England v NZ, 1st Investec Test, Lord's, 2nd day May 17, 2013

Indispensable Anderson master of his craft

He may not be the quickest or the most dangerous bowler in world cricket but James Anderson has mastered the skill of fast bowling and England would be lost without him
15

If any reminder was required of James Anderson's value to the England team, it was provided in empathic fashion on the second afternoon at Lord's.

It was not just that Anderson joined an illustrious group of players to have claimed 300 Test wickets - he was the 26th man to do so and just the fourth England player - but that he produced a performance so palpably superior to his colleagues that it was painfully clear once more how much his team continue to rely upon him. Without his contribution, England would be in desperate trouble in this match.

When Fred Trueman became the first man to take 300 Test wickets, in 1964, he remarked that anyone else who reached the landmark would be "bloody tired". So it was probably not surprising to see Anderson appearing weary at the close of play. But it was not just the emotion of reaching a landmark that has been looming in the road ahead for some months, at this famous old ground and in front of his proud parents, but that he continues to shoulder more than his share of the bowling duties of this England side. Only when Graeme Swann, gaining turn and bounce, was in support did England maintain control at both ends.

The difference between the sides to date - and New Zealand have looked the stronger so far - has largely been in the performance of the support seam bowlers. While New Zealand's were wonderfully disciplined and tight, England's have been profligate and expensive.

Stuart Broad, in particular, endured a wretched day. After a duck with the bat underlined the doubts about his suitability to bat as high as No. 8 - he has reached 30 just once in his last 20 Test innings - he then conceded 10 boundaries in his first 13 overs. On a truculent pitch on which England had struggled to score at more than two-an-over, every long-hop he delivered - and there were several - was another body blow for his team. He generated neither great pace nor great swing and, in conditions in which seam bowlers should dream, was close to a liability.

Steven Finn, cut to ribbons by the impressive Ross Taylor as punishment for over doing the short ball, was even more expensive. But while Finn was selected for this game in the knowledge that he was a fast bowler in the developmental stage of his career, Broad is playing his 56th Test. Such seniority comes with expectation. England require more from Broad.

Besides, Finn was hostile and sharp. He has conceded more runs in 11 overs than Bruce Martin did in 26, but he compensated with a wicket that kept his side clinging on to the coattails of New Zealand. Taylor later commented that they would be looking for a first innings lead of 50 or 60 but at one stage it looked as if it could be far more than that. "I wasn't looking to score at a run-a-ball," he said. "They just bowled a few loose balls."

Both Finn and Broad could learn much from Anderson. He is, in most ways, a far superior bowler to the young man who, a decade ago to the month, burst upon the Test scene here with a five-wicket haul against Zimbabwe. Most crucially, he has learned how to bowl an inswinger to complement the outswinger with which he claimed his first Test wicket; Mark Vermeulen beaten by a beauty that pitched leg and hit the top of off.

"I'm happy I got the landmark out of the way, really. It was nice that Graeme Swann took the catch to reach it. It was just nice to see him hold on to one."
James Anderson on his 300th Test wicket

Anderson has developed a consistency, too, that led Andrew Strauss to name him the most reliable bowler he ever captained, MS Dhoni to remark that he was the "difference between the sides" in the Test series in India and earned him an excellent opportunity to overhaul Sir Ian Botham's England record of 383 Test wickets. He might not be the most dangerous, the quickest or even the best fast bowler in Test cricket - those accolades surely belong to Dale Steyn - but it is very hard to think of one more skilful.

But it's perhaps Anderson's attitude that marks him apart. While some bowlers bemoan their workloads and their aches and pains, Anderson simply gets on with it. His quiet, modest demeanour conceals a strength that used to be considered a pre-requisite of a fast bowler. He makes neither excuse nor complaint and prepares with the professionalism and diligence required to go into every Test in condition to give of his best. It is a long, long time since Anderson bowled poorly with a red ball. Taylor later compared him to "a mixture of Vernon Philander and Dale Steyn", to which Anderson responded: "I'll take that".

