Gambhir, Vijay, Pujara, Rahne, Kohli, Dhoni, Binny, Ashwin, Shami, Aaron, Ishwar.

  • Greatest_Game on August 5, 2014, 14:02 GMT

    Anderson has had more success against India's top six because Kohli & Dhawan have been unrelentingly horrible, & Pujara bad. Vijay has had good scores, & Rahane has made runs consistently. Whether no. 6 is Dhoni or Jadega, even they are better than Kohli & Dhawan, and they are both averaging 28. Only Vijay & Rahane average above 50, with Kumar next at 45, then Pujara at 30 leads the procession of failure. Not too difficult to get good figures against that batting.

    And, if @ Farooq3 thinks India's is "arguably" the top batting lineup in the world, he, and whoever he is arguing with, don't seem to know much about cricket. Only Pujara is in the top 10, at no. 10! One more bad match & he will be gone.

    Both lineups are ranked below the top 5: SA, SL, Aus, Pak, & NZ. Eng's 3rd & 5th best ranked are KP & Trott!

    The funniest of all? The best bowling figures of the tour are Ave 6, Econ 3, SR 12 …. belong to Cook!!!

  • on August 5, 2014, 13:50 GMT

    If Bhuvi has some more pace then he would be more deadly than Anderson in conditions like England .....!!!!!!!!!

  • liz1558 on August 5, 2014, 13:42 GMT

    Jimmy Anderson is clearly the outstanding fast medium bowler of his generation - amply evidenced by these stats.

  • Nero28 on August 5, 2014, 13:22 GMT

    If not kumar, Aaron please. Ishwar pandey can only replace Pankaj. Pankaj and pandey both are swing bowler with good height. So, a different category fast bowler in aaron should play if he is doing well in net.

  • landl47 on August 5, 2014, 13:08 GMT

    Bhuvi has bowled extremely well. His control has been excellent, he moves the ball both ways and he's a very willing bowler who gives 100%. His style always seemed to be suitable for English conditions, like Praveen Kumar who did so well in 2011 (I still can't understand why Praveen was left out and other bowlers not so well suited to the conditions were included).

    The problem now is that Dhoni has pretty much bowled him into the ground. Long spells, the strange tactic of one-over spells in the last test and bringing him back too soon. By the end of the last test he looked exhausted. Now he's come down with an ankle injury. With neither him nor Ishant in the side, India's bowling looks weak; Pankaj was unlucky in the last test, but still went for a lot of runs and Shami hasn't looked special- 5 wickets @73 apiece all series. The other bowlers don't look good fits for English conditions.

    I hope Bhuvi plays, he's a class act.

  • Vaughanographic on August 5, 2014, 11:14 GMT

    Hahaha!! Best batting lineups... both England and India have just TWO batsman in the top 20 test ratings. What this article does do well is show how good Kumar is - I think he is seriously underrated (as opposed to Anderson who I think is a little overrated). I hope Kumar keeps fit for the next test and the contest can continue

  • Vasunigam on August 5, 2014, 11:02 GMT

    @Farooq - India was used to be best batting line ups in the world but not right now -true that all the batters are talented but they are still untested & not performed in trying conditions so they are far from BEST. & I will also add that even a normal batting line up is pretty dangerous in there own back yard so Bhuvi's effort is more louder (n if u say that Eng pitches are meant for fast bowling then dont forget that bowlers like shane warne struggled on tailor made pitches for spin in India) So bottom line is -to be performer on foreign pitches one need to be absolutely best

  • on August 5, 2014, 10:33 GMT

    Bravo!! Loved this article. Such close look and observation over stats makes the contest even more interesting. Would be sad to see Bhuvi losing out an opportunity if he doesn't get fit before 4th test. To cover this up, I hope Kohli will take it up to have a great contest with Jimmy. At this stage, series is all set to bring huge entertainment. :-)

  • Farooq3 on August 5, 2014, 10:11 GMT

    Statistics do paint a picture - but that not be the complete one! On the basis of facts it seems that the two bowlers are evenly matched. But if you look closely, Anderson is bowling against arguably one of the best batting lineups in the world!

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • Farooq3 on August 5, 2014, 10:11 GMT

    Statistics do paint a picture - but that not be the complete one! On the basis of facts it seems that the two bowlers are evenly matched. But if you look closely, Anderson is bowling against arguably one of the best batting lineups in the world!

  • on August 5, 2014, 10:33 GMT

    Bravo!! Loved this article. Such close look and observation over stats makes the contest even more interesting. Would be sad to see Bhuvi losing out an opportunity if he doesn't get fit before 4th test. To cover this up, I hope Kohli will take it up to have a great contest with Jimmy. At this stage, series is all set to bring huge entertainment. :-)

  • Vasunigam on August 5, 2014, 11:02 GMT

    @Farooq - India was used to be best batting line ups in the world but not right now -true that all the batters are talented but they are still untested & not performed in trying conditions so they are far from BEST. & I will also add that even a normal batting line up is pretty dangerous in there own back yard so Bhuvi's effort is more louder (n if u say that Eng pitches are meant for fast bowling then dont forget that bowlers like shane warne struggled on tailor made pitches for spin in India) So bottom line is -to be performer on foreign pitches one need to be absolutely best

  • Vaughanographic on August 5, 2014, 11:14 GMT

    Hahaha!! Best batting lineups... both England and India have just TWO batsman in the top 20 test ratings. What this article does do well is show how good Kumar is - I think he is seriously underrated (as opposed to Anderson who I think is a little overrated). I hope Kumar keeps fit for the next test and the contest can continue

  • landl47 on August 5, 2014, 13:08 GMT

    Bhuvi has bowled extremely well. His control has been excellent, he moves the ball both ways and he's a very willing bowler who gives 100%. His style always seemed to be suitable for English conditions, like Praveen Kumar who did so well in 2011 (I still can't understand why Praveen was left out and other bowlers not so well suited to the conditions were included).

    The problem now is that Dhoni has pretty much bowled him into the ground. Long spells, the strange tactic of one-over spells in the last test and bringing him back too soon. By the end of the last test he looked exhausted. Now he's come down with an ankle injury. With neither him nor Ishant in the side, India's bowling looks weak; Pankaj was unlucky in the last test, but still went for a lot of runs and Shami hasn't looked special- 5 wickets @73 apiece all series. The other bowlers don't look good fits for English conditions.

    I hope Bhuvi plays, he's a class act.

  • Nero28 on August 5, 2014, 13:22 GMT

    If not kumar, Aaron please. Ishwar pandey can only replace Pankaj. Pankaj and pandey both are swing bowler with good height. So, a different category fast bowler in aaron should play if he is doing well in net.

  • liz1558 on August 5, 2014, 13:42 GMT

    Jimmy Anderson is clearly the outstanding fast medium bowler of his generation - amply evidenced by these stats.

  • on August 5, 2014, 13:50 GMT

    If Bhuvi has some more pace then he would be more deadly than Anderson in conditions like England .....!!!!!!!!!

  • Greatest_Game on August 5, 2014, 14:02 GMT

    Anderson has had more success against India's top six because Kohli & Dhawan have been unrelentingly horrible, & Pujara bad. Vijay has had good scores, & Rahane has made runs consistently. Whether no. 6 is Dhoni or Jadega, even they are better than Kohli & Dhawan, and they are both averaging 28. Only Vijay & Rahane average above 50, with Kumar next at 45, then Pujara at 30 leads the procession of failure. Not too difficult to get good figures against that batting.

    And, if @ Farooq3 thinks India's is "arguably" the top batting lineup in the world, he, and whoever he is arguing with, don't seem to know much about cricket. Only Pujara is in the top 10, at no. 10! One more bad match & he will be gone.

    Both lineups are ranked below the top 5: SA, SL, Aus, Pak, & NZ. Eng's 3rd & 5th best ranked are KP & Trott!

    The funniest of all? The best bowling figures of the tour are Ave 6, Econ 3, SR 12 …. belong to Cook!!!

  • cricket_lover1 on August 5, 2014, 14:28 GMT

    Bhuvi needs to raise his pace to higher 135s and he can be more deadly. For fourth and fifth Aaron & Ishwar should be given chance to prove..if they fail look for the next talent..but they should be given chance in the next two test matches. In absence of Bhuvi and Ishant..Shami should lead the attack. Pace bowlers for fourth test (Shami + Aaron + Ishwar)... Also bring back Binny in place of Jadeja. Ashwin also needs to be given a chance in next two test matches. This can be playing XI - Gambhir, Vijay, Pujara, Rahne, Kohli, Dhoni, Binny, Ashwin, Shami, Aaron, Ishwar.