England v India, 4th Investec Test, Old Trafford August 6, 2014

Cook defends Anderson attitude

17

Alastair Cook defended the attitude of James Anderson and insisted the bowler has no need to change his on-field approach.

Barely a couple of hours after it was confirmed by ICC chief executive Dave Richardson that there would be no further investigation into the alleged incident between Anderson and Ravi Jadeja at Trent Bridge, the England captain reiterated the view that the man he rates as the "best English bowler" he has seen, requires an aggressive on-pitch persona to render him effective at the highest level.

But, after Richardson suggested there was "no place in the game for the use of offensive language," Cook suggested that, as long as the aggressive behaviour was left on the pitch, it should not be seen as a problem.

"We know that every time you pull on the shirt as an England player, or any international side, you are role models for anyone watching," Cook said. "We're all aware of that. We also want to play competitive cricket. We don't want to be too nicey-nicey with everyone saying they're playing in the right spirit. There's always that muddied line.

"We want to play competitive cricket like these three games have been played and I don't think we need to change too much."

Suggesting that Anderson had something of a "split personality," Cook explained that's Anderson on- and off-field personalities were as different as any player he had known.

"I've been round for dinner with Jimmy and he doesn't use that language with mum and dad," Cook said. "It's the same as a rugby player. You need to get yourself in the right frame of mind. I'm not sure every rugby player walks down the street wanting to tackle every person he sees. But you have to get yourself in that right mental state for you personally to perform. That's when it's important and that's why he has that slightly split personality."

The difference is that while tackling is a necessity in rugby, swearing is certainly not in cricket. But while Cook admits there may have been moments when Anderson has "overstepped the mark," he is reluctant to ask his key bowler to alter a method that has, on the whole, worked well for him.

"Of course there may have been little bits where he might have overstepped the mark throughout his career," Cook admitted. "But you'd rather be on that line than too passive. He needs that for his bowling and the way he bowled, especially at Southampton, was incredible.

"He is the best English bowler I have seen by quite considerable margins. He's not blessed with absolutely express pace, so to be able to control that ball and find a method like he did in Australia in 2010, where it didn't swing that much, is outstanding.

"I've probably not played with someone who changes so much when they get on to the pitch. But Jimmy is an experienced cricketer and he has found a method that he needs and he has become England's second leading wicket-taker in Test cricket. I'm pretty sure he'll be England's leading wicket-taker very soon and that's an outstanding achievement. He's found his way of doing it.

"Yes, he has a very different personality when he crosses the line. And I don't think anyone should moan about it because what happens on the field should stay on the field and off the field you should be a nice guy.

"Of course, you understand the parameters you have to play within, but I think the way both sides have played this series has been fantastic, apart from that one incident which has been blown up. I thought both sides have been very competitive and played it in the right way and in the right spirit."

George Dobell is a senior correspondent at ESPNcricinfo

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • YorkshirePudding on August 7, 2014, 7:51 GMT

    In regards to the Rugby analogy is not quite right, a better one would be a prop forward walking down the street handing off anyone in their way, which is a frequent occurrence, nor would they square up to someone without cause, but will do on the field.

    In the end every fast bowler has had a form of aggression, from Mitch Johnson, who isn't adverse to the use of expletives, so where is the condemnation of that? Where was Georges condemnation of the Australian Tactics in the last Ashes where he was writing about how England should jut get on with it.

  • on August 7, 2014, 7:04 GMT

    As per Mr. Cook, this is no longer a "Gentlemen's Game". He forgets how India have allowed Bell to play on in the name of the "Spirit of the Game", where is it now?

  • vijeshvincent on August 7, 2014, 6:55 GMT

    same situation...back in that famous Australia tour Aussies prepared green top and included Shaun Tait claiming that he will rip through Indian batsmen...the rest is history...India demolished Tait threat...he took a long leave from the International cricket since he didn't take wickets as expected ...hope, the history will repeat with Fin tooo.....

  • Arvind17 on August 7, 2014, 5:40 GMT

    Banter on the field is fine. Abusing is not. Cook's and the ECB's public backing just seems too bad. I atleast hope they have had a private word with him while publicly backing him. Somehow, their stubbornness reminds me of the way Liverpool backed Suarez in the racism row. It came back to bite them later and they realized the club's image is of far greater importance. BTW, Wasn't this the same team that couldn't tolerate KP? Or were they just jealous?

    Personally, I find it pitiable that a player says he plays his best only when he abuses the opposition. I'd take that anyday if a guy comes to me and says he can play better than me only if he abuses me!!

  • on August 6, 2014, 23:08 GMT

    It's amazing how much two teams can speak off the field ....The best teams in the world don't and shouldn't need to talk so much ...It's the cricket that should be doing the talking....One of the reasons why SA's been in the top 3 teams forever now ...The matter's done and dusted ..Can we have some good test cricket now !!!

  • wolf777 on August 6, 2014, 22:19 GMT

    Play Varun Arron on pacy Old Trafford. Let him lose on English batsmen in Anderson in particular...let's talk aggression now...

  • eggyroe on August 6, 2014, 19:41 GMT

    Excellent that the Captain of England is giving his full support to a proven innocent man,maybe the rest can forget about something that has been part and parcel of Test Match Cricket since Day One and long may it continue.

  • on August 6, 2014, 19:12 GMT

    Question to Cook. What are we contesting here for. Who could be best at swearing.

  • fguy on August 6, 2014, 18:41 GMT

    i find it funny that so many ppl after the buttler run out incident vs SL said that the biggest problem they had with it was that kids everywhere would start doing the same in playgrounds & it set a bad example. what about seeing their "heroes" constantly abusing? is that ok for kids to imitate

  • glen1 on August 6, 2014, 18:30 GMT

    Cook needs Anderson to do well for him; however, he should not be blinded by that. The aggression shown by Anderson is the kind that is seen when the series heats up, somewhere during the middle phases. Instead, it was seen on day two of the first test match, and one is still searching for reasons?

  • YorkshirePudding on August 7, 2014, 7:51 GMT

    In regards to the Rugby analogy is not quite right, a better one would be a prop forward walking down the street handing off anyone in their way, which is a frequent occurrence, nor would they square up to someone without cause, but will do on the field.

    In the end every fast bowler has had a form of aggression, from Mitch Johnson, who isn't adverse to the use of expletives, so where is the condemnation of that? Where was Georges condemnation of the Australian Tactics in the last Ashes where he was writing about how England should jut get on with it.

  • on August 7, 2014, 7:04 GMT

    As per Mr. Cook, this is no longer a "Gentlemen's Game". He forgets how India have allowed Bell to play on in the name of the "Spirit of the Game", where is it now?

  • vijeshvincent on August 7, 2014, 6:55 GMT

    same situation...back in that famous Australia tour Aussies prepared green top and included Shaun Tait claiming that he will rip through Indian batsmen...the rest is history...India demolished Tait threat...he took a long leave from the International cricket since he didn't take wickets as expected ...hope, the history will repeat with Fin tooo.....

  • Arvind17 on August 7, 2014, 5:40 GMT

    Banter on the field is fine. Abusing is not. Cook's and the ECB's public backing just seems too bad. I atleast hope they have had a private word with him while publicly backing him. Somehow, their stubbornness reminds me of the way Liverpool backed Suarez in the racism row. It came back to bite them later and they realized the club's image is of far greater importance. BTW, Wasn't this the same team that couldn't tolerate KP? Or were they just jealous?

    Personally, I find it pitiable that a player says he plays his best only when he abuses the opposition. I'd take that anyday if a guy comes to me and says he can play better than me only if he abuses me!!

  • on August 6, 2014, 23:08 GMT

    It's amazing how much two teams can speak off the field ....The best teams in the world don't and shouldn't need to talk so much ...It's the cricket that should be doing the talking....One of the reasons why SA's been in the top 3 teams forever now ...The matter's done and dusted ..Can we have some good test cricket now !!!

  • wolf777 on August 6, 2014, 22:19 GMT

    Play Varun Arron on pacy Old Trafford. Let him lose on English batsmen in Anderson in particular...let's talk aggression now...

  • eggyroe on August 6, 2014, 19:41 GMT

    Excellent that the Captain of England is giving his full support to a proven innocent man,maybe the rest can forget about something that has been part and parcel of Test Match Cricket since Day One and long may it continue.

  • on August 6, 2014, 19:12 GMT

    Question to Cook. What are we contesting here for. Who could be best at swearing.

  • fguy on August 6, 2014, 18:41 GMT

    i find it funny that so many ppl after the buttler run out incident vs SL said that the biggest problem they had with it was that kids everywhere would start doing the same in playgrounds & it set a bad example. what about seeing their "heroes" constantly abusing? is that ok for kids to imitate

  • glen1 on August 6, 2014, 18:30 GMT

    Cook needs Anderson to do well for him; however, he should not be blinded by that. The aggression shown by Anderson is the kind that is seen when the series heats up, somewhere during the middle phases. Instead, it was seen on day two of the first test match, and one is still searching for reasons?

  • guidedbyvoices on August 6, 2014, 18:28 GMT

    I'm staggered that in this entire debate about verbal belligerence on and off the field that Virat Kohli's name hasn't been brought up. Just watch him whenever a wicket is taken; he's shouting in the face of the departing batsman, pointing the way to the dressing room, all from the safety of the celebratory huddle. He really needs to concentrate on getting a few runs instead of mouthing off at opposition batsmen who have completely overshadowed him up to now.

  • on August 6, 2014, 18:20 GMT

    I hope India and BCCI put this whole episode to rest and concentrate on the next test now. They received a serious pounding in the last test and its up to these guys to leave it all behind and turn up with a whole new mindset in the coming game. Current crop of Indian players are certainly not softies of old era and know how to give it back to the opponent. Unfortunately they are not able to bring their A game to the table and hence this whole thing is weighing up on their minds. It would be great if they could concentrate on their game and try to produce a positive result. Once things start falling in place for their game, then I am sure other things will itself get taken care of. Remember the monkey gate saga and how India responded to it by playing superbly at Perth. Block out everything else and just think about performance guys, India just needs that at this point of time. Everything else is just a distraction.

  • on August 6, 2014, 17:54 GMT

    @Daniel : If england does it is called Competetive cricket and if india does it's not acceptable. Why this biased behaviour. Here Anderson just defending not only anderson but also England cricket board.

  • rketreni on August 6, 2014, 17:25 GMT

    And here is the same guy who couldnt take the Mankading of Jos Butler earlier with the grain of salt. Such a farce this Cook and he is the captain of an International side. As long as his team is not affected he is happy with whatever his team does. Poor way to showcase the game.

  • Hardy1 on August 6, 2014, 16:58 GMT

    I've never believed in this 'he's a really nice guy off the field' stuff. What does that even mean? You don't cease to take any responsibility for your actions just because you're in a competitive environment. If anything it says it's the kind of guy who's agreeable when things are nice & easy but becomes hostile when there's any pressure.

    Also quite funny that Cook says it's fine as long as it's left on the pitch, the whole point about this issue is that it wasn't left on the pitch, it was carried on after play broke up for tea. Anyway enough on this issue now, here's hoping for a good Test match.

  • Dravid_Pujara_Gravitas on August 6, 2014, 16:50 GMT

    The culprits will keep repeating it ad nauseam that there is this much touted line that shouldn't be crossed, things on-field should stay on-field and all of those straw-man arguments. What's that line by the way, and how do players get to decide what and where that line is? What's all this hypocritical beating around the bush? Do players get to decide what colour clothing they can wear for a test match or is it the ICC that decides it? How exactly did it come to this kind of hypocrisy that everybody thinks that he can have an opinion on this? As long as umpires hear the filth from the players' mouths and just request them, "Gentlemen, keep it clean", with no consequences to take, it ain't gonna happen and the culprit will keep doing it. You sure realize that personal abuse and foul language is not cricket.

  • on August 6, 2014, 16:46 GMT

    Attitude is fine, as long as it does not degenerate into personal insults.

    Some of the personal insults may be pub-class banter in England, but it may be perceived differently in many parts of India. Certainly in a gentlemen's game like cricket. Especially for many of us who became fans of English Cricket, more than half a century ago and had been following the game ardently ever since. May be, we have become archaic, and be consigned to the Jurassic park! :-( But that is the way we feel.

    Some of you may be sitting in the Brian Statham stand tomorow. If so reflect how he used to conduct himself as a human being and still be a terror to the batsmen (along with the great Freddie Truman)

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • on August 6, 2014, 16:46 GMT

    Attitude is fine, as long as it does not degenerate into personal insults.

    Some of the personal insults may be pub-class banter in England, but it may be perceived differently in many parts of India. Certainly in a gentlemen's game like cricket. Especially for many of us who became fans of English Cricket, more than half a century ago and had been following the game ardently ever since. May be, we have become archaic, and be consigned to the Jurassic park! :-( But that is the way we feel.

    Some of you may be sitting in the Brian Statham stand tomorow. If so reflect how he used to conduct himself as a human being and still be a terror to the batsmen (along with the great Freddie Truman)

  • Dravid_Pujara_Gravitas on August 6, 2014, 16:50 GMT

    The culprits will keep repeating it ad nauseam that there is this much touted line that shouldn't be crossed, things on-field should stay on-field and all of those straw-man arguments. What's that line by the way, and how do players get to decide what and where that line is? What's all this hypocritical beating around the bush? Do players get to decide what colour clothing they can wear for a test match or is it the ICC that decides it? How exactly did it come to this kind of hypocrisy that everybody thinks that he can have an opinion on this? As long as umpires hear the filth from the players' mouths and just request them, "Gentlemen, keep it clean", with no consequences to take, it ain't gonna happen and the culprit will keep doing it. You sure realize that personal abuse and foul language is not cricket.

  • Hardy1 on August 6, 2014, 16:58 GMT

    I've never believed in this 'he's a really nice guy off the field' stuff. What does that even mean? You don't cease to take any responsibility for your actions just because you're in a competitive environment. If anything it says it's the kind of guy who's agreeable when things are nice & easy but becomes hostile when there's any pressure.

    Also quite funny that Cook says it's fine as long as it's left on the pitch, the whole point about this issue is that it wasn't left on the pitch, it was carried on after play broke up for tea. Anyway enough on this issue now, here's hoping for a good Test match.

  • rketreni on August 6, 2014, 17:25 GMT

    And here is the same guy who couldnt take the Mankading of Jos Butler earlier with the grain of salt. Such a farce this Cook and he is the captain of an International side. As long as his team is not affected he is happy with whatever his team does. Poor way to showcase the game.

  • on August 6, 2014, 17:54 GMT

    @Daniel : If england does it is called Competetive cricket and if india does it's not acceptable. Why this biased behaviour. Here Anderson just defending not only anderson but also England cricket board.

  • on August 6, 2014, 18:20 GMT

    I hope India and BCCI put this whole episode to rest and concentrate on the next test now. They received a serious pounding in the last test and its up to these guys to leave it all behind and turn up with a whole new mindset in the coming game. Current crop of Indian players are certainly not softies of old era and know how to give it back to the opponent. Unfortunately they are not able to bring their A game to the table and hence this whole thing is weighing up on their minds. It would be great if they could concentrate on their game and try to produce a positive result. Once things start falling in place for their game, then I am sure other things will itself get taken care of. Remember the monkey gate saga and how India responded to it by playing superbly at Perth. Block out everything else and just think about performance guys, India just needs that at this point of time. Everything else is just a distraction.

  • guidedbyvoices on August 6, 2014, 18:28 GMT

    I'm staggered that in this entire debate about verbal belligerence on and off the field that Virat Kohli's name hasn't been brought up. Just watch him whenever a wicket is taken; he's shouting in the face of the departing batsman, pointing the way to the dressing room, all from the safety of the celebratory huddle. He really needs to concentrate on getting a few runs instead of mouthing off at opposition batsmen who have completely overshadowed him up to now.

  • glen1 on August 6, 2014, 18:30 GMT

    Cook needs Anderson to do well for him; however, he should not be blinded by that. The aggression shown by Anderson is the kind that is seen when the series heats up, somewhere during the middle phases. Instead, it was seen on day two of the first test match, and one is still searching for reasons?

  • fguy on August 6, 2014, 18:41 GMT

    i find it funny that so many ppl after the buttler run out incident vs SL said that the biggest problem they had with it was that kids everywhere would start doing the same in playgrounds & it set a bad example. what about seeing their "heroes" constantly abusing? is that ok for kids to imitate

  • on August 6, 2014, 19:12 GMT

    Question to Cook. What are we contesting here for. Who could be best at swearing.