Maybe time - and all those overs - have taken a toll, though. Until a couple of years ago, Anderson was still capable of bowling spells at least approaching 90mph. Now he operates closer to 80mph and, on pitches or conditions offering no assistance, can appear tidy but unthreatening. He experienced a disappointing tour of New Zealand and a disappointing series against South Africa, though whether he has chosen to bowl within himself in the knowledge of spells ahead or whether the miles on the clock are starting to show is unclear. It is quite true that speed is not everything, but it is not nothing, either.

"I don't see why not," 30-year-old Anderson replied when asked if he could beat Botham's record. "I'm not too old. I've a few more left yet. But I don't want to think about it. I'll just try and stay fit.

"I'm happy I got the landmark out of the way, really. It was nice that Graeme Swann took the catch to reach it. It was just nice to see him hold on to one," he said with a smile. "It meant a lot to me and I could see how much it meant to him too."

Anderson's relief was tempered by the knowledge that New Zealand remain in the stronger position in this game and that his side's bowling had contributed to the situation. While he modestly attempted to share the blame, his description of events owed far more to his colleagues than himself.

"I bowled too many short and wide and I'm sure the other guys would say the same," Anderson said. "That's one of Taylor's strengths and we knew that. We weren't trying to bowl there. We just didn't bowl very well for that period of time."

England will have to bowl far better on the third day if they are to claw their way back into the game. But the knowledge that Anderson remains fit and willing to lead the revival will remain as reassuring to England's supporters as it has been to a succession of England captains.

George Dobell is a senior correspondent at ESPNcricinfo

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • cric_J on May 18, 2013, 3:45 GMT

    A very nice article.

    He is not the fastest , neither the most threatening and nor the best in the world ATM. But I adore Jimmy Anderson. I really do. Perhaps more than any other fast bowler. Not because I am English , I am an Indian instead. And it is not just because he is the second best seamer in the world behind Dale. I adore the man for his for his sheer modesty.For his hardwork.For his unfailing commitment to the team.For his tendency of taking the blame on himself , even when the other bowlers bowl poorly.For his incredible athleticism , be it in the slips, covers , midon/midoff or the outfield.For his respect for the opposition.For his honesty. For his being staright-forward. For his dry sense of humour. For his ever-trying self.

    I admire James Anderson - the man himself .Not just the cricketer in him.

    I have no doubt that Steyn is the better bowler of the two and will go down as so in the history and I love to watch him bowl. But Jimmy will always be my personal favourite.

  • on May 19, 2013, 13:55 GMT

    lol compared to' mixture of steyn and philander'how?jimmy has skills no doubt but taylor has gone overboard with his praise ,as for the commenters here it really gets annoying when you try to belittle steyn's colourful test career with these 'oh he has backup and other bowlers create pressure'really?just acknowledge that steyn is far the best.

  • voma on May 19, 2013, 13:39 GMT

    @ Paul Rone-Clarke . What was you saying about Stuart Broad ? .

  • on May 18, 2013, 14:28 GMT

    Jimmy is not a star in that sense. He is a very (very) talented workhorse. More skill than Steyn, but at 4mph slower Steyn will prove the more dangerous. Also Steyn gets support the other end and pressure is created. In recent years Anderson has got precious little support and batsmen take few risks against him - they don't need to - Broad is bowling 1 or 2 boundary balls an over at the other end where his modus operandi seems to be medium pace long hops wide outside off "CRUNCH 4 ... AYE THANK YOU" Broad then returns to his mark to either bowl another trundling long hop or decide it's time for the looping half volley that can be hit a little straighter...with the same result "CRUNCH 4... TA VERY MUCHO". With REAL support Anderson could be a great bowler. Surely even the most blinkered England selector can see...Broad is NOT that support. He's a free hit an over bowler who trundles in at county seconds pace and does absolutely nothing with the ball off the pitch or through the air.

  • voma on May 18, 2013, 9:45 GMT

    If he stays fit , he can beat sir Bothams record . Which we be a brilliant achievement for such a modest man . Well done jimmy .

  • on May 18, 2013, 9:16 GMT

    Indispensable is an ugly word because it tends to suggest dependance. In the context of the situation of the rest of this series + 10 Ashes tests it means there are literally millions of Englishman with their fingers crossed behind their backs hopeing that Jimmy will last all those tests despite having to carry the English attack with less than reliable support. In simple terms it means that England are stuffed without him and have no hope of getting 20 wickets, even if they are the underrated Australians. Australia on the other hand; have a galaxy of wicket taking bowlers to choose from. Anyone who denies this need not look any further than Trent Copelands most recent performance against Nottinhamshire of 7/63 from a man who isnt even in the squad. Amongst the bowlers at least there is no 'Indespensability' in the Australian team which has me smiling with quiet optimism ahead of the Ashes!

  • Front-Foot-Lunge on May 18, 2013, 8:16 GMT

    Anderson - This one player has created more horrors for teams like Australia and India than the entire Rocky horror show combined: Just ask their batsmen what they think of him. A true great, no one who has actually watched a spell of his (as opposed to merely looking at a stats page online, stats that are scewed by his first 4 years of being in and out of the international curcuit with injury) could say otherwise.

  • Vindaliew on May 18, 2013, 6:29 GMT

    Anderson's "quiet, modest demeanour" has come with his maturity as a fast bowler. In the past when he had yet to become the spearhead he is now, he was quite a petulant chap himself. Maybe that's the key - to let your ball do the talking and put your energies into something which can make a difference.

  • Shan156 on May 18, 2013, 5:23 GMT

    So, Broad's and Finn's struggles in NZ were not just one-offs then. Here they are struggling in helpful conditions at home. Broad, especially, as the article notes, has been outright poor. His batting is so bad that he should be a #10 not a #8. Forget the Ashes, Eng. will do well to win this series. I shudder to think what McCullum is going to do tomorrow. Hopefully, like Prior in this test, he will fail too. Eng. cannot expect Prior to bail them out everytime. Our batting, without KP, looks like one that can bat for a long time but not score many runs. Bresnan and Onions instead of Broad and Finn for the next test.

  • Greatest_Game on May 18, 2013, 4:42 GMT

    I really love this piece of writing " He might not be the most dangerous, the quickest or even the best fast bowler in Test cricket - those accolades surely belong to Dale Steyn - but it is very hard to think of one more skillful."

    Ummmm…..Steyn?

    I understand George's intent, and don't disagree, but he really set himself up for the wise crack, somewhat like Broad's bowling sits up and begs to be hit out of the park.

    Congratulations Jimmy - a well deserved milestone for 9 years and 359 days of toil for England. A rose amongst thorns, especially today!

    Interesting that both bowlers mentioned reached the milestone against New Zealand, as did another S African & Englishman - Allan Donald & Bob Willis! Of the 25 bowlers who have hit that mark, 5 - Bret Lee being the other - did it playing the Kiwis, 5 playing England, & 5 playing Aus. If Jimmy had been playing at The Oval, he would have been the 5th to do so there, joining Trueman, Botham, Pollock & Walsh. But, he is the 1st at Lords

  • cric_J on May 18, 2013, 3:45 GMT

    A very nice article.

    He is not the fastest , neither the most threatening and nor the best in the world ATM. But I adore Jimmy Anderson. I really do. Perhaps more than any other fast bowler. Not because I am English , I am an Indian instead. And it is not just because he is the second best seamer in the world behind Dale. I adore the man for his for his sheer modesty.For his hardwork.For his unfailing commitment to the team.For his tendency of taking the blame on himself , even when the other bowlers bowl poorly.For his incredible athleticism , be it in the slips, covers , midon/midoff or the outfield.For his respect for the opposition.For his honesty. For his being staright-forward. For his dry sense of humour. For his ever-trying self.

    I admire James Anderson - the man himself .Not just the cricketer in him.

    I have no doubt that Steyn is the better bowler of the two and will go down as so in the history and I love to watch him bowl. But Jimmy will always be my personal favourite.

  • on May 19, 2013, 13:55 GMT

    lol compared to' mixture of steyn and philander'how?jimmy has skills no doubt but taylor has gone overboard with his praise ,as for the commenters here it really gets annoying when you try to belittle steyn's colourful test career with these 'oh he has backup and other bowlers create pressure'really?just acknowledge that steyn is far the best.

  • voma on May 19, 2013, 13:39 GMT

    @ Paul Rone-Clarke . What was you saying about Stuart Broad ? .

  • on May 18, 2013, 14:28 GMT

    Jimmy is not a star in that sense. He is a very (very) talented workhorse. More skill than Steyn, but at 4mph slower Steyn will prove the more dangerous. Also Steyn gets support the other end and pressure is created. In recent years Anderson has got precious little support and batsmen take few risks against him - they don't need to - Broad is bowling 1 or 2 boundary balls an over at the other end where his modus operandi seems to be medium pace long hops wide outside off "CRUNCH 4 ... AYE THANK YOU" Broad then returns to his mark to either bowl another trundling long hop or decide it's time for the looping half volley that can be hit a little straighter...with the same result "CRUNCH 4... TA VERY MUCHO". With REAL support Anderson could be a great bowler. Surely even the most blinkered England selector can see...Broad is NOT that support. He's a free hit an over bowler who trundles in at county seconds pace and does absolutely nothing with the ball off the pitch or through the air.

  • voma on May 18, 2013, 9:45 GMT

    If he stays fit , he can beat sir Bothams record . Which we be a brilliant achievement for such a modest man . Well done jimmy .

  • on May 18, 2013, 9:16 GMT

    Indispensable is an ugly word because it tends to suggest dependance. In the context of the situation of the rest of this series + 10 Ashes tests it means there are literally millions of Englishman with their fingers crossed behind their backs hopeing that Jimmy will last all those tests despite having to carry the English attack with less than reliable support. In simple terms it means that England are stuffed without him and have no hope of getting 20 wickets, even if they are the underrated Australians. Australia on the other hand; have a galaxy of wicket taking bowlers to choose from. Anyone who denies this need not look any further than Trent Copelands most recent performance against Nottinhamshire of 7/63 from a man who isnt even in the squad. Amongst the bowlers at least there is no 'Indespensability' in the Australian team which has me smiling with quiet optimism ahead of the Ashes!

  • Front-Foot-Lunge on May 18, 2013, 8:16 GMT

    Anderson - This one player has created more horrors for teams like Australia and India than the entire Rocky horror show combined: Just ask their batsmen what they think of him. A true great, no one who has actually watched a spell of his (as opposed to merely looking at a stats page online, stats that are scewed by his first 4 years of being in and out of the international curcuit with injury) could say otherwise.

  • Vindaliew on May 18, 2013, 6:29 GMT

    Anderson's "quiet, modest demeanour" has come with his maturity as a fast bowler. In the past when he had yet to become the spearhead he is now, he was quite a petulant chap himself. Maybe that's the key - to let your ball do the talking and put your energies into something which can make a difference.

  • Shan156 on May 18, 2013, 5:23 GMT

    So, Broad's and Finn's struggles in NZ were not just one-offs then. Here they are struggling in helpful conditions at home. Broad, especially, as the article notes, has been outright poor. His batting is so bad that he should be a #10 not a #8. Forget the Ashes, Eng. will do well to win this series. I shudder to think what McCullum is going to do tomorrow. Hopefully, like Prior in this test, he will fail too. Eng. cannot expect Prior to bail them out everytime. Our batting, without KP, looks like one that can bat for a long time but not score many runs. Bresnan and Onions instead of Broad and Finn for the next test.

  • Greatest_Game on May 18, 2013, 4:42 GMT

    I really love this piece of writing " He might not be the most dangerous, the quickest or even the best fast bowler in Test cricket - those accolades surely belong to Dale Steyn - but it is very hard to think of one more skillful."

    Ummmm…..Steyn?

    I understand George's intent, and don't disagree, but he really set himself up for the wise crack, somewhat like Broad's bowling sits up and begs to be hit out of the park.

    Congratulations Jimmy - a well deserved milestone for 9 years and 359 days of toil for England. A rose amongst thorns, especially today!

    Interesting that both bowlers mentioned reached the milestone against New Zealand, as did another S African & Englishman - Allan Donald & Bob Willis! Of the 25 bowlers who have hit that mark, 5 - Bret Lee being the other - did it playing the Kiwis, 5 playing England, & 5 playing Aus. If Jimmy had been playing at The Oval, he would have been the 5th to do so there, joining Trueman, Botham, Pollock & Walsh. But, he is the 1st at Lords

  • pat_one_back on May 18, 2013, 0:49 GMT

    Is this the Eng team that's going to belt Aust all year long then??? Not seeing it, The drawn tour of NZ is hardly looking like a blip now. NZ have an honest disciplined attack and can hopefully bat a bit into this test with their plucky tail. Sorry to diverge from the Test at hand again but the Ashes just got a lot hotter.

  • gramedgar on May 17, 2013, 22:53 GMT

    Great reticle, Jimmy is one to saviour in a team withered in doubt. It's becoming a very good test match, and I'll bet Jimmy will end it close to FST.

  • 2.14istherunrate on May 17, 2013, 22:22 GMT

    Anderson is a very fit man,and a fine athlete. HIs three wickets today was a little cameo of his normal best. I would say he could play for quite a long time yet,and carry on taking superb catches. Quite a while ago I decided that nearly every decent catch I watched in the outfield from England was actually him. I do not think one gets to be a great without being fairly modest as well as working very hard to get there. Obviously Swann bowled well too and went unrewarded. Broad too is a good bowler if not in the same class as these two yet. Finn today was mostly embarrassing and needs a kick up the backside. The best of the day apart from Anderson was Taylor who amply showed that fortune favours the brave rather than those too fearful not to play like doddering old grannies. McCullum will do the same.

  • on May 17, 2013, 22:04 GMT

    Anderson is the Statham of this England side but unfortunately, there is neither Tyson nor Truman to take advantage. Unless Broad and Finn show clear signs of improvevemnt over the remainder of this match, England have only one more test to figure out who the other two fast men are to be for the Ashes. If they don't and England turn up with the same attack, Australia do have a very real chance.

  • Nutcutlet on May 17, 2013, 21:18 GMT

    England would be in a sorry state this evening had it not been for Jimmy. I doubted the wisdom of sending Bresnan back to play for Yorks as with him went any sustained element of control which would have maximised Jimmy's effectiveness - think Brian Statham's role in Fred Trueman's scalps ( not that 'George' didn't get a few for himself). It is a long-established truism that bowlers hunt best in packs, or at least in pairs. Finn & Broad wanted wickets before economy: result? NZ all but got away & even now there must be a distinct possiblity that they will take a significant lead in a low scoring match. Broad & Finn, with economy rates of 3.2 & 3.8 respectively are the most expensive bowlers in this match thus far & significantly so as the dangerous Wagner is only conceding 2.5 & he is most expensive of the Kiwi attack. Thus Jimmy, well though he bowled, operated without proper support from the other end. I thought the players knew their roles. This Eng side is not fully focussed ATM.

  • Nutcutlet on May 17, 2013, 21:18 GMT

    England would be in a sorry state this evening had it not been for Jimmy. I doubted the wisdom of sending Bresnan back to play for Yorks as with him went any sustained element of control which would have maximised Jimmy's effectiveness - think Brian Statham's role in Fred Trueman's scalps ( not that 'George' didn't get a few for himself). It is a long-established truism that bowlers hunt best in packs, or at least in pairs. Finn & Broad wanted wickets before economy: result? NZ all but got away & even now there must be a distinct possiblity that they will take a significant lead in a low scoring match. Broad & Finn, with economy rates of 3.2 & 3.8 respectively are the most expensive bowlers in this match thus far & significantly so as the dangerous Wagner is only conceding 2.5 & he is most expensive of the Kiwi attack. Thus Jimmy, well though he bowled, operated without proper support from the other end. I thought the players knew their roles. This Eng side is not fully focussed ATM.

  • on May 17, 2013, 22:04 GMT

    Anderson is the Statham of this England side but unfortunately, there is neither Tyson nor Truman to take advantage. Unless Broad and Finn show clear signs of improvevemnt over the remainder of this match, England have only one more test to figure out who the other two fast men are to be for the Ashes. If they don't and England turn up with the same attack, Australia do have a very real chance.

  • 2.14istherunrate on May 17, 2013, 22:22 GMT

    Anderson is a very fit man,and a fine athlete. HIs three wickets today was a little cameo of his normal best. I would say he could play for quite a long time yet,and carry on taking superb catches. Quite a while ago I decided that nearly every decent catch I watched in the outfield from England was actually him. I do not think one gets to be a great without being fairly modest as well as working very hard to get there. Obviously Swann bowled well too and went unrewarded. Broad too is a good bowler if not in the same class as these two yet. Finn today was mostly embarrassing and needs a kick up the backside. The best of the day apart from Anderson was Taylor who amply showed that fortune favours the brave rather than those too fearful not to play like doddering old grannies. McCullum will do the same.

  • gramedgar on May 17, 2013, 22:53 GMT

    Great reticle, Jimmy is one to saviour in a team withered in doubt. It's becoming a very good test match, and I'll bet Jimmy will end it close to FST.

  • pat_one_back on May 18, 2013, 0:49 GMT

    Is this the Eng team that's going to belt Aust all year long then??? Not seeing it, The drawn tour of NZ is hardly looking like a blip now. NZ have an honest disciplined attack and can hopefully bat a bit into this test with their plucky tail. Sorry to diverge from the Test at hand again but the Ashes just got a lot hotter.

  • Greatest_Game on May 18, 2013, 4:42 GMT

    I really love this piece of writing " He might not be the most dangerous, the quickest or even the best fast bowler in Test cricket - those accolades surely belong to Dale Steyn - but it is very hard to think of one more skillful."

    Ummmm…..Steyn?

    I understand George's intent, and don't disagree, but he really set himself up for the wise crack, somewhat like Broad's bowling sits up and begs to be hit out of the park.

    Congratulations Jimmy - a well deserved milestone for 9 years and 359 days of toil for England. A rose amongst thorns, especially today!

    Interesting that both bowlers mentioned reached the milestone against New Zealand, as did another S African & Englishman - Allan Donald & Bob Willis! Of the 25 bowlers who have hit that mark, 5 - Bret Lee being the other - did it playing the Kiwis, 5 playing England, & 5 playing Aus. If Jimmy had been playing at The Oval, he would have been the 5th to do so there, joining Trueman, Botham, Pollock & Walsh. But, he is the 1st at Lords

  • Shan156 on May 18, 2013, 5:23 GMT

    So, Broad's and Finn's struggles in NZ were not just one-offs then. Here they are struggling in helpful conditions at home. Broad, especially, as the article notes, has been outright poor. His batting is so bad that he should be a #10 not a #8. Forget the Ashes, Eng. will do well to win this series. I shudder to think what McCullum is going to do tomorrow. Hopefully, like Prior in this test, he will fail too. Eng. cannot expect Prior to bail them out everytime. Our batting, without KP, looks like one that can bat for a long time but not score many runs. Bresnan and Onions instead of Broad and Finn for the next test.

  • Vindaliew on May 18, 2013, 6:29 GMT

    Anderson's "quiet, modest demeanour" has come with his maturity as a fast bowler. In the past when he had yet to become the spearhead he is now, he was quite a petulant chap himself. Maybe that's the key - to let your ball do the talking and put your energies into something which can make a difference.

  • Front-Foot-Lunge on May 18, 2013, 8:16 GMT

    Anderson - This one player has created more horrors for teams like Australia and India than the entire Rocky horror show combined: Just ask their batsmen what they think of him. A true great, no one who has actually watched a spell of his (as opposed to merely looking at a stats page online, stats that are scewed by his first 4 years of being in and out of the international curcuit with injury) could say otherwise.

  • on May 18, 2013, 9:16 GMT

    Indispensable is an ugly word because it tends to suggest dependance. In the context of the situation of the rest of this series + 10 Ashes tests it means there are literally millions of Englishman with their fingers crossed behind their backs hopeing that Jimmy will last all those tests despite having to carry the English attack with less than reliable support. In simple terms it means that England are stuffed without him and have no hope of getting 20 wickets, even if they are the underrated Australians. Australia on the other hand; have a galaxy of wicket taking bowlers to choose from. Anyone who denies this need not look any further than Trent Copelands most recent performance against Nottinhamshire of 7/63 from a man who isnt even in the squad. Amongst the bowlers at least there is no 'Indespensability' in the Australian team which has me smiling with quiet optimism ahead of the Ashes